2.1 Million People View Leaked 'Odyssey' Bootleg on X (variety.com) 66
Variety reports:
"The Odyssey" leaks have begun, as a high-quality bootleg of the film reached millions of people on X thanks to a viral tweet on July 25. At 2:25 p.m. PT, a post on X reading "Someone uploaded 'The Odyssey' full movie on X. Can you believe it?" amplified a message from a now-suspended account. The message included a high-quality version of the film, as confirmed by Variety, and climbed to over 2.1 million views within two and a half hours. By that time, the streaming film was replaced by a takedown notice, and then the account was suspended...
As of July 26, a few clones of the bootlegged film are available on X, but they've been mostly flooded away by mislabeled files promising "The Odyssey" but actually showing a Rickroll, the longtime internet prank of tricking people into watching the music video for Rick Astley's 1987 song "Never Gonna Give You Up."
The article notes the leak "certainly doesn't seem to have hurt the film's still-surging box office in its second weekend, during which it earned another $87 million," or lessened demand for Imax 70 mm tickets.
As of July 26, a few clones of the bootlegged film are available on X, but they've been mostly flooded away by mislabeled files promising "The Odyssey" but actually showing a Rickroll, the longtime internet prank of tricking people into watching the music video for Rick Astley's 1987 song "Never Gonna Give You Up."
The article notes the leak "certainly doesn't seem to have hurt the film's still-surging box office in its second weekend, during which it earned another $87 million," or lessened demand for Imax 70 mm tickets.
Saw it. Didnâ(TM)t think it was real (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I plan on seeing it in the theater tomorrow afternoon. Don't need a bootleg copy.
Re: Saw it. Didnâ(TM)t think it was real (Score:2)
Same, I don't think this hurts anyone's bottom line significantly. Either people can afford to see it in a theatre and they will, or they can't and this doesn't make a difference because they were never going to spend that money anyway, let them have the bootleg.
Re: Saw it. Didnâ(TM)t think it was real (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Telesyncs were the polar opposite of the definition of "high quality".
Re: (Score:2)
Much better than CAM usually, so works for the most impatient. Or so I hear.
If you think a Rickroll is cruel... (Score:4, Funny)
Just wait until you try to download the bootleg video and end up with a copy of Musk's AI-generated "historically accurate" version instead. D'oh! :)
A "historically accurate" version. (Score:2)
Just wait until you try to download the bootleg video and end up with a copy of Musk's AI-generated "historically accurate" version instead. D'oh! :)
So, it's going to include all the Greek gods, Scylla and Charybdis, the Cyclops, Circe, Calypso, Sirens, man-eating giants etc. This should ensure it is "historically accurate". Oh, and all the actors will of course be white, not olive skinned.
Re: (Score:2)
I think we have more recently determined their skin was actually covered with colourful feathers.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Only recognized joke on the rich target? It's a good joke, and well contextualized, but Slashdot still makes me sad these years.
But considering all the kids Musk starved to death, sadness is Musk's main business now and perhaps that suggests his next acquisition target will be Slashdot?
I think there are actually two paths to extreme wealth. One is pure luck. Rich parents. But Musk's parents weren't THAT rich.
The second path is crime. But today the "best" criminals fix things by bribing the cheapest politici
Re: (Score:2)
I'd pay to see this version of the Odyssey, and Musk is in it a little: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Who cares? (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
From TFS it appears that it was posted on X and was taken down only after someone in control there were done watching it.
I guess elona really wanted to see Helen Nolan.
Re: (Score:3)
The article makes no mention of the source. But everything about this sounds like it's just the CAM release from LuCY [predb.me]. Which has been available for around a week and a half now.
In which case, yeah, the only thing novel about it was that it was posted to a more publicly-visible website.
Re: (Score:3)
Sort of: Nolan was upset X/Twitter's 280 character limit is not IMAX compliant.
Re: (Score:1)
The difference is that the copyright owners can't do much about a magnet link or The Pirate Bay, and even if they could there is no money to recover. Twitter, on the other hand, has a lot of money.
Twitter is already being sued for copyright infringement by music companies.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah the news here is that the normies got a brief glimpse of the Matrix.
Re: Who cares? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The reason why people should care is in this case the minimum statutory damages are like 50 times the infringer's market cap. There's a chance that X ends up owned entirely by comcast.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"High quality" (Score:4, Interesting)
The definition of quality is quite relative. For a film shot in IMAX format I don't think event the bluray release should be considered "high quality" much less a bootleg, regardless of how good that bootleg may be.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I never understood the fascination for ruining something for yourself simply because you can't wait a few weeks for the streaming version or a bootleg of the bluray.
But it reinforces the idea that piracy is not a lost sale. The kind of person who was happy watching a telesync copy was clearly not remotely interested in seeing the movie, since evidently they barely saw it when they were watching it.
2 hours 53 minutes (Score:4, Interesting)
Completely insufferable to watch in a cinema, with no breaks and disruptive people.
Re: (Score:3)
I didn't mind the lack of breaks (3h would be my limit though), and there were no disruptive people in the big cinema where I watched it, but I *did* mind the obnoxiously loud sound in that IMAX theater. In most action scenes I couldn't wait for them to be done so my ears would stop suffering.
Re: 2 hours 53 minutes (Score:3, Interesting)
Where I live, there's a lot of entitled, disruptive people. People talking loudly during the film, on their phones, sometimes even taking calls, people kicking your seat, or hanging massive coats on their seats, right in front of you...
I think I'm mentally done with the communist approach to film watching.
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds like exceptional cases all rolled into one... Maybe pick different times/days? But if you got an adequate setup at home and you're really mentally done, fair enough. I prefer home for comfort and most importantly subtitles... damn modern audio mixing
Re: 2 hours 53 minutes (Score:2)
Just a modern 50 inch qned TV with a sound bar. Nothing fancy setup-wise, but nothing beats peace and quiet, and a sofa that perfectly remembers your buttprint.
I'm one of those people who can't stand subtitles. They distract me too much.
Re: (Score:2)
Most of the theatres here have extremely uncomfortable seats. A small handful of them have decent seats and charge a premium for them.
They also try to sell you large drinks, which cause you to need the toilet, so you either sit there in discomfort needing the toilet or miss a chunk of the movie. If the movie is long then your drink will go cold (or warm) and not taste good.
At home i have a comfortable seat, i can adjust the volume to suit my needs, i can pause the movie if i need to visit the toilet or get
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, I agree. The rock concert sound levels is one of the reasons me and the family don't go to the cinema any more. The knuckle dragging grunts who think they own the cinema, can do what they like and no one else matters is the other.
Re: (Score:2)
I mean I've been to rock and metal concerts and I don't remember my ears suffering that much (except Motorhead!). On top of that, I'm not sure that the speakers were handling the volume that well. But yeah I wish there was some feedback mechanism to the cinema on that front.
Re: (Score:2)
They definitely cater to the tinnitus crowd these days. The last movie I went to see required earplugs and it was a normal theater. Hell, on my tv at home I run my sound through a studio compressor because of dialogue sitting at -20db and and music being +20db.
Re: (Score:3)
It's kind of annoying that these earplugs are necessary, why not just turn down the volume? But anyway this is the situation we are in, and I recommend using earplugs to protect your hearing (whatever's left of it).
Re: (Score:2)
I've heard of those and a friend has some like those, but custom-made for his ears, and he swears by them (he's a musician). I might try one of those next time I plan to go see an IMAX film, sad indeed
Re: (Score:2)
Insufferable (Score:4, Insightful)
Completely insufferable to watch in a cinema, with no breaks and disruptive people.
I think the harder thing for more people is the cost. When I was a little kid our babysitter could take us to see Star Wars (or other movies) at the downtown Marcus discount theater for $0.25 a kid. Even making minimum wage she could take a car full of kids (us and our friends) for a buck. Then she could get soda and popcorn for those kids for less than $5.
As a teenager I could take a girl out on a date for less than $6 for a Friday night movie, then add another $8 for soda, popcorn.
Today my wife and I spend $40 on tickets and another $30 on popcorn and soda.
Don't get me wrong, Marcus does a pretty good job at making it a comfy and technologically impressive experience. The seats are nice, far nicer than the plastic "school theater" seats of my childhood. That makes a long movie far more tolerable than in the 1980's or 1990's or 2000's.
The concessions haven't changed, the popcorn hasn't really changed if you go to the right Marcus theater where they still pop everything on-site. That's where the cost bites the most... but it's also about the only place the chains can make any money.
Just saying... The chains (Marcus at least) have tried to adapt to the times. For most people, especially parents and kids, it's the cost that's more painful.
Re: (Score:2)
What's also different is I don't have to go to the movie theater to see a movie as much as I did in the good ol' days. Back then my only options were to pay for
3 hour movie (Score:3)
If it was taken down after 2.5 hours it means nobody saw the movie, just part of it.
Added to my time machine to-do list (Score:3)
Go back to when Homer wrote The Odyssey and convince him to release it under the GPL license.
Re: (Score:2)
That's just silly. Homer was widely known to be a BSD guy.
Blokes twatting around with swords (Score:3)
"By 2.5 hours I had lost the will to live"
My girlfriends review.
I owe her 2 rom coms now. TBC if that's a fair trade.
I will watch it again, alone on a wet afternoon with some libations to Athena. I found The Return [imdb.com] a better production in respect of performances and examination of Odysseus and his Queen. That was a footnote in the new movie, but some of the scenes were epic, the cyclops, the pig polymorph was very spooky.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
He got on the right end of the marketing wave for this one for sure.
The outrage at his casting choices are possibly as bonkers as Tenet was. A masterclass in walking backwards.
Interstellar was memorable. And a go to if I have trouble sleeping. No one moaned about the honourable Cockerney Caine being cast as a professor of anything other than pulling birds, robbing banks and shooting Zulus
Re: (Score:2)
tenet incomprehensible,
That's on you. It wasn't complicated.
Re: (Score:2)
The visuals.
Interstellar wasn't just mid, it was utterly moronic... if you were listening to the dialog and couldn't see the screen. For fuck's sake "It's necessary"? And this, the most exciting part of the film, is about rotating your ship at the same speed as the one you want to dock with? Ooh, I'm on the edge of my seat! (Also, just coincentally the ship that's completely out of control and had 1/4 of it blown into space is rotating around the airlock but sure "most scientifically accurate movie evah")
Re: (Score:2)
Torrent has been up for over a week (Score:3)
So again, NOT stuff that matters.
Imax (Score:2)
I'm fed up of this movie being spammed on /. (Score:2)
Musk is losing his edge. (Score:1)
Screen size Auditorium scale sound. (Score:2)
Some movies are just made to be watched on the big screen and in this case the biggest screen you can find. I have a killer home theater setup as well as a VR system that will make a virtual movie size screen. Even then, it just can't match the in theater IMAX or Dolby Cinema (Tall) experience for a movie like the Odyssey. Not to
Why is this on Slashdot? (Score:2)
The story has nothing to do with technology or even science fiction.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not about the movie, it's about media "sharing"/piracy/copyright infringement on a massive scale (pick the term you find least offensive), which has been a Slashdot topic since the 1990s.
Re: Why is this on Slashdot? (Score:2)
Can We Trust Elon Musk Not to be Premissive? (Score:2)