Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Robotics China Government United States

Trump Administration Bans New Chinese Humanoid Robots (bbc.com) 146

The Trump administration has banned newly authorized foreign-made humanoid and four-legged robots, along with power inverters, citing "unacceptable risks" to the country's national security. FCC chairman Brendan Carr said the agency was doing its part "to secure America's critical supply chains." The BBC reports: The FCC has added the items to its Covered List -- a register of goods and services that are deemed a risk to US national security. The ban applies to new foreign-produced advanced robotic devices and power inverters and does not prevent the sale or import of any existing models that had been previously authorized by the FCC.

The FCC cited concerns that the use of foreign-made inverters could allow overseas firms to turn them off, steal data, facilitate remote access and surveillance by "foreign government actors, or be otherwise exploited through a cyberattack." It added that the use of robots made outside the US could allow "malign actors to surveil Americans, enhance the capabilities of foreign intelligence services, or to remotely commandeer the robots."

Trump Administration Bans New Chinese Humanoid Robots

Comments Filter:
  • by T34L ( 10503334 ) on Wednesday July 29, 2026 @01:51AM (#66262190)
    Also, it's a real shame it's impossible to design a power inverter without any complex logic or arbitrary data links. I imagine they can't flip those electrons back and forth without maintaining a lively chat with the mothership.
    • by clovis ( 4684 )

      Also, it's a real shame it's impossible to design a power inverter without any complex logic or arbitrary data links. I imagine they can't flip those electrons back and forth without maintaining a lively chat with the mothership.

      True, but the esp32 microcontroller chip that's at the root of all this costs only a dollar or two, so no MBA is going to approve funding a redesign.

      • ESP32 is not cheaper than a full-featured dedicated three phase inverter IC from TI.

        And there's less engineering hours involved in that sort of design.

    • by CEC-P ( 10248912 )
      I don't think the robots have inverters. I think they mostly have computers, cameras, microphones, and a network connection. That's probably why they banned them. I also don't think humanoid robots compete with Tesla in any way. You might want to adjust your meds.
      • RTFS "along with power inverters"

      • The electric car, and self driving don't make line go up anymore. So Elons new grift is that Tesla is a robotics company
      • by MachineShedFred ( 621896 ) on Wednesday July 29, 2026 @11:20AM (#66262796) Journal

        So you have somehow missed all the hype around the Tesla Optimus humanoid robot? And how China is basically causing it to be unmarketable at their hinted pricing by massively undercutting it? https://economy.ac/news/2026/0... [economy.ac]

        Also, Tesla makes solar panels. Solar panels create DC voltage, which needs to go through an inverter to be used on an AC system. You think that this ban of cheaper inverters doesn't help Tesla, who makes their own inverters?

        Good lord, dude.

      • 1) anything with both a battery and a brushless motor has an inverter
        2) Inverter is being discussed because it's in the document announcing the rule, on the line right before "robots," with a link to the whole explanation about the importance of the power grid. The key sentence in that document is probably, "The lack of a secure U.S. supply chain for inverters and the continuous inflow of foreign-produced or controlled inverters and inverter components poses threats to U.S. economic and national security."

        I

  • by Alain Williams ( 2972 ) <addw@phcomp.co.uk> on Wednesday July 29, 2026 @03:12AM (#66262226) Homepage

    to replace Trump and his cronies. It would be very hard for them to do a worse job.

  • After outsourcing a lot of mass production to China for decades, good luck being able to mass produce anything without China. We close the markets for them, admitting there is a big market (why, I don't fully understand. It still seems to me specialized robots are better suited, but probably it easier to produce "one" robot for all tasks and adapt in software), but we won't be able to fill the demand gap any time soon.
    • Re:Good luck (Score:4, Insightful)

      by gweihir ( 88907 ) on Wednesday July 29, 2026 @09:06AM (#66262524)

      The Trump regime is not connected to reality. See, for example, the doubling down on the tariffs that are absolutely devastating for the US economy. Or the "short" Iran war that they still have not found a way out of.

      • The Trump regime is connected to the reality of sabotaging the USA.

        It really doesn't matter why or for who, although it's Putin ofc.

    • I think you got the nail on the head.

      specialized equipment is always better at sufficient volume. But it's also usually wildly expensive. Either Becuase its produced by a low volume specialist company or because you built it in house - either way you typically have massive embedded engineering costs and, to prevent those costs being even higher, you significant over specified all the individual components.

      Programming a generic robot to do the same thing could be easier. Superficially it seems like the p

      • You have it backwards when it comes to robotics. Making a humanoid general purpose robot means it's crap at everything, not good at everything, because robot dexterity is crap compared to ours, and so is latency. People have thought they could fix this in software since the seventies, they were wrong then, they are wrong now.

  • by 93 Escort Wagon ( 326346 ) on Wednesday July 29, 2026 @03:46AM (#66262248)

    Do they have a robot that resembles an elderly, overweight man with a comb-over and who keeps nodding off in important meetings and at events?

  • by fortfive ( 1582005 ) on Wednesday July 29, 2026 @06:54AM (#66262354)

    Weâ(TM)re all going to die!

    Seriously, how can power inverters be any kind of threat, and what does the fcc have to do with them, beyond measuring potential em interference?

    • The term is specifically targeting solar and large-scale battery (like a whole home or grid-scale) inverters:

      https://www.fcc.gov/covered-li... [fcc.gov]

      * Device has to be bi-directional DC<->AC.
      * Device has to support wireless remote management.

      • I can get a 5kW hybrid inverter for ~50v battery systems for around 500 euros, with a backup port. So you can put a couple important circuits on the backup port cheaply without a whole house transfer switch. Everything has wireless.

        Basically all foreign hybrid inverters are gone now, but you can still get enphase for 10x the cost.

    • by clovis ( 4684 )

      Weâ(TM)re all going to die!

      Seriously, how can power inverters be any kind of threat, and what does the fcc have to do with them, beyond measuring potential em interference?

      It's about the ESP32 microcontroller chip that's in everything.
      Already discussed at length on slashdot
      https://hardware.slashdot.org/... [slashdot.org]

      • by gweihir ( 88907 )

        And the main criticism is still valid: How would anybody access that from a distance? You cannot do ground-to-orbit on these things. Do they envision the Chinese driving vans though the streets to switch off solar inverters?

        • by j0se_p0inter0 ( 631566 ) on Wednesday July 29, 2026 @10:36AM (#66262734)
          "In November 2024, PRC company Deye disabled inverters in the United States, United Kingdom, Puerto Rico, and Pakistan following a dispute with a U.S. distributor. This episode demonstrated that PRC manufacturers retain operational control over installed systems".
          https://www.fcc.gov/sites/default/files/power-inverter-fcc-determination.pdf
          https://content.striderintel.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Strider-Report-In-Broad-Daylight-2025.pdf
          • by gweihir ( 88907 )

            And that is a different problem. This is about Internet-connected inverters, not regular small solar inverters.

            Minimal insight into the matter required.

            • This. Most solar inverters, batter inverters, and anything else used in home or even larger scales require the customer to buy an additional thing to actually make them internet connected.

              Sensible legislation targets a problem. Trump legislation targets a nation. There's nothing wrong Chinese inverters, there's no security risk there either. There may however be good reason to regulate the use of inverters that don't have online connectivity as a 100% optional feature.

              • Most solar inverters, batter inverters, and anything else used in home or even larger scales require the customer to buy an additional thing to actually make them internet connected.

                False. Typically they require payment, after which they push the "allowed" command to the already-actually-connected device.
                It is exceptionally rare for modern devices to even have expansion slots for additional hardware.

    • by gweihir ( 88907 )

      If you are incompetent and paranoid enough, everything becomes a threat and actual evidence is not required anymore.

      In the case at hand, they probably completely mistake what an ESP32's communication capabilities and reach are.

      • by HiThere ( 15173 )

        Why do you accept that the reasons he give mean anything?
        He wants to get rid of the power inverters. His excuses are just whatever sounds good at the moment. (That he wants to do it to cripple solar power sounds plausible, but I don't really believe it. That someone asked him to do it sounds more likely.)

        • by gweihir ( 88907 )

          My take is that the ESP32 in there is the reason the power inverters even came to his attention. Some flimsy justification for the dumb. We have seen that fake argument in Europe as well, but after a brief panic, nobody cares now and things continue as before.

          Obviously, he wants to kill solar and wind and keep the US dependent on the oil from the middle east. People there gave him shiny toys and he is hoping for more.

    • by caseih ( 160668 )

      Nearly all power inverters of the type they are targeting are always connected to the interview for reporting and logging purposes. Of course you don't have to connect them but it's helpful if they are. Many can be integrated with third party dash boards. I don't know if anyone with home solar that doesn't look at their inverter dashboard regularly to see how they are doing with power generation and consumption.

    • by hwstar ( 35834 )

      Calling B.S. on Trumps ban, however...

      They could be made to destroy themselves or the equipment that they are powering. The malware could modify the switching waveforms to overvolt the power busses and cause fires elsewhere.

    • It has been found that many inverters, commercial and residential, unexpectedly contained cellular network modems. These could be used to surreptitiously access/control inverters remotely. For instance the Chinese government decides to turn off U.S. power. There's also the concern about unknown firmware and what not. Some might consider this ridiculous or fear mongering. But, we have examples to demonstrate that the threat can be very real.

      In the below example, a Chinese inverter company(Deye) shutdown/bric

  • by mkwan ( 2589113 ) on Wednesday July 29, 2026 @07:32AM (#66262398)

    Galapagosing: when a country cuts itself off from foreign products, and develops weird, inefficient, local stuff that wouldn't survive in the global market.

    America did it years ago with cars (American cars are rubbish and no-one else buys them). Now they're doing it with drones and robots.

    One days tourists might visit America to gawk at their over-priced steampunk robots.

    • Did you coin this? I googled and found zilch.

      • by _merlin ( 160982 )

        It's variously called "galapagosization", "Galapagos syndrome", "Galapagos-ka" in Japanese, or "island gigantism". The GP probably didn't read it properly.

    • And other Mecha shows. But it's not real because humanoid robots don't really make any sense. You wouldn't just have humanoid robots in a warehouse you would build a Warehouse around non-humanoid robots because that's vastly more cost efficient.

      The only place humanoid robots might make sense is if you're trying to replace the emotional connection with humans because you don't want to have to pay humans to do work.

      So for example a School district tried to replace a teacher with a robot because they
    • America did it years ago with cars (American cars are rubbish and no-one else buys them).

      This was nonsense until China started putting out cheap EVs below cost. American automakers had huge overseas sales.

      • But not selling American cars. They were heavily adapted to the local market. There are no European Muscle Cars for a reason.
        • Mercedes makes European muscle cars.

          Germans are probably the Europeans most resembling Americans. Most of their cars are automatics now, and lots of them are fat, and... You know...

          Lots of those cars were indeed designed for Europe, but some weren't. The F-Series still sells well in other countries with wide roads. Others were designed to be international, like Focus.

      • by mkwan ( 2589113 )

        It happened first when the Japanese started selling cheap cars to the US. Then the trade barriers came up, and the Japanese opened US factories. I don't count US-made Toyotas and Hondas as "American".

  • What we really need to ban are humanoid politicians. There's no reason they need to look like humans since they are nothing more than vending machines.

  • Are Musk and Trump sucking each other's dicks or not? They have separated in the media but clearly this is an edge for Musk.
    • Re:BJs (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Gilgaron ( 575091 ) on Wednesday July 29, 2026 @09:16AM (#66262548)
      Is it though? The latest products from his companies have been Grok (Nelson haha! meme), Cybertruck (Homer car meme), and the only successful stuff from SpaceX where he's famously internally sidelined to keep away from important things. Androids are way to exciting for him to be kept at arms length, so they'll continue to fail to produce anything interesting compared to... I dunno, Boston Dynamics? It's all moot until you can get a Shark Cleandroid at Costco for $200 (it comes with a free dustpan when you get it there!) .
      • You have to remember, Trump and Musk are in the same world. This is a world where Musk is already the best robot builder because he says he will make trillions on it one day.
        • Ah yes, I keep making the mistake when interpreting the actions of the administration as botched attempts at being effective instead of action for action's sake.
      • See: Tesla Optimus, a humanoid robot product they are looking to get into the market if they can ever make it work without humans behind the curtain.

        See Also: Tesla Energy, which installs a lot of solar panels and inverters.

        This is Elon Musk.

      • by bool2 ( 1782642 )

        "where he's famously internally sidelined to keep away from important things."

        That's not famous at all... in fact I've never heard of such a thing. Musk is heavily involved in SpaceX. Citations needed.

        The latest products...

        you're cherry picking. To be successful, you have to be prepared to fail and real success more often than not leads a trail of failure, not always visible, behind it.

  • Little by little... (Score:4, Informative)

    by MpVpRb ( 1423381 ) on Wednesday July 29, 2026 @11:37AM (#66262842)

    ...we are losing access to the best technology in the world while demonizing experts.
    There was once a time when the best and brightest came here to invent and create, now we arrest them.
    Welcome to the moronosphere.

  • Using a middle eastern supplied bribery plane as air force one is totally ok for security but robots and inverters are a threat? Security theater.
  • Their War on Energy has to be about depopulation at this point. They've destroyed 20% of world oil, sulfur, helium, fertilizer, natgas, and now they're going after the building blocks of home solar installs that could help people cope.

    At the same time the RFP for Draft Management Software closed today.

    Even Alex Jones is calling for impeachment. They've gone totally off the deep end.

    Power Inverter means:
    A bi-directional power device or system that converts direct current electricity to alternating current

  • The FCC has no such authority to ban inverters or robots or anything else. What this is really about is targeting of radios in such devices that require FCC approval and denying approval not based on technical characteristics of the hardware but politics. This is the same covered list trick as the "router ban" which also bans radios not routers.

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/cf... [cornell.edu]

    And of course just like the router ban it comes with an arbitrary shakedown regime:

    "The Executive Branch interagency body has esta

"Open Channel D..." -- Napoleon Solo, The Man From U.N.C.L.E.

Working...