Bitcoin-based Liquid Network Says $320 Million Withdrawn in Hack (reuters.com) 41
Reuters reports:
Liquid Network, a Bitcoin-based payments and settlement network, said on Sunday that about $320 million was withdrawn from its federation wallet in a hack.
"Purported white-hat hackers" withdrew around 4,000 of the 4,200 bitcoin held in its Liquid Federation wallet, Liquid Network said in a post on X.
"Liquid wallets will be impacted," their post concluded, adding "and we're sorry for any inconvenience."
"Liquid wallets will be impacted," their post concluded, adding "and we're sorry for any inconvenience."
EPIC RESPONSE (Score:2)
"Liquid wallets will be impacted," their post concluded, adding "and we're sorry for any inconvenience."
Re: (Score:2)
"We're sorry" https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Re:EPIC RESPONSE (Score:4, Interesting)
if i understand correctly what is meant is that transactions are stopped while they figure the mess out, not the loss of funds. indeed a serious inconvenience but i'm guessing it would fall into "force majeure" category.
Re: (Score:1)
"force manure"
Re: EPIC RESPONSE (Score:3)
"We apologize for the incontinence"
we're sorry for any inconvenience (Score:2)
Store of value (Score:5, Insightful)
Wrong, gold is stolen all the time (Score:3)
Electronic transfers of gold can be reversed (Score:2)
Gold has been one of the most heavily targeted assets for theft throughout human history. I'm not sure how you got the idea that gold is not stolen.
I think he means by hacking. Gold cannot be transferred electronically due to its physical nature. The named owner of a particular amount of gold can be changed electronically, but that can be fixed if done in error or by hacking. Crypto transfers cannot be undone, by design.
Re: (Score:3)
And it's extremely inconvenient to transfer it physically. It's so inconvenient that when the Dutch central bank decided to transfer its holdings from the US to UK, it did it electronically.
That is, it sold its gold holdings in the US and then bought them back in London. So no physical gold moved around. Presumably whoever bought the gold in the US wants it there, but physically moving it is now a Them problem.
For small amounts, gold is tra
Re: (Score:3)
Same thing with other commodities like oil. Mostly traded back and forth by via futures contracts and such at CME, etc. But at some point, someone does actually want the physical oil (or gold) and that means it has to exist somewhere. For purposes of standardized, uniform trading it makes sense to choose one location and for the delicious West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude that place is Cushing, Oklahoma.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Stocks have been drawn down as people sold during the first part o
Re: (Score:2)
The Villena treasure (9kg of gold stolen from a museum in Spain about two weeks ago). And there was a diamond necklace worth about $4m stolen from a Viennese museum shortly afterwards.
Re: (Score:2)
More than $1 million in gold stolen from Pennsylvania couple, police say [msn.com]
Armed thieves steal gold and cash during Port Moresby hold-up in one of PNG's biggest robberies [abc.net.au]
Gold heist ringleader pleads guilty to theft of $22M in gold and cash from Toronto's Pearson airport [nationalpost.com]
Iraq seizes mounds of gold and millions in cash from officials in corruption crackdown [cbsnews.com]
Those are all stories from the past year. That sai
Re: (Score:2)
Really? I have.
Stolen gold is more recoverable (Score:2)
Don't hear a lot of stories about million in gold being stolen... Really? I have.
Then you probably also heard the stories of gold being recovered, found, etc. Also stories of accidental/erroneous transfers, and then the reversal of these transfers.
Not so much for crypto. At best a gov't hacks into a thief's infrastructure. Want to get your stolen goods back, please identify yourself, provide proof of ownership, pay your taxes, etc. Many crypto owners declined to do so when the US gov't seized the servers of the BTC-e exchange, netting 60% of the exchanges crypto.
More importantly,
Letting someone else hold your crypto ... (Score:3)
Someone who holds crypto is doing high risk speculative investment.
Letting someone else hold your crypto, using a 3rd party online wallet, has nothing to do with store of value. One of the main points of crypto is that t
Re: (Score:2)
"Purported white-hat hackers" (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Invest in a scam (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Invest in a scam (Score:2)
HAHAHAHAHAHA (Score:1)
Re: They're in on it (Score:1)
The rehypothecation / leverage problem :o (Score:2)
Capital gains reforms needed (Score:2)
People can fun with all their little tokens or trading cards or whatever but as soon as anyone wants to turn those into USD then there's gonna be some taxes... high taxes. I am talking like 70%+. Frankly, to me, someone getting those coins via "theft" isn't that far off from whatever we call general crypto trading with it's rug pulls and scams galore. They want to decouple from financial regulations then they can decouple from judicial ones as well, figure out your own justice there, just pay your taxes.
Re: (Score:2)
only what this Liquid network feels it is worth.
Nah, they feel it's worth whatever they can get in USD for it. If they went to court over this they would absolutely declare a value based on USD exchange rates. If crypto wasn't worth actual currency nobody would give a shit about it.
Also I have zero belief these people have any noble goals about the destroying the system. If that was the case they would announce it and do something public-ally with the funds. There's no point otherwise.
With taxing crypto we can just safely assume all of it came from i
Better then gold they said (Score:2)
More secure than cash they said. Good thing I've invested in BTC, best investment ever!
Re: (Score:2)
Which tells us that "they said" is not a reliable source of information. Obviously, the stupid-greedy will not be able to understand that, but still.
Re: (Score:2)
It was more of a sarcasm thing.
Re: (Score:2)
I get that. And it was on point.
Crapto remains crapto (Score:2)
What else is new? There is a reason real currency and real banks are secured on a massively better level than crapto. But the stupid never learn.
Ugh (Score:2)
if fiat worked (Score:2)
remember Bitcoin wallets couldn't be hacked (Score:2)
And nothing of actual value was lost... (Score:2)