A New 'Super Ice' Is 10 Times Stronger, Bringing It Close to The Strength of Concrete (sciencealert.com) 55
Researchers have created a strengthened "BioPykrete" by combining ice with cellulose nanocrystals and a custom protein that binds the plant-based crystals to the ice structure. In small-scale tests, the material was about 10 times stronger than regular ice and absorbed 70 times more energy before breaking. ScienceAlert reports: Instead of wood pulp's larger, disordered fibers, the researchers used cellulose nanocrystals here. Cellulose is the main structural material in plants, and in nanocrystal form, it can act as a microscopic strengthening agent for other materials, including ice -- essentially stopping cracks from spreading easily. The protein used here was called CBM3a-AFPIII, a combination of an antifreeze protein (AFP) and a carbohydrate-binding module (CBM). Its job was to act like glue, keeping the cellulose nanocrystals and ice bonded together.
It's a clever approach, and the researchers think that by tweaking their ingredients and methods, they might be able to improve their 'super ice' even further. "Optimizing solidification kinetics and freezing protocols, alongside developing diverse AFP-CBM variants, could yield even higher-strength composites," write the researchers. Besides further tests of the durability of the material, the researchers are also keen to take a closer look at how cracks propagate through BioPykrete, to confirm that the underlying strengthening mechanisms are what they think they are.
Further down the line, this approach could open up a whole new landscape for materials used in packaging, construction, and more: Using a custom protein to bring two unlikely compounds (ice and cellulose) together. "By bridging the gap between recombinant protein design and structural engineering, we have developed a high-performance material specifically engineered for the rigors of the world's most extreme environments," write the researchers. The findings have been published in the journal Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces.
It's a clever approach, and the researchers think that by tweaking their ingredients and methods, they might be able to improve their 'super ice' even further. "Optimizing solidification kinetics and freezing protocols, alongside developing diverse AFP-CBM variants, could yield even higher-strength composites," write the researchers. Besides further tests of the durability of the material, the researchers are also keen to take a closer look at how cracks propagate through BioPykrete, to confirm that the underlying strengthening mechanisms are what they think they are.
Further down the line, this approach could open up a whole new landscape for materials used in packaging, construction, and more: Using a custom protein to bring two unlikely compounds (ice and cellulose) together. "By bridging the gap between recombinant protein design and structural engineering, we have developed a high-performance material specifically engineered for the rigors of the world's most extreme environments," write the researchers. The findings have been published in the journal Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces.
Paging Kurt Vonnegut... (Score:5, Funny)
Meet at the ice-9 kiosk.
Re: (Score:2)
Came to post this. Left satisfied.
Re: (Score:2)
more like Ice -(9 + 5i) amirite
This will revolutionize igloo construction (Score:5, Funny)
but anyone who has ever fallen on their butt on an ice rink will know that ice is hard.
Maybe this will be useful on Mars? Article is not clear why this story is significant outside of its niche. We don't normally get obscure materials science papers here.
Re:This will revolutionize igloo construction (Score:5, Informative)
It's not about the specific "BioPykrete" example, it's the technique that's interesting: using proteins to bridge dissimilar materials in composites. It's using them in a way that's sort of like how an emulsifier lets you bridge lipophilic and hydrophilic compounds
Think, say, plastic-ceramic or plastic-metal composites. We can do these today (say, Colorfabb Bronzefill 3d printing filament), but the addition of ceramic or metallic particles makes the material properties generally worse, not better. The plastic just does not bond well to the particles; you have to significantly limit the percentage of metal or ceramic in your mix, and it makes them much harder to work. But what if they *did* bound well? You could easily produce materials with significantly boosted strength, abrasion resistance, etc, but with the low-temperature workability of plastics (note: they'd probably have to be thermoset, not thermoplastic, or low-temperature thermoplastics; proteins have heat survivability limits)
And why stop at metals and ceramics? You could literally just use "dust", just ordinary mineral dusts (clays, silt, etc) as a bulk filler in plastics, yet instead of ending up with a weaker product than working with pure plastic, you'd end up with a stronger one.
Maybe you don't even need a plastic. Maybe you can do what they're doing and bridge cellulose to an inorganic material? Then you're *really* operating on waste. Ice has the advantage of a low melting point in this situation, letting you use that component as a fluid - but cellulose can be dissolved in a number of substances, so perhaps you mix a cellulose-protein slurry with metal or mineral powders and then vaporize/recover the solvent?
Or even forgetting "novel" products, what about conventional composites? If you can bridge high-tensile fibres (such as carbon fibre) better to the polymer matrix that they're in, then you can help eliminate one of the main failure mechanisms of said composites, as well as making the behavior far more predictable. Because like metals (and unlike ceramics), a protein-bridged compound shouldn't be brittle; breaking one bond shouldn't introduce a discontinuity (like a ceramic), it should just reconnect after breakage (like a metal). Such composites should have ductility.
I don't know how widely applicable this will be, but technology that helps bridge dissimilar compounds is nothing to scoff at. And today we have tools like AlphaFold to assist with the design
As for the caveats:
* The concept of coupling agents is also not new, we already use various coupling agents to bond plastic to metal particles in metal-plastic composites and the like - they're just not great at their jobs.
* The aforementioned temperature limits
* Potential production challenges (though industrial enzymes are as cheap as like $15-50/kg, so seems viable?)
* Other coupling agents may offer better advantages; it's not a static field.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not about the specific "BioPykrete" example, it's the technique that's interesting: using proteins to bridge dissimilar materials in composites.
What is a big enabler in this process is that the synthesis products needed work fine with the e.coli bacteria they are grown in. So that is a big plus. What remains to be seen is if this can all be done at scale. Not that I'm an expert in this field, but it seems to me that it probably can. Might be useful in the Antarctic.
Re: (Score:2)
The beauty of growing the chemistry with bugs is the limit to your production is really just the size of your bioreactor, and thats a very much known and solved problem
Re: (Score:2)
The beauty of growing the chemistry with bugs is the limit to your production is really just the size of your bioreactor, and thats a very much known and solved problem
Yup. I think the biggest thing will be seeing how this plays out with freezing the new Pycrete in the field. They had pretty controlled (understandably) in the lab. I'm pretty sure it will work though.
I think, for construction in the antarctic, the whole process can be performed onsite,
Re: This will revolutionize igloo construction (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
We don't normally get obscure materials science papers here.
Yeah, what a waste of space, we could have gotten one more article about AI instead!
Re: (Score:3)
If it's biodegradable, it'd be good up North for the ice roads.
Or maybe for lakes that are popular for ice fishing but have a tendency towards weak ice would benefit from this stuff.
Re: (Score:2)
I was thinking this will revolutionize cocktails.
What temp? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:What temp? (Score:4, Informative)
Re: What temp? (Score:2)
Fine, Arctic or antarctic. I'd like to know any application where the strength of the regular ice is not sufficient. Also, how do they intend to manufacturer it there? I don't see what's the breakthrough here. It is well established that any material can be made stronger by embedded strong fibers in it.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: What temp? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
The original Pykrete (Score:5, Informative)
The original Pykrete [wikipedia.org] was proposed to Winston Churchill and Franklin D. Roosevelt as a material for constructing aircraft carriers during WWII.
Re:The original Pykrete (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
Reading his wiki entry he reminds me of Bergholt Stuttley Johnson [lspace.org].
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not so sure about that. Pyke didn't invent anything that made a significant contribution to the success of Allied forces. Turing and Barnes Wallace made major contributions, although Wallace's inventions were not quite as useful as Turing's work on Ultra. Pyke was a relatively harmless weirdo who had some interesting ideas worth investigating that in the end were not workable.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:The original Pykrete (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
I learned of this in the book My Tank is Fight! (https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/214596.My_Tank_Is_Fight_)
Can I build my generation spaceship from this? (Score:5, Funny)
It consumes the hull as fuel.
Re: (Score:2)
which could make running out of gas mid-journey a doubly-frightening thing.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes . Make it very big I guess and have a lifeboat inside.
Maths and physics are not my strengths, but it seems one of the challenges of space are mass and fuel , you want something big to live in and grow food but then you have got to move it and your fuel has mass too.
If your mass is your fuel, like a human body when it goes into ketosis , that feels efficient, it works for us, we eat to top up our mass, some considerably more than others.
Frozen H20 has most of the things to sustain life too. Construction
One flaw for packaging (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
RTFS:
...a high-performance material specifically engineered for the rigors of the world's most extreme environments,
I don't think this material is going to be used over most of this world but it could be useful in, say, Spitzbergen or Antarctica.
Then there's the Moon, Mars, etc...
"a relatively slow melting rate" (Score:2)
Ice has a horrible habit of melting. Don't know if the researchers have considered this yet. I'm happy to be quoted on any future papers.
Don't know if you know it but they did such research during WW2 to build an "aircraft carrier" for north atlantic waters:
"Pykrete (/pakrit/, PIE-creet)[1] is a frozen ice composite, originally made of approximately 14% sawdust or some other form of wood pulp (such as paper) and 86% ice by weight (6 to 1 by weight).[2]
During World War II, Geoffrey Pyke proposed it as a candidate material for a supersized aircraft carrier for the British Royal Navy. Pykrete features unusual properties, including a relati
Re: "a relatively slow melting rate" (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I hadn't heard of that before that's incredibly cool.
Ideally, yes, else your aircraft carrier melts.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Made obsolete (the carrier) by the Consolidated B-24 Liberator's great range, allowing the 'Atlantic Gap' to be closed against U-boats.
WRT the ice carrier, that and escort carriers. The very long range liberator configuration was an important part in closing that gap, but not the entire solution. The escort carriers were also an important part. VLR and CVE complemented each other well.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: One flaw for packaging (Score:2)
Would you prefer Doctor liqu1d or just liqu1d?
Re: One flaw for packaging (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Use dry ice instead, it won't melt.
In tension? In compression? In shear? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Concrete has wildly varying mechanical characteristics based on the type of stress you put it under. That's why rebar is needed. The title is little more than clickbait, though it's from BeauHD.... so that's no surprise.
Tell me you didn't look at TFA without saying you didn't look at TFA. 8^)
Re: (Score:2)
Tell me you didn't look at TFA without saying you didn't look at TFA. 8^)
That's easy, just post a comment on Slashdot.
C02 (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
And now that Meta has made small hand-held devices that you talk to, and that talk back, as interfaces to AI agents, we have officially come full circle.
Vs pykrete (Score:1)
Stronger is good, but what about impact resistance?
Maybe combining both approaches could be beneficial.
LNG tankers (Score:2)
They should make LNG tankers out of this stuff. It would be a perfect application... they already have Cryo coolers for the LNG and they also use the gas to power the ship anyway so there is an infinite energy source to keep the ice cold.