Schools Across US Protest FCC Plan That Could Disconnect Kids From Internet (arstechnica.com) 152
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Schools and libraries from around the U.S. pleaded with the Federal Communications Commission to drop the idea of ending E-Rate, a $2 billion-a-year program that connects students and library visitors to the Internet. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr has criticized school districts for having "experimented with a massive increase in screen time for students," and said E-Rate expanded too far beyond its original purpose of "supporting basic Internet access to schools and libraries for educational purposes." In June, Carr led a 2-1 vote to issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) seeking public comment on whether E-Rate should be "limited or sunset to reflect today's extensive connectivity rates."
Carr's proposal could result in E-Rate cutting the discounts that schools and libraries receive for telecom services and equipment, and imposing more restrictions on how E-Rate money can be used. The FCC seeking comment on whether to sunset the program also raises the possibility that Carr might choose to axe E-Rate entirely. The National Association of Elementary School Principals told the FCC that it "strongly supports the continued operation of the E-Rate program and urges the Commission to reject proposals that would eliminate, substantially restrict, or impose new conditions on this essential source of connectivity assistance for schools and libraries." The Carr FCC already scaled E-Rate back last year by ending funding for schools and libraries to lend out Wi-Fi hotspots and for Wi-Fi service on school buses. "Importantly, the FCC does not have the authority to terminate the E-Rate program. The E-Rate program is mandated by Congress, and the FCC is responsible for administering it," the American Library Associated told the FCC.
The American Library Association said "the FCC lacks the authority and expertise to regulate screen time or determine educational outcomes." In a filing, the group pointed out that under U.S. law, determinations about what content is inappropriate for children "shall be made by the school board, local educational agency, library, or other authority responsible for making the determination."
Carr's proposal could result in E-Rate cutting the discounts that schools and libraries receive for telecom services and equipment, and imposing more restrictions on how E-Rate money can be used. The FCC seeking comment on whether to sunset the program also raises the possibility that Carr might choose to axe E-Rate entirely. The National Association of Elementary School Principals told the FCC that it "strongly supports the continued operation of the E-Rate program and urges the Commission to reject proposals that would eliminate, substantially restrict, or impose new conditions on this essential source of connectivity assistance for schools and libraries." The Carr FCC already scaled E-Rate back last year by ending funding for schools and libraries to lend out Wi-Fi hotspots and for Wi-Fi service on school buses. "Importantly, the FCC does not have the authority to terminate the E-Rate program. The E-Rate program is mandated by Congress, and the FCC is responsible for administering it," the American Library Associated told the FCC.
The American Library Association said "the FCC lacks the authority and expertise to regulate screen time or determine educational outcomes." In a filing, the group pointed out that under U.S. law, determinations about what content is inappropriate for children "shall be made by the school board, local educational agency, library, or other authority responsible for making the determination."
Two more years (Score:3, Informative)
Once this administration leaves the White House there must be a reckoning. The people that are actively trying to destroy this country need to be held accountable for their actions.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: Two more years (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
What? Who is scared to criticize Trump openly? Go turn on NBC, MSN, or CNN and just listen for 5 minutes. They'll negatively talk about Trump.
Sticking on topic, why do the kids need wifi on the school bus? Don't their cellphones (that they need already have) have cellular connections? Seems like a waste of taxpayer dollars to me.
As for the schools themselves, given all the other money they "spend" on sports and administration, I'm quite sure they could afford a fiber connection to the school. Cost less then
Re: (Score:1)
You're not an idiot. You know that 'people' in the GP post does not refer to 'all people'. But to interpret that correctly would involve making a good-faith argument, and we all know that's boring.
Anyway: yes, some people are afraid of having Trump decide to invent some shit and make an example of them. That has happened:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: Two more years (Score:5, Informative)
Really? That thing that happens all the time across the media is something people are afraid to do?
LMGTFY: (PDF warning) https://www.congress.gov/119/m... [congress.gov]
Additionally, you only need to look as far as Jimmy Kimmel, 60 Minutes, or several other high-profile instances in which the Turmp government has gone after people critical of them. Maybe a little intellectual honesty on your part would be appropriate?
To some extent I get people who have their heads in the sand. But I'll NEVER understand people who ignore clear and prominent evidence while willfully and stubbornly keeping their heads up their own asses.
Re: Two more years (Score:5, Informative)
Re: Two more years (Score:5, Informative)
Reason: ICE seeks to unmask Reddit user who criticized it [reason.com]
Re: (Score:3)
So you're backing away from the plural victims ("users", "people") in your original claim and hanging this existential fear on one case that may include doxing?
For the second time in these comments I'm saying LMGTFY:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
https://thehill.com/opinion/cr... [thehill.com]
https://www.reuters.com/invest... [reuters.com]
https://protectdemocracy.org/w... [protectdemocracy.org]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
https://www.npr.org/2025/04/29... [npr.org]
You might have found these links, and others, had you only looked before shooting off your keyboard.
Re: Two more years (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
While there have been many victims of Trump going after them, it isn't necessary to show all of those cases, and hunt down the links to each story. The only people who need proof are those who have been living under a rock for the past two years.
Re: (Score:1)
In the present case, Omar has some explaining to do. This isn't some absurd birtherism: the publi
Re: Two more years (Score:4, Informative)
Ilhan Omar has been under investigation for over a decade by both Democrat and Republican administrations. There have been a lot of questions, but no evidence of wrongdoing has ever been made public.
What no other administration has done is to weaponize the Department of Justice into launching an "October Surprise" to drag her name thru the muck days before she stands for re-election.
There is a policy (the "60-day rule") at the DOJ to avoid overt investigative actions that could influence a primary or general election within 60 days of the vote.
Ignoring this policy is a deliberate attempt to use the power of the Federal Government to influence an election. It is corruption writ large.
Re: (Score:2)
What no other administration has done is to weaponize the Department of Justice into launching an "October Surprise"
You can't be serious.
Re: (Score:1)
Yes, and Kimmel still has a show. So free speech is still standing strong. Turns out, the system is still working even with a dipshit president.
But yeah, people are SO afraid to speak out. Give me a break.
Re: (Score:2)
CBS and others PAID OFF Trump to avoid the bogus lawsuits. Those who can't afford to drop $1 million into the Trump bank account are the ones who end up going to court at some point.
Re: Two more years (Score:2)
Additionally, you only need to look as far as Jimmy Kimmel
What? Jimmy Kimmel is still on the air, his bosses took him off the air briefly for what they figured were good reasons (like, you know, major affiliates refusing to air his show over some 'jokes' that were in bad taste).
Let me guess, you also think a school district deciding to not put "This Book is Gay" in a middle school library is "banning the book" despite your ability to buy it online or in any bookstore, as well as check it out at your local library. I bet you're also one of those folks that constant
Re: (Score:2)
If you are not famous or wealthy enough to pay off Trump to drop the lawsuit, you need to be afraid of lawsuits.
Re: (Score:2)
Let me guess, you also think a school district deciding to not put "This Book is Gay" in a middle school library is "banning the book" despite your ability to buy it online or in any bookstore, as well as check it out at your local library.
Well, the local library has been threatened, had its funding cut, and had people harass librarians and patrons for having books some people didn't like. Or for having certain people read books that some other people don't like.
And while SOME people may have the money and capacity to drive to a bookstore or order a book online, many cannot. Many children, for example, and many adults, especially when you're struggling to pay rent and put healthy food on the table.
And the bigger issue is that the banning i
Re: Two more years (Score:2)
Are there any books a school or public library (both of which are funded by taxpayer funds) could choose not to buy despite the inability of some interested locals to actually buy the book on their own and not be accused of "banning books"?
Can a library choose to not shelve The Anarcists Cookbook or a coffee table book of Maplethorpe's photography, or is that also "banning" those books?
Humorously, many libraries I know are actually reducing the number of actual books they shelve, preferring to dedicate more
Re: (Score:2)
Are there any books a school or public library (both of which are funded by taxpayer funds) could choose not to buy despite the inability of some interested locals to actually buy the book on their own and not be accused of "banning books"? Can a library choose to not shelve The Anarcists Cookbook or a coffee table book of Maplethorpe's photography, or is that also "banning" those books?
There are some 4,000,000 books published every year. Even the largest public library can't even purchase a fraction of the new books published each year, let alone manage that many titles from previous years too. So, yes, obviously, no library will purchase or make available every book.
Obviously (maybe not obviously?), the problem is who gets to decide which books are purchased, and which books are allowed to be purchased. Increasingly, it is wealthy people and well-funded fringe political groups that are
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: Two more years (Score:5, Informative)
Not everyone has the power of an organisation who can afford many lawyers to stand behind their opinion. If you look up how much money the media who criticise Trump has spent on legal defences in the past couple of years you'd realise how stupid your post actually is.
Re: (Score:1)
I have to wonder what people are going to complain about with the next BIC, or are the next BICs issues/problems going to be stapled to the last BIC?
Don't know about you, fluffernutter (so, you're the gal who gets the guys ready before a porn shoot?)... but I'd rather the country gets rid of the illegals and tries to bring jobs back to the country... I could be wrong, but I view that as a good thing.
Re: Two more years (Score:2)
This is the most DEI administration in history. Outside the head of NASA, can't think of one appointee actually qualified to do their job.
Re: (Score:2)
I've been saying that for years... the country has become so much of a business, it needs a businessman (or woman or whatever... as long as they know business management) to run the business.
Trump just happened to be the first with business experience (admittedly, not the best choice, but better than the alternative... lesser of two evils (or... "lesser of two weevils" from Master And Commander)) to run for The Big Chair, and his campaign happened at just the right point when people wanted what he was sling
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Surely you're smart enough to figure out Trump hasn't left the Whitehouse yet?
If he's willing to support Putin and withdraw support from Ukraine with no notice. His team would be willing to go after anyone.
Not wanting people to be held accountable, but you're against flock I bet...
Re:Two more years (Score:5, Insightful)
The Trump administration is trying to strip the US citizenship of a member of Congress in an absolutely reprehensible attack on free speech and basic rights:
https://www.wsj.com/politics/p... [wsj.com]
https://www.aljazeera.com/news... [aljazeera.com]
It's not surprising that people do not want to openly criticize this administration.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Fuck off, you psychotic piece of shit.
The law is crystal clear: citizenship is citizenship. It is absolutely not conditional on whether you like someone or not.
The state should not go fishing for paperwork errors from three decades ago because the president ordered it.
The government should never raid someone's house or seize their passport because of some fucked-up conspiracy theory.
But that is exactly what happened, in no small part because of weak people who continue to support this administration.
A quest
Re:Two more years (Score:5, Informative)
You are completely wrong about the law here, asshole. Please go away.
For anyone else who has read this far down in the thread, what is being alleged is that Ilhan Omar was actually 18, not 17, when her father applied for US citizenship for the family. If she was 18, she should have filed a separate application.
There are multiple problems with the government pursuing a denaturalization case here:
- It's based on a lie - somebody made up the original claim of knowing when she was born.
- It's impossible to prove anything. Somalia was in the midst of a civil war, there are no records.
- The alleged fraud would have been by her deceased father, not her - he's the one who filed the application.
- IT DOES NOT MATTER.
The last point is especially important. The written law and case law for denaturalization is unambiguous: after someone becomes a citizen, the government must demonstrate that any mistaken or fraudulent information would have been significant and material. The state must PROVE that an application would have been almost instantly rejected if the information had been complete.
The only cases where denaturalization has been applied in the past has been for things like former concentration camp guards and direct participants in terrorist organizations.
The facts in this case do not come even close to to what the law requires. In fact, the evidence is that even if she had filed an application as an 18-year-old, it would have been approved.
This entire case is because Stephen Miller and Trump wanted to attack her. Anyone claiming otherwise is an idiot.
Re: (Score:1)
Did the dad or her fill out the paperwork entirely on their own, or did they have an 'advocate' fill in all the right boxes to make sure they got in and got every last little drop of all forms of assistance?
Fraud while applying for citizenship is still fraud, whether you're a kid and your dad does it or someone of age fills it out, it's fraud.
Hint: that area of the world is always in a war of some sort, and they've never had real birth records (the vast majority all say they were born New Years Day). Exact
Re: (Score:3)
The civil war is not even the case.
I have a Somali friend who was born perhaps two decades before the civil war started in 1990.
He told me that he does not know when he was born, simply because there are no birth records in Somalia. He needed this info to apply for something in a Western country.
He said the only way to know for sure is to go to the village elders who will remember when he was born based on a c
Re:Two more years (Score:5, Informative)
Politics aside
Why? This is obviously a political case. This raid would not have happened if the president had not ordered it.
Omar is absolutely NOT required to demonstrate anything about her citizenship. Once granted, the presumption is that it was granted legally; the government has to prove otherwise. Vague "she might have been 18" allegations aren't even close to being proof.
And let's be clear: Only a complete monster would try to denaturalize somebody over shit like this after twenty-six years in this country. Of course, Miller is that kind of monster.
Re: (Score:2)
This is obviously a political case. This raid would not have happened if the president had not ordered it.
If we have a member of Congress who has even a whiff of an issue with their citizenship, y'all should all stop with the partisan bullshit and agree to get to the bottom of it and pronto. There is a problem with the publicly known facts here, and it needs to be laid to rest one way or the other. If you can't get on that bandwagon, then you and your partisan hackery are are the problem.
Re: (Score:2)
Multiple posts in this thread have explained the law, the government's burden of proof, and the actual information available. But for some bizarre reason, you've decided to ignore all of that, and instead focus on a conspiracy website that mis-states what laws would apply, claims that the dates listed on a couple of web sites are somehow incontrovertible evidence, and that mixes in some Islamophobia for good measure.
It turns out there is another source that knows there is no case here - the Trump administra
Re: (Score:2)
This thread has really brought out the losers.
And I'm very sure that you are a loser. Research has shown repeatedly that authoritarian regimes and racist groups attract mediocre, weak people.
It's not always the truly stupid that join groups like that and blame their failures on others - they usually know that they are struggling. And truly smart and successful people do not need to find a someone to hate.
Instead these groups recruit among the weak and the dunning-krugers of the world. People smart enough to
Re: (Score:2)
OK, guess I was wrong about the 'able to write complete sentences' part.
Apparently you're trying to construct a hypothetical that has absolutely no relationship to the topic under discussion, and then use that to draw conclusions. That's a thing people often do, but it's still stupid.
Since we're going to be a little repetitive here:
Omar is an American. Full stop.
Re: (Score:3)
Ilhan Omar’s widely published birth date of October 4, 1981 means she turned 18 in 1999 and 19 in 2000, and therefore, was ineligible to gain citizenship by derivation.
None of which is legally an adequate reason to remove someone's citizenship two decades or more later. Filing the wrong form would be considered a minor clerical error. It should have been rejected at the time, and she should have had to file the correct form at the time, but once citizenship is granted, that's moot.
There is a general presumption in the law that citizenship cannot be revoked unless all of the following criteria are true:
Re: (Score:3)
If you lie on the application form. Your application is void. She was never a citizen.
That may be how it works in some fascist hellholes, but that's not how it works in the United States. What I described are the legal requirements for denaturalization.
The whole family misrepresented who they were. Pretending to be refugees when they weren't. The father was claiming to be a teacher. And not a high level military leader of a dictator...oops...
Even if those claims are true — and given that similar allegations were made years ago and DHS concluded that they were without merit, so that's a pretty big stretch — the misrepresentation would have been by her father, not her. She was not a member of the Somali military. So why do you think that would make a material differen
Re: (Score:3)
There is a CONGRESSIONAL STATUTE that says an alien who is a member of a communist or totalitarian regime, they are INADMISSIBLE under immigration statutes.
Being a member of the military of a country does not constitute being a member of a communist party/regime unless you're high up in a military junta. So no, that law does not apply. And regardless, him being ineligible does not make his daughter ineligible, which means it is still not a material omission in the context of *her* immigration — only his. *She* was a kid.
There is compelling evidence her father as a Colonel in the army of a Marxist-Leninist dictator, and commanded a regiment that committed atrocities against a tribal minority.
No, there is not compelling evidence, or else it would have been presented by now. Years later, still no actual evidence has materia
Re: (Score:3)
If you're claiming citizenship because your dad has it. But your dad didn't have it. They you never got it either.
Here's the flaw in your logic. Her dad did have it. If someone had documented proof that he should not have been granted that citizenship because of fraud on his part, then it could be revoked. But that still would not change the fact that at the time she filed it, he had been granted citizenship, which means the form was filed legitimately.
So unless you can prove your age theory (which, without valid birth records, would be impossible), you have nothing.
Re: (Score:2)
You don't need to be 'high up in the military junta' to be a member of a communist or totalitarian regime.
Bzzt. Reading comprehension fail.
I didn't say you have to be high up in the military of a totalitarian regime to be a member of the party. I said you aren't guaranteed to be a member unless you're a military officer who took control of the country in a coup or someone who is very close to that person. That's what "does not constitute" means.
In a lot of foreign countries, military service isn't optional. And that was actually true in Somalia for many years, though I suppose that was after her father serv
Re: (Score:3)
The point was to stop baddies from entering the country.
Lying on the form to hide relevant information is the textbook example of this kind of fraud.
No, it isn't. To be fraud, the lie has to be material. Would him saying that he fought in the military have disqualified him? No. Because being in the military of a communist country doesn't automatically make you communist. It might have caused a deeper investigation, and that investigation might have concluded that he was, but given that the regime had already fallen and any records would probably have been nonexistent at that point, that's a pretty unlikely outcome — doubly so decades later.
Se
Re: (Score:2)
Then fucking prove it. There are several posts in this thread, by myself and others, that explain how high the bar for that is.
I am amazed by how many people seem to be ok with the US government having armed agents storm someone's house in a predawn raid, based on an internet rumor sparked by a Wikipedia entry.
People really are ok with authoritarianism. Especially when it's aimed at 'other' people.
Re: (Score:3)
These are baseless claims as far as I can tell. Someone started a rumor, probably based on a mistake in a legal reference library entry in Minnesota. That library said they didn't rely on official records and only got information from secondary sources like Wikipedia. This is not enough grounds to start a whole investigation unless they were a political enemy.
She came from a country that was in civil war and there is no documentation available from there anymore.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
You mean a scammer fraudster who should never have been eligible to be in America let alone the Congress.
You're talking about Melanie, right? Who lied on her Epstein visa?
Re: (Score:2)
Epstein died, didn't he? So, claims against him are less than productive, aren't they?
I didn't know '70's musician Melanie was involved with Epstein.
Oh, wait... I see what you're doing... Haha.
You're basing your claim on a picture of Trump and Epstein at a business function or whatever... so because Trump was at something that Epstein was at, before all the claims against Epstein came out, Trump is automatically guilty. Proof? Oh, wait... I forgot, this Admin's DoJ redacted _only_ Trump's name out of eve
Re: Two more years (Score:2)
What about why have the Epstein files not been released as required by law?
Stop defending child rapists, shitbird.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, yeah... they haven't released a single thing yet... https://www.epstein.media/ [www.epstein.media]
I'm not defending Epstein... prove that current BIC (Butt In Chair) was there. What about Clinton and Gates and everyone else? How do you know for absolutely certain he had the DoJ redact his name, while showing everyone else's name?
Or... do you have concrete evidence (as in: dude shot dude, dude gets busted with gun in hand with the gun tied to the shooting and gunner witnessed on 50 cameras in the act) that hasn't been pub
Re: (Score:2)
You're a spineless shitheel so this question is rhetorical but when (and I mean WHEN) Omar's case is dismissed like Comey, Letitia James or hell even the sandwich thrower guy [wikipedia.org] will you walk back your claims, change your position in the face of evidence?
To the reader of course the answer is no because these people are bullshit bad faith conspiracy theorists. Turns out a belief system that can ignore reality can be quite powerful.
Re: (Score:2)
If she stands trial and is convicted then yes I will. See, isn't that easy when you're not a coward?
So answer the question, will you?
Re: (Score:2)
How many WNBA games have you ever watched
Re: (Score:2)
Just say "Never" and save the bloviation you blithering shitgibbon.
See, the thing with your PoV is while you pretend to be some noble defender of women's sports what you are really saying is "I think women are too stupid to regulate their own sports league".
I think the WNBA is more than capable of figuring out that issue for themselves because I do in fact think women have agency in the world.
Re: Two more years (Score:1)
I hope you're a rusbot because if not it's truly sad that a human being would choose to live in such a complete state of bitterness and spite. Show yourself some kindness man.... there's a big wide world out there full of new experiences and opportunities.
Re: (Score:1)
Don't know if she is a scammer herself, but I wouldn't be surprised if something comes out that she had a backwards-facing hand in the whole $9 billion fraud thing in MN.
Even if she's innocent (aside from moving her parents, grandparents, all of their kids, and their kids kids over here), maybe this'll have other Senate and House and others shaking in their boots, and maybe, just maybe... this'll clean out the various positions in the Government a little (either directly or indirectly).
Re: (Score:1)
You shouldn't use words you don't understand, like "irony".
Or "goodness"
Re: (Score:2)
The irony of someone with a UID over 8 million -> Feels the need to have a username that says they used to have one with more "prestige". Enough said. Nobody gives a fuck, and you giving one is enough of a tell for everyone reading literally anything coming out of your fingers/mouth.
Re: (Score:2)
My username came out of a failed password recovery process that I chose to laugh about. I've been here since late '97, so the additional joke is that I'm getting old.
Re: (Score:3)
The king pins will never face accountability.
Re: (Score:3)
Why wait that long?
"Clean up your room!"
"Oh mom! Can I do it in two years?"
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
That's just an excuse. Government by the people of the people etc. You either step up or your cower in fear of your government, while simultaneously complaining about its incompetence.
There are countries where citizens aren't afraid to impose their will. In France, even school children aren't afraid of the government. It's the government who's afraid of the school children.
Maybe learn a lesson from them. Generations of people regularly marching in the streets, until the government caves in. People who ar
Re: Two more years (Score:2)
Re: Two more years (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I wouldn't count on MAGA being gone in 2 years, or Trump either. He will remain at the head of MAGA regardless of who wins the presidency, an any winner other than MAGA will be declared fraudulent - with the DOJ, FBI, SCOTUS, ICE, and the Army if needs be, to back him up.
Re: (Score:2)
Gubmint should finance Faraday cages for schools (Score:5, Interesting)
I don't think so (Score:1, Troll)
As a dumb kid learning to program in basic I hit a wall for some reason on the concept of data statements. The idea that you would have data at the back of your program listing that you would read from the fron
Re: (Score:2)
Everyone, and this includes the homeless kids living in cars, has smartphones. (Source: spouse who is an elementary school teacher in a lower middle class neighborhood). Kids are saturated in horrible online shit 24/7. School should be a refuge from that.
Re: (Score:1)
And you're mixing up different problems. You're complaining about social media and outrage porn designed for engagement. Just regulate social media. Problem solved.
I don't see any reason to cut children off from a massive source of information that can explain a complex topic to them in a thousand different ways to help them learn just because they can go to Facebook and you are too obsessed with corporations rights to stop them from doing terrible t
Re: (Score:2)
Regulating drugs has worked so well that you want to apply the same techniques to equally addictive online tech? How would you go about such a thing, anyway? The solution is worse than the problem.
But that's a red herring: I never said anything about screen use outside of school. You ought to talk to some actual teachers if you want to know the nature and scope of the problem in school. The solution I imagine is the solution most teachers would like to see a
Re: (Score:2)
I remember when that was how it was in schools... we read books like 1984 and Brave New World and did homework on paper, and learned stuff! We didn't have cell phones and tablets and XBox 27's and PS19's... we had a phone on the wall, and (if you were lucky) a NES or a Sega Genesis and a few games, and we read books regularly (not for school stuff).
Does it matter if the FCC has the power to end? (Score:2)
""Importantly, the FCC does not have the authority to terminate the E-Rate program. The E-Rate program is mandated by Congress, and the FCC is responsible for administering it," the American Library Associated told the FCC. "
That asshole has already cut the program back, he could just cut it to zero but leave it as a program on the books. And when has that alleged administration gave a flying rat's ass for the law or the Constitution?
Re:Does it matter if the FCC has the power to end? (Score:5, Insightful)
Strange how the FCC was powerless to do anything under Biden and yet today it can do whatever it wants.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
As an non-American, I'm curious why the amount of screen time in schools is a matter for the FCC rather than the Department of Education?
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Keep in mind that many of our states are comparable to entire countries elsewhere in the world, so this is probably the only workable arrangement unless we adopt some kind of Soviet-style national bureaucracy.
Re: (Score:3)
In a way, the US Constitution and the Bible are similar in that they are viewed by many to be sacrosanct writings where each individual word holds outsized meaning. Yet, we don't have the original authors to clarify their intent, so we are left to rely on so-called experts for interpretation. In today's world, those interpretations far transcend the original text, despite non-believable claims of strict construction.
The right-wing six on the Supreme Court are right, and everyone else is wrong ... by definit
Re: (Score:2)
Congress has exercised Inherent Contempt powers as recently as a hundred years ago but they turned the Congressional Jail into a speakeasy/conference room which roughly reflects their sense of duty.
Which, to your point, they now refer the DoJ to the DoJ for prosecution.
But also that illustrates why prior Congresses held the power to be essential.
It would have been grand if "The Dow, the Dow is over fifty thousand!" landed Bill Barbie in jail until she had time to think abour her duty to respond truthfully.
I
Re: (Score:2)
In a way, the US Constitution and the Bible are similar in that they are viewed by many to be sacrosanct writings where each individual word holds outsized meaning. Yet, we don't have the original authors to clarify their intent, so we are left to rely on so-called experts for interpretation.
In fact, we have many writings from the original authors of the US Constitution on exactly what they intended, and what they feared the unintended consequences might be. They were quite prolific in their musings. Of note is the fact that they did not all agree -they compromised.
Start with the Federalist Papers. Then read the Convention Records for Madison's notes on the arguments that occurred during the original US Constitutional convention. You can find writings by Washington, Adams, Hamilton, and Jef
Stop the hyperbole. (Score:1)
What about that means disconnecting kids from the internet? What about that is a termination of the program?
Nothing.
Re:Stop the hyperbole. (Score:5, Informative)
What about that means disconnecting kids from the internet? What about that is a termination of the program?
Nothing.
It costs money to provide those services, and schools and libraries are already wanting for funding in this post-fact America. What's between your ears? Nothing.
Re: (Score:1)
Yes, but that's not a legal argument.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Yes, but that's not a legal argument.
That's OK, like Cheeto Benito's latest Ivanka substitute, I didn't pass the bar. (Never claimed to, either.)
Re: Stop the hyperbole. (Score:2)
I don't know which is sadder, that we all know Trump wants to fuck his daughter, or that trolls who are also fans of child rape will spend mod points being mad about it.
The only example shared seems trivial (Score:1)
FTA: “The FCC received specific examples of how E-Rate helps local communities. “We estimate our annual Internet cost at approximately $3,120 and our annual E-Rate support at approximately $1,560,” Paul Lapka, the principal of Rock Valley Christian School in Iowa, told the US agency. "
Is this Christian school really operating on such a knife edge that the $1560/year ($130/month) puts them over the edge? Note it is a private school with around 240 students and an awesome 11:1 student/teach
Re:The only example shared seems trivial (Score:4, Interesting)
$2 billion for any government program of this scale is really not bad. The support is scaled to the poverty level of the region. If they are getting a 50% discount, they are either rural (1%-19% eligible for National School Lunch Program) or in a relatively poor urban rea (20-30% eligible for school lunch program).
Guaranteed funding for connectivity actually helps provide incentive to companies to build services for these areas. This is long-term guaranteed income to any company willing to run fiber to an otherwise unserviced area. I think that $3000 rate would be a lot higher if the public schools in the same town didn't have a discount too. The cost is driven by having multiple customers to support the infrastructure build out.
This is part of what's funded by the Universal Service Fund (USF fee) on your phone bill. And it's by far the least wasteful, since it's not about connecting individual households.
Re: (Score:2)
Religious schools in more poverty-stricken areas scrape for every dime so subsidizing internet service via E-Rate is important to them. They don't pay the teachers that well, either, compared to the unionized public-school teachers. That 11:1 student/teacher ratio speaks more about the sacrifices the students' families are making (i.e. paying tuition, doing "service hours", etc.) than about being a posh learning environment.
Send in the devices (Score:3)
not sure how K12 works today considering I last worked for one in 2017 pre-COVID and only for one year, and I don't know how much of this if anything is funded by this plan, but I can attest that there is a ton of waste back then.
1) iPad's galore. Every other classroom had a cart with 30 iPads in them. Most of them filled with learning apps with dubious uses. They were a pain to administer and broke constantly because kids dropped them and even the rugged cases couldn't save them. Although I've heard they switched to Chromebooks because their cheaper and more rugged since then. Speaking of Chromebooks...
2) Chromebooks galore. My Cousin, at a different school, were given Chromebooks post-COVID. She literally has a pile of them in her room because she gets one every other year and the school doesn't want them back. Her mother gave them to me to figure out what to do with them since the school won't even take them to recycle. All of them were unregistered from the school org and I Powerwashed them with no ties back to the school org once I updated them and put them back online. All of them still have 2-5 years of support left. I know Chromebooks are relatively cheap especially when bought in bulk but this seems to be a massive waste to me.
3) Craptastic desktops. Back to the school I worked for. They had ancient desktops that were easily 10+ years old in 2017 and claimed they didn't have the money to replace them. I asked them at the time why don't they replace them with Chromeboxes (or use Cloudready, which Google eventually bought to make Chromebook Flex) since the school was a google shop (they were on the Google for Education system at the time) and their answer was because they needed MSOffice even though none of the kids used Office because they were on Google and were using Google Docs and Classroom for everything. They were too afraid that if they dropped MS that some software would come down the line that was Windows only, and they would be screwed. I can understand that at that time, but it was getting very clear that K12 across the board was going full web based and anything would be better than running Windows 10 on 2GB ram systems on low end Core 2 Duo's.
4) Wifi everywhere. Every single classroom had an AP. This makes sense considering the iPad's everywhere. It didn't make sense to me that it was used so inefficiently at the time. I remember having to run 4 network lines to a classroom 200 feet from the switch to temporarily hook up 3 computers and a phone for a room that already had wifi in it when wifi USB dongles were $20 each and the phones supported wifi connectivity. Students had access to them and would hook their phones to them to watch TikTok all day.
5) Smart boards everywhere. Every classroom had Promethean smart boards. There were projector based connected to a laptop the teacher had. Useful but were very expensive and failure prone. They constantly needed realigned and the projectors would "star-out" since they were all DLP projectors with that faulty TI chip.
6) Bandwidth Galore. The school system I worked for had a 1gbps link at the time which was symmetrical. The busiest we would see it was roughly 750mbps around 11AM to 2PM and vary rarely peaked beyond a minute or two. They were planning to up it to 2gbps but I left there before that happened. Keep in mind that most kids at that point did nothing but Youtube and Tiktok if you put a screen in front of them so even with that amount of Bandwidth usage it never seemed to be an issue. You would be amazed how much you can stretch 1gbps when you actively manage bandwidth correctly.
As for Cellular access points (Might make sense in some rural areas but would probably just put it in a Chromebook or tablet.) and Wifi on school buses (Why? So Billy can Doomscroll TikTok because he ran out of data?) can't comment on that since those weren't around when I worked in K12 (I'm guessing it was a COVID thing) but I don't see why you would need this overlap when there is the subsidized low income broadband initiatives already in place that's supposed to fill in these gaps.
Re: (Score:2)
Thank you. Best comment on here.
Re: (Score:2)
There's a lot of incompetence too wasting thousands of dollars.
I worked in a district where the boobie manager had bought bottom spec computers for the whole school - Intel Pentiums (this was in an age of Core2duo, I didn't even know they still made Pentiums at that time) with bottom spec ram and spinning rust when SSD's were standard. This combined with an upgrade from XP to Windows Vista/7 made them nigh on unusable.
They had just had all their switches replaced with GBPS switches; I remember (I was a b
Libraries ... (Score:2)
And lest you think that this is a problem primarily of rural areas, I can drive by Bill Gates mansion on my way to work and flip him off.
I can't go 10 minutes without some Trump chatter . (Score:2)
Geez people.... Regardless of who is President, the issue here is worth taking a good look at. $2 billion is a LOT of money to burn through each year! And this is a program that arguably went FAR beyond what people expected it to do (ensuring libraries and schools had an afford Internet connection). Handing out free hotspots to people? Yeah ... I'd rather not fund THAT with my tax money. Just use free public wifi like the rest of us do.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
TDS: The paranoid feeling that someone else must be deranged because they don't love and worship the Orange God Emperor with every fiber of their being.
It couldn't possibly be because the man is an asshole and complete shitheel.
My crystal ball says... (Score:2)
Modernity is bad. (Score:1)