Boeing uses real time open source CORBA ORB 39
An anonymous contributor wrote in saying
"
Boeing is using an open source CORBA ORB called
TAO
in its avionics systems. The idea is that complex systems
can benefit from standard off the shelf software."
I'm posting this story
because it shows that Tao was able switch processing over
from a broken processor, possibly making it useful for
life-support equipment in hospitals or in space.
Ah, Sengan's Slashdot Soapbox (Score:1)
Silly sengan, don't you realize that if it wasn't for weapons, your precious european country would be the German Empire? Evil people can use force, so we must have the ability to use force so those evil people don't own us.
I sleep better at night knowing that the US has the strongest military in the world. I think that it's great that we're going to have a kick-butt F22 and kick-butt JSF planes. And you people who think that the military is unnecessary are the same people who will want it when it is needed.
Apple Pie (Score:1)
Antiamerican (Score:1)
First I see a lot of people mock the US for going on the offensive and defending foreign nations. I find it odd that people will condemn this action before actually understanding why we do it. We bomb military installations in a country with an oppresive government and everyone is on our backs because they believe our president is trying to cover up his own problems.
Then there is that notion that you will get shot, stabbed, thrown off a tower, and robbed if you go out any time past 8 pm in the US. While that might be true in some of the slums, it sure isn't true where I live or any of the places I've lived (up and down the west coast, hawaii and in the east coast).
Censorship on /.? (Score:1)
I find it distressing that
SoupIsGood Food
PPC but what OS? (Score:1)
Ah, Sengan's Slashdot Soapbox: Agreed, somewhat (Score:1)
Antieuropeanism (if there's such a word) (Score:1)
And it does happen in real life too (I've had a couple of Europeans discuss in front of me how uncultured and stupid Americans are). Just accept that there are idiots out there and do your best to ignore them.
OTOH, I think sengan's post was inappropriate. If he wants, he can post an immediate followup with his pontificating, but I (and others) would appreciate it being kept off the front page.
sengan, put up or shut up! (Score:1)
If you really despise all these things, then move to India, shave your head, and let the sympathetic masses steal every stitch of your clothing and beat you senseless with sticks. That way, you will die a quick, honorable death, and leave the rest of us survive in the real world.
Whether or not you *like* violence, there are people and ideas in this world that are plain evil. Your choice is to either succumb or resist. As the evil people will happily kill you just for resisting.
What we don't need in this forum is another effete pseudo-intellectual that likes all the trapping of modern society, but is *horrified*, yes *horrified* that a society is willing to defend its ideals and way of life.
sengan out of control (Score:1)
another thing (Score:1)
article and a dozen about the military-industrial
complex! Not the appropriate forum! Please Sengan!
You are ruining it for everyone! How can we placate you
so you'll stop editorializing!!!
Simple answer. (Score:1)
Personally I have only one major anti-european bias: Our F-22 is gonna kick euro-fighter ass all over the place. But then again, I am quite biased.
/dev
Antieuropeanism (if there's such a word) (Score:1)
Slashdot needs to have a clear distinction between news and editorial, like good newspapers (are supposed to) have.
I think it looks pretty neat (Score:1)
I thought Descent was too enclosed to play nicely, this looks refreshingly different.
U.S. not perfect, better than alternative. (Score:1)
The Irony in Sengan's detractors (Score:1)
If you're so concerned about making
Sengan's was a through away comment, like: "I don't like jello, but here is a story about it...". Deal with it, people.
It makes me wonder if most of you have a pro-weapons agenda or something. Well, personally I don't like weapons, just like Sengan. They tend to hurt people. Way to go, Sengan, don't change.
Duh! (Score:1)
So how would any country be a part of the German empire if it wasn't for weapons? Do you think the German's would go round saying "I say, old chap, fancy being a part of the German empire?". I somehow doubt it. Call me stupid, but I suspect the existence of weapons would be a prerequisite for a German empire.
I support sengan (Score:1)
Actually after first reading it, I was going to complain that the post didn't make any sense, but I see the reson is that I read it after it had its "I don't like weapons"-ectomy. I was also surprised that the poster ( I didn't look at who it was at first) didn't mention that open source software was being used for military purposes.
Personally, If I wrote OSS that was taken by the military and used to deliver bombs, I'd have a bit of an internal crisis to deal with. I'd bet that I'm not alone, nort in a very small minority in feeling this way.
I don't think the Sengan is any more editorial than anyone else (in general) and I really think that people should get off his back.
Maybe Rob should implement a killfile so people can filter out posters they think are "offensive," but honestly I think that the loud complainers should just become a little more tolerant of people who don't share their viewpoint.
Persnally, I'm more irritated at the person who expurgated Sengans article.
**********TAO is "The ACE Orb"********** (Score:1)
1. Please go easy on Doug Schmidt's web site. They are
2. TAO stands for "The ACE Orb", while ACE stands for "Adaptive Communication Environment". ACE is a very nice environment for developing communications systems. TAO is developed using ACE.
3. TAO (pronounced [dow]) has been ported to many platforms---Win32 (NT3, NT4, 95, even CE), SunOS4, 5, IRIX 5, 6, HP-UX 9, 10, 11, DEC UNIX 4, AIX4, Linux, SCO, UnixWare, NetBSD, FreeBSD, VxWorks, Chorus, LynxOS, and pSoS, MVS.
4. Compiling TAO on Linux is totally painless. Although an auto config script is not available, each platform is HAND CONFIGURED already. I compiled it on Red Hat 5.1.
5. TAO is mainly a C++ thing. There is not yet IDL compiler for other languages. But it is compliant with the CORBA 2.2 specification and IIOP 1.0 specification. So it INTEROPERATES with CORBA objects from another ORB.
6. The comp.soft-sys.ace is a USENET news group dedicated to ACE. A fair amount of TAO discussion is also carried on there. There's an ACE and TAO mailing list that you can subscribe from the TAO home page. The traffic of the mailing list is GATEWAYED to the news group, so you can expact to see some useful discussions there. The news group postinga are NOT gatewayed back to the mailing list.
7. TAO is a very serious ORB. It is written for standard compliance and performance. It's Real-Time claim is rarely seen amount ORB vendors.
8. TAO is Open Source, you get the source! You compile it yourself. And it just works. You can also get someone else to do it for you, see #10. below
9. TAO is the whole thing. There's the ORB, and there's all (well, almost) the CORBA services (Naming_Service, Event_Service, Trading_Service, etc., things other vendors unbundle from their ORB).
10. TAO is commercially supported. Just like Cygnus supports GNU C/C++, TAO has gained a commercial support provider. Industrial grade support and training is obtainable by contacting Object Computing, Inc. (http://www.ociweb.com).
[Disclaimer: I am an employee of OCI, although not in the TAO group. The opinions above does not represent any one else but my own.]
--
IIO, my third(?) message to
Conflict... (Score:1)
Arguing over who had weapons first is like arguing the chicken and egg problem. Wishing for all weapons to eventually go away is like Canute commanding the sea to recede.
There is nothing wrong with holding a philosophy which is against weaponry. If you can survive in such a fashion it is admirable and right to do so. There comes a time, however, when instruments of force and violence are necessary. When such times arise I would prefer to be ready for them. If this means having weapons in order to deter those who would use weapons against me, then so be it. If I choose to use said weapons in an immoral and unrighteous fashion, then it is only fitting that I expect those around me to prevent this by any means necessary - including their own use of weapons against me.
The existence of weapons has never been the problem; it's the willingness of people to use them against others to force their will that is the problem. Since there will never be a shortage of such people, and since eliminating the pursuit of weapons is impossible given our nature, it is proper to arm one's self for defense against them.
I'm rambling... I'll stop. It's people, not weapons.
Back to the point (Score:1)
I don't like weapons, so I have never bought any. Vote with your wallet!
"I don't like weapons" (Score:1)
Why do Sengan's opinions have any bearing on news postings?
BTW Sengan: That's a broad statement. Do you use flatware? That could be considered a "weapon" against your dinner - even if you don't eat animals.
And isn't it arguable that living as a member of a society made possible by the effective use of weapons is tanamount to supporting their use?
Please keep your opinions to yourself, unless you're in a forum appropriate for expressing opinions.....
I want one.. (how does this relate to ORB (Score:1)
And how does CORBA relate to Koffice (Score:1)