Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Technology

Nanomagnets for Hard Drives 58

Posted by blizzard from the borg-in-your-hard-drive dept.
Single GNU Theory writes "Scientists at Cornell have developed magnets so tiny they could be used to create standard form-factor hard drives with terabyte capacities. All they need is a way to read and write them fast. Check it out here. Hmmm... That'd require 250 Amiga Fast File System partitions! "
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Nanomagnets for Hard Drives More

Nanomagnets for Hard Drives

Comments Filter:
  • SFS is a free implementation of a "cursed l:disk-validator"-free filesystem for the amiga. disk-validator is the equivalent of fsck, but for amiga OFS and FFS. In later amiga models, it was in rom rather than in l:

    SFS uses the 64-bit Amiga New Style Device (NSD) API that was published a while after CBM went belly-up, and claims to support up to 2000 GB partitions, though limitations in the current dos.library prohibit individual files > 2GB long (note to linux-people: this is not a limitation of the filesystem itself, just the amiga's antiquated 32-bit dos.library v40.x (yes, the amiga version numbering conventions are a little different to linux))

    It's available from the link below. This site also has a remarkably easy to follow description of how the filesystem actually works, including some rather good diagrams.

    [xs4all.nl]
    http://www.xs4all.nl/~hjohn/SFS/

    I've been using it for some time now, on my poor lonely old 68060 amiga (that sits next to my linux-x86 box) and it's wonderfully fast compared to amiga-ffs, more space efficient, and I've deliberately punished it by turning the computer off in the middle of writes, without any loss of data coherency, and pretty much immediate boot-up afterward.

    It will also support the (relatively little-used) amiga multiuser filesystem bits+pieces, too! ( thus making a linux implementation even more useful - it could be used as a native partition with no loss of functionality)

    It actually seems to work better than the current ext2fs, IMHO, despite being nominally a late beta.
    It would be great if some linux next-gen filesystem developers were to at least look at the site, if only to make sure SFS hasn't got anything
    they haven't thought of.

    Now, how about a linux implementation ???






  • Parkinson's Law (Score:1)

    by Anonymous Coward
    This wouldn't help a bit. The data would just expand to fill up all the space you can get.

    Side note: we really should create an altavista-like tool to index our HDs before we get truly mad because of the excess of random assorted huge junk files.
  • Posted by himes:

    400 x 400 nm bits in a hard drive aren't a big deal. You'll be buying the same areal density from Office Max in the very near future.
  • When it'll be ready, the question is how much it'll cost? Some great technology never see the light because they would be too expensive to produce...
  • But they need to sort out the processing power.

    The site has been slashdotted already.
  • NEver underestimate the power of Pron, MP3s and \/\/4r3z [ok and any MS/OS] to fill up a HD that large in minutes. This will however be pretty cool for video storage [assuming it's fast enough]. Maybe we'll be one step closer to *real* video on demand.
  • With this technology, couldn't you also use the laser to burn a pattern of "live" and "dead" spaces into the medium, thus getting a read-only medium with even higher density? Or do you only get parallel lines of scoring?

    no, that's not possible. all you can do is etch out lines, and by repeating the process rotated 90 degrees you can etch out a grid, so you create little islands of magnetic material.

    Also, from what you're saying, this is a grid, not a radial pattern like what you'd need for a rotating disk medium. That might actually be better, though: what kinds of bearings could rotate a disk with only nanometers of vibration?

    yup, it's a grid. but as you say, a rotating disk will undoubtedly vibrate, which probably is very bad for the head's accuracy :-)


    )O(
    the Gods have a sense of humor,
  • but then you'd first have to make a flat magnetic layer and then wrap it around a drum, and I don't know how possible that is :-)


    )O(
    the Gods have a sense of humor,
  • well who says they're gonna put a full size hard drive in a portable MP3 player? just think how small a 5 or 10GB drive would be using that technology. tiny drives like that would revolutionize portable equipment like laptops, palmtops and MP3 players. not to mention that a drive like that would require much less power, which would also be very convenient for portable computers.


    )O(
    the Gods have a sense of humor,
  • You're right, of course. Oops.

    Jon
  • I could see someone building a hard drive for a mouse- or bug-sized 'bot with this tech, but not a viral-sized one!

    At one molecule per bit, it's going to take a lot of nano-legs to carry the code around!

    It's kewl, though!

    Jon

  • Not too good of an example. In terms of pure text, a book should easily fit on the floppies we have now. Illustrations would bulk it out a lot more, of course.

    Oh well, it's only journalism. ;)

    Jon

  • With this technology, couldn't you also use the laser to burn a pattern of "live" and "dead" spaces into the medium, thus getting a read-only medium with even higher density? Or do you only get parallel lines of scoring?

    Also, from what you're saying, this is a grid, not a radial pattern like what you'd need for a rotating disk medium. That might actually be better, though: what kinds of bearings could rotate a disk with only nanometers of vibration?

    Jon

  • Actually, downloading the entire internet has already been accomplished. In parallel.
  • This is "microtechnology" or whatever you call top-down construction. Nanotechnology implies creation from the bottom-up (the atoms are combined instead of removed). Sorry, folks.

    If you think I'm wrong, then too bad. :P

  • Be Big (Score:1)

    by Taos ( 12343 )
    Hey, now we can actually test that claim of BeOS
    that they can support gargantuan file systems.
  • Just how many nanites can dance on the R/W-head of a hard drive? And will looking at it while it runs make it disappear here, and appear again in Alpha Centauri? And do we really have to stick a cat in the PC case to make it work? Will it work faster if travelling at the speed of light? And if it weighs as much as a duck, does that mean it is made of wood, and therefore a witch??

    Things are getting freaky. But, I'm looking forward to downloading the whole internet. :)
  • Build a bigger hard drive and the world will build bigger files. Soon we'll all be complaining about how our new 1.2 TB drive is all filled up and there's nothing we want to delete.

    *begin nostalgic music

    I remember when I got my first 150 meg hard drive. Almost 4x larger than my 40 megger. "I'll never fill that up! " I foolishly said as I pulled it from the box, carelessly tossing aside the $500 invoice. That hard drive is still running today in that old 386... ESDI was the great new technoligy NEC had said....

    *end nostalgic music
  • Programmers should learn how to optimize the size of their code w/ out compromising the speed or the operation of it.

    Isn't that the sort of thing that the first small groups of hackers were proud to have done, when the only available space was about 1-3K? When you had to fit an entire video game in 2048 bytes, and used all sorts of interesting tricks to do it?

    I remember this from a book on the subject, and a few such tricks were mentioned:

    Using data as instructions (weird but useful in a fractal sort of way)
    Understanding and using the full instruction set of a CPU (makes for proprietary code, but we're talking ASM at the time anyway --which is much more efficient just because of what it is)
    Simple compression algorythms (using the small free memory space to store uncompressed pages of code)
    Overlay files (Inefficient use of disk space, but efficient use of RAM)

    and so on...

    Even with enormous sloppy APIs, certain things don't ever go out of style... like well-organized program structure, efficient algorhythms, et cetera.

    But you knew that.
  • Actually, rotating r/w heads are an excellent idea. Just pop in a square chip with a notch in the corner, and the two heads will lock in and spin like cyclones...

    And as discussed elsewhere, with multiple heads on each platter you have vastly-reduced seek times and potentially extended disk life (the arm doesn't vibrate so much when it's a disc).

    Then again, the head doesn't have to rotate, necessarily. In fact, it might just be another plate of magnets, cone-shaped this time. Kind of like old-time core memory (mini-donut magnets wrapped in wire), we would in fact have a new kind of stable RAM chip. 2Gig flash RAM, anyone? :)
  • The article says "A single 1.44 megabyte floppy disk can hold an entire book with room to spare; a terabyte hard drive could hold a library with at least one million titles." meaning that currently, this is true. I thought the same thing at first myself, then reread it.
  • I'm all of 26 years old and I recall playing with a PDP11 in my father's office. Ah, those were the days of platters and the clackety-clack of the punch machine. Nothing more fun that making lace cards to piss my pop off. =)

    But MY first drive was a 40m'er. I donated a 100m to a local bbs and was immediately given god status. That was way back in...what? 1991? Heh.
  • George Lucas should be happy. Unfortunately it seems rather far off right now.

    --
    JCA
  • the best part is not that drives will now be in terra bites (excuse my sp) ... because no matter what, the bigger the hard drive the bigger the files ... microsoft alone will make the first terra bite word processor, i'm sure ... games will be bigger ... we are like gold fish ... we expand to fit the space we have ...

    the truely great part will be the floppy disks ... storing media in archives is always the most obnoxious part for both buisness and users ... zip disks cost entirely too much to truely archive what you want to archive ... but floopies? ... if one floppy can hold more than one present zip? ... that would be cool ...

    granted the games still won't fit on floppies because they will have expanded ... but i'd love to carry around the works of shakespeare on a floppy ... or how to program in ___ (enter programming language here) ... then we could start making little book reading thingies ... that instead of carrying heavy books around you carry a viewer (bookman vs walkman?) and some disks ... you could carry 20 books and still have room in your back pack for jolt and some peanuts ...

    maybe i'm the only one obssesed w/ reading ..
  • I'm not sure this nanomagnet scheme would
    be feasible. When the domains get small
    enough, they can flip between states by
    quantum mechanical tunnelling.

    A scheme that *does* look feasible is storing
    of individual electrons in nanometer-scale
    metal particles. This would be electrostatic
    rather than magnetic storage (but would still
    be on the surface of a rotating disk). The
    read head would be a "single electron transistor"
    with a head/disk spacing similar to current
    hard drives. See the most recent Proceedings
    of the IEEE for an article on this.
  • From my own studies into molecular systems, I have to say this will be a large step forward in developing nanotechnology. Now that is possible for us to make such large capacity hard drives, we can decrease the size of the drive and we'll have perfect data storage for nanocomputers and nano-robots. The possibility of a watch containing more data storage as my computer has now, or an internal medical nanobot with a database of biological and medical knowledge, it is all suddenly viable (assuming that other key components of molecular systems are advanced as well). All in all, not only is this a good thing for the computer world, but ultimately for any field that molecular systems will touch, which is basically any and all.

    Jack
  • Simple, convert a nanotech assembler to read data instead of moving atoms...of course this would be a LOT simpler if assemblers existed right now. Doh. Oh well, history has shown us that we have the right ideas for technology, it's the implementation that screws us up. Best of luck to the researchers out there in developing this technology.
  • But the theory of computation still applies... there are some problems that will always be unsolvable via a computer, even if one can go arbitrarily far back in time arbitrarily many times. Whatever fancy computer you come up with, if it is a universal one (one that can emulate any other computer of its kind), I can just feed that same computer its own encoding, and some string, and no one (i.e. no computer) will be able to tell if that computer will ever stop running. In finite time.
  • Things are getting freaky. But, I'm looking forward to downloading the whole internet. :)

    Hey, I've done 42% already ;)
  • I just found this out from a friend who's studying electrotechnics here; the University of Twente, Netherlands, is developing a similar system.

    with current technology all domain grains are irregular, and the stronger ones might start dominating the weaker ones over time, corrupting the data, so you need about 100 domains per bit, making one bit about 50nm in size. the solution to that problem is to make sure all domains are equal in strength. up to here it's the same as the nanomagnet theory.

    the next problem is how to get those grains on a drive, and here is where it starts differing. the nanomagnet technology takes a number of nanomagnets and lines them up. the technology developed by the UT uses LIL, Laser Interference Lithography. the surplus magnetic material is etched away using two interfering laser beams, so in the first go you create lines of magnetic material. then you turn it by 90 degrees and repeat the procedure to create small islands of magnetic material, at perfectly equal distances. currently they're able to create a periodicity of 200nm, but with a new laser they could decrease that to 160nm, and with a new technique that is still in development they could decrease it even to 80nm. yes, 80nm per bit.

    they've also designed a head with a one atom wide tip to read the data... the only real problem still is how to position that head accurately enough and quickly enough to allow for reliable, efficient and quick reading and writing.

    so basically the University of Twente is already ahaid of Cornell University :-)


    )O(
    the Gods have a sense of humor,
  • this technology won't just enable you to create huge storage capacity in a standard size hard drive, but also teeny tiny hard drives with standard storage capacity... how big would a nano-magnet drive with 10GB capacity be? 0.5x1x2" maybe? imagine what that would do for portables and wearables. and a tiny drive like that would surely also take less power, yet another convenience...


    )O(
    the Gods have a sense of humor,
  • A terrabyte for portable MP3 players? Does anyone have that much music? Doing some quick math and assuming 1 minute = 1 meg (although you'd probably use something better if you had this capacity).

    You'd be able to store 1048576 minutes of music, or 17476.26666667 hours, which is 728.1777777778 days or (assuming 365 days per year), 1.99500761035 years of music on a single disk.

    I don't think that's the most pratical application of this technology :-)

  • With this areal density, your wouldn't go for today's form factors. You could make a thumbnail-sized drive that would hold a few gigs, assuming that you could shrink the electronics, rotor, and servo down to similar scales.

    One pressing question is whether today's rotary voice coil head actuators are accurate enough to position the head within +- 20 nm or so. Probably not.
  • If you check out the original site at Cornell you'll find this link [cornell.edu] where they talk about growing nerve cells on silicon. William Gibson's predictions coming true already....

    --a proud Cornell class of 1970 alumnus
  • Still reason to be optimistic, however.

    They can't yet lay down a layer of these things into the track/sheets needed for a disk plater, for one thing. They had to do so individually, best I could tell, when what they want is to, perhaps, apply some sort of magneto-electric field, spray a mist of these magets embedded in a gel, and as the magnets settle towards the surface of the platter they'd align and space themsevles according to the field, and then as the gel/platter is heated the fields become erased and the surface solid and fixed for future use.

    Then the problem of actually reading/writing to the disk.

    The suggestion of a massively parallel fixed read arm would still have the problem of many 'wires' of the same size as the magnets, which might not be feasible.

    If a motorized arm is used, we'd need something more precise and accurate than currently possible. Perhaps piezo-electric seek heads, grown within specifications, used to move the arm back and forth. As opposed to coils or something.

    If I make no sense, please ignore, but I think those are some of the biggest hurdles to deal with.

    AS
  • Presumably, if the heads are small there's less mass to crash into the magnetic surface (although less inertia to resist shock in the first place, of course) - which implies better shock resistance since the drive will get gouged less when you drop it.

    Not that I'm in the habit of dropping my hard drives, of course, but it makes high-capacity MP3 players cheaper.
  • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • How are we supposed to replace our magnetic media with something more esoteric when they keep making magnetic media more esoteric? Next I suppose they'll have little nanomachines pumping pedals to spin the drives...or they'll rotate the heads instead of the platters.
  • Yes it is possible with a cartesian grid. Put the grid on a magnetic drum, not a magnetic disk. Magnetic drums are particularly fast with head-per-track designs.
  • It might be zero time. The "teleportation of light" experiments in the past few years are altering a characteristic of light at a sensor. The researchers are considering using this for communication and computing. For communication, an entangled light beam could be sent between two places and alterations teleported between them...if entanglement works in zero time, bits could be sent across the country in zero time although the entangled light already made the trip at the speed of light.
  • Why have a rotary voice coil. One of the limiting factors in the drive is positioning the coil accurately. Just put an array of heads across the disk on a static arm -- one head for each track. You get an average seek time of only 1/2 rotation and no alignment issues. A lot of complex circuitry is eliminated, further shrinking the drive. Futhermore, you could get 1024 tracks read in parallel -- transfer rates would skyrocket.

    I'm sorry I have to stop now, I'm drooling on my keyboard.

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Close