Lynnaea writes
"An interview from Linuxpower gets Mandrake and Rasterman together to talk about the future development of E, what it's like to work at VA, and whether/how E will play with KDE and GNOME. " Also nice to see what the boys are up to. Not eating vegemite is a possible answer.
Re:E is a pig; now we know why. (Score:2)
As a result, I haven't run E in some time, even though I like and admire E and its developers. Instead, I run 4DWM on my old SGI, which serves my needs very well and is quite a bit less expensive than a dual Pentium III/500.
Overall, my sense is that E's reputation as a pig is undeserved, unless you count the "need" to run high resolutions and colour depths that come with the experience.
D
----
Re:How's the stability? (Score:1)
Mike
Re:Why so long between releases? (Score:2)
--
Geoff Harrison (http://mandrake.net)
Senior Software Engineer - VA Linux Labs (http://www.valinux.com)
Re:E is a pig; now we know why. (Score:2)
--
Geoff Harrison (http://mandrake.net)
Senior Software Engineer - VA Linux Labs (http://www.valinux.com)
Wonder what distro... (Score:1)
Re:Vegemite? Come on. (Score:1)
But that's just because I'm unnaturally cruel.
Re:hoser (Score:1)
But its all good for laughs. It works both ways. Recently when I saw Big Daddy (in Canada) and the line "you know Canadian beer, its like moonshine" came up, the whole theatre went up in a roar of applause. Personally I find molson to be a bit week.
So take off eh, ya hosebrain. Like okay, pass me a beer eh.. And ah, now I get I'm done.
Okay eh..
Re:Not a pig at all (Score:1)
Yup, the great thing about E is that it is useable and beautiful while still being in beta version. I don't think windows even came quarter closer at version 0.15 (hahahaha, given what windows 1.0 was like the Beta versions should have been ridiculous).
BTW, I first tried e 0.13 and the theme rocked. I know they are some port in 0.15 but I have tried two of them and they weren't quite the same (the 0.13 pager was beautiful, I am eager to see the new pager).
Thanks you guys for doing so cool stuffs.
SCWM gets unnoticed again (as most configurable) (Score:1)
I would put my money on SCWM being the most
configurable window manager. It uses GUILE
to achieve a very high degree of flexibility.
Nearly everything can be changed dynamically
(even on a per window bases -- how many other window managers do you know that can have different decorations themes on different
windows). The constraint-base layout module
is also fantastic. GUILE/SCWM scripts that call
GTK+ widgets... etc..
Check it out at http://serveuse.mit.edu
What I was thinking about GMC... (Score:1)
A few months ago there was a discussion on gnome mailing list about how to do the auto-mounting stuff so people don't have to mount like under windows. Their are the little applets for the Gnome bar that are cool but this still need to educate the user to mount and unmount the disks.
At the time I was wondering if this would be useful to add this kind of properties to directories: something to execute when you enter/leave a directory so when you enter
This looks like what you are doing and this is something that i am looking forward to
Good job guys.
BTW: in another post Mandrake is talking about "tools tod do that" in reference to change themes and configurate themes. I was wondering if there was such a thing already into work and even wanted to do one (unfortunately I am stuck in a foreign country with no Linux box around so right now I can't).
This would be cool to have a general theme creator software that give some general functions and support plug-ins so you just need to create a plu-in with the help of the provided functions to add the support of the creations of E.x themes when E.x is out a break the theme compatibility (if this happen again), or do a plug-in to be able to create KWM themes...
Is there something like that begun or even planned ?
Re:uhhhhh, *drool*...... (Score:1)
Very few people, who have old slow machines update CVS daily, much less recompile E every few minutes. You really don't want to try this on your typical PC, it will drag it down too much.
If your work requires it, you can afford those nice high tech tools.
(Although, they do recommend that you test all of your software reguluarly on the minium supported configuration, it's stupid to waste time on those machines compiling it on them).
olvwm too (Score:1)
One thing I found annoying about olvwm: the way it clears the X selection whenever I raise a window.
My laptop runs Enlightenment though. (It also has more RAM than my desktop Linux box.)
Re:WIll E play nicely with K? (Score:1)
really, and what are your sources of this info. DEA's website? go read some of the work tim leary ph.d did, or john lilly ph.d . their studys seemed to show a INCREASS in intelligence ( defined as finding and communating info. ) these "drugs" seem to also cause a decrease in sanity in those who never think to question their elders ( read MASTERS ), dogma.
now, dont i didnt say that everyone should do them, or that they are "GOOD" for you. cause NOTHING is good all the time.
HINT: think for yourself, get out of the genepool.
nmarshall
#include "standard_disclaimer.h"
R.U. SIRIUS: THE ONLY POSSIBLE RESPONSE
Perl/GTK via O'Reilly (Score:1)
Re:E is a pig; now we know why. (Score:1)
teeheehee... Granted, this isn't any ordinary 486dx2/66, it's got 32megs of parity *60* ns memory, and 2 1.35gig scsi drives. The most surprising thing, is that it still runs fairly well. It's usable. Even transparent window moves arn't too bad as long as it's not a huge window like netscape. Gnome stuff I just leave going, I don't touch it, it doesn't bother me (besides having slashapp) and it all works out good.
Re:Vegemite? Come on. (Score:1)
Re:Where E is heading (Score:1)
Solaris 7 on a 24" monitor (HDTV aspect ratio) - no crashing.
Redhat 6 with the latest kernel on a Dell Latitude - no crashing.
I love E. there are just a couple of things that I could do in fvwm2 that I miss a little bit, but they are minor. I don't have any issues with its stability.
Re:Where E is heading (Score:1)
Re:What bugs me about E... (Score:3)
--
Geoff Harrison (http://mandrake.net)
Senior Software Engineer - VA Linux Labs (http://www.valinux.com)
Re:How many aussies does it take to... (Score:1)
Re:What bugs me about E... (Score:1)
Re:uhhhhh, *drool*...... (Score:1)
Well maybe the dual processors are, though even that is a little much for most.
Certainly, having 3 21" monitors is pretty rare, no matter where you work though.
-Nic
Re:E is a pig; now we know why. (Score:1)
Clear thinking (Score:1)
I'm dismayed by several posts here disparaging these guys as drug-crazed ravers. They seem to be quite rational to me, at least in their talk about the Linux desktop and in the hard work they have already done to bring that about. Various implications that E is not so practical or is necessarily wild and flaky are not true. I'm using the latest CVS version of E, and the new E widgets for desktop settings work well and are simple and attractive - much beter than the grotesquely buggy and memory hogging Gnome control panel or the ugly, kludgy Kde control panel.
Believe it or not, Fvwm2 is also becoming an excellent desktop environment and handles graphics much better than Kde. It's a shame about the ugly default settings for Fvwm2 used by distros like Slackware that turn people off, but fvwm2 can also look *very* good, as good as E without the fancy window borders though. Like E, it can a good desktop shell for launching and managing apps as well as managing windows.
E is on the right track. Fully utilize X at a fairly low level and provide a framework which users can customize (or they can use any one of dozens of very stable, good-looking premade themes) and also provide hooks for Gnome and Kde apps to use.
Only a few window managers today provide anything like this - E, Fvwm2, and Afterstep. These are the only modern window managers that fully take advantage of multiple desktops with multiple pages within each desktop and useful pagers. E and Fvwm2 also allow users to make the desktop look like almost any other desktop, something the NextStep based Window managers can't do because they are limited to squarish, large icons and fixed docks.
Many people do not want all this so they will use something like Icewm or Window Maker or Kwm. That's ok but really the Linux desktop deservers more full featured setups as well - desktop systems which are so overwhelming versatile and beautiful and useful that they *REALLY* impress people coming to Linux from a Windows background, in being so much nicer than the Windows desktop. Already, E provide this.
Kde and Gnome will keep adding bloat. The appearance of the Kde desktop will certainly improve (better icons, better gradients, etc) so that it will look as good as Gtk themes Gnome uses, but neither address the need of a *desktop* manager - which E does address. Really they have no business providing a desktop. They should concentrate on toolikts to build apps and communications between apps (Corba, etc).
Right on Raster and Mandrake !
Re:Vegemite? Come on. (Score:1)
As an ozzzzzztralian (sic), we do get sick of these silly references after a while, and then we start bringing up references to other things about other countries...
Take for instance, this joke(?, perhaps true story)...
A man goes from the US to Canada, and at the border is stopped by customs and asked if he has any guns. The man say no, and is allowed to continue on. On the way back across the border to the US, the customs officers stop him again, and ask the same question, have you got any guns, and again, the man says no. So the customs officers ask him which one he wants......
As for us bringing up other references in regards to other countries, the whinging poms just don't get it, and the kiwis are to busy doing unmentionably things with sheep that we australian have grown thick skin.
Note: Vegemite is no longer Australian, and so being the patriotic person I am, I am going to hold off buying vegemite until Dick Smith releases his Ozziemite to the world.....
Re:Where E is heading (Score:1)
E is beautiful and relatively fast (but by no means as fast at fvwm or windowmaker), but has too many needless features and the development of useful things (pager for one) is too slow.
I wish them both the best of luck, but I'll stick with WM till E is a little better.
Re:E is a pig; now we know why. (Score:1)
Rasterman, Mandrake, and KainX (Score:1)
VA should make them a team and not scatter this awesome collection of talent amongst projects.
Re:"I'm not tempted to drop into bash..." (Score:1)
--
Variety is the best, not the "One True Desktop" (Score:1)
It is an unfortunate aspect of our society that we insist on finding the "best" and the "winner". What is wrong with having different people working on different desktops?
That choice is one of the biggest things that drew me to Linux in the first place.
Baby Duckling Syndrome (Score:1)
See, I was imprinted when I worked for a couple of years on a Sparcstation 2 (that was about 10 years ago) and I am comfortable with the background and menu configuration, etc.. I was overjoyed when I discovered that it had been opened up and came with my Linux distribution - no need to learn somthing strange (like WindowMaker - ick!). I judge my current machine to be just as powerful as the Sparcstation was, at a fraction of the price. :)
If I ever do change WM's it will probably be to convert to E, but it never seems the right time - I guess I'm just a stick-in-the-mud. Maybe when E 1.0 comes out?
--
Not a pig at all (Score:1)
There are some things that don't go quite the way I'd like, but well, that's what the '0' in '0.15' there for.
(I'm not going to mention them here because it is mostly the same old configuration stuff other people have mentioned.)
It irates me when people nitpick about works in progress, especially when they are not putting their own code on the line. Sending a bug fix or a comment by e-mail is one thing. Publically saying "it sucks" when "it" isn't done is just bad form.
(Unless it is a Windows Beta, of course.)
FVWM2 (Score:1)
Fvwm2 has been my favorite wm for some time now. It is becuase of Fvmw2's very powerfull configuration options. It did not look as pretty (until recently) as E, nor do you have the (insane) level of fine grained control. However the Fvwm2 config file (~/.fvwm2rc) is very easy to edit. I find that it is easier to quickly setup the keyboard and mouse controls under Fvmw2 then E.
I currently am using E on Debian (unstable). E is very nice on faster hardware, and I like the direction that it is going. On slower hardware I prefer Fvwm2 as I can configure it to use few resources and still have a look and interface that I like without too much work.
To the other poster: you will find the configuration file "system.fvwm2rc" is decently documented and combined with the man page you can figure out how to do most things.
Re:uhhhhh, *drool*...... (Score:1)
(And maybe an Alpha DS10-alike when they're available..)
True Jealousy (Score:1)
Why bother with window managers indeed (Score:2)
Here's another example - I run windowmaker and kfm, and have a large image library. I use xv to view the images, but since they were taken from my digital camera (go Olympus! woo!), they often end up with non-descriptive names (pic00001.jpg, pic00040.jpg, etc), and yeah, I should rename them, but how often do you organise your paper photos, either? ;) So I use the kfm-feature "show thumbnails" and can browse into a directory and find the single, poorly-named image I want by examining the thumbnails, rather than xv the whole dir and search by hand. Then I can drag it onto my nfs-mounted web directory, and voila- it's there.
So, that's one reason to support desktop environments (or anything that makes operations less cumbersome.) As always, if you don't like it, don't use it.
Re:hoser (Score:1)
Just thought you'd like the know how they are refering to it. not by alcohol content, but by taste.
Re:You're using the wrong tool (Score:1)
Re:Vegemite? Come on. (Score:1)
Re:"new default theme - I love brushed metal" (Score:2)
But Apple didn't really pioneer most of these ideas, this is something that most people tend to mistake. They just happen to be the company that brought a lot of them together. But all of these people stopped short - I don't intend that we will make this same mistake
--
Geoff Harrison (http://mandrake.net)
Senior Software Engineer - VA Linux Labs (http://www.valinux.com)
Re:Where E is heading (Score:2)
--
Geoff Harrison (http://mandrake.net)
Senior Software Engineer - VA Linux Labs (http://www.valinux.com)
Re:Vegemite? Come on. (Score:1)
Astroturf Football?
Field Baseball?
Court Basketball?
Grass Soccer?
Ice hockey.... heh...
It's called 'Hockey'. And yes, it's played on a sheet of ice. Fun game.
Just DARE to say drugs, y'know (Score:1)
That does remind me, however, about an experience I had in 1981 or so. I was tripping, rainbow blotter, and took a notion to spend some time with the original IBM PC BIOS code, a printed copy of which was to be found in the Tech Manual. When I got to the beating heart of the serial handler and discovered that there was no way it could be fooled into being re-entrant, I could actually hear my mind ripping apart, like tearing a head of lettuce in half. I decided that there were more interesting things to do while tripping than look at IBM code, and have since limited the amount of coding I do when on acid. But weed and speed, now--watch out!
Re:E is a pig; now we know why. (Score:1)
Cool (Score:1)
WIll E play nicely with K? (Score:2)
sigh....
has anyone else noticed that this discussion slips really quickly into raver-drug references?
I mean... come on the K desktop with the E manager... hehe... maybe we could get the LSD screensaver....
person1: Hey look, the fireworks on the monitor are great!...
person 2: umm... dude the computer is turned off.....
coincidence in naming? i think not!
Where E is heading (Score:4)
For the secret message, check out the boldface letters. :-)
cya
Ethelred
Re:WIll E play nicely with K? (Score:1)
e;
Re:Vegemite? Come on. (Score:1)
Actually, since I live in the Dallas/Ft. Worth area, I do bring up hockey every time I speak to a Canadian!
After a while, the references do get annoying...
Re:Vegemite? Come on. (Score:1)
Vegemite? Come on. (Score:2)
I mean, we don't bring up hockey when a Canadian does something, or royal family references for English people...
Disclaimer: No, i'm not Australian, i'm actually from Long Island. And i hate it when people go, "Oh, Lawn Guyland?" and think that they're being clever.
Re:E is a pig; now we know why. (Score:1)
K5-75 (malfunctioning one as well, the secondary cache is a goner) w/ 64 meg of RAM
and I've even run it on an Amiga w/ 68060-50 & 32-meg of RAM, so E's not so much of a pig as people think. anyone else ever tried OPTIMIZING the gcc? You'd be suprised how much faster it runs.
Just my 2-beans
Curious (Score:1)
Since you have a good processor and enough ram, maybe it's a video card / X server thing?
uhhhhh, *drool*...... (Score:1)
Raster: my main machine(s) at home and work are dual xeon 450's with 2MB L2 cache per cpu and 512MB ram, 2x21" using 16Mb matrox G200's, 22Gb
SCSI HD each, and the usual SB16 soundcard
Uhhhh, must clean drool off keyboard.
"I'm not tempted to drop into bash..." (Score:1)
> into a directory with a property of "tar zxvf -C
> . %f" - gee -
Is entering "tar zxvf -C %f" in a properties box really easier than typing it on a commandline?
> we do cool stuff - Linux looks cooler -
> their Linux hardware sells more
See, VA Research makes money selling the base system so they fund basic system development. But there's only so much you can do with a window manager and a bunch of system utilities. How do you make them fund application development?
E working with KDE (Score:2)
--
Geoff Harrison (http://mandrake.net)
Senior Software Engineer - VA Linux Labs (http://www.valinux.com)
Re:"I'm not tempted to drop into bash..." (Score:1)
The point is to have it all set up and such so that you don't HAVE to go to the commandline for most stuff. I'm not advocating removing the commandline, I'm saying simple things should have simple methods of getting done
--
Geoff Harrison (http://mandrake.net)
Senior Software Engineer - VA Linux Labs (http://www.valinux.com)
ewww.... (Score:2)
you probably have and dont know it. Alcohol, Caffeine, sugar all alter mood and perceptions.
and truthfully, alcohol is one of the most vile substances known to man, yet it is legal....
and about coding in an altered state of mind... you really ought to try it some time. sometimes you need a little help thinking about things in new and unusual ways... ever try to debug a graph based branch and bound algorithm written in some of the most obfuscated c that you've ever seen? it gets alot easier when you have help looking at things from a diferent perspective.
Face it --- This is really how code gets written. at least good, creative code. coding is much more of an art than a science. people tend to forget that, and try to force good code into a nice business-y type structure with protocols and all that... and unfortunately, you get suit-code. no creativity, horrible user interfaces, and no new solutions to problems.
basically, you need to expand your minsd a little bit. drugs are not "evil". most of the "facts" that are spread are blatant misrepresentation of facts.
try to expand your mind a bit. you will be able to look at life from a different perspective. Probably a much, much better perspective.
Re:E is a pig; now we know why. (Score:1)
1. It is amazing the amount of configuration you can do...finally a computer that looks (and operates) the way I like it...there is much joy in having a fly desktop
2. the amount of pain that came from trying to get it to run right after installing linux for the first time...I think I gained more knowledge about just by trying to make it all work
Now all I need is the SGI 540 to run it on
Re:uhhhhh, *drool*...... (Score:1)
--
Geoff Harrison (http://mandrake.net)
Senior Software Engineer - VA Linux Labs (http://www.valinux.com)
Re:"I'm not tempted to drop into bash..." (Score:1)
unzipping scheme would work. At some point someone will
need to specify that unzipping or untarring needs to take place.
This is not necessarily as trivial as assigning a property to a
directory: consider disk spanning for zipped files.
Re:moo (Score:1)
Re:Funding Apps (Score:1)
I wonder about E the wm versus E the desktop (Score:1)
I feel sooooo relieved now that CVS E-0.16 has a pager. Before, E required the gnome panel to run the gnome pager and it was unbearable--- I went back to fvwm for a while. (It goes without saying that a pager is absolutely necessary.) The memory footprint of E-0.16 with a pager is smaller than that of the pager-applet alone (not counting the panel or anything!) GNOME-free and happy about all those extra cycles.
I have the feeling that I will be using E-16 for a long time--- it does everything I want now. Alt-TAB for focus switch on each desktop area (fvwm couldn't do that), transients get focus from parents (if you want) so you can alt-f in netscape, type and do not have to use the mouse to move the cursor, etc... Oh yeah, and you can make it look however you want.
Now my point---I wonder whether I will use E once it has a filemanager and DND and all the fixins to be CLI-free? I mean, I love E because it's trim and flexible. That could feasibly change soon. Maybe I'm the minority, but I don't want to use a filemanager and so I don't want one running. Yeah, I think the parser for the config-files might need some work and the config-dialogs are great, but a file-manager?
Anyway, best to you both. You may be happy to know that it's raining in Raleigh-Durham right now.
Re:Where E is heading (Score:1)
All I want is a window manager that doesn't crash, easy to configure, has all the basic features (pager, auto-raise etc). I've yet to find it. They all have their wierdness and instabilities. Tried E, fvwm2, scwm. I'm hoping scwm will start to stabilise soon and go with that.
Re:I wonder about E the wm versus E the desktop (Score:2)
that's one of the great things about E is the ability to turn off all the crap you don't want to deal with
now, that being said, in CVS there's always some transitional periods (like the iconbox right now) that happen. but then again when we do the release-a-day thing like CVS that's the kinda thing you're willing to put up with
--
Geoff Harrison (http://mandrake.net)
Senior Software Engineer - VA Linux Labs (http://www.valinux.com)
Re:True Jealousy (Score:1)
I have to debug stupid stinking problems in Windows code written by idiots who were trusted with a really large and complex architecture... (whine, whine)
I wish *I* could hack kewl user interfaces on a great OS and get paid for it!-)
heh.
Re:SCWM gets unnoticed again (as most configurable (Score:1)
Erik -- journey
Re:Why so long between releases? (Score:1)
That's one way of looking at it. However, remember that a large percentage of people access the net from work rather than home. My last 3 companies have all blocked CVS at the firewall level, and I (like many others) don't have enough bandwidth at home to get the entire E tree via CVS -- remember also that free local calls are rare outside the US. With regular releases, I can download them at work and burn them onto a CD to take home. That isn't possible at the moment with CVS.
Re:Vegemite? Come on. (Score:1)
And yeh, we are world champions in Hockey, and yeh, I love vegemite too
Re:Vegemite? Come on. (Score:1)
Seriously though, vegemite/dingo/whatever jokes don't really have much impact. I think americans should watch more aussie tv to see what we're like (and then apply the same degree of scepticism as you do to your own tv).
F.
--
make clean; make love --without-war
Re:E is a pig; now we know why. (Score:1)
quick, but cetainly usable. If I were to load Windoze on to this box with themes and stuff, it would die. I can build E on this box in the time it takes to have a good crap.
Surely you're not stupid enough to think these guys don't test on run-of-the-mill boxes? Have a look at the source for E; these guys know what they're doing. If I were you, I'd be looking at tuning my configuration before flaming the performance of E. Given the serious use of pixmaps etc. I think it smokes
Ciao
Re:E is a pig; now we know why. (Score:1)
A beauty, and fast. Disabling sound support was the key for me
Now I'm updating from CVS on a daily basis and since E installed uses only 1Mb of diskspace if you remove all the themes you don't want, I'm going to put it on my laptop too
--Tim
Re:Vegemite? Come on. (Score:1)
normal hockey is still played on a green field
(and I think australia is worldchampion)
Re:E working with KDE (Score:2)
Re:E is a pig; now we know why. (Score:3)
--
Geoff Harrison (http://mandrake.net)
Senior Software Engineer - VA Linux Labs (http://www.valinux.com)
Re:E is a pig; now we know why. (Score:2)
--
Geoff Harrison (http://mandrake.net)
Senior Software Engineer - VA Linux Labs (http://www.valinux.com)
Funding Apps (Score:2)
Why so long between releases? (Score:2)
I noticed that Mandrake is reading comments, so I figured I'd throw out this question. Oh wait.. maybe I just answered my question. Get back to work, man!
p.s. I have no idea why this defaults to a score of 2.
Re:WIll E play nicely with K? (Score:1)
su -c 'ln -s
Re:E working with KDE (Score:1)
E and general Linux app question (Score:1)
Re:"I'm not tempted to drop into bash..." (Score:1)
Well, E has no problems running on the 4-color grayscale Sun box I have here. It's not pretty, but it works.
As for Gimp in 16-colors - why?!? For Gimp to be useful, it has to be able to render a graphic at least somewhat realistically, and that's just not possible with 16-colors (esp. as I suspect that by 16 color you mean VGA, which has an unchangeable palette). It would be like driving blindfolded, unless your were only trying to create a 16-color graphic - in which case Gimp is the wrong tool.
Re:"I'm not tempted to drop into bash..." (Score:2)
actually it is. example.
i create my download directoty - i set the properties action once and once only on creation
(tar zxvf -C %w %f) or select this property from a list of provided templates.
hence forth whenever i drag a tarball onto that directory instead of being copied or moved it getas untared in that dir. so henceforth we have a "smart directory" that will untar for me with a simple drag & drop.
you could extend this idea from this simple task to quite complex ones with powerful shell scripts or utilities - example:
you have freinds or people you work with who you exchange files with all the time - BUT you do it via mail with the dada uuencoded. easy.
create a directory called "Friend" or whatever - set the drop action to be:
uuencode "%f" | mail friend@work.com -s "%f"
bingo - every file i drop on this dir gets uuencoded and mailed to my friend. sending a file to them has now become a single drag and drop action. use your imagination to make this feature work FOR you. it's one of the things i have planned asa "i must have this" feature.
Re:"I'm not tempted to drop into bash..." (Score:1)
Re:E working with KDE (Score:1)
have you ever heard of "CHOICE" or "FREE WILL"
well, i am glad i don't live in your perfect little world where people only do things "good enough" to make you happy, then move on to something else that you want.
Re:What bugs me about E... (Score:1)
or patch one to do your work.
why do you keep on posting crap about people not doing what you want? do you pay anyone of these guys for their time? i though so, then shut up and go back to playing your stupid games somewhere else.
Maybe another try, then? (Score:1)
Anything E does, it always does.
-russ
new to E (Score:1)
I just wanted to say that the E developers have done a great job
Mike
Re:I wonder about E the wm versus E the desktop (Score:1)
Aha. Good to know. Right-- of course I won't have to use it. I just got nervous at the end of the interview when Raster said
Anyway, even if I don't use a filemanager, I think emacs as a widget in E could be neat---I always have emacs running :)
Re:E and general Linux app question (Score:2)
Re:WIll E play nicely with K? (Score:1)
Re:Where E is heading (Score:1)
I've seen the screenshots and I think they look really cool. I'll probably try E again when I get a dual Pentium III/500 like they have.
D
----
What bugs me about E... (Score:2)
Re:"I'm not tempted to drop into bash..." (Score:1)
Re:E is a pig; now we know why. (Score:1)
Thanks for your statements. I wonder why you bother however. Most people here are pretty hard headed and will believe what they want to believe.
I think, E has gone through some outstanding changes. The one thing I would like to see is good documentation. You've gotten E to be very configurable, but you really need to give decent documention take advantage of it. Otherwise, people spend large amounts of time trying to understand and configure E.
My two cents.
sri