Super Shielded PC Cases 68
mvw sent us an amusing link
for the super paranoid.
These cases
claim to be all shielded, all filtered, and emit none of the
stuff those snoopers like to listen to. Plus it looks like
it could be dropped from a low flying jet and keep ticking.
This is nothing new (Score:1)
A quick search of IBM's patent server service revealed several interesting patents:
The best source of tempest info is this: http://www.eskimo.com/~joelm/tempest.html
And for protecting yourself from EMP interference or doing it yourself, http://www.eff.org/pub/Privacy/Security/tempest_m
and
http://jya.com/emp.htm
HERE is a really interesting company: http://www.codexdatasystems.com/
real TEMPEST (Score:1)
Re:Magpulse... (Score:2)
All of the lines are filtered. If you are using approved cables, they are heavily shielded as well. (If you're not using approved cables, you've defeated the point of the case anyway). Since the point of the setup is not EMP protection, it all really depends on how over-designed it is.
If it's milspec, I'll give it better than average odds.
LCDs are not TEMPEST safe (Score:2)
Another problem is that the video port emmits TEMPEST, the video cable (even the shielded ones) emmit radiation, and the power outlet that the display is plugged into emmits radiation.
The only real solution is to purchase certified TEMPEST equipment.
Re:Yes! It's Black! (Score:1)
So I'm not the only one that thought WOPR (from WarGames) was the damndest cool-looking computer ever?
(Okay, so it wasn't black, but it was definitely sinister-looking
Re:EM not the only way (Score:2)
That is a good way to do it. Syncing with the signal isn't too hard, it's just like the vertical and horizontal hold knobs on an old TV. With a little more sophistication, the horizontal and vertical; blanking can be analyzed for automated synching (but why bother, it's easy enough).
Air of Legitimacy (Score:1)
In my stint in the USAF, we used something very simular to these for secure data transfer (the data transfer bit used STU-III units). The difference between those pictured and what I remember was the drive area was covered by two swinging "doors". I'm thinking what is pictured is an earlier model.
These things were HEAVY. Obviously designed with more rugged services in mind (seemed more USA than USAF). They had wire mesh shielding along all contact poits (top of case, the aforementioned doors, etc). The idea is to direct all errant signal to ground instead of inadvertantly broadcasting them to whoever might be able to listen.
They were also woefully behind the times - when 486DX4s were going against the first Pentiums, we had a 386. They worked fine for their task. But man, were they slow.
I wouldn't be suprised t find out that these puppies are military surplus.
Re:Magpulse... (Score:1)
So? (Score:1)
Of course these computers are safe... (Score:1)
"Um boss" "Yes?"
"We can't scan his machine." "Why not?"
"Our tools won't run on his machine! They require a Pentium III! He's got a 386!"
"Sneaky Bastard!"
Military == ugly? (Score:1)
For non classified information, I'd still buy that cutie 1U Penguin rackable box I seen a banner for on slashdot lately. (I have no links to the compagny, but their site is worth visiting, their servers look really sexy). Maybe on the adfu page you can find their banner
How would you secure output? (Score:1)
Them things is FUGLY (Score:1)
Dirk
Full of it... (Score:2)
Christopher A. Bohn
Anybody notice that... (Score:1)
Re:So? (Score:1)
Greetings,
TEMPEST isn't the only way (Score:2)
Anyway, one of their escapades was to insert a pair of microphones either in the room with or directly inside a typewriter keyboard. From the sounds recorded this way they could reproduce what the typist was typing. Sort of a low-tech (high-tech at the time!) implementation of a TEMPTEST-like scheme.
If you can find it try reading the book. It starts off as a fairly good read and reveals some of the real way espionage agencies can get information. The writing style deteriorates later on (fired the ghost writer or hired a different ghost writer?)
Re:So? (Score:1)
Err... (Score:1)
For those of us less paranoid, make sure that your case is closed. See them little metal springy thingies that are along the seams? Don't lose them. They keep the PC in FCC spec. Don't leave any rear IO fillers out either. Not only is it bad for airflow, but it lets EM radiation out too.
woah (Score:1)
---------------------------(
Re:Anybody notice that... (Score:1)
Steve
Top X Things A Super Shielded PC Case Doubles As (Score:2)
1) Bomb Shelter
2) Garbage can for AOL 30 Day Trial CDs.
3) Office cot.
4) A nifty hat. Come on, you know you've been tempted!
5) Really expensive paperweight.
6) Something else to spill coffee on.
7) Bulletin board.
8) Dildo.
9) Something else to throw out the window and watch go "kerplunk".
10) A new comfy home for the hamster that runs everything by wheel power.
11) A superfast, top of the line, totally dedicated working environment for reloading
Re:Military == ugly? (Score:1)
.
.
News for nerds? (Score:1)
---
Re:Now if they just made quiet cases! (Score:1)
pananoia ? (Score:1)
Is there really any point to these 'beasts' ? I know that there are reasons to encrypt data, and that MI5 sand-blast their hard drives after use, but surely there must be a limit...
Re:How would you secure output? (Score:1)
Andrew
Re:Dated Components (Score:1)
Re:Magpulse... (Score:2)
That's a good start. The pairs should also run inside a shield grounded to the case. Not too hard to construct.
Re:Soft Tempest (Score:1)
On the issue of the case, it is almost exactly the opposite of what I need! My perfect case might have some of these qualities:
1) Ultra-light frame
2) Maximum internal size versus frame size
3) Quicklock removable case - to access the insides in a hurry, while closing quickly for transport (no more combing the carpet for a screw)
4) Case handles for easy luggability
5) built in CD Rack
etc.
anyone else care to contribute?
Re:So? (Score:2)
"Ruggedized" systems (Score:1)
More info at: http://chs2.gte.com/product.htm [gte.com]
Dated Components (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:So? (Score:1)
You'll have to use wireless
Soft Tempest (Score:2)
[1] UK, not Massachusetts, thank you.
Re:Anybody notice that... (Score:1)
I remember these. (Score:1)
Yes! It's Black! (Score:2)
Metal cases, and they even painted it BLACK! I had to wipe away a tear of joy. Black equipment is always the best. Why do you think people were really interested in the NeXT cube? It wasn't really because of the software; they just pretended to like Nextstep later, after the cubes stopped being made. (Had to rationalize.)
Oh.. and why do I use a USR Courier instead of a Sportster? Duh. Because it's black, of course. There's nothing more sinister-looking than a dark brooding Courier, with its row of hellish-looking red LEDs flashing.
Of course, I used to use a black Micropolis drive, but it died, and now I use silver-white Quantum. Oh well, no theory is perfect.
As for the metal cases.... I don't really care about shielding; I just like heavy metal computers. Yep. Like IBM keyboards ... *drool* .. oh, don't get me started on IBM keyboards.
A monochrome monitor??? (Score:1)
Hey people, does anyone know how hard it is to pick up signals from an LCD monitor? I figured they are low-powered and would require completely different equipment to pick up an any signals it could put out. But I don't believe it puts out any signals. Thoughts?
Later
Erik Z
Re:Magpulse... (Score:1)
Tempest PC == IBM Aptiva (Score:1)
The funny part is, it is an IBM Aptiva with a new sticker pasted on the front of it. Apparently, you don't need to use a two-inch-thick, lead-lined case for TEMPEST after all.....
Interesting Link... (Score:1)
Re:Military == ugly? (Score:1)
Guess it IS in the eye of the beholder. : )
Re:News for nerds? (Score:1)
Re:Yes! It's Black! (Score:1)
But it did look so great. A pity they won't let me do that with my office PC.
Re:LCDs are not TEMPEST safe (Score:1)
the perfect system would not have any display device at all.
--
Very Amusing... (Score:1)
CONSTITUTES AN EXPRESS CONSENT TO MONITORING AT ALL TIMES." and then some other blurb in the same vein... And then an "AGREED" button.
I did not click it, fearing of course that the NSA or suchlike would be taking my pc's to bits (well, more to bits) within the hour... but then the page automatically agreed for me after 30s.
Nice
Re:Don't drop one on your foot! (Score:1)
Owch...
Re:Military == ugly? (Score:1)
Ahhh, but therein lies the beauty of it-- one hundred percent functional design, and absolutely top-of-the-line quality construction. Unlike most consumer products, which are built as cheaply as possible, and usually with the help of "product designers" to make them more palatable to mainstream consumer tastes. Ugh. (Ever seen the interior of a Ford lately?)
It's kind of like UNIX versus Windows, when you think about it. After all, what some might consider ugly, in the aesthetic sense, may be technically beautiful to those in the know
EM not the only way (Score:1)
i.e. We don't care where the electron beam is pointing, it is just illuminating (or not) one pixel at a time. So feed the light (any light, reflected or otherwise) from the room into something which chops it up at the right frequency (which is presumably one of a small number of standard ones) and you're away.
Whilst a windowless room should be proof against this (as long as you black out the gap under the door
[And yes, I know light is also electromagnetic radiation. By 'EM' I mean the stuff which a Faraday cage is hoping to ground out. Sorry if this is insufficiently pedantic.]
Now if they just made quiet cases! (Score:1)
Re:News for nerds? (Score:1)
Their is nothing my cats like better than batting at dangling cables and chewing cables (they're brain damaged I swear sometimes)
Re:A monochrome monitor??? (Score:1)
Re:Dated Components (Score:1)
besides those old 386 cases were as tough and heavy as hell anyway, would most likely survive a bomb blast anyway...and for nuclear blast..well the operator would not be alive to use it anyway. Who even puts a case on their computer?
Whoa, I got bad gramma.
Bah, you call that armor? (Score:1)
Being dropped from a height of 1.5 meters.
a power surge which fried a power strip.
being run with a tesla coil next to it. (for fun! Made it reset, but no other damage)
Lets see this spy-tech computer do that!
"Remember, it's not falling out the airplane that kills you. It's the sudden STOP!"