Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Unix Operating Systems Software

W. Richard Stevens Passes On 266

Tybstar writes "Looks like W. Richard Stevens has passed on, according to this Deja article. The poster of that article is listed in the credits of UNIX Network Programming, and the book mentions his place of work. " Thanks to mpearce, we have a link to an obituary. It's weird to think that just yesterday I almost bought one of his books...
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

W. Richard Stevens Passes On

Comments Filter:
  • Whether you agreed with him or not, the man knew his stuff and was Unix to the bone.

    Maybe in tribute, we can all pour a Jolt (or caffeinated beverage of choice) on the sidewalk in his honor. :)

  • by Anonymous Coward
    Dude, you need help. You may not realize it, but it's obvious to everyone else that you are disturbed in ways that require professional help to sort out. You can do yourself a favor by admitting that you have a problem. At that point, a mental-health crisis hotline could probably refer you to an appropriate practitioner. This sort of thing is usually covered by health insurance policies, so you really have nothing to lose (and a lot to gain) by seeking help.

  • I wonder if Richard Steven's family would agree to keep his wonderful Kohala [kohala.com] website permanently open as a tribute?

  • You don't. You live by your own words and actions. Frankly, I wished you'd signed all your posts so the rest of the world would know what a fool you are. May your demise be met not with the hatred you've shown here, but complete apathy.
  • Only you would be dumb enough to actually stick to strict syntax w/ a /. sig. I know a single char is an int (0x4d is the ASCII value for "M", which you apparently didn't know). I KNOW this won't really work. But you get the general idea. This is where that "imagination" (Geez. A man is (apparently) dead, and we're arguing over which one of us is stupider. Get a life.

  • Only you would be dumb enough to actually stick to strict syntax w/ a /. sig. I know a single char is an int (0x4d is the ASCII value for "M", which you apparently didn't know). I KNOW this won't really work. But you get the general idea. This is where that "imagination" (<- look! a string! this _would_ be a pointer) thing I spoke of comes into play. Unfortunately, spending too much time coding has killed yours.

    Geez. A man is (apparently) dead, and we're arguing over which one of us is stupider. Get a life.

  • And no right to life, free-speech or work for anti-anti-perl-bigot-bigots either, while we're at it?

    There's a reason you're hiding being an Anonymous Coward shield.

    Being an elitist zealot may impress your mad-hacker-script-kiddie friends on IRC, but a point comes at which you have to realize a person for their humanity and not their superfluous opinions on technology.

    The guy wasn't fond of Perl -- it wasn't like he was encouraging slave-labor in Indonesia or funding slave-trading and supplying nuclear arms to third-world nations.

    The open-source movement, if nothing else, is an effort to recognize the value of differing opinions, needs, thoughts, and the strength of humanity -- so show some.
    ---
    icq:2057699
    seumas.com

  • Slashdot is not full of Linux bigots. Most of us (AFAIK) are extremely contented Linux users that use it because we (*gasp*) like it. Slashdot has a very few but extremely noisy Linux bigots.
  • People loved this guy. I know I did. NOBODY wrote like he did. Hell, he wrote like he fscking INVENTED the internet, PERSONALLY. He knew this stuff that well.
    You know a person is beloved when...
    Speculation that his death might be a hoax emerges.
    Iconoclasts start pissing on them right away.
    Our microcephalic AC's have actually heartened me this day. They bolster Stevens' greatness all the more.
    I will, however keep an eye out for him at my local 7-11. Ya just never know...
  • yikes! i cant belive i just saw that!
  • My copies of "Advanced Programming in the Unix Environment" and "UNIX Network Programming" are well worn from years of use. I have only the highest esteem for Mr. Stevens, truly a giant
    among technical authors.
  • ...what's wrong with saying 'died'?

    Nick

  • by craw ( 6958 ) on Saturday September 04, 1999 @11:10AM (#1704118) Homepage
    When somebody passes away, you should either speak of the good things about him/her, or otherwise keep your mouth shut. With that in mind, I would like to quote from his last book. This was in the preface.

    I produced camera-ready copy of the book (PostScript), which was then typeset for the final book. The formatting system used was James Clark's wonderful groff package, on a SparcStation running Solaris 2.6. (Reports of troff's death are greatly exagerated.) I typed in all 138,897 words using the vi editor, created the 72 illustrations using the gpic program (using many of Gary Wright's macros), produced the 35 tables using the gtbl program, performed all the indexing (using a set of awk scripts written by Jon Bentley and Brian Kernighan), and did the final page layout. Dave Hanson's loom program, the GNU indent program, and some scripts by Gary Wright were used to include the 8,046 lines of C source code in the book.

    I just had a big smile on my face after I first read this. Stevens was Unix to the very core.

  • Advanced Programming in the Unix Environment, Unix Network Programming, and especially his TCP/IP series are all brilliant: clearly written, filled with examples, and packed with information.

    My condolences to his family. Through his books he made a deep contribution to the future of the Internet.

  • by zairius ( 54221 )
    I can't but help feel a loss... I have a well used
    copy of Unix Network Programming and was looking at his TCP/IP book just the other day.

    John Casey

    p.s. I can't but help feel people are now going to list all the books they own that he wrote
  • by Anonymous Coward
    Most moderators have a finite number of points, and really shouldn't be wasting them on assholes like this. (I've personally already blown 3 of my five points on him.) At the very least, we need another category for crap like this, something that completely deletes a post from existing, if 3 or more moderators decide on it (to prevent abuses). I tend to keep my alignment at 0 or -1 because there are a few good comments that get moderated down there, but nobody should have to put up with this crap.
  • Regardless of what he thought about Linux and/or Perl, he was a very influential person on the Linux/*BSD scene, even though he was not an actual Linux/*BSD coder - his books have taught a lot of 'real' techies much of what they know about system calls and networking. Ya' don't see writers like him everyday, or every year.

    The torch isn't going to be passed for a long time, folks.

    -Chad,

    Rather disusted by a lot of the posts, even some which weren't lowered to -1.

  • Some things in life matter more than being able to download the source to a web server.
  • oh you noble person you, you've found your cause in this world. There's more to this world than whether someone likes or dislikes perl/java/gtk/qt/windows/linux/de-caff/caffeinated /blue/red/etc. etc. etc. I am VERY glad that you've found your niche in this world though, because I'm sure you'll do lots of good, and we'll all benefit from your contributions to society.
  • Uhh...Maybe he was on the other side from you, but it's still not good that he died. Sheesh. Engaging an intelligent person with opposing opinions in thoughful debate is a more productive than anything else.

    Yeesh!

    -awc
  • I see, you're in a bad mood, so you get to ruin everybody else's Slashdot experience. I'm sorry you didn't want to see people grieve over the death of someone they respected. Maybe when your mom dies or something you'll get some condolence cards describing how everybody wants to jizz on her face. Won't that be nice?

    And I'm glad you've made some of the highest-ranked AC posts ever. That really makes you a good person. Or, more likely, you really know how to suckup to the moderators. Congratulations.
  • I was in the textbook section of Barnes & Noble on 18th and 5 Avenue here in NYC last Friday looking at his books. This is a great place to see what books the professionals use. There was a large stack of new and used copies of his Advanced Programming ITUE book. This to me indicates they sell and sell and sell. Of course the number of copies I see every day at the large Unix based companies I work at is another clue. A great man, and a great loss, but not a disaster - the books remain and clearly a lot of people were touched by his spirit as well and will keep his memory alive.

    Chris Morgan
  • Where do these ideas come from. Movies? Books? Television news? Certainly not from experience.

    Could it be true that people become computer geeks because they are antisocial? Some of these postings certainly suggest it.

    More than likely it's that there are assholes in any cross section of the population and this guy is one of them.
  • He's been active participant of tcpip usenet
    discussion group. I've received some very
    useful responses from him.

    I've met him once in Boston, about 6 years ago.
    He gave a presentation on IPv6 with an emphasis
    on programming perspective. It was very
    informative.

    As I'm writing this message, two of his books -
    TCP/IP illustrated, and Unix network programming
    sit on my desk.

    News of his death simply blew my mind.
  • If I were to die unexpectedly, I'd probably still be logged in, too. The only time I'm logged out is when I reboot... :)

    ------
  • Chris Siegler wrote:
    "I just wish I'd written and thanked him a long time ago. RIP."

    Very sad news. Stevens put a lot of himself into his books -- read
    Prentice-Hall's interview with him, linked on his site. Stevens talks
    about how he writes his books, and what his ideals are in that respect.
    I took the opportunity to express my appreciation while visiting his
    site recently; I'm glad I did.

    ************************************************ **
    From: rstevens@kohala.com (W. Richard Stevens)
    Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 01:13:45 -0700


    [In your message of Aug 31, 8:06pm you write:]
    > The bottom line is that your books are in my experience the best
    > available -- I'm thinking of APUE, TCPIP Illustrated (v1 is all I've
    > read of it), and UNP (I see v2 is out now -- I'll order it tomorrow!) I
    > thoroughly enjoy reading your books; it's sort of a geek communion. :-)

    Many, many thanks.

    Rich Stevens
    ************************************************ **
  • This is a sad, sad day for Slashdot.
  • Stevens was a wonderful writer that had a real
    knack for getting tough technical points across
    in easy to understand language. His books have
    been a big help to me over the years and I own
    a ton of them. They are worth every penny I paid
    for them. I think the computer industry just lost
    a wonderful teacher today.

    You'll be missed..

    As for slashdot... WTF is going on with this
    place lately??? Anyone notice over the past few
    weeks that the number of A$$holes has increased
    10 fold? This article is about a great mans death
    and you F%ckheads have to consume over 100 posts
    bashing each other back and forth? "Suck my dick,
    Fuck you, No Fuck you" etc..etc..etc.
    I can live with the first post morons..
    And even tolerate the occassional wacko. But
    recently its exploded. IF YOU DONT HAVE ANYTHING
    CONSTRUCTIVE TO ADD, STOP TYPING PLEASE! Your
    wasting all our bytes. Dam.. I gotta change my
    preferences... sheesh

    Flame all ya want.. I am sure ya will..

    Anyway.. Mr. Stevens you will be missed by many of
    us.

    Malice95
  • Linux was huge in 1990.
  • /. should mark down all posts from the same IP once moderated. this idiotic anonymous coward is trolling here with an inifinte supply of postings.
  • That was, indeed, a refreshing reprive from the flame-fodder that usually pollutes this site. You speak with both eloquence and truth, and I lament only not having said these things before you. Thank you, sir.


    From a Sun Microsystems bug report (#4102680):
  • Worst discussion ever read on Slashdot :-(
  • While I do not agree with this moron that you replied to, I must comment that Slashdot is written in Perl. I find it quite useful.
  • His contributions to the UNIX and Internet communities are immeasurable.

    --
    Insanity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change

  • Someone very respected has died. His books have become an indispensible resource to anyone developing under Unix. His family is, without, agrieved to see this happen. So what happens on Slashdot? Every single sad, disrespectful cretin comes rolling out of the woodwork. I'm disgusted by the lack of respect too many of us have shown the man. I am equally disgusted by the attitude of a minority of the readers of Slashdot who have chosen to decry this man not because of things he did in his life, but because he did not fully share our viewpoint on OpenSource, GNU/Linux, and many other issues. He did not have to write the books he did, but he did so none the less. I sincerely doubt that his family would like to read some of the things that have been posted here today. Some of you have seen fit to celebrate his death as another gain for our community. It is no such thing.

    As long as our community speaks out with such depravity and immaturity, even such a small minority, it will not receive respect many of us desire, and have worked for. The events last week with Unisys (a company whose policies many of us, rightly, disagree with), and many other times, here on Slashdot, the usenet, the web, and in other forums will continue to harm us. Until we choose to grow up and cease our continues flaming, we will not achieve our goals. Grow up people, this is not a religion, this is not a war. This is about debating our ideals and achieving our goals in a mature, productive, fashion. Instead of sending filthy, offensive emails to everyone you don't agree with, sit down, pick a project, and get to work on it. Or start a project of your own to address a need or shortcoming in Linux, or something you think would be pretty cool. That is what RMS, Linux, ESR, and the rest have been fighting for. That is what we all, I hope, believe in.
  • we moderators ran outta points. the AC has an inifnite supply of postings. more points rob..puh-lease.
  • I apologize in advance for several typos in this post. Change Linux in the second to the last sentence of the post to Linus. Also, change "His family is, without, agrieved" to "His family is agrieved". Sorry about that.
  • I had no idea he was a pilot. This man could
    reach two major dreams of my life- be a networking
    specialist and be a pilot.
    RIP, great man, shine your light upon the
    coming generations.
  • I remember the first time I met him. HIs latest book had just come out and I had spied it. I didn't even notice he was there, but I just exclaimed right there, "oh man, this book is out, I love this book!" Out of no where, I heard a voice that said, "Thank you". And there he was larger than life. I talked to him for a couple of minutes, talking about his book and ipv6. He was so pleasant. He even autographed my book! I'll never forget the man, and now his 2nd edition Network programming book will be one of the most precious books in my collection.

    Good bye Richard, I hope you are at peace. The world will grieve your loss and the contributions you might have made.

    sri
  • One bad thing about /. : if you don't get here when a story is posted, then you usually miss out, because 9 times out of 10 whatever possible link there was (his homepage) is /.'d within minutes.
  • No, I have found AC posting can be useful except that we now have a bandwidth hijacker gone postal and carpet bombing the posts. Let's say if his identity could be tracked down within a few hundred miles, I might visit the knucklehead or his peers and ask what's up. I would imagine he would be sure to retaliate if he could.

    This is like someone showing up at a funeral and spitting on the grave while others who wish to look at the contributions of a person. Its distracting and makes me think about what could make a person so detatched.
  • by Rick Richardson ( 87058 ) on Sunday September 05, 1999 @02:02PM (#1704163) Homepage
    I had a nice email convo with Rich just after
    TCP/IP Illustrated came out. We both attended
    University of Michigan and both used the MTS
    in the early 70's.

    Here's a piece of the email convo to demonstrate
    just the kind of guy Rick was...

    > As a troff die-hard myself (I'm the author of the JetRoff
    > laserjet backend for ditroff), this raised my curiosity
    > to a such a level that I had to write. You use troff
    > so well in this book that I wonder, would it be possible
    > to get the actual troff, tbl, pic, whatever source for
    > say the first couple of chapters, just for my own
    > personal education and gratification? I'd love to see
    > how camera ready troff is written for an actual book.

    Hi. I've seen your name for years in the troff newsgroups. Didn't
    you used to be in New Jersey?

    Here's a shar file for Chapters 2 and 3, along with their pic files.
    I also use lots of shell scripts and awk programs to automate things.
    For example, the automatic numbering of figures and the like is done
    using awk. Rather than try to explain what it all does, take a look
    and just ask questions if you have any. I use the -ms macros, with
    numerous additions of my own, and a little tinkering. Troff comments
    "foo" are where I put in page breaks at the end--I normally put in
    each page break by hand when doing the page layout. All the .ix
    macros are also index entries that I put in by hand at the end.

    Naturally, please don't redistribute these files at all. Also, thanks
    for the kind words about the book--glad you enjoy it and find it useful.

    Rich Stevens
  • In my nearly two decades of habitation upon the Arpanet and its descendents, never before have I ever had the misfortune to witness so distressing a thread of messages as these. This unspeakably sickening invective against so kind a man, a man whom most of you never even knew, can have no other effect than to boggle the mind, wound the heart, and taint the soul with a nauseous stench.

    Rich was always gentleman: pleasant, helpful, and courteous. Despite his fame and his skill, no prima donna was he. He was never bitter nor spiteful, never arrogant nor condescending. His humor and his insights inspired many of us, and not merely in our programming.

    In the last few years that I came to know Rich a bit better as we shared a meal at random conferences scattered about the globe, I was always impressed by his irrepentantly positive attitude. Whatever the tale he told, whether a personal one relating to his children or his delightful rediscovery of the piano, a professional one related to programming and computers, or simply some incidental anecdote, that tale he presented with a childlike delight and glee. Rich displayed a perpetually positive attitude rare in a man even half his age. He was uplifting merely to be around.

    Never was I so honored as on that day when Rich lamented not bringing his Perl Cookbook with him so he could get my autograph on it. I was deeply touched and completely surprised. Rich is acknowledged in the credits for his indirect help in preparing that book from our discussions of troff and systems programming matters. Despite his good taste and obvious skill, he had been for some time using Perl for various daily jobs. It's true that Rich had minor issues with Perl's cleanliness, but these were subsumed by the practical concerns of simply getting a job done easily and quickly. In short, it worked and he used it, and he was thankful it saved him time. The very things that the HTML crowd find hardest with Perl -- its Unix roots and proclivities -- Rich found immediately familiar and obvious. I am proud that I had ever so small a part in helping out a man who had tremendously helped me and thousands of others.

    It is with nothing less than complete shock and surpassing shame that I have read here what so many insensitive malcontents have cruelly and unjustly scrawled. Doubtless these are the same twisted perverts who torture kittens and kick pregnant mothers, a sickness upon this medium and this planet. I hope these sociopaths find help soon, or at least remove themselves from the company of men and the gene pool.

    Forget not this one inescapable fact: that where Rich has gone, so too inexorably goes each and every one of you walking shadows, and tragically sooner than you dare fathom. May you be remembered in the same measure as have you remembered those who preceded you down that lonesome path to dusty death.

    It does not take a particularly compassionate and sensitive person to be sickened and hurt by these inexpressibly horrible postings. It takes nothing but a decent and caring human being, the sort of which we seem to have so few of these days--and today, to our loss, one fewer.

  • Disclaimer: I can't figure out how to post directly on a story, only on someone else's comment. I picked this one cuz I thought it was nice and expressed itself coherently.

    I think people need to step back somewhat from the perspective-draining provincialism that has been seen here on the various postings. I'll admit to complete ignorance of this man's positive or negative attributes. I never even heard of him till I read this. I didn't know ANYTHING about him, only that he was techical enough to have Rob place an announcement of his death on /. I still felt the pang of sympathy when I realized that this guy meant enough to someone warrant a /. story and over 300 comments, all of which I have (sickeningly) read.

    I think that people need to realize that there are a few sacred cows that transcend CS, that affect us all due to our greater abstraction than IT, *humanity*. Don't get me wrong. I'm a die-hard techie, as my parents will, to their chagrin, vouch for. I spend far too much time at my computer, the one I saved for 6 months to buy. But I still recognize the power of greater things than CS, let alone Linux or KDE or any of the other 65 kazillion CS things I like or don't like.

    Notably:
    Religion - by definiton (or at least by the definition of my religion (christianity)) religion supercedes *everything*.

    The Search For Knowledge - exemplified perfectly by the /. moderation system. It's a good system. I love, even relish, reading through the posts that accompany every story. Despite practically inducing vomiting on myself reading those 300+ posts, I STILL believe that freespeech is important.

    and, last but not least:

    Humanity - For any kind of exchange or enriching experience, the participants must, at pain of waste of their own time and that of others, hold to the basic tenets of respect and kindness. Very simple values that have been simeaultaneusly trumpeted and rejected by many of the world. I am continually apalled by the lack of my fellow teenagers respect for *anything*. The gifted (yet shortsighted) of these tend to cry wolf, very perceptively and rightly, at all the various injustices of the day, and wax nostalgic about how kindness is going down the drain.

    It pains me to see such myopic tendancies that surround my daily life pollute my _escape_ from such pettiness, the usually clearheaded tech culture.

    Take a step back, look at the greater things you sacrifice when you fight over meaningless things.


    Micah McCurdy

  • Thanks for your comment. Now I feel even worse. I never met the man although his books and the attitude contain in them were very good. I'm a scientist, not a professional programmer. As such I greatly appreciate an education source of info that is concise and lucid. As a person that has been working on Unix systems for about 15 yrs, I can also appreciate the trials and tribulations of mastering the mysteries of troff and other pre-historic formatting languages. Hell, I started out with Script, IIRC that came out of Waterloo.

    Someone once asked me to document how to use one of my kluge programs. I told him that it would take me as much time to write the documentation in troff as it took me write the program. My ability to write concise and proper test is pathetic. To have to go in an edit the test is difficult.

    Thank you for your reply. As I initially stated, I feel even worse after reading your reply and some of the other posts on this story.

  • That is truly disgusting.

    Put aside any dislike for MS you may have, but how could anyone be that twisted?

    I don't like Microsoft or it's products. I don't hate them, or even Gates for that matter, and if he were to die tomorrow, I wouldn't celebrate. The death of anyone is a sad affair.

    It amazes me how callious and disgusting people can be.
  • I doubt that simply ignoring objectionable posts will ever cause the people responsible for those posts to ever go away completely.
    OK, it probably does perpetuate the problem to get into conversation with these people, but if they persist in posting irrespective of the amount of activity they cause, then we have gained nothing by ignoring them. We have certainly lost something, however - anyone reading the message will see unworthy material going uncontested, and will think they we, the /. community, condone (or at least accept) these posts.
    This thread does demonstrate the basic effectiveness of moderation; reading with the threshold at 1, didn't see any of the material causing the furore.
  • Man he will be sorely missed. He was my favorite technical author. He was an excellent author. In contrast to many other writers his writings were clear, and thorough. He seemed to persue each topic from all angles which is what you need when you are in need of a good technical book. He didn't just gloss over topics to make sure that they were covered, he covered each and every topic in depth and he did it in a way that it was reasonably easy to read.

    Last time I talked to him (at SANS last year) he was working on an update to Advanced Unix Programming and expected it to be done and released around the beginning of the year 2000. I wonder if it was close enough to done that the editor can patch it together and release it. I am sure that it has all sorts of wonderful knowlege in it.

    -ben
  • Disclaimer: I can't figure out how to post directly on a story, only on someone else's comment.

    Directly under the story is your preferences bar (with your moderation level, how comments should be listed, etc). There is a "reply" button on the right of this bar. That replies to the story.

    It confused me too, at first, since it's a different interface than the reply to comments hyperlink, which is much more numerous, of course

  • by Zico ( 14255 ) on Saturday September 04, 1999 @06:04PM (#1704182)

    It's not just the need to inject Linux into every single topic that's annoying. What's troubling (and disheartening for people concerned with the current state of humanity) is the huge number of attitudes expressed at Slashdot with attitudes like:

    • "I hope TrollTech goes out of business because they won't release QT under the GPL."
    • "Yay, NT support for the Alpha is being dropped and more than 100 programmers are losing their jobs."
    • In this thread on Mr. Stevens's death, the announcement that all of his books have been scanned/ripped and will be posted on some IRC warez channel.
    • "I wish someone would kill Bill Gates."
    • The continuous venom and hoping by KDE and GNOME fanatics that the other side will end up as a complete failure. Plenty of people seem to care more that KDE turns out to be a failure than they do that GNOME actually succeeds, and vice versa.
    • "Now that BSD has changed their licensing terms, let's GPL it! HAHAHAHA!"
    • "You use platform X, so you're an idiot!"

    I honestly do believe that there's a relatively high number of people here that have damaged psyches and could use some mental help. Stuff like this makes me think of Jon Katz's Hellmouth series and wonder if these people suffered abuse when they were younger which turned them into such despicable human beings. No matter how much it might seem like a short-term fix, cutting down other people instead of improving yourself will never give you the peace that you seek.

    This site can be an entertaining read, but when you look at the big picture, it can be one of the most depressing sites on the web.

    Cheers,
    ZicoKnows@hotmail.com

  • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • [see subject]

    Zontar The Mindless,

  • The dude is obviously infatuated with PERL. It's probably his first language. PERL is great for it's designed purpose, but those who know it best also know when it's use is inappropriate.
  • Dude, it's not us. the filth is being posted by anonymous trouble makers. People know this is a Pro-Linux, Pro-UNIX site. Trouble makers from outside this community come here because they know we are basically opposed to censorship, and they post in a lame attempt to destroy our credibility.
  • by Anonymous Coward
    I am imploring the AC or AC's who insist on posting their drivel to this page to desist. One of Stevens' sons loves to read Slashdot and is extremely distressed to see some of the posts that are being "written" here today. If you have a heart, just give it a rest.
  • I've had hours to think about it now, and I'm even more depressed by his death than before. So I went to his homepage and dug around some. His FAQ [kohala.com] is interesting. My favorite excerpt:

    I really believe that my background is fundamental to the success of UNP and my other books. That is, I was not one of the developers at Berkeley or AT&T, so the writing of UNP was not a "memory dump". Everything that is in the book I had to dig out of somewhere and understand myself. This process of digging up the details and learning how things work leads down many side streets and to many dead ends, but is fundamental (I think) to understanding something new. Many times in my books I have set out to write how something works, thinking I know how it works, only to write some test programs that lead me to things that I never knew. I try to convey some of these missteps in my books, as I think seeing the wrong solution to a problem (and understanding why it is wrong) is often as informative as seeing the correct solution.

    Surf around some more and you find out he loved to ski (he used to have a GIF of an old ski pass on his home page), he was a pilot, got his Ph.D while working a full time job at Kitt Peak observatory, has lived in Zambia, Utah, New Mexico, Virginia, Michigan, Oklahoma, Georgia, California, Arizona, Connecticut, and South Africa.

    And among all the people who understood Unix systems programming and networking in 1988, this was the guy who had the courage to actually sit down and start writing his first book, Unix Network Programming. Just think of all the people who didn't write that book. He was a unique mix of talented engineer,programmer, and author. It's really no suprise that nobody beat him to writing APUE and his TCP/IP series.

    And you thought Linus was unique.

  • by Anonymous Coward
    First of all, lets respect Richard Stevens, he's already dead. He is one of the Best in the Computer Industry and He's the author of some of the BEST UNIX programming books and that is UNDISPUTABLE. Second, he's NOT anti-linux, when he was working on UNP vol. I 2nd ed. one of the unix system he was using was Linux. AND SECOND, even if he does hate LINUX, who cares? alot of people hate linux, bcoz compared to 4.4BSD, linux is shit. My Respect to Richard Stevens, His books transformed me from being clueless to "some-how knowledgable" =). Richard Stevens is the BEST!
  • I'm a close personal friend of Tom Christiansen. And Stevens was no Christiansen

    Close personal friend or not, judging by the following quote I don't think Tom shares your opinion:

    'Unix Networking Programming and the three-volume TCP/IP Illustrated by W. Richard Stevens are indispensable for the serious socket programmer...'
    - Perl Cookbook p.603

    His books are cited a couple of other places as well (I'm too lazy to refer to all of them). Additionally I see in Advanced Perl Programming that the reader is referred to two of his books each in at least two chapters (again, too lazy).

    I think this indicates how the people who matter in the Perl community (that is, those who are actually Perl hackers) regard W. Richard Stevens, whatever he might of thought of Perl. It might be a good idea to follow their example.

    Chris
  • <RANT mode=FUCKYOU>

    Go to hell. You are not contributing to this discussion at all, and I seriously hope his family has not seen what you are saying. You are not being funny, and if brains were leather, you couldn't saddle a flea.

    Not liking Perl or Linux does not demand a death sentence. Both are far from perfect. You would probably justify your comments under "free speech", yet you condemn this man (which you are not) for what he said.

    Just crawl back into whatever dark, smelly hole you came out of and die, 'K?

  • No, most people join the military because they need a job/education, and/or they feel it's their duty to their country. Think about it (but don't hurt yourself).
  • The TCP/IP Illustrated book is perhaps the most read book on my shelves. I bought it a while back just wanting to know how the Internet worked - what I learned from it is amazing and I will always be grateful to him to educating me.

    Gonna miss you, dude.



    Mister programmer
    I got my hammer
    Gonna smash my smash my radio
  • and you suck
    "Subtle mind control? Why do all these HTML buttons say 'Submit' ?"
  • This may be too personal a question, but I'm going to ask it anyway:

    Why are you cynical, disenchanted and jaded?
    Why, for that matter, are so many people, especially on Slashdot ?
    Is this just a technology industry thing?

    I have a hard time understanding the deep seated bitterness that underlies many people's attitudes. Perhaps I'm just too much of an optimist.
  • When I read the topic, I was hoping it meant something else, I was smacking myself for thinking and believing the topic meant he was dead. It took 10 years for the fucking page to load, and it turns out to be true. What will I be with APUE, UNP and TCP ill? I was looking forward to his next TCP/IP book when ipv6 makes it out here. He will be greatly missed.
  • I never met the man, but I can vouch for his books. They've been an invaluable asset. He will be missed.

    OT = 1;
    I don't want to start another pro/con thread on the need for or want of the AC option, but perhaps its time to reconsider the whole issue. Many of the postings here are obviously a sick joke. And, considering the context, depressing to say the least.

    Sure, I could set my threshold above the noise, but then some of the occasional interesting off-topic notes would be missed.

    Sad...very sad.

  • I haven't read any of Mr Stevens' books. However, due to the number of folks who have posted their thanks and their sadness at his passing, I will make a point of going out and finding them. He sounds like someone I will have wished I had found before. As for the trolls, my guess is these are the same people who send less than intelligent emails anytime an article is posted criticizing linux. It is our misfortune that they have chosen linux as their cause, as it makes the rest of us look like assholes. Only difference is, instead of some author somewhere they are posting about a man that a lot of /.'s admire and respect. Maybe now we can get a little more militant about policing our own. Unfortunately, I don't think rational, intelligent , logical reasoning why being a dick won't help linux advance and does more to hurt than help will work. Perhaps only a massive amount of emails from other linux users who point out that they think the poster is a total asshole will make them rethink their attitude and behaviour. Then again, maybe not. Sorry, rambling. Anyway, there were a lot of heartfelt posts here about a man that I know very little. And it's made me want to know more. So for that, thanks. And as for the trolls, ignore them. Not worth the time.
  • I suspected there was some sort of corporate relationship between the systems, I just didn't look for it. Particularly as the Star's web page called the classifieds by yet another name. But it was also possible that the same obit was sent by the family to several places.
  • W. Richard Stevens was that rarity in modern humanity: a gentleman and a scholar. I am deeply saddend to see the number of people posting hateful comments about this man because he didn't like perl and he didn't like linux. I can assure you that professor Stevens knew what he was talking about and had reasons for those statements. The fact that one might not agree with them is not a justification for assailing a man's character or intelligence.

    In 1993 I was writing some networking applications software for RS-6000's at a large IT shop. I was, like almost everyone else in the industry, working from W. Richard Steven's excellent "Unix Network Programming." I was testing code examples from that book and found (to my mild concern) that Steven's code to run-time detect whether you were on a system V or a BSD style system (for signal handling) was returning true for both cases on the version of AIX I was on.

    I was pretty sure that AIX wasn't so deviant that such standard stuff as is found in that book would not work, but I'm certainly not too proud to seek expert advice. I hopped on over to USENET (web? What web?) and posted a question basically asking if Stevens' code would work on AIX. Later that day I got an e-mail from Stevens himself with details on what works, what doesn't and why (almost all of it worked, BTW). In 1993 the 'net wasn't quite the sea of raging lunatics that it is today, but even then USENET was full of loudmouthed know-nothings. That Stevens would take the time to review newsgroups and help out an indivdual questioner says something about the man.

    His contribution to the modern net is difficult to overstate. I would venture that almost every serious developer of Internet applications (esp. those who were here before the explosion of the WWW) learned his or her trade from Stevens (and Comer, and a handful of others). Whatever he thought of Linux and Perl, or about NAFTA or any other damned thing, he was a knowledgeable and generous man. Such a man is worth ten thousand foul-mouthed AC's. Shame on you.
  • If this is one person, then he is a very pitiful figure indeed. In the past few weeks we have seen the overall discourse on Slashdot descend to new lows. I have read this forum since the week it first opened, and I have never seen such immature, childish, and outright disrespectful posts. Up until today I was a fierce supporter of the AC option. Today's disgusting display has broken the camel's back. The greatest failing of the internet is the rampant lack of respect exercised by some. Noone, except the most deranged individual, would react in such a flagrant manner in real life. Instead we have a culture on the internet who feel it is obligitory and acceptable to insult and denigrate individuals for their viewpoints, lifestyles, and beliefs.

    To Rob, Hemos, and everyone who runs Slashdot: Please, review the current situation. This is getting well out of hand.

  • I learned a lot from his book, UNIX Network Programming. I still have it on my desk and pick it up from time to time. Since I probably won't be going to his service, this is my only chance to say goodbye to him. So thanks for everyting Mr. Stevens.
  • Thank you. I feel great sorrow that, apparently, one sad man has brought about all of this.

    Folks, as a community, we need to sit back and look at this. This person joins the ranks of the sad people who rampantly attack Windows users, who send offensive emails to companies, and generally degrade the overall image of Linux. We're doing ourselves no good by ignoring these actions.
  • This is the last time I post on slashdot, this is the last time I even read slashdot comments. I am fed up with all trolls around here.
  • Stevens has written many fine books, from which I have learnt tons of information. His Unix Networking Programming taught me nearly everything I know about the topic.

    Assuming that his death is real (and not some sick hoax), this truley is a great loss for programmers, and ultimately society, everywhere.

  • Judging by your sarcasm I assume you think human life has no real value too. Well how bout I kill you then? Would you like that? Since your life has no value, then it wouldn't matter, would it?

    Asshole!
  • by Anonymous Coward
    Thank you. I can't post from my account atm cos I had moderator points, and if I use my account, then everything I have so hastily moderated will get unmoderated, gah). Apparently I can't leave my name either. But I have an account here. And a life which involves interacting with the real world, which I can't believe is the case for some of the comment-posters around here. How anyone can say some of the stuff on here, I have no idea. It's particularly upsetting that as I understand it, they're using a medium that Richard Stevens helped define and explain to post their rubbish. I suppose a dispassionate observer could mae a telling point about that, but I find it hard to be dispassionate about jibes about the death of someone.

    I was with people who work in net-related stuff, and they are people I respect. As soon as they heard the news, they were truly upset. This was someone they all knew and valued. I value their estimation of the man far more than I value anonymous cowards (and no, creating a stupid account name does not absolve you from being an anonymous coward).

  • I second the motion. "X is dead." is clear and concise. "X has passed (away, on, or simply "passed")" has unfortunate resonances with passing the bar, passing a test, and passing gas. "We lost him." suggests he should be found. However, one can say (at least around me) "the passing of an era" (time passes) or "community mourns loss of a leader" (who might not be dead, but retired, incapacitated, or simply not leaderly any more. Rob, DO something.
  • I took a class based on his "Advanced Programming in the Unix Environment" several years ago (at a Usenix conference) and it remains one of the best classes I've had. I refer to his books constantly. He was a terrific writer and instructor. Very sad news indeed.
  • WTF? No shit death is a fact of life! That has not a damn thing to do with it.

    The fact that someone doesn't care about the lives of others, that's pretty damn sick!
  • OK, so I haven't read all the replies (sp), but
    I think that those that are bitchin' about bad
    posts are doing so prematurely. I mean come on
    this place (slashdot) is just a slice of society
    and there are bastards here as there are elsewhere
    come on guys, you are seasoned enough to know who are trolls and who are not so lets stay serious. A very important man is lost but your
    mention/reply of the trolls are not good, so stay
    real!

    -haffi
  • by drwiii ( 434 )
    Man, first Postel, and now Stevens. I found "Unix Network Programming" to be quite an intersting read.

    Goodbye, Mr. Stevens.

  • ... with a heavy, blunt, iron object.
    Shortly after this story was posted, I thought I'd just hang around /. all day and diss every AC who posted this sort of crap. But I realized I wouldn't be able to keep up.
  • I have UNIX Network Programming and will soon be getting his IPC book. Don't know much about the man, but his writing style is/was clear and easy to understand. I guess what I'm saying is, bummer about losing a good author, espescially since most of 'em suck.

    As for the troll, it is not a huge tragedy that someone is going around saying not-nice things about Stevens. It is just an occasion for liberal use of moderation. So before getting angry and "never using /. again" and proclaiming the "downfall of anonymous posting" and complaining about the existing moderation system, try using it -- raise your reading threshold to 1 point or so. If the trolls upset you or you just don't like to read them, you don't have to.
  • There is a reason /. has moderation. It's to let people read messages with actual content w/o reading the trash that has apparently been posted on this thread (I haven't seen the actual messages, just the responces to the morons. I set my prefs so that I only read messages with a score >= 2.) If you're tired of reading the idiotic trash some people post, set the filter to 1 or 2!
  • You're clearly someone who's never done any serious UNIX programming, otherwise you'd appreciate the value of his books.
    Then again you're probably too self-absorbed and immature to have much heart-felt compassion, so why should I waste my time giving you the attention you seek by making such comments?
  • My grandmother, who I loved dearly, is dead. My kitten died, and I was upset, but hardly less so upon reading her autopsy. I do not think that many others will be torn apart by reading the word "dead". It's sweet to think that his widow will be consoled by everyone around her telling her (metaphorically) that "he's not really dead, simply gone to some other place" when that may not be her beliefs at all.
  • Ever read this?
    • As a representative of the Linux community, participate in mailing list and newsgroup discussions in a professional manner.
    • Refrain from name-calling and use of vulgar language. Consider yourself a member of a virtual corporation with Mr.Torvalds as your Chief Executive Officer. Your words will either enhance or degrade the image the reader has of the Linux community.
    • Avoid hyperbole and unsubstantiated claims at all costs. It's unprofessional and will result in unproductive discussions.
    • A thoughtful, well-reasoned response to a posting will not only provide insight for your readers, but will also increase their respect for your knowledge and abilities.
    • Don't bite if offered flame-bait. Too many threads degenerate into a ``My O/S is better than your O/S'' argument. Let's accurately describe the capabilities of Linux and leave it at that.
    • Always remember that if you insult or are disrespectful to someone, their negative experience may be shared with many others. If you do offend someone, please try to make amends.
    • Focus on what Linux has to offer. There is no need to bash the competition. Linux is a good, solid product that stands on its own.
    • Respect the use of other operating systems. While Linux is a wonderful platform, it does not meet everyone's needs.
    • Refer to another product by its proper name. There's nothing to be gained by attempting to ridicule a company or its products by using ``creative spelling''. If we expect respect for Linux, we must respect other products.
    • Give credit where credit is due. Linux is just the kernel. Without the efforts of people involved with the GNU project, MIT, Berkeley and others too numerous to mention, the Linux kernel would not be very useful to most people.
    • Don't insist that Linux is the only answer for a particular application. Just as the Linux community cherishes the freedom that Linux provides them, Linux only solutions would deprive others of their freedom.
    • There will be cases where Linux is not the answer. Be the first to recognize this and offer another solution.
    Linux Advocacy mini-HOWTO

    So shape up or ship out!

    Embarrassed

    belbo

  • Hello. This, like many other comments here, is meta-discussion, and thus not really on topic. I wish there was a better place for it, but I cannot think of any. Pardon.

    I don't find the several derogatory messages appearing here a disastrous problem. Practically all of them have been moderated down, and I must commend the moderators for such prompt action. Everyone is aware, hopefully, that at threshold -1 you do get to see utter crap. This time there is more of it, mostly because of a few persistent flamebaiters. However, as always, you get what you ask for, if you don't want to see the worst of the worst, keep your threshold higher. The moderation system works, in my opinion, remarkably well in general.

    However, please, people, do not feed the flames by replying to completely obvious trolls. Trust the moderators to do their job. Flaming flamers is just a waste of mutual resources, most notably reading time.

    I suspect that starting IP banning would not be worthwhile. It would open yet another can of worms about censorship, and IP banning is not a foolproof protection against misbehaving individuals in any case. Like I said, I find the current moderation system doing its job commendably well. The only problem that I see that the comments on this story have revealed is that people who really see effort to abuse the system may overwhelm, or at least overload the moderators, and it must be frustrating for them. I cannot really see an obvious way to remedy the situation.

    There is one thing that I actually am worried about, though, perhaps reflecting the frustration of the moderators. There seem to be several comments that have been moderated down, that I for one really don't see deserving it. Please, moderators, remember that you should only consider the topicality, language, and information content of a comment, not the opinions it expresses.

    In addition to the hordes of (quite appropriately downmoderated) comments mainly concerned with bodily fluids, there are some comments which merely criticize the late Mr. Stevens and point out that something good may, in their opinion, result from his demise. I find it most unsettling to see posts such as these, not blatantly offensive and quite topical, moderated down. Yes, the dead should be respected, because it's unfair to abuse someone who cannot defend himself. But that doesn't mean that one should suddenly only start saying positive things about the dead. People have a right to their opinions unbiased by their subject's death, and as long as they are expressed with dignity, and are topical, I see no reason to moderate them down, even if the moderators are offended by them.

    Like some comments have already pointed out, had Bill Gates died, it's doubtful that comments remarking that his demise might be positive for Linux would get moderated down. As a more extreme example, consider the phrases "Good riddance, Hitler", and "Good riddance, Stevens", uttered right after the deaths of the respective individuals. If you are to be impartial, you should moderate both the same way.

    Actually, I cannot help being reminded of the Daria episode "The Misery Chick" [simplenet.com] where a local celebrity dies, and Daria, being the only one criticizing him after his death, gets shunned by everyone. I wouldn't like to compare Slashdot readership to the students of Lawndale High...


    Lauri Alanko
    la@iki.fi [mailto]

    PS. I wouldn't be at all surprised if JonKatz were to write a piece about this story, and all this discussion that followed, and again try to psychoanalyze the readership of slashdot..

  • ..what's wrong with saying 'died'?

    His work didn't die, but will be with us forever. Its not "dead," but immortalized. :)
  • by Mike Gleason ( 86683 ) on Saturday September 04, 1999 @10:25PM (#1704253) Homepage
    Richard,

    Simply put, you're the one guy in the world in whose presence I would have been in awe of. I wouldn't bother asking for Michael Jordan's autograph, didn't shed a tear for JFK Jr., and couldn't care less about shaking the hand of a U.S. President, but it would have been a great honor just to say "hi" to you in person.

    Your work served as the foundation of my own work, and many others as well. The most influential book in my life so far has been Unix Network Programming -- without it, I simply would have done what most college students do and simply go to class just to get it over with. Your work inspired me to do something outside the realm of the classroom and filled my head with ideas and dreams, and for that I can't thank you enough.

    Your obituary [azstarnet.com] cites you as a "noted author of computer books", but your books weren't simply "computer books" nor "programming books", nor were you simply an author. Your works stand as great works of computer science.

    We will miss you, W. Richard Stevens, and we regret that you were taken from us when surely you had 20 more years of knowledge yet to bestow upon us.

    Sincerely,
    Mike Gleason
    NcFTP Software

  • Try finding ANY mention of Linux in ANY of his books.

    Okay.. Inside back cover of "Unix Network Programming, Volume I [amazon.com]":

    Hosts and networks used for most examples in this text:

    AIX 4.2 (w/IPv6) PowerPC
    Digital Unix 4.0B (w/IPv6) Alpha
    BSD/OS 3.0 (4.4BSD-Lite2) Intel x86
    Linux 2.0.30 (RedHat 4.2) Intel x86
    Solaris 2.5.1 (w/IPv6) Sparc
    UnixWare 2.1.2 Intel x86
    HP-UX 10.30 (beta) PA-RISC
    SunOS 4.1.3 sparc

    Michael Johnson of Red Hat Software provided the latest releases of Red Hat Linux.

    He seemed pretty open-minded to me..

  • by TreyHarris ( 15366 ) on Sunday September 05, 1999 @03:47AM (#1704281)
    The way I remember Rich will be at conferences, standing at the front of a room where he has just presented, with a small mob of people around him, all eager to ask him some esoteric point of network programming or argue some vanishingly trivial point or just to shake his hand and tell him how much they admire him.

    I learned more from Rich than from all my CS professors combined. Over lunch one day at a conference, I chatted with him about his plans for starting TCP/IP Illustrated all over again, rewriting it for IPv6. I remember being excited about these updates, and telling all my friends about them, even though they wouldn't be out for years.

    It breaks my heart to think that these, and all the other good works that mind was capable of producing, will never come.
  • by Anonymous Coward
    I have 5 books by Stevens, I think I am going to go out and buy another today. I love all of his books and especially his style of writing. He can take pleasure in knowing that he helped educate thousands of people around the world.
  • Does this mean the price of TCP/IP will go up?
  • His home page is here [kohala.com], and reading it is to find out what a truly great guy he was. My favorite is his recipe [kohala.com] for chocolate chip cookies, which are harder to make than a bug free threaded tcp/ip stack.

    His books were the best. Well written with the best exercises of any books out there. I think the reason he obviously put so much thought into the exercises at the end of chapters was because he knew that's where readers did most of their learning. Unlike other fine books like Knuth's, his books actually got used, reread, and handed around to be used again. He accomplished better than any author I can name exactly what he sought to do--teach.

    I just wish I'd written and thanked him a long time ago. RIP.

  • In the 18 months that I've read Slashdot, I have never seen such disheartening cruelty and heartlessness as displayed in the article about Richard Stevens' death. Pompous zealots lacking complete humanity oozed into every thread, including one as simple as my post suggesting that anyone who has ever read, barrowed, purchased or dog-eared any of his work donate a few bucks in his name to Habitat to Humanity.

    What was the response by one such person hiding behind an AC shield? "Don't send flowers or donate to a charity in the bigot's name. If you want to help humanity -- code a GTK IRC client".

    I'm astonished that the same community that so fiercely argues for freedom and fairness also witnessed a strong chorus of "But what has he done for [insert your favorite cause] lately?"

    I'm as jaded, disenchanted and cynical as the next person. Probably more. But the death of a good man who is remembered fondly by his colleagues and readers is a time to keep your mouth shut about some gripe you have with his philosophy. Each of us feel pain and fear death. Underneath our beliefs, causes and actions, we all share those two primal aspects of life. If we can not sympathize and feel compassion for someone who is suffering great pain or has died, then we can never feel compassion. Compassion isn't an honorable thing. It is a basic trait of mankind that separates us from gorillas and slugs.

    I'd like to think that the shallow comments made in Slashdot were by those of us who have spent our entire lives in front of our monitors and in our bedrooms or dens hidden away from society, because anyone who has a healthy composition of civility, humanity, and sociable skills could not possibly be so thoughtless. There is a time for personal opinion and debate and a time to practice the art of knowing when to shut up and be a graceful man.

    Real men fight on level playing fields -- they don't kick someone while they're down.

    Thankfully, the same person who tought me Perl and has his own chunk of shelf-space next to my desk also gave some depth to the man so many articles of harpooned. I encourage everyone who displayed their ignorance and carelessness to re-read Tom's post and then visit Richard's website.

    Yesterday it was Postel. Today it was Stevens. Tomorrow, it could be your favorite geek.
    ---
    icq:2057699
    seumas.com

  • by Clover_Kicker ( 20761 ) <clover_kicker@yahoo.com> on Saturday September 04, 1999 @08:50AM (#1704298)
    > No, this is not flamebait. I'm serious.

    > Stevens was a noted anti-Linux, anti-Perl bigot
    > who happened to be a high profile author of some
    > very good Unix books. This event signifies the
    > passing of the torch to the GNU generation.

    I'm speachless, and that doesn't happen very often. I was going to let this slide, but I just fscking can't.

    <RANT mode=REALLYFUCKINGPISSED>

    It's not a fscking crime not to like Linux, or Perl. It's a matter of opinion, and the last time I checked, the GNU movement is all about giving people a little empowerment, and more choice.

    The contribution of Stevens' books to the computing community has been enormous. There are so few good technical books available, and his are among the best technical books I have ever read.

    How much code in the world is better because the author(s) of that code read and applied some of these books?

    Now a lot of that code is in commercial software, but vast, incalculable KLOCs of Free Software/Open Source have benefitted from Stevens' insights. This man has advanced the Free Software community by leaps and bounds, without maintaining a single program (that I know of.)

    One of the biggest weaknesses in the computer industry (and the Free Software movement is no exception) is the shitty documentation and books. Any author that reliably comes out with well written, concise, insightful, and experienced books deserves to be sainted IMNSHFO.

    I'm a sysadmin by trade. I don't fscking care if you run GNU/Linux or *BSD or SCO or Ultrix or NT or VMS or NetWare, if you're crazy enough to maintain computers for a living, you need all the decent documentation that you can get, and TCP/IP Illustrated has helped fsckloads of people understand the subtle interactions of the various protocols that make the 'net work.

    In conclusion, if I thought you were reprentative of the GNU generation, then I would probably toast my fscking Linux and FreeBSD partitions and put NT back on, you selfish, short sighted, ungrateful punk.

    </RANT>
  • by Seumas ( 6865 ) on Saturday September 04, 1999 @08:52AM (#1704299)
    As per his obituary, I think a very fitting farewell would be if everyone who read, bought, barrowed or dog-eared his books (or even if you haven't) made a small donation (a buck or five) to his requested charity.

    Habitat for Humanity, 2950 E. 22nd Street, Tucson, AZ 85713

    You have to love this comment, "Please wear colorful clothing to the service; Richard loved colors."
    ---
    icq:2057699
    seumas.com

  • There are /plenty/ of things to dislike about Linux and perl. Stevens' biases could well have been founded in a deeper understanding of the issues that he grappeled with than perhaps you know?

    And in addition, the day that anyone in "The GNU Generation" writes a book as trenchant, concise, and informative as "Advanced Programming in the Unix Environment," is the day that someone can start making noise about the torch being passed.

    Regards,
    JFB
  • by SEWilco ( 27983 ) on Saturday September 04, 1999 @09:02AM (#1704303) Journal
    The web site of the Tucson Daily Star [azstarnet.com] has the same info for the Stevens funeral notice [azstarnet.com]. I don't know the relationship with the other obit which has the same content.
  • by Anonymous Coward
    Stevens was not anti-Linux. It is well known that one of the OS he used was Red Hat Linux. But his favorite OS was the commercial offering from BSDI. Do a Deja Search. See how he was critical of the free versions of BSD and Linux because he didn't like tracking patch levels. He prefered to pay for support and leave patch level details to the pros. He wasn't "anti" anything. He just favored professional support. Nothing wrong with that. He clearly had more important things to do with his time.

Today is a good day for information-gathering. Read someone else's mail file.

Working...