Slashdot Log In
LED Lighting As Cheap As CFLs Invented
Posted by
Soulskill
on Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:41 AM
from the bright-ideas dept.
from the bright-ideas dept.
mcgrew writes "New Scientist reports that a British team has overcome the obstacles to cheap LED lighting, and that LED lamps as cheap as CFLs will be on the market in five years. Quoting: 'Gallium nitride cannot be grown on silicon like other solid-state electronic components because it shrinks at twice the rate of silicon as it cools. Crystals of GaN must be grown at 1000C, so by the time a new LED made on silicon has cooled, it has already cracked, rendering the devices unusable. One solution is to grow the LEDs on sapphire, which shrinks and cools at much the same rate as GaN. But the expense is too great to be commercially competitive. Now Colin Humphreys's team at the University of Cambridge has discovered a simple solution to the shrinkage problem. They included layers of aluminium gallium nitride in their LED design... These LEDs can be grown on silicon as so many other electronics components are. ... A 15-centimetre silicon wafer costs just $15 and can accommodate 150,000 LEDs making the cost per unit tiny.'"
Related Stories
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
Finally! (Score:5, Funny)
Now Colin Humphreys's team at the University of Cambridge has discovered a simple solution to the shrinkage problem.
Excellent news! Wait, what's this story about?
Oblig seinfeld reference (Score:5, Funny)
Lightbulbs getting out of a pool I guess.
Parent
My first experience with LED lighting... (Score:5, Insightful)
So I bought a 3 pack of LED lights that were supposed to be the equivalent of 40 watt bulbs...
A 25 watt incandescent bulb is about 10 times brighter. I was pissed. Might keep me from stumbling in the dark, but it doesn't really illuminate a damn thing.
I was so hopeful.
Re:My first experience with LED lighting... (Score:5, Insightful)
I've heard similar reviews from a co-worker who was very motivated to 'go green'. The '40-watt equivalent' turned out to be an over-sized night-light (per her review - I haven't seen it).
Still, this could be good news. I switched about half-way to CFLs largely to save $$ on electricity, but they're neither as efficient nor as 'green' as LED lights. I priced LED lights but, at the time, they were so damned expensive that it would take ~40 years for the investment to pay itself off. Even if I have to over-rate everything to get the same level of light, it should be better all the way around compared to the current alternatives.
Still, even though this sounds solid, the ominous 'This should be available in 5 years' always makes me a little cautious.
Parent
What about the production? (Score:5, Interesting)
I'm all for getting away from CFLs, as their production alone is NOT environmentally friendly (most of the mercury in the world is mined in China, where HALF of it is "lost" to the environment during production, which means "polluted"), not to mention the ratio thrown out.
But what about the LEDs? How toxic (or not) are the materials they're talking about? And what about the production of such? And heck, back on the pollution thing, WHERE they are produced makes a big difference, since if it's in China, forget any environmental disposal of chemicals used, whereas if it's in a developed country, it'll probably be OK.
Not insurmountable problems, but I do want to know how those things will work out.
Parent
Re:What about the production? (Score:5, Insightful)
If you only replace them at 1/10th or 1/1000th the rate then its unlikely it could be bad for the environment....
Parent
Wrong bulbs (Score:5, Informative)
You're buying the wrong bulbs then. Mine are at full brightness instantaneously.
Parent
Re:Wrong bulbs (Score:4, Informative)
Parent
Re:Wrong bulbs (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Re:Retina Sear (Score:5, Informative)
A pointless tip for anyone:
Don't you hate it, in the middle of the night you have to have a piss. So you get up and can quite easily make you way to the toilet just by ambient light. You flick the light switch in the WC and do your thing. You finish and then switch the light off. Instantly you are thrown into total darkness. You stumble your way back to bed, hitting your shins and stepping on as many things as possible on your way. What can you do?
A simple solution is to close one eye before turning on the light. Keep this eye closed tight as long as the light is on. After you switch the light off, open your eye. You can still see quite well in the ambient light again with the eye you had closed as it did not adjust to the brightness of the light.
Parent
Re:What about the production? (Score:5, Informative)
Quit buying crap CFL and just rig your place with T5HO linear fluorescent.
One 54 watt bulb is all I need to light my living room or my kitchen, and it's 5,000 lumens INSTANTLY, no warm-up.
And they grow GREAT sweet basil and catnip and peppers.
Parent
Re:What about the production? (Score:5, Funny)
Is that what the kids are calling it these days?
Parent
Re:What about the production? (Score:5, Informative)
I'm calling bullshit.
The largest T5HO bulb only uses 54w of power, two of those would be 108, plus ballast which in reality should be far, FAR more efficient than that, should use no more than 125w of power.
My 4-lamp T5HO system uses 230w according to Kill-A-Watt, that's 216w in light bulbs plus 14w energy conversion loss in the ballast. I toss out 20,000 lumens.
Your 100w incandescent only at most pumps 12-1800 lumens.
So either you bought some bullshit lighting or you're talking out of your ass.
Parent
Re:What about the production? (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Re:What about the production? (Score:5, Informative)
When you break a lamp, the state of Maine [maine.gov] says "The next time you replace a lamp, consider putting a drop cloth on the floor so that any accidental breakage can be easily cleaned up. If consumers remain concerned regarding safety, they may consider not utilizing fluorescent lamps in situations where they could easily be broken. Consumers may also consider avoiding CFL usage in bedrooms or carpeted areas frequented by infants, small children, or pregnant women. "
Here's what the EPA says to do if a CFL bulb breaks in your home [epa.gov]:
Before Clean-up: Air Out the Room
Clean-Up Steps for Hard Surfaces
Clean-up Steps for Carpeting or Rug
Clean-up Steps for Clothing, Bedding and Other Soft Materials
Disposal of Clean-up Materials
Parent
Re:What about the production? (Score:4, Informative)
I suggest you look up their recommendations for cleaning up a standard incandescent bulb for comparison.
I looked and didn't find anything. Care to provide a link?
As far as land fill problems, putting them in the land fill puts less mercury in the enviroment then using an incandescent bulb. Assuming your power come from coal, and not a clean alternative like nuclear.
The concern here is spot concentration -- what goes into the landfills tends quickly to go into the groundwater. If you've got a coal plant 150 miles away, you're not going to be getting much of it. Here's a link [mercuryexposure.org] that says mercury in landfills is a bigger problem than mercury in the air.
Parent
Re:What about the production? (Score:5, Informative)
BULL-fucking-SHIT. The ~3 MILLIgrams of Hg in a CFL are in an entirely inorganic metal amalgam form [patentstorm.us]. Stop pulling wacky pseudoscience scare tactic shit out of your ass and claiming it as truth.
Parent
Re:What about the production? (Score:5, Informative)
Inorganic mercury in the environment (wether it's by burning coal at power plants or from light bulbs) eventually reaches soils, which get wet with water, and as most of the water on land eventually does, washes into aquatic systems (water cycle).
Microorganisms in the aquatic environment then convert it to methylmercury (what he was talking about).
After that, it's the same old story you already know: Aquatic system is contaminated so the mercury (actually methylmercury) bioaccumulates its way up the food chain until it gets to the humans who eat the fish. The higher up the food chain the carnivore is, the more toxic their exposure is. This should be of personal concern to you if you are a whale, shark, big fish (like tuna) or human.
It really doesn't matter what type of mercury is in those bulbs.
All forms of it that get into the environment do eventually turn into the very type that hurts us most.
Parent
Re:What about the production? (Score:5, Informative)
More mercury from coal plants used to power incandescent bulbs, 100% of it lost to the environment. Look at whole life, not just one part.
Parent
Re:What about the production? (Score:5, Funny)
All in all, a win all around, although - as someone has mentioned here - LEDs are not that 'bright' compared to traditional lighting.
I take it you've never seen a high power LED. All I can say is: don't look into high power LEDs with remaining eye.
Parent
Re:What about the production? (Score:4, Informative)
1) They are nearly a perfect point light source.
2) They light output is typically very directional.
But when you try to illuminate a room with one, you have to spread out this concentrated beam so much that it's not nearly as bright as your first impressions might make you think.
Parent
We need lumens ratings (Score:5, Insightful)
The real issue is that all light bulbs really do need to have the rating of lumens. Wattage is power use, lumens is light output (obviously). Saying "40-watt equivalent" is empty marketing speak, no wonder they were disappointing. And then there's the whole light temperature issue, which is very difficult for a consumer to determine.
For my LED experience, I went with these LED bulbs [theledlight.com] for my chandelier (I was looking for a "25-watt equivalent") and have been very pleased. It may help that it's a cluster of bulbs in my fixture. Considering the lifespan of LED bulbs, I'm willing to pay a lot more per bulb providing the light output falls in the appropriate range.
Parent
Re:We need lumens ratings (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Re:My first experience with LED lighting... (Score:5, Informative)
How so? Recently, in my local walmart, GE started selling Par20 LED bulbs that were supposed to be 40-50 watt equivalent but for 7 watts produced 200 lumens. That's 28.5 lumens per watt.
My Feit Electric (Costco) 13w CFLs (60 watt equivalent) produce about 800 lumens. That's 61 lumens per watt.
A 60w incandescent makes around 700-850, depending on brand. Using the 800 as a comparison, thats 13.3 watts per lumen.
LEDs may have the potential to be more efficient than CFLs, but it doesnt look like they automatically are. Or am I missing something?
Parent
Re:My first experience with LED lighting... (Score:5, Insightful)
Any home depot accepts any and all CFLs. In fact, it's easier and cheaper to dispose of CFLs properly than it is of Fluorescents.
Oh, and if your electricity is generated from coal, you are helping put mercury in the air as well.
Parent
Re:My first experience with LED lighting... (Score:5, Informative)
Don't lose hope yet. For one thing, a 40 watt incandescant (you didn't specify if what you were replacing was incandescant or CFL) is damned dim to start with. When I used incandescants, the lowest watt bulb I used was usually a 100 watt (60s in closets and in the basement where there's one every fifteen feet), and used 3 way 250 watt bulbs for reading.
A 40 watt CFL would be damned bright, I don't know if I've ever seen one. Most of my lamps have 27 watt twirley tubes. They vary in intensity, in color, in startup time, and some grow brighter the longer they're on. The one on the front porch won't light if the temperature gets below 0F, the back porch light has lit every time. It's also dimmer and bluer.
I'm looking forward to these, but when I finally buy one, I'm not going to pick one that says "equivalent to a sixty watt incandescant", I'm going to get one that says it's equivalent to 100 watts, just to be sure.
Parent
Re:My first experience with LED lighting... (Score:5, Funny)
Your friendly neighbourhood CDO neat-freak???
Fixed it for you. The letters are now in alphabetical order. LIKE THEY SHOULD BE!
Parent
Re:My first experience with LED lighting... (Score:5, Funny)
It's worse than that, mate. Every time you double the distance, the brightess goes down by a factor of four! So, two feet away, the bulb is a quarter as bright as it was a foot away.
Parent
Sweet (Score:5, Insightful)
If they are still not dimmable they still suck (Score:5, Insightful)
Honestly we NEED a led light bulb that will DIM acceptably for people.
most people want to be able to use dimmers and every customer I have wants to use lighting automation.
They need to work on that second right after figuring out how to get the lumens up to that of CFL lamps.
Re:If they are still not dimmable they still suck (Score:5, Informative)
I've not used the commercial LED light bulbs, but standard LEDs dim just fine (at least to a point). I see no obstacle that would stop the bulbs from dimming too.
In fact, a very quick check on the bulbs available at Amazon indicates that they do dim. Is there a dimming problem that you're aware of that's not made clear in the Amazon reviews?
Parent
you sir are incorrect (Score:4, Insightful)
"Light Emitting Diodes are binary - either all the way on or all the way off"
You're smoking crack. LEDs can be dimmed just fine, by varying the current going through them. How do you think they control the brightness in LED-backlit LCD displays.
Parent
Re:you sir are incorrect (Score:5, Insightful)
You're smoking crack. LEDs can be dimmed just fine, by varying the current going through them. How do you think they control the brightness in LED-backlit LCD displays.
While you can dim them that way, they are very picky and inefficient. PWM is much, much more efficient and allows for nearly 1-100% dimming range easily. Getting such accuracy with current is very hard, since it's nonlinear. Most LCD backlighting is done via PWM, there are tons of tiny chips to do this efficiently, for phones too. It's just too easy and cheap not to use PWM these days.
Parent
Re:If they are still not dimmable they still suck (Score:5, Informative)
It's hard to take you seriously when you don't know about a SINGLE component in the system.
First, LEDs are definitely variable in a non-binary sense. Anyone who has ever used an LED in pretty much any application ever can tell you that light output can be changed by altering the current.
Second, a dimmer isn't a variable resistor. It cuts the AC waveform, reducing the current available to an incandescent light bulb.
Pulse width modulation is definitely NOT the only way to vary the light output of an LED.
Parent
Ok, let's get this thread straightened out. (Score:5, Informative)
(1) LEDs can in fact be dimmed by running less current through them, however their power efficiency drops, which negates the whole purpose of LED lighting. The most efficient way to dim an LED is to strobe it on faster than the human eye can detect By varying with fraction of the on/off cycle that the LED is on, the human eye perceives this as "dimmer". The number of photons averaged over a second is reduced, but for the milliseconds the LED is on it is at full brightness.
(2) Incandescent bulb dimmers are almost never been rheostats, not since maybe the 1920s. The problem is efficiency again. Imagine a certain current flowing through the light bulb and the rheostat; the power dissipated in each device is then proportional to the resistance. When the rheostat is at equal resistance to the light bulb, it is dissipating as much power as the light bulb is! A 100 watt light bulb at 50% of the normal RMS current dissipates 25 watts, which means your rheostat is getting as hot as a small soldering iron. You'd need a massive heatsink to handle this.
Therefore for many years, dimmers were not very practical. The best dimmers were actually transformers, but they were extremely bulky. They were mainly used in theaters and fancy restaurants to soften the shock of the prices on the menu by relief at being able to find them at all.
With the creation of the solid state silicon controlled rectifier (scr), it is possible to do a trick with incandescent bulbs that is rather like the LED strobing trick. What you do is you take the sine wave power and you clip out the parts of the waveform on either side of the peak. So rather than having power delivered to light bulb all the time, the light bulb is only powered for a fraction of the cycle. The difference is that an incandescent filament glows because it is hot; it does not flicker on and off.
Now with respect LED light bulbs, I'm not sure about what circuitry they contain, but they do contain circuitry. If you just plugged enough LEDs in series to plug straight into AC, they'd flicker at a very noticeable 60Hz. If you put a full wave rectifier into the circuit, they'd flicker at 120Hz, which might be fast enough you wouldn't notice the flickering. You'd certainly be able to use the a solid state dimmer to dim such as circuit, but flickering might be noticeable.
There are relatively simple tricks you could use to maybe double the frequency, in which case you probably would not be able to perceive the flicker. On the other hand, there might be fancier circuits that know how to do the right thing. One of the problems with LEDs is that they age, their brightness varies. If the LED bulb achieves its white color by using several different colors, you need a compensating circuit to maintain the original color.
Of course you could use white LEDs, but most of the bright ones are very harsh; I've seen warm white LEDs advertised, but I've never had one.
So there you go, the straight facts on dimming that every geek should know.
Parent
Re:Ok, let's get this thread straightened out. (Score:4, Interesting)
Problem is: any recommendation I make is going to be based on the LED's we have, and most of those are either not for sale yet, or are stupidly expensive. I honestly don't know what commonly available lightbulbs have which LED's, either, because only a few LED's intended for general illumination are easy to recognize. I can tell you that I have great respect for Philips LumiLEDs, Osram Dragons, and most of the stuff Cree makes. I've worked with all those extensively and they're beautiful.
A white/red combo might look okay. It's good for general illumination but still not particularly great for really good color rendition. The problem is that color rendering is dependent on a *lot* of weird stuff. (For instance, part of the reason a ruby is so red is because it's absorbing shorter-frequency light, and re-emitting it as red light, so even if you have a good red source that's lacking in the short-wavelength area, the ruby will look dead. Fish have lots of fluorescent/iridescent coloration, so a standard color rendering index (CRI) test might not tell you what you want to know: will this light look good with this situation?)
With the li-ion, they'll burst into flame, so the manufacturers *have* to put in good charge-controller circuitry. LED's are currently like cars in 1910: you can make anything that sort of vaguely works, and someone will buy it. It's no secret that the LED crowd are hoping so many people will buy them just because they're cool, that they'll jump the early adopter chasm before they've realized that they've mostly bought turkeys.
All the stuff we work with does, essentially, some sort of rectification, then dc-dc conversion, either buck, boost, or SEPIC, and ends up as a constant-current supply for the LED. We (and I'm sure a bunch of other people) have made drivers for really good dimming using standard triacs (ours is just about to hit the market) and they work *amazingly* well. You're limited in part by how well the triac works: a lot of the ones I've worked with have such crappy triggering circuits that the best you could ever get is roughly 60% dimming -- as in, you turn it on, keep coming up, and suddenly the light comes on at 40% brightness. You can then finesse it down to maybe 20%, but it's a pain. Thing is: we can digitize that and do clever stuff in software and come up with something that can essentially accommodate for the crappy triac, learn what it's doing (by sensing how it's chopping the AC) and produce a fabulous dimmer. We have one setup that can dim 10,000:1. If you get 5:1 out of a so-called dimmable compact fluorescent you're lucky. A good dimmer with an incandescent can do something similar: it can start producing heat before there's visible light coming off the filament. But I think only our (and similar) driver can get good performance out of cheap triacs.
With all that said, a cheap triac dimmer driving a cheap unregulated LED will work, but they're (in my opinion) objectionably flickery. A triac dimmer driving a good switching converter (without any detection stuff to try and decode what the dimmer's trying to send) will still dim because you end up starving the switcher when the power's off, but it's icky-looking. In my experience it's even more non-linear than just the cheap triac: when there's enough power it drives well (but as you say at full current/full brightness), and when there's no power it turns off, and in the between situation it thrashes. Most LED driver chips have dim pins so you can apply an external dim signal derived somehow from the signal if you want to add a bunch of external circuitry. (We're building stuff that integrates all that junk into the chip.)
>the idea that you're trying to keep the LEDs at the peak of their efficiency, it seems like a no-brainer.
It is. But very few people will actually *pay* for better circuitry, apparently. So instead we have to add bullet-point functionality to justify more research, and then add in good current regulation and the like as a side-effect of (say) cold-we
Parent
Re:If they are still not dimmable they still suck (Score:5, Informative)
Actually, you should be able to use a standard dimmer switch on these things. Unless someone is doing something I've never seen before, there's no logic in them, just the diode and a resistor. Maybe a capacitor if they were really ambitious.
Nope. LED fixtures on an Edison base incorporate ballasts, just like CFLs, and incandescent dimmers do not work well with any ballast. You are probably making the incorrect assumption that an incandescent dimmer just takes a sine wave with a ~ 170 V peak and outputs a sine wave with a lower peak. It would indeed be easy to create a dimmable ballast if that were the case. But instead these things just cut out portions of the wave creating all kinds of nasties on the house current. This is because it is cheaper to do, and all you need to do to dim an incandescent is to reduce it's average current consumption.
There are a number of solutions to this problem. The one that's most likely to happen is that a new type of dimmer will be created which does something sane for ballasts like reduce the peak voltage, and labeling will be created for both such dimmers and the CFL and LED light bulbs with compatible ballasts. Another solution would be to simply put the dimming entirely within the ballast itself, then the switch would just send a message to the bulb via radio or another out-of-band channel to the bulb circuitry to dim. But while this would be more efficient, this is not going to happen in today's fragmented home automation market without a government mandate, or at least the threat of a government mandate, to standardize.
PS There already are dimmable CFLs and CFL compatible dimmers, I have some in my house. They are not perfect, and both cost 2x as much as conventional CFLs and incandescent only dimmers; and there is no branding to tell the consumer they are compatible. This means you need to do a lot of frustrating web research before you buy the things. I also bought one bright LED Edison base lightbulb to satisfy my curiosity and it was both very expensive and non-dimmable.
PS2 My biggest frustration with buying lighting on the web is that no one shows you a spectral diagram of the light output of the bulbs. If there are any lighting web retailers reading this, please do this and you will win some early adopter business and appear expert in the eyes of even those who don't know what they are looking at. Use, trademark and reasonably license compatibility marks and you will make a killing.
Parent
Clap on? (Score:5, Funny)
I have a Clapper that I've been unable to use with CFL bulbs. I'd like to know whether these new LED lights work with the Clapper and other remote-switching appliances.
Re:Clap on? (Score:5, Informative)
They won't work with the clapper.
Cheap automated switching devices like the clapper and some timers include the bulb as a resistance element in the switching circuit. They count on the bulb acting almost like a short when the light is off. This works with incandescent bulbs, since the resistance of the filament is very low when it is cold. CFL and LED bulbs act exactly the opposite way. They are almost an open circuit when off. With no current flow, the automated switch is unpowered.
There are switches that will work with these types of bulbs, but they generally cost more.
Parent
Whoopie for cold light! (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Whoopie for cold light! (Score:5, Informative)
LEDs have almost nothing to do with antennas, aside from the fact that both emit EM radiation. Specifically, there is no oscillator in the LED. The photons are a direct result of the diode band gap -- each electron-hole pair combining emits one photon with energy equal to the electron charge times the forward voltage (ie a 3V forward voltage LED emits photons with 3eV of energy, aka blue visible light). The Wikipedia page [wikipedia.org] has a fuller explanation.
The reason LEDs produce weird light is that their spectrum is a sharp band, as opposed to the broad hump of a black body. This can be fixed (somewhat) by using a phophor to shift some of that frequency (most white LEDs), but the usual techniques for that leave a gap between the LED emission and the phosphor emission. Better, though more expensive, is combining enough different color LEDs that the narrow individual bands blend together to simulate the blackbody output. Eventually, that will get cheap enough to be common, and then you'll see LEDs in common usage as lighting.
Parent
British invention (Score:5, Funny)
Big advancement (Score:5, Interesting)
I'm not sure everyone is completely aware of how big an advance this is. I'm going to buy Philips' stock as soon as I can. I'm sorry people have been screwed by some misleading marketing, but LEDs are the future of lighting... and the big green movement.
And yes, they're really easy to dim, either by converting to DC and modulating current, or by using a PWM - I'm not sure which is more efficient/cheaper.
I can't wait for CFLs to go away. Eventually you'll see commercially available, color-selectable LED bulbs.
Anyone know if the process was patented/sold to a specific company? Pretty obvious why...
Ahh, 5 years... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Ahh, 5 years... (Score:4, Funny)
The good ole' 5-year technology promise. Close enough to be exciting and get attention, but far enough away that you'll forget about their claim before they miss their deadline.
I just updated the "desktop" image on my OLED t-shirt to read "PowerVegetable is right on!"
Parent
Good for displays too (Score:4, Interesting)
This is great news not just for lighting, but also potentially for ILED TVs (basically LED - the "I" stands for inorganic. It would be simpler than even OLED, and the lifetime would be amazing of course.
Lumens per watt is? (Score:4, Interesting)
Granted this is an as yet unrealized technology, but I really wonder what the lumens per watt will be.
For reference a standard 48" T8 fluorescent is about 80 lumens per watt,
Compact fluorescent is around 65 lumens per watt,
and a 60w A19 bulb (the "normal" light bulb) is about 15 lumens per watt.
Cree has some Gallium nitride LEDs that (they claim) produce a record breaking 130 lumens per watt,
but they also have some 100 lumens per watt LEDs and they're also gallium nitride.
Cost of production isn't totally meaningless, but over it's 20 year life, 5 watts means more than $100.
Re:Solar panels too? (Score:5, Informative)
Looks likely. Cambridge are researching that too, e.g. both fields are covered by the following grant application.
Details of Grant [epsrc.ac.uk]
Parent
Re:Are they going to be tiny? (Score:4, Funny)
That's just what women SAY to make LEDs feel better, but in the end, they always go home with some huge frosted incandescent with a harsh light. And the day after, they'll be crying to their LED friends about how much energy it wasted the night before, how it kept getting hot and leaving burns on her, and how it burned out after only a few thousand uses. And the LED will listen and be supportive, but you know she'll never give it a shot.
Not that I'm BITTER or anything...
Parent
Gallium is NOT in short supply (Score:5, Informative)
Never has been, and probably never will be.
Indium and Gallium Sustainability â" September 2007 Update [indium.com]
Parent