Video and Software Downloads Overtaking Music 234
Trigun writes "The Seattle Post-Intelligencer is reporting that movie and software downloads have outpaced music downloads. Music accounted for 48.6 percent of files shared online, compared with 62.5 percent in 2002, according to a report by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. The article says that 1 in 4 internet users have downloaded at least one movie, and attributes the proliferation to access to broadband. Maybe we've just downloaded all the good music already?"
Blame ' pirates ' (Score:4, Interesting)
Same old story (Score:2, Interesting)
All empires crumble, why won't they accept it?
Maybe if by size... (Score:5, Interesting)
MPAA not exactly impartial (Score:5, Interesting)
The problem is right there.
Sales down because of bad customers or bad music? (Score:4, Interesting)
Music down by volume or percentage? (Score:4, Interesting)
If music swapping is actually down, could it be because there are viable legit music download services now? I know I've bought multiple albums from both iTMS and Audi Lunchbox myself...
Re:Surprise, surprise... (Score:3, Interesting)
Wow, nice move.
Re:Global coverage (Score:5, Interesting)
I honestly wonder how they calculate this? I daresay that the majority of people using P2P networks share their music shares which probably are around 1000 files or more. I just have a hard time seeing that most are sharing that many movies and pieces of software. i.e. those sharing movies almost certainly are also sharing songs.
What I suspect they did is just scanned for not music files. They then end up with all these small files - sometimes the content of you system directory - that dumbnits share or people trying to get a certain GB shared limit share. Yet if they count each .ini file and other such thing as a different software file, of course the number of files will outnumber music. But is that a real accurate count of movies and software shared?
i.e. shouldn't they count software packages and movies shared rather than *files* shared?
Perhaps they aren't making this mistake. But given their statistics something just smells fishy. I'd like to see their methadology.
1 in 4 internet users? (Score:3, Interesting)
I wonder.. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Surprise, surprise... (Score:3, Interesting)
Only partially correct. I believe it is having a chilling effect (maybe) on trading of music produced by RIAA members or that would otherwise get you in trouble with the RIAA if caught.
Conversely, in some areas, such as ( to use a rather geeky example ) anime and video game soundtracks, music is easily found with a bit of work and people are more than willing to share vast quantities.
Seattle? who do we know there? (Score:3, Interesting)
While the SPI has a good reputation (I think) I can help but wonder if this article might have something to do with a little software company in Washington who has a deep and abiding interest in software- and hardware-based DRM schemes. Hyping the threat to companies from "software terrorists" is a prerequisite for the kind of digital rights infringement that Microsoft and other want to sell the public and content providers.
This doesn't mean that copying isn't happening, just that someone nearby has an incentive to make the problem appear larger than it is.
Isn't that entrapment? (Score:3, Interesting)
It's not illegal to download a file, or swap it amongst people. It's only illegal if you don't have permission to do it..
legal mp3 downloads vs P2P (Score:1, Interesting)
I had to get that by Limewire P2P because iTMS isn't coming here for years.
The OECD is tracking pop music...HUH? (Score:3, Interesting)
These people are serious stuffed shirt economists. I don't think that they have the methodogy or the skills to track the semi-legit world of P2P and the various secretive subcultures asssociated with warez and big time file sharing. I suspect that they are simply repeating highly questionable numbers obtained from dubious sources that have clear political agendas (the RIAA, anyone?)
You wouldn't smoke pot from any of these guys in the OCED, why trust their analysis of P2P usage? I suspect that this is just another example of economists getting bad data from journalists who got numbers from secret sources (the RIAA) who just pulled them out of their ass to get laws passed to make themselves rich.
The OCED should stick to what they do best and tracking the P2P/warez underground is not it.
Re:Global coverage (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Child care (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:legal mp3 downloads vs P2P (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Isn't that entrapment? (Score:2, Interesting)
You mean that DEA can't infiltrate with drug dealers, sell/buy some drugs to catch the dealers? It's the same MPAA can infiltrate, maybe help a little just for not being recognized and identify who is sharing...