Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Technology Science

Using Air to Recharge Your Cell Phone 346

sanspeak writes "Now you do not have to look for a power outlet to charge your cell phones. Department of Industrial Design at Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi have come up with a mobile turbine which generates around 3 to 4 watts of energy - sufficient to charge a mobile phone. It costs around $4, fits in your pocket and runs on air ;-). What else do you want ?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Using Air to Recharge Your Cell Phone

Comments Filter:
  • by ackthpt ( 218170 ) * on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:01PM (#11769598) Homepage Journal
    ... a mobile turbine which generates around 3 to 4 watts of energy - sufficient to charge a mobile phone. It costs around $4, fits in your pocket and runs on air ;-). What else do you want ?"

    First impression of "in your pocket and runs on air" is this is charged by hydrocarbon emissions, i.e.

    I am not "just" farting, I'm recharging my phone, and it's a renewable resource!"
    Logically followed by
    "Now you're going to hold that thing to your face?!?!"
    The device is best suited for coastal areas where the wind flows almost continuously.

    They must eat more lentils there...

    "ahhhhh, go blow yer phone!"

  • by TheKidWho ( 705796 ) on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:01PM (#11769603)
    Money that grows on Trees thank you very much.
  • by KinkifyTheNation ( 823618 ) on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:02PM (#11769613) Journal
    What about us people who never leave the house?
  • by SeanTobin ( 138474 ) * <<byrdhuntr> <at> <hotmail.com>> on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:02PM (#11769617)
    Great.. A cell phone that charges by air. Now all I need is a light weight air compressor with an efficiency greater than unity and I'll never have to plug my phone in again! At least, I won't have to plug it into anything aside from the turbine and the perpetual motion machine.

    I still prefer the alternator strapped to a cat with a slice of buttered toast strapped to its back.
  • by EsbenMoseHansen ( 731150 ) on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:02PM (#11769618) Homepage
    ...what else do you want

    Does it run linux?

  • Re:and... (Score:4, Funny)

    by cayenne8 ( 626475 ) on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:03PM (#11769628) Homepage Journal
    Was that turban or turbine?

    :-)

  • uhh... (Score:2, Funny)

    by Arctic Dragon ( 647151 ) on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:03PM (#11769629)
    "It costs around $4, fits in your pocket and runs on air"

    Is that a turbine in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?
  • by davecb ( 6526 ) * <davecb@spamcop.net> on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:03PM (#11769643) Homepage Journal
    How about an adapter to connect it to my propellor beanie?

    --dave

  • by bigtallmofo ( 695287 ) on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:04PM (#11769658)
    We've seen hand cranking chargers [edn.com], now windmill charging... How long until someone packages and sells a DIY Dam & Hydroelectric Cell Charging kit?

    Also, I understand that Iran is currently importing plutonium from Russia in an attempt to make a personal, portable nuclear reactor capable of charging cell phones.
  • But, (Score:5, Funny)

    by jim_v2000 ( 818799 ) on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:05PM (#11769662)
    How long does it take to charge, and wouldn't you have to leave it somewehre with a constant air flow? Like, outside, or in front of a fan, or does it strap to your side so it uses the breeze when you walk?

    I can just imagine someone talking and their battery's about to die, and all the other person on the other end hears is "Wait, my phone is dying...hold on a sec *blowing sound* Ok, now where were we..*blowing sound*...Oh yes, about the *blowing sound*..."
  • by nizo ( 81281 ) * on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:06PM (#11769672) Homepage Journal
    I just realized, there are other good uses for "blow phones" too: simply add a breathalyzer to avoid those embarrassing late night drunken calls to your ex.
  • by kitty tape ( 442039 ) on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:06PM (#11769676) Journal
    How do you breathe?
  • Re:uhh... (Score:5, Funny)

    by Tackhead ( 54550 ) on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:06PM (#11769687)
    > > "It costs around $4, fits in your pocket and runs on air"
    >
    > Is that a turbine in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?

    From the Department of Industrial Design at Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi.

    I believe you meant to say "Please be telling me is in your pocket a turbine, or are you happy to be seeing me?"

    Now, if you'll pleased to be pardoning me, I have another caller in my queue. Some woman named Paris Hilton needs to be blowing on my hard drive to reboot her Windows.

  • by rtaylor ( 70602 ) on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:07PM (#11769693) Homepage
    What about us people who never leave the house?

    Simply place a fan next to the turbine.
  • by aichpvee ( 631243 ) on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:07PM (#11769700) Journal
    Then I guess it's time to put on the Superman costume and run up and down the stairs real fast.
  • by mmaddox ( 155681 ) <oopfoo@gm[ ].com ['ail' in gap]> on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:07PM (#11769701)
    Run, Tommy! Run like the wind! ...Can you hear me now?
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:08PM (#11769712)
    But that's stealing energy that rightfully belongs to the train operators.
  • by rd4tech ( 711615 ) * on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:08PM (#11769716)
    buy a second batery
  • by antifoidulus ( 807088 ) on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:10PM (#11769743) Homepage Journal
    air-powered fan next month.
    Powered exclusively by /. comments!
  • wind? (Score:4, Funny)

    by Loconut1389 ( 455297 ) on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:11PM (#11769750)
    "What else do you want?"

    -wind?
  • by jim_v2000 ( 818799 ) on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:12PM (#11769769)
    Can they get sued when people drop their phones, or lose an arm while holding it out the window?

    Only if it's because you're riding with an evil driver who rolls up the window on you.
  • Re:But, (Score:3, Funny)

    by rd4tech ( 711615 ) * on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:15PM (#11769797)
    ...*blowing sound*... and ...*blowing sound*... call me a ...*blowing sound*... ambula.......... ...*decaying whistling sound*...
  • by mentalfloss ( 122009 ) on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:16PM (#11769812) Homepage
    Replenish your airtime with.. uhm.. some air time!
  • by donutello ( 88309 ) on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:17PM (#11769816) Homepage
    ... how people travel [sumgenius.com.au] in [waxvisual.com] India.
  • by shlashdot ( 689477 ) on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:20PM (#11769850) Homepage Journal
    That's $1 per watt, which is the holy grail of renewable energy technologies, being the approximate cost of conventional power plants.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:22PM (#11769878)
    That'll do us a lot of good here in the US provided I can get the ice cold air conditioning in my Escalade cranked up on high to blow on your little charger.

    I realize you designed it to work by sticking it out the window of that decrepit bus that you and 160 other people are riding on (or perhaps on top of)...
  • yeeeeeeehaw (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:25PM (#11769914)
    That was really funny. It would be good for people who run in rodeos and then go home and ranch their cattle because there is a lot of wind on the praire and they would be riding around on horses, which is a lot of fun.

    The wind would blow, and then the battery would get really recharged. They could talk forever:
    Sample conversation

    Customer service: This is a Sprint customer service person, how may help you?

    Cowboy Neal: I would like to order some pizza
    ?

    Customer service: This is not a pizza place, this is Sprint Customer service

    Cowboy Neal: Oh, sorry, I just pressed some random buttoms because my battery is really charged up.

    Customer service: Oh you have one of those new air chargers, those are really cool

    Neal: Yeah, I like them a lot.

    Sprint customer service: Hey have you played Zelda: The wind waker?

    Cow Boy Neal: I hear it is awesome.

    Sprint person: Can you hear me now.

    Cow Boy Neal: Yes.
  • by SmokeHalo ( 783772 ) on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:29PM (#11769961)
    Turning a hand crank would make use of cheap, available human power.

    A pocket hand crank? I can see it now, a whole new array of pickup lines...
    "Excuse me miss, can you turn my hand crank? It's in my pants."
  • by Jeremiah Cornelius ( 137 ) on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:41PM (#11770075) Homepage Journal
    O.K.,

    I have a hundred of these, mounted on the roof of my Prius. Next...

  • by mikael ( 484 ) on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:46PM (#11770123)
    .... then we could have an electric powered car which recharges the battery automatically.
  • Re:RTFA (Score:3, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:47PM (#11770135)
    Err... why would hanging a 12V adapter out of a car window be better? I don't quite get that.
  • Re:Now.. (Score:5, Funny)

    by narcc ( 412956 ) on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:52PM (#11770218) Journal
    No, but I have a go-cart that's powered by my own sense of self-satisfaction...
  • by mduckworth ( 457088 ) on Thursday February 24, 2005 @04:54PM (#11770244) Homepage
    If you think about it carefully, the buttered toast has to be strapped to the cat's feet ;-)
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 24, 2005 @05:04PM (#11770389)
    I still prefer the alternator strapped to a cat with a slice of buttered toast strapped to its back.

    I'm afraid that will infringe upon my hovercraft patent.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 24, 2005 @05:05PM (#11770397)
    I do not like this idea. Girls who talk a lot on cell phones will have arms of a bodybuilder. But that's all a mater of taste... :)
  • by ambienceman ( 721763 ) <crazywolfeyes@yah o o . c om> on Thursday February 24, 2005 @05:09PM (#11770460) Homepage
    " GOOD!! "
  • by Cyn ( 50070 ) <(cyn) (at) (cyn.org)> on Thursday February 24, 2005 @05:12PM (#11770486) Homepage
    Now if your cell battery starts to get low while chatting to your friend while driving, you can just crank up your A/C, roll down your window, and hold one arm out the window while you eat and change the radio station with the other.

    Or for when your battery is a little low, but you just really need to call someone - you can blow on your phone for a few minutes, then pass the phone to a friend (if you have any left) and they can call 911 since you're hyperventilating.

    Seriously, in public transportation - of the times when you can hold your phone up to a window - you might want to purchase some tshirts that say "I'm an idiot, steal my expensive phone after I get off the bus". Any other times, you should be able to find a much more efficient and timely manner of charging your phone. Windows down + A/C up == your car is burning excess energy.
  • by SeanTobin ( 138474 ) * <<byrdhuntr> <at> <hotmail.com>> on Thursday February 24, 2005 @05:13PM (#11770497)
    If you think about it carefully, the buttered toast has to be strapped to the cat's feet ;-)
    Not in the "classical" buttered-toast-on-cat scenario. In the classical scenario, a slice of buttered toast it attached to the back of the cat (usually with duct tape) so that the buttered side is facing up if the cat is standing on its feet. When the cat-buttered-toast object is dropped from any height two laws regarding the components come into play. Firstly, a falling cat will always land on its feet. Secondly, a falling piece of buttered toast will always fall buttered-side down. When the cat-buttered-toast object falls, one of the "laws" will be violated assuming the cat-buttered-toast object does indeed hit the ground. Again, in the classical scenario the cat either ends up perpetually spinning above the ground, or simply floats in mid air.

    In your example you are using a non-traditional cat-buttered-toast model in which the cat is placed on top of the buttered toast in such a manner that the cat ends up with buttery paws. This model is not used for various reasons. Firstly, the difficulty of attaching toast to all four paws of the cat is at least an order of magnitude greater than simply attaching the toast to said cats back. Although various attempts at slicing the toast have overcome this difficulty, the amount of effort required is always greater than attaching the toast to the cat's back.

    In any event, the results of the non-traditional model are usually the same as the classical. Our cat with buttery paws is dropped from a height and attempts to land on its feet, however the toast that is attached to its feed attempts to land buttered-side down.

    Now, it should be noted that defenders of the classical scenario usually point out that the toast, relative to the cat, has already succeeded in landing buttered side down by the nature of it being attached to the cats paws. If the cat were to hit the ground while standing on the toast, it would be akin to someone steping on a slice of toast after it has already landed on the floor, buttered side down. Basically it would be irrelevant as the goal of the toast to attach its buttered side to a surface has already been acomplished.

    So, although I used the traditional buttered-toast-on-cat model and the non-traditional models are at least partially flawed, I believe I made the correct decision in its use.
  • by sinrakin ( 782827 ) on Thursday February 24, 2005 @05:25PM (#11770624)
    > Why not use Faraday's Principle of Induction like these LED torches [thinkgeek.com] Sort of handy, but I can't help but chuckle at: "Forever Flashlight" (one-year warranty).
  • by gkwok ( 773963 ) on Thursday February 24, 2005 @05:29PM (#11770677) Homepage
    You think that's air you're breathing?

    Hm.

  • by Psmylie ( 169236 ) on Thursday February 24, 2005 @05:29PM (#11770681) Homepage
    DON'T TRY THIS!

    I tried this once on a cat at home (not one of my favorites, fortunately). The cat landed on it's feet at the same time that the bread landed buttered-side down, causing a small tear in space time that instantly pulled the cat, toast, butter container, miscellaneous dishes, the toaster, and 3/4ths of a city block into a parallel dimension where old adages aren't always true. I can't imagine the horror of trying to live in such a place!

  • by Noofus ( 114264 ) * on Thursday February 24, 2005 @06:48PM (#11771672)
    I attempted this experiment. I tied a piece of buttered toast to my cat's back and dropped him off the side of the table. The cat landed on his feat and the toast slid around his body under the string and hung, butter side down, on his belly. It then slipped out of the string and fell butter side down on the floor.

    Granted my experiment might have been more sound with better method of toast attachment, I do believe this proves that neither law can be violated. Were I to more securely attach the toast some other method of getting both the toast butter side down on the ground and the cat on its feet would present itself ;)
  • by giminy ( 94188 ) on Thursday February 24, 2005 @10:52PM (#11773396) Homepage Journal
    What if we put the cat between two slices of toast? The slice on the cat's feet would be buttered so that the cat's feet were in the butter, and the slice on his back would be buttered so that the cat's back was in the butter. The toast on the cat's feet will orient itself so as to land butter side down, but the cat and the toast on its back will instinctively correct the positioning so that it would land on its feet. The trouble here is that only one slice of toast wants one orientation, while the other slice + cat wants the other orientation. This requires an additional slice of buttered toast (and a second layer of cat) to be added to the equation to balance things out.

    Of course, the intelligent reader will note that this also creates an imbalance. Now one cat and two slices of toast want one orientation, and one cat and one slice of toast want the other. We can add an infinite number of cats and toast slices and never reach equilibrium, proving that this thought experiment is irrational. QED.

Always draw your curves, then plot your reading.

Working...