CaminoBrowser.org Launches 126
Samuel Sidler writes "Introducing CaminoBrowser.org, the new Camino project site. The pages have been completely revamped with up-to-date information, useful and easy-to-read support pages, and, of course, pretty pictures. Months of effort have gone into creating a truly excellent site. While the product pages will remain hosted at mozilla.org, our new website will be the home of the project and all support/development information as well as up-to-date news and information."
Slick (Score:2, Interesting)
I mainly use Firefox on Windows anyways (as my main browsing experience). Good to see this baby still in development though. I remember how excited I got back in the 0.1 and 0.2 days everytime a new release came out
Re:Slick (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Slick (Score:2, Interesting)
Speaking of Gecko Browsers Using Native Widgets... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Why? (Score:3, Interesting)
(IIRC) Camino has native widgets. Firefox uses custom ones.
Cool website! (Score:1, Interesting)
Why Camino over Firefox? Camino is faster, uses fewer system resources, and has a beautiful Cocoa front end, meaning that it's GUI and widgets are all Aqua goodness. When I use Firefox, I feel like I'm on a Windows box, and that's not why I bought a Mac.
Thanks to all the Camino developers out there, they rock! I wish all the resources that went to Firefox for Mac were concentrated on Camino instead. Downloading a nightly as I type this to see what's up.
Re:Slick (Score:3, Interesting)
The three minute test... (Score:5, Interesting)
Camino: :-(
+Nicer tabs
+Better scrolling
+Better integration
-No Mozilla extensions.
-So no way to block Flash or images natively
+Much better preference panel
+Pretty close functionality to Safari.
+Fastest of the three, it seems.
Firefox:
-A little glitchy at times
+Very good extensions support
+Works mostly the same as Firefox on other platforms
-Integration with OSX not so good, nor is it supposed to be.
-Slow at times.
Safari:
+Just works
-No way to block annoying Flash popups
Safari works for most things, Firefox works for the rest, and Camino sort of just ends up out there in case the first two don't work.
Re:Why? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Slick (Score:4, Interesting)
Looking at the screenshots there's lots of improvements since I last saw it (0.7), but on the Mac side, Safari does everything I need.
My only problem with Safari is that it is so noticeably slower on HTTPS connections. I use a G4 at work, and any time I need to use an HTTPS connection I use Camino because Safari drags so much. It's not so noticeable at home where I have a 1.8GHz G5, but when on slower machines (including my mom's iBook), Safari just drags on secure connections.
Re:Ok, we have clones (Score:2, Interesting)
Its a native OS X application. If you use Firefox instead, you just have a windows/unix browser on OS X which is 5 years ahead of them.
E.g. Omniweb here, while I write this reply, spell check is in action. It just calls spell check framework of the system.
You wouldn't believe the "services" a mac user uses everyday. For me, a foreigner, its "one click answers" at first place.
Opera does some inventions about the stuff you mention. Their work with IBM will be in cars. A browser which you control purely by voice, voice XML etc.