Detecting Speech Without Microphones 221
kyle90 writes "New Scientist is reporting on a new way of detecting speech without using microphones, using electrodes places on the neck that measure muscle activity and nerve impulses. Apparently the user doesn't even need to speak the words out loud in order for them to be detected. This looks like pretty neat technology; if used with cell phones it could give the user a little more privacy, and the rest of us a little more peace and quiet."
Re:Huh? (Score:1, Insightful)
Don't expect this to ever beat the speed and usability of a normal throat mike. It's only usefulness is where a half-second or so delay is acceptable, and the silence is critical.
Re:Huh? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Technology (Score:3, Insightful)
People talking on handsfree cells already look like that.
Brin (Score:3, Insightful)
In the book he postulates that doing so, the actual movement can be reduced, and in time, you can speak quicker with this method than you can when actually vocalizing.
Re:Quick (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Subconscious speech? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Huh? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Quick (Score:2, Insightful)