Minority Report UI For The Military 227
merryprankster writes "New Scientist is reporting that a 'Minority Report'
style interface is being developed by defense company Raytheon. Users don a
pair of reflective gloves and manipulate images projected on a panoramic
screen. A mounted camera keeps track of hand movements and a computer
interprets gestures. Raytheon has even
employed John Underkoffler, the researcher who
proposed the interface to the makers of the film. Now just wait till Billboards start scanning your iris."
Has potential (that's being wasted) (Score:5, Insightful)
Gorilla arms. (Score:1, Insightful)
I have a (cool) Wacom Cintiq tablet, and, in contrast, it is completely bearable and even comfortable because it is (almost) horizontal when I use it. If I had to use it vertically like a 1980s home light-pen system for a C64 (which I am old enough to have used briefly...), my arms would be in constant pain by now.
Re:Where do the $5,000 toilet seats go? (Score:3, Insightful)
This might be useful in air combat control. There's got to be a limit to what can be conveyed on a flat computer screen or edge-lit piece of glass.
It might also be useful for detecting patterns in huge amounts of data. You've probably seen images where data is represented by a 3D projection. If you could manipulate the interpretation from inside, maybe you could see patterns more readily than from a fixed viewing point outside the system.
Besides, think of how fun it would be to play Populous with one of these and really "shoot" lightning bolts out of your fingers.
Pretty dangerous if you pick your nose or scratch your crotch, though, don't you think?
Because it is exhausting (Score:5, Insightful)
Try it yourself - stick your hands in front of the monitor, a bit below level with your shoulders. Feel free to move them around as if you are "manipulating".
Now, see how long you can hold them up there before your shoulders give out.
Now compare that to how long you can use a keyboard and mouse in one session.
It is not even in the same ballpark.
"virus'" (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Where do the $5,000 toilet seats go? (Score:5, Insightful)
Someone probably said the same thing about ARPANET.
I wonder what congressional district the defense company is located in?
Edward J. Markey [house.gov] (Ranking Democrat on the Telecommunications and Internet subcommittee)
Raytheon is based in Waltham, Massachussetts, but they have offices everywhere. Canada, Japan, Oz...
And they are Linux friendly. [prnewswire.com]
And where in the field will this be used?
One use might be a virtual sand table. Not everything the military does is 'in the field'.
Am I the only one who gets scared when I imagine what a room in the pentagon might look like, with Generals wearing special glasses, and moving projected data off walls?
Probably.
Generals don't move data. They direct Col's and Majors to do that.
Re:Do they also replicate the part of the interfac (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Because it is exhausting (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Seems like an awfully inefficient UI (Score:3, Insightful)
it is. But it wasn't designed to be a computer UI. It was designed to work with the thought-process of the user.
Have you ever stood up and walked to think? Ever wanted to guesture and put something on the wall?
It's a useful technology. Not one that you'd use next to your keyboard, but one that you'd use to direct a media stream or command a hundred distinct fire-teams.
Re:Because it is exhausting (Score:4, Insightful)
If you never take the stairs, try walking down 8 or 10 flights of stairs, the next day your calves will be thrashed, but if you do it every day you won't even notice it a bit.
Or try mixing concrete by hand, uber hard labor if it's not something you're used to, but run of the mill for people that do it regularly.
Holding your hands in the air isn't exactly hard labor lol, although I suspect we'd also do it standing just like they did in the movies, the kinematics of moving your arms and hands is very different standing than it is sitting.
Re:I'm Impressed (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Seems like an awfully inefficient UI (Score:3, Insightful)
We were just playing around years ago with a stereo wall, and I found that data was easier to visualize, and the gyromouse interface was more natural than a puck on a desk. On the other hand, this was still only one handed, and there are times that you wanted to be able to use the other hand for more operations.
The average office-drone isn't going to have this technology, but architects, doctors, scientists, etc, will take to it once the space/price issues for the screens get solved.
Re:Wow - this technology is so new.... (Score:2, Insightful)
For example, notice you can independently bend your second and third knuckes. (Counting from the fingertip, that is.) Each possibility leads to a unique shape.
I suspect the least uncomfortable system would be to have latex gloves with unqiuely-colored spots on key areas. Use a binary system with paints that only reflect at specific wavelengths, and create custom CCDs that detect on each of these channels. Reserve one wavelength for "invalid", to increase contrast between valid sensor spots and the rest of the glove.
Re:I'm Impressed (Score:3, Insightful)
Not to mention that text appears line by line on screen (slower than a PCXT) with a sound reminiscent of a line printer...
I was actually impressed with the UI in Minority Report.
I don't know why MR is getting the "credit" for this. It's hardly a new idea in academia; in fiction there's of course Neuromancer-style cyberspace (and and many others), and in movies 1995's Johnny Mnemonic (almost exactly the same) and 1994's Disclosure (full body immersion).
The latter reminds me of another element of the Hollywood interface: files are deleted line by line, or page by page, as you watch... and no one ever seems to have an offline backup, one copy is all there is.
Add voice too. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Where do the $5,000 toilet seats go? (Score:2, Insightful)
Someone probably said the same thing about ARPANET.
ARPANET wasn't about replacing nimble control with sluggish/gross control or mimicking movies that involved lotto balls as a core element.
I really don't see much here that can't be done using a smaller finger controlled representation of the bigger one.
The arm waving thing is generally idiotic, like most Speilberg stuff...