Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Technology Science

Researchers Control the Flip of Electron Spin 157

karvind writes "According to PhysOrg, physicists in Europe, California and at Ohio University now have found a way to manipulate the spin of an electron with a jolt of voltage from a battery. In this experiment voltage was applied to Indium Arsenide based quantum dot which flipped the spin of electron inside it and emitted a photon. The scientists were able to manipulate how long it would take for the electron to flip its spin and emit a photon - from one to 20 nanoseconds. This may have possible applications in optoelectronics and quantum cryptography. Results were published in the latest issue of Physics Review Letters"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Researchers Control the Flip of Electron Spin

Comments Filter:
  • by proverbialcow ( 177020 ) on Sunday May 29, 2005 @05:45PM (#12672120) Journal
    How about an ansible?

    Pair off two electrons in a shell, flip the rotation of one and you change the rotation of another - instanteously. Even if they're no longer in the same atom and millions of miles apart.
  • by 1nt3lx ( 124618 ) on Sunday May 29, 2005 @05:46PM (#12672128) Homepage Journal
    I found myself reading this article quite mindful of the frequency of stories recently that suggest the US is headed down a dangerous path of neglect and ignorance. Not only in the arena of biological research (stem cell, et al) but in technological developments as well. This is not a matter of observation but rather official administrative policy http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/0 2/183230&tid=98&tid=103&tid=190&tid=215&tid=231&ti d=14 [slashdot.org] .

    "The study was funded by EPSRC in the United Kingdom, Ohio University, Volkswagen, and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundations, with additional support by the Scottish Executive and the Royal Society of Edinburgh"

    It seems to me that this is exactly one example of the type of technology the government should be promoting, for military benefit or not. What I am not sure of is wether the researches had the option to solicit US funding or if they chose rather to not bother?

    I don't know, it struck me as a little odd considering that we're told repeatedly about how important it is to be a world leader in economy, technology, and security here is something that promotes all three and the pentagon's fat couffers are nowhere to be found. (well potentially compromises the third, but that's another story)

  • by jfern ( 115937 ) on Sunday May 29, 2005 @06:02PM (#12672218)
    Quantum error correction can be used to fix quantum errors. If the errors are independent, local, then there is a fault tolerant threshold, below which you will be able to correct enough errors to do arbitrary quantum computation. Error correction will typically add polylog (polynomial in log n) overhead in the number of qubits and the running time. So Shor's factoring algorithm becomes O(n^3 log^a n) instead of O(n^3).
  • by memoriesofgreen ( 784598 ) on Sunday May 29, 2005 @07:06PM (#12672556) Homepage
    A couple of points;

    Just because you are part of America, it doesn't give you the right to discover everything in the Universe.

    Perhaps I am reading into your post too much, but it implies that because of a lack of funding, it should have been an US group who headed this discovery?

    Not any one group, organization or country can push forward the bounds of humanity on their own.

    I for one relish any discovery that is made. I also realize that their is a political element to everything, especially scientific discoveries.

    It is up to every civilization to grow, prosper and then fall. I, as one of Her Majesties Subjects (UK), understand that empires are fleeting.

    PS

    Their is an H in whether ("I am not sure of is wether the researches"), if you are going to proclaim yourself as a spelling Nazi (
    http://slashdot.org/~1nt3lx/journal/7289 [slashdot.org]) then at least don't be hypocritical. Also a few commas wouldn't go amiss.

  • by kmac06 ( 608921 ) on Sunday May 29, 2005 @07:34PM (#12672705)
    No, it doesn't need to be completely sheilded. As far as 'reading' the information simultaneously detroying the quantum state, that is true...just like reading a memory cell that uses a capacitor destroys the information, yet we miraculously still build computers with them :P. Also, the application of quantum computers is quite limited (factoring numbers is one thing they can do well), don't expect to be playing Doom 6 on them.

    And don't think of that 'other world' explanation. It's not really what is happening according to current theory, just a convenient/spooky way to explain it to some lay people. And yes, IAAP

New York... when civilization falls apart, remember, we were way ahead of you. - David Letterman

Working...