Shaking a 275-ton Building 110
Roland Piquepaille writes "If you want to predict how a tall building can resist to an earthquake, some researchers have better tools than others. Engineers from the San Diego Supercomputer Center (SDSC) have built a full-size 275-ton building and really shaken it to obtain earthshaking images. The building was equipped with some 600 sensors and filmed as the shake table simulated the 1994 Northridge earthquake in Los Angeles, California. It gave so much data to the engineers to analyze that they needed a supercomputer to help them. Now they hope their study will yield to better structure performance for future buildings in case of earthquakes."
Shakey (Score:3, Interesting)
Picture LInk (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Any structural engineers around? (Score:2, Interesting)
But it wouldn't surprise me if there were a market for such a thing... Include some other foreseeable disasters (fire, flood, airplane, Michael Jackson...), and sell it to major construction companies in skyscraper or other 'secure' building markets.
And just for kicks, maybe add an easter egg like sim city, so that you can destroy your buildings with aliens, dragons, etc.
Is it Accurate? (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:The only problem is (Score:3, Interesting)
True enough for moon rockets, but for some simulations -- like projecting whether a given asteroid (1950 DA [nasa.gov] for example), the colour does matter if you're project the orbit to see if it hits Earth in 800 or so years. Over such long time intervals the difference in sunlight pressure (and a couple of related effects) on a light vs dark surface will affect the trajectory.
The same effects have an affect on the rocket too, of course, but as you point out, on that scale they're not important.
Re:Shakey (Score:2, Interesting)
What you describe is a good application for eccentric mass vibrators, if you can affix one to the structure. I do appreciate the scale of the shake table these folks built, but sometimes you can't move the structure to your shake table to test it.
Eccentric mass vibrators are just like the cell phone vibrator (or other things you know of that vibrate) but much larger. And you strap these to the roofs of large buildings, wherever they are.
This is a crude Wikipedia article on it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vibrator_(mechanical) [wikipedia.org]
Here's a good example of one at UCLA: http://nees.ucla.edu/eccentric_mass.htm [ucla.edu].
Another interesting way to do structural testing is called snapback testing. A lot like when you played tug-of-war with your friend, but you let go of the rope. So you attach cabling to a structure and force it to be bent by pulling really hard on it. The coupling mechanism allows for rapid de-coupling of the force being applied (i.e., it lets go). The structure snaps back to its original position, and in so doing you can analyze its dynamic behavior under roughly controlled conditions.
Shaking Building Not New (Score:4, Interesting)