Demonoid Tracker Is Back Online 211
Crymson4 writes "We discussed the shutdown of the Demonoid torrent tracker last fall. For those who don't already know, Demonoid is back up. Looks like they found a new host for the Web site and the tracker is functioning properly as well. For those with old accounts, all the old data has been saved. It's almost as if they never left."
Wha? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Wha? (Score:5, Informative)
though off the top of my head i can also see how a 'closed' system could be a legal defence, your not distributing to the public everyone is a member of your 'private' club.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Wha? (Score:5, Funny)
I cannot wait to start torrenting those warez. I'm going to collect hundreds of MP3s! Information wants to be freeeeee!
looking for trouble? (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
mike89@spamex.com
I will delete that email address as soon as I get the invite. THANK YOU!
Re: (Score:2)
misery.guts@gmail.com
Re: (Score:2)
*Rolls eyes* It's not at all hard to get in. The second time I tried them, they must have just done a purge, because I signed up there and then.
I'm assuming their resurrection will engender a lot of traffic. Give it a couple of weeks and you'll probably be able to register just fine.
Re:Wha? (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Wha? (Score:4, Informative)
canada back online (Score:2)
I don't know about this 1:1 ratio thing of which you speak, but I am sure glad to be able to resume leaching from Canada. They blocked the country due to legal threats quite a while ago, and now seem to have forgotten to do so again. Will see where that goes.
If you ask me it is the protocols job to get leaches to contribute not the sites. After all the site serves ads regardless...
Re:canada back online (Score:4, Informative)
Traceroute shows they're not in Canada anymore. The web server is in the Ukraine, the domain registration is in Brazil. So I'd guess that those legal threats are no longer a problem.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Not if the site operator resides in a country that's a signatory to the Berne Convention and is providing access to folks in those countries.
I'm aware that it's a popular myth that hosting your site in some other country will exempt you from the laws of the country in which you live. And, sure enough, lots of folks have tried it. But it's generally not the case.
If this is boggling anybody, conduct a thought experiment by substituting "information freedom fighter sticking it to the rich and greedy copyri
Re:canada back online (Score:5, Insightful)
Of course not. But it makes it a lot harder to pursue. Dealing with your own government is numbingly frustrating as it is. Now consider having to deal with governments that are not your own, and that may not have the same priorities. So, let's see. You need to jump through the hoops of Brazil's government to compel a "privacy guard" type registrar to give the name of the domain holder. That turns out to be a mail drop in Vanuatu. Call around and try to find someone who speaks Bislama, because while you're pretty sure that whoever answers the government phone in Vanuatu understands English, they're being pricks about it. Give up on that approach, which is just as well because even if you had found someone who spoke Bislama and filed the necessary paperwork in that language with the Vanuatu Justice Ministry, it would have turned out that the mailing address is vacant lot in Amsterdam, and the email address is a free account in South Africa.
So, go after the server in the Ukraine (even though you're pretty sure the operator is backing everything up by FTP to somewhere else, and can start up at a new location on 24 hours notice). Call around to find someone who speaks Ukranian, and someone else who has a petty cash fund big enough to pay the bribe that's going to be required. On second thought, say "what the hell" and give up, you joined the force to catch bank robbers, not to play bureaucratic games in languages you don't understand, for the benefit of some company that isn't even in your country.
Besides, what makes you think the site operator is Canadian?
Re: (Score:2)
Excellent points! You're certainly correct that it might make it a lot harder.
Funny that you referenced Vanatu -- of course, that's where the fine folks at Kazaa registered their company, apparently in a similar attempt to throw up some legal barriers. As we know, it ultimately didn't work out, as they were tried in Australia, where the executives live.
I did not state that the kid running Demonoid is a Canadian (the "canada back online" title was from an earlier post, something about being blocked in Ca
Re: (Score:2)
One rule for houses, another for creation (Score:2)
But riddle me this..
If I spend 5 years of my life building a house, its mine for my entire life and its passed down to my descendants FOREVER. If I spend the same 5 years creating a movie book or software, apparently I don't enjoy the same rights to what I created.
Why?
Explain to me why there is one rule for property and another for creative works. Is a garden not a creative work? ditto arc
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Explain to me why there is one rule for property and another for creative works.
One obvious reason is that they are different kinds of things. A piece of physical property, like a house, cannot be given to someone else without depriving the creator of it. A creative work, rendered in digital form, can be copied and distributed to others without depriving the creator of it.
Another difference is that physical property can only be sold once, while digital works can be sold any number of times. For these reasons, it is clear that physical property is fundamentally different from digi
Re: (Score:2)
Surely its more important for society that people do NOT hoard physical land as populations rise. Surely thats way more important than luxury good like digital entertainment? Yet you advocate people inheriting property and keeping eternal rights to it.
Why?
Re: (Score:2)
Quite simply, because property laws of any kind exist to maximize social welfare.
Even as recently as two hundred years ago, property rights were very rare. In most societies, everything from farms to wells wells considered communally owned. Despite the romantic illusions of comradeship that such policies inspire
Perpetual copyright is elephant shit (Score:2)
or are you in favour of the state seizing your house when you die, or 50 years after you bought it and making it public domain?
Are you in favor of the state seizing your copyright when your heirs fail to pay intellectual property tax on it? Because if copyright in musical works becomes perpetual, then people will eventually own exclusive rights in all possible combinations of notes [slashdot.org], just as people presently own exclusive rights in all land. The short story "Melancholy Elephants" by Spider Robinson [spiderrobinson.com] investigates some of the ramifications of overly long copyright terms.
Re:All file shareres are leechers (Score:4, Insightful)
... and who then post the music, the movies, the shows and the software freely on torrents.
No longer quite so honest in your book, huh?
Anyway, ethics is relative and subject to change, and so are business models.
As far as I'm concerned, it is better to let everyone adapt to new conditions in the world than to try to reverse them.
Besides, it has been proved that torrents don't hurt music sales in the least; quite the contrary, in fact. Software companies have also profited from the increased mindshare (private users may pirate the software, but when they use it for business, they buy the software they are familiar with instead of something else).
Aside from all that, the ratio requirement is there so that information would continue to flow — it only happens when everyone gives at least as much as they get. And that's why it is called sharing.
A 100% requirement is not achievable (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Broadcast TV/radio, purchased DVD, purchased games, etc :)
A torrent can send only one file or one folder, uniquely identified by a hashing algorithm. Multiple rips of one TV or radio broadcast, multiple MP3 recompressions of a CD album, or multiple single layer recompressions of one purchased DVD will come out to different hash values. So if you want to improve your ratio on an existing torrent, you can't just buy a copy and rip it.
Are you talking about the courier layer of warez distribution [wikipedia.org]? I can understand why couriers would have a share ratio advantage
Re:All file shareres are leechers (Score:4, Informative)
Quite a lot of the content here is likely to originate from people who bought the whatever and uploaded it. Another major source is where the content was broadcast to a significent chunk of the planet.
without them, the stuff would not get made,
This is the "every pirated copy is a lost sale" theory. Which has been completly debunked. Quite simply the vast majority of the people involved are not "potential customers" in the first place.It's also very possible that the "pirate" version, which tends to be "Available worldwide and DRM free", will be the only version available to people. Possibly for months/years even forever.
Re:All file shareres are leechers (Score:5, Insightful)
No, it's not. Ever heard of TV shows getting cancelled because of bad ratings, movie sequels being made because the original sold well, artists being dumped by a label when their latest album bombs, et cetera? It's not hard to see that the creation of media is influenced by people going out and paying for it. That also means that people going out and buying stuff contribute significantly to the diversity of media available for downloading. If you only download and never buy, you are profiting from the availability of materials that is paid for by paying customers.
That has nothing to do with "every pirated copy is a lost sale" (or "without IP no art would be produced"). It's just pointing out that when person A buys albums and person B downloads them, A contributes more to the production of future albums than B. How you can miss the point so completely and still be modded "4: insightful" is beyond me.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Switched video (Score:2)
Labels still own lots of exclusive rights (Score:2)
And nothing's stopping you from making your movie independant.
Other than the fact that most multiplex cinemas won't show unrated films or films from lesser known distributors, and a consortium of major Hollywood movie distributors [mpaa.org] manages the U.S. film rating system [filmratings.com].
why is $actor so freaking rich for just talking and walking
Because $actor has demonstrated that he knows how to talk and walk more effectively than the majority of the population.
Labels are such crooks I'm suprised so few people are actively dumping their labels to go independant.
For one thing, if an artist is already signed to a label, the label owns exclusive rights to the artist's voice over the course of multiple albums. For another, until the price of a re
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
This is the "every pirated copy is a lost sale" theory. Which has been completly debunked. Quite simply the vast majority of the people involved are not "potential customers" in the first place.It's also very possible that the "pirate" version, which tends to be "Available worldwide and DRM free", will be the only version available to people. Possibly for months/years even forever.
Actually, that theory is true. I use my linux server running 20 separate bittorrent configurations to pirate. Each one downloads two movies per day (for speed, they seed to each other, and each download two movies per day. By the end of the day, I have $20 per movie * 20 copies * 2 movies = $800 per day. I put the movies on a dvd at the end of the day (20 copies of the same thing have very good compression) and put it under my pillow. The piracy fairy brings me my $800 of disposable income straight from th
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
What about CDs that are no longer in print (and impossible to find second-hand), or hard-to-find DVDs that are encoded for a region other than yours?
Re: (Score:2)
But the GP's example of a major Hollywood blockbuster is not an exception. It is freely available if you want to pay a few $currencys. That it isn't available under the precise terms you would like also does not count, as it's grossly tilted in your favour ("I'd like it DRM free, and in Ogg Theora, and hosted on a Linux server, and with a penguin on it, and a pony, or else I won't pay a $currency/100").
Re: (Score:2)
I'm just saying....
Re: (Score:2)
What's my point. I guess I'm asking on Slashdot to see if anyone can help me find the UK version
Re: (Score:2)
"What about CDs that are no longer in print (and impossible to find second-hand), or hard-to-find DVDs that are encoded for a region other than yours?"
That's a fine tangental discussion, but not really relevant. Look at the top list of most any tracker, or the list published by BigChampagne [bigchampagne.com], which aggregates this info. It matches closely with the stuff that's popular at the moment.
The BitTorrent protocol can also be used to share Linux distros, and other authorized stuff. But neither these, nor the "n
Re: (Score:2)
Devil's advocate (Score:2)
<devils-advocate>
What about CDs that are no longer in print (and impossible to find second-hand)
Hire a band and record your own version. Pay the songwriter the legally mandated nine cents per track per copy. Now the song is in print again.
or hard-to-find DVDs that are encoded for a region other than yours?
Buy six DVD players, one for each region, and a TV capable of handling both 50 Hz and 60 Hz component video.
</devils-advocate>
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
so your saying if i download enough RIAA label music and hollywood movies i'll send the fuckers broke and they will have to stop making their dribble? excellent!
Re: (Score:2)
so your saying if i download enough RIAA label music and hollywood movies i'll send the fuckers broke and they will have to stop making their dribble? excellent!
From whom am I leeching? (Score:2)
You are leeching off the honest people who actually BUY the music, BUY the movies and BUY the software. without them, the stuff would not get made
I resent that insinuation. If I download a work that was first published 50 years ago, which has since fallen out of print, and whose author has since died, from whom am I leeching and why? If I download free software (such as GNU/Linux distributions) and free text (such as Project Gutenberg collections), from whom am I leeching and why?
Re: (Score:2)
My country [wikipedia.org] is allegedly run by a bunch of shady criminals.
But seriously, how does taking a work out of print "promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts"? What do you recommend for orphan works?
Re: (Score:2)
If Microsoft takes GPL Linux code and secretly incorporates it into Windows 7, who's being leeched from and why?
Microsoft can add Linux as a subsystem inside Windows [colinux.org] without leeching anything from anyone. But if Microsoft does this secretly, Linus Torvalds and other authors of Linux are being leeched from. The GPLv2 allows reuse of code by those who preserve "an appropriate copyright notice". Removing these notices is not only copyright infringement but also plagiarism, and it is leeching because a lot of people who write free software do so for name recognition to develop their CVs.
GNU GPL on a work says it is
Re:Wha? (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Wha? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=684425 [ssrn.com]
That might pose a problem. There is a reason that the fed expands money supply.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I thought everybody knew that.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I call BS. What I see is merely a random (and lucky) coalescence of community good will. It can occasionally happen, but for every tracker like yours there's a bajillion out there where NOBODY seeds, and I end up having to wait two days for a 500MB file. It also really depends on what type of content the tracker hosts.
I have a lot of friends who use BT, who are not as attuned to the whole concept of not being a dick and seeding. In fact I am the *only* person I know personally that actually regularly seed
Slow uplink makes it harder to share evenly (Score:2)
I have a lot of friends who use BT, who are not as attuned to the whole concept of not being a dick and seeding. In fact I am the *only* person I know personally that actually regularly seeds. Why? Because ISPs have bandwidth caps, and people are too cheap to put some of their caps towards contributing back. I've always believed that seeding is the "rule of the game" when it comes to BitTorrent, it's the thing that makes the wheel keep spinning, but the vast majority of people on public trackers do not seem to agree.
To be fair, it's hard for many people to get a good upload ratio since home broadband connections tend to be hugely asymmetrical. A typical DSL connection will let you download an episode of Lost in 15 minutes but it over 1.5 hours to upload (assuming max throughput). So even in the ideal case, a user may have to leave the torrent going for hours to reach a 1.0 ratio, which many are not likely to do, simply because they are used to closing a program when it's finished downloading.
What's more, other clien
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Feel free to send an invite to rjpkhsmz@trashmail.net [mailto]
You know someone with a three-digit Slashdot ID is the sort of fine character who will be a credit to your torrenting community. :-)
Re:Wha? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Wha? (Score:5, Funny)
Want an invite?
Comment removed (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Wha? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Wha? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Wha? (Score:5, Funny)
I was talking about other people's information, not mine. Obviously.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But I challenge some fellow demonoid members to share as well.
Private tracker. (Score:3, Interesting)
You need invite only registration if you really want to be able to enforce ratios. Otherwise people just create disposable accounts, leech to the cap and never seed.
On Demonoid, people seed or their ratio goes to shit and they can't DL.
Anyway, I'm glad it's back. TPB is great, but it doesn't always cover all the bases for me.
Re: (Score:2)
Nice ratio of 1.5 million there, buddy!
Re: (Score:2)
"Information must be free!" ( but only to my friends that in effect pay for it by being required to do something in return )
Re: (Score:2)
I don't see any hypocrisy. The opinion that the law shouldn't be used to restrict people from sharing information does not oblige them to use their resources to distribute it. The opinion is not that they must do so, but merely that they should be able to do so if they want to.
Maybe your confusion is because you got the saying wrong. It's "Information wants to be free", and it's a statement about economics.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
According to http://gmail.com/ [gmail.com], Google Mail is still in beta. Did you mean something else?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I've found that unless there are no leechers at all, it's hard to AVOID winding up with at least a ratio of 0.3 -- which seems like a reasonable giveback to me. A ratio of 1.0 or greater isn't always practical, nor should it be necessary in a healthy system with many contributors. Everyone giving back a little bit equates to the same as a few giving much and the rest giving nothing, tho the latter situati
no catch? (Score:4, Interesting)
They did not goto court (the innocent admins would have shouted it from the roof-tops), they must have had an out-of-court settlement. Considering all the old account are still available, this stinks of a setup.
I am from Canada, and as we are aware there are several laws that 'allow' me to d'load. There is even one that I can think of that allows me to upload. BUT that said, I will not log back into demonoid, I will not create a new account.
I will continue to use the private trackers that I am currently on, and most importantly continue to use Piratebay to search.
Re:no catch? (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Just wary, and paranoid.
hehe paranoid of demoniod.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Citation needed, or STFU with the FUD, RIAA-troll.
Suprnova never came back... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
...but Demonoid did. I think this indicates a subtle but meaningful change.
Though it's possible that the idea behind pirating has evolved from a "free stuff is sweet" idea when it first started to a "free stuff is sweet + stick it to the RIAA/MPAA/similar entities" idea, I think that would probably be looking over a number of much less ideological and much more IRL/priorities/personal reasons not to restart it consequential to whoever was administrating the site.
/. (I have the beta skin
That being said, on a completely OT side point, though I (mostly) dislike the new skin of
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
TORRENTS R DEAD (Score:2, Funny)
Oblig. Ackbar quote (Score:5, Funny)
~ Admiral Ackbar.
Wow (Score:2, Insightful)
The Pirate Bay is okay but didn't have the range of Demonoid. I used to have a Torrentleech account with 20gb worth of positive ratio but was a victim of their new "regular login" rule, so it's great to have a comparable site back from the dead.
Best-- only? site for old comics (Score:2)
Great, if only.... (Score:2)
Anyone manage to find a Bell throttling workaround for deluge? ( or any other Linux P2P) Turning on encryption hasn't helped.
Re: (Score:2)