Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Operating Systems Software Businesses Windows Apple Linux

Triple Booting an Intel Mac the Right Way 101

Miah Clayton writes "In the past, installing Mac OS X, Linux, and Windows on an Intel mac meant that you were forced into only having 3 usable partition slots due to the MBR/GPT hybrid limitations. Steven Noonan figured out a way to avoid dealing with the MBR partition limit and have a Linux install that isn't performance-crippled by having a swap file instead of a swap partition."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Triple Booting an Intel Mac the Right Way

Comments Filter:
  • GPT partitions (Score:5, Informative)

    by c_g_hills ( 110430 ) <chaz AT chaz6 DOT com> on Friday October 31, 2008 @12:15PM (#25584817) Homepage Journal

    Since Windows even now only recognizes the Master Boot Record (MBR) format

    This is untrue. 64bit versions of Windows support GPT, as do versions newer than Vista.

    Also, I don't have a problem using a swapfile. I see no performance difference at all.

  • by Chrononium ( 925164 ) on Friday October 31, 2008 @01:29PM (#25586181)

    Sadly, since we are dealing with the world of computing, things do change, especially for the Mac in the times since those articles were written. The ARS report was benchmarking an emulated version of Photoshop (that's what "Rosetta" does). Fast forward to today, we already have Photoshop CS3 (Mac Pro's do beat the G5's) and there's also CS4. According to one benchmarking source, Photoshop CS3 did do slightly better with the 8 core Mac Pro versus the 4 core (although I would agree that the difference is so small that it could be within measurement error).

  • by Taxman415a ( 863020 ) on Friday October 31, 2008 @02:16PM (#25586979) Homepage Journal

    Indeed it's been a long time since that wasn't the case. Since the 2.6 Kernel came out basically. Here's the lkml thread on it. http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/6/29/11 [lkml.org] and http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/7/7/326 [lkml.org] are the two posts. The latter is more informative, the former is definitive and clearly shows Andrew Morton is the one saying that part too. This is from 2005 folks. Someone notify the submitter. That is of course unless you don't trust Andrew Morton to know what he is talking about. And just because this comes up every once in a while, googling for linux swap file performance finds that post easily.

The moon is made of green cheese. -- John Heywood

Working...