Parallels Desktop For Mac Vs. VMware 195
neilticktin writes "MacTech performed an exhaustive set of benchmarks comparing Parallels Desktop 4 to VMWare Fusion 2 to run Windows on a Mac. To tackle this problem, MacTech undertook a huge benchmarking project starting in December — over 2500 tests by stopwatch. The goal was to see how the recent versions of VMWare Fusion and Parallels Desktop performed on different levels of Mac hardware, using XP, Vista, 64-bit, multi-procs, games, etc. ... As usual, results vary by what's important to you."
Desktop Comparison (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Citrix? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Slashdotted after 3 comments (Score:5, Informative)
Personally, I prefer VirtualBox [virtualbox.org]. It has all the features you expect of a professional VM (rootless desktop, 3D acceleration, drive passthrough, etc.) but is available for the low-low price of $0.
The situation looks a bit different if you're going to use it for business purposes, but for home use there is no better option than VirtualBox.
Re:free? (Score:5, Informative)
I would have liked to see Sun's VirtualBox [virtualbox.org]thrown into the mix. I use Fusion and "love" it (as much as one can love having to use Windows), but a free alternative would be nice.
That being said, I also use Crossover (WINE) for quite a few things (IE6, RegexBuddy) so I don't have to launch a full VM image.
The article is loading (slowly) through Coral cache [nyud.net]
Re:free? (Score:5, Informative)
VirtualBox got off to a slow start. There were some issues for a long while that prevented it from running FreeBSD in guests, but they were fixed with the 2.1.2 release. Now it works very well, and I didn't have to pay anything to go from the old release to the one that actually works (or for the original release, for that matter). The latest version apparently supports 3D on Windows guests, but I don't have a Windows install set up at the moment so I haven't been able to test this.
Article is Flawed (Score:1, Informative)
FTA:"A few years back, Apple switched the Mac platform from PowerPC to Intel processors. This introduced some interesting opportunities for the Mac, including the ability to run operating systems other than Mac OS X on a Mac"
Wrong. Linux ran and runs on PowerPC based macs. Do your research please...
Re:Uhhh, it does? (Score:5, Informative)
That's from nearly two years ago. There's now support for hardware accelerated 3D. From section 4.8 of the user manual:
Re:Always funny to me... (Score:5, Informative)
It sucks that I am sometimes forced to use it, but I lose a sale if I don't.
That's my reasoning for needing a Windows instance, and I bet my situation is not that uncommon.
Re:Desktop Comparison (Score:2, Informative)
The idea is to compare virtualization solutions running on Mac OSX. VMWare ESX does NOT run on OSX.
Re:Citrix? (Score:3, Informative)
If you want to play DirectX games, you are probably best using Boot Camp, or finding a native version of the game. Neither Parallels nor VMWare will reliably support anything later than DirectX 8, most recent games, certainly anything where performance is an issue, requires DirectX 9.
I use Parallels to run MS Access and Visio - there is no native versions of either of these for Mac, and a few accounting programs that are Windows only.
Re:This violates VMware's EULA (Score:4, Informative)
From Fusion EULA:
You may use the Software to conduct internal performance testing and benchmarking studies, the results of which you (and not unauthorized third parties) may publish or publicly disseminate; provided that VMware has reviewed and approved of the methodology, assumptions and other parameters of the study. Please contact VMware at benchmark@vmware.com to request such review.
Re:This violates VMware's EULA (Score:5, Informative)
Wrong! VMware only wants to review the methodology and approve it. You do not have to get the results approved.
From register.vmware.com/content/eula.html
"you (and not unauthorized third parties) may publish or publicly disseminate; provided that VMware has reviewed and approved of the methodology, assumptions and other parameters of the study. Please contact VMware at benchmark@vmware.com to request such review."
Re:Always funny to me... (Score:3, Informative)
You probably have not used Linux in a long time. You don't have to edit config files as you describe anymore. There are many GUI tools available, depending on your distribution.
Also, everything you list for your Mac setup is easily doable and freely available on a Linux setup, with the exception of Quicktime. And there are plenty of us who think Quicktime is a steaming pile, so we use other, more accessible formats.
Just sayin'.
Hosting server issue resolved, article loads bette (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Apparently the final benchmark is still underwa (Score:3, Informative)
Re:'Fusion' ne 'ESX' (Score:3, Informative)
My biggest gripe is the removal of anything Linux'y, as with white box hardware it becomes harder to use cheaper gear as none of it plug's in to ESX. eg Cheap UPS's and Raid Cards (ie the HP/Adaptec 2610SA). Aside from that, Tyan Board and Raid Card -> 20mins to fully installed VMware ESXi environment.
Re:free? (Score:3, Informative)