Submitting a review for consideration is easy; please first read Slashdot's book review guidelines. Updated: 2008114 by samzenpus
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2009 Geeknet, Inc.
Simple (Score:5, Insightful)
There's nothing like keeping your own data on your own system..
Re:Simple (Score:4, Insightful)
Parent
Re:Simple (Score:5, Interesting)
Or even just keeping a copy of your own data on your own system.
Thats why I don't call it "cloud computing", I prefer OPS (other peoples servers). Its more self-explanitory.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Why? What could be a better phrase to describe something entirely clouded, than "cloud"? Keep the term and contrast it to "clear sky computing" where no clouds hide the sun (i.e. the data).
Re:Simple (Score:4, Funny)
Ya'll down with OPS.
Parent
Re:Simple (Score:5, Insightful)
Bingo.
Let's see, you upload images and text onto Facebook. Now, what's stopping you from uploading the same images and text onto MySpace? _Nothing_.
The author's bitch is that you don't have a one-click Export-Import function. Should you? Should Facebook or whoever be required to make the structure that they have provided for free use on their system portable?
That's the business deal here. There's structural lock-in, but not data lock-in, in exchange for free use of the structure. If you don't like it, you're not required to use it, and even if you do, you remain free to use your images and text however you want.
I've got an Ubuntu computer here. It's loaded with data and configurations. If I migrate to Windows or Mac, it's going to take hours of work before the new box is 'my' box in the same way, though in the end it will be done. Is Ubuntu or anyone else an asshole because of that?
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
What it really comes down to is market demand vs supply. Let's not frame the discussion about whether or not XYZ is an "asshole" because they don't offer customers what they want. Let's not ask whether the government should mandate such things. Not all problems can be answered by the "Free Market", but this is one problem which *can be*. At some point, whether it's Google or someone else, someone will see a market opportunity - a way to make customers happier, and hopefully more loyal, by giving them someth
Re:Simple (Score:4, Insightful)
So the Insightful comment here is bascially that there is no such thing as data lock in? After all, you can always recreate the data you put in. It's not like these services make it up...
Sorry, but that's a bit like saying "Microsoft Word documents aren't proprietary, you could always re-type the same thing in Open Office!".
The Facbook / MySpace examples are inane. Do people really really care so much about migrating their social networking data? The article is more apt for SaaS "clouds" such as Salesforce or AWS. The author doesn't appear to indicate cloud providers should be mandated to prevent data lock in, just that customers should be aware of the data lock in of most cloud services.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
They're not holding the information hostage. They still have it, from the same source they uploaded it from.
Saying that every service should be *required* to have a particular export to every other service is a good way to run banks, but not necessarily every business with user generated content.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Simple (Score:5, Funny)
Which one is that? the normal one exports all your data to hackers.ru at the click of a mouse!
Parent
Re:Simple (Score:5, Funny)
So data checks in but doesn't check out?
That's more like the Roach Motel.
Parent
Re:Simple (Score:5, Funny)
Oh that's the Hotel CA reference.
I was thinking that I can stab it with my steely knife, but I just can't kill the beast...
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Simple (Score:4, Funny)
And I was thinking along the lines of "This could be heaven, or this could be hell".
Cloud computing is eerily like the music industry, more news at 11!
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
There's nothing like keeping your own data on your own system..
What if its not your data or not that important?
Re:Simple (Score:4, Interesting)
What you can use the cloud for is to have a few truecrypt volumes stored there as a backup in case you ever need them.
If someone gets at your volume they won't be any wiser.
Parent
Simply outdated (Score:3, Interesting)
There's nothing like keeping your own data on your own system..
Or burying your own money in your own yard.
Re:Simple (Score:5, Insightful)
Also, EC2 gives the user no recourse if the system goes down for any reason, or if your data is lost. http://aws.amazon.com/agreement/ [amazon.com] You get a 10% discount if the system uptime is less than 99.95%, but that's the extent of your rights. If you screw up, it's your fault. If Amazon screws up, it's their fault but your problem.
Now, the nice thing about Cloud Computing is scaling. When your magic startup starts generating massive throughput, you can just add resources to your EC2 allotment as needed. But for small deployments that don't anticipate sudden rapid growth, I don't get the appeal.
Parent
Re:Simple (Score:5, Insightful)
I can assemble a nice rackmount 1U RAID server with better computing resources than that for the same price.
But you can't make it redundant, back it up, give it high-bandwidth connectiontivity, or maintain it for that price. The hardware itself, is by far the cheapest part of any server room.
But for small deployments that don't anticipate sudden rapid growth, I don't get the appeal.
Because building and maintaining any remotely reliable IT infrastructure is expensive and requires expertise that is, for most companies, utterly irrelevant to their core business.
Parent
Re:Simple (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm just very nervous about entrusting the company meat and potatoes to an external business. If our stuff goes down because I screwed up - and it has happened - I can try to fix it immediately. If our power or internet connectivity goes down, I can work with the corresponding vendor to get it restored. If something goes wrong with my Cloud Computing setup, I am at the complete mercy of their technical staff. Instead of actively working to solve the problem, all I can do is stay on the phone with their tech support and hope they fix it. Naturally, I'd rather be working than waiting.
And of course, I'm at the mercy of the vendor. If they decide to shut down, I have to scramble to find replacement as quickly and painlessly as possible. If they decide to raise prices, I'm looking at an instant drop in operating income or else the expense of moving to another vendor.
I'm not saying the cloud is the wrong way to go. I'm just saying that I am nervous.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Your already at the mercy of the air conditioning vendor, fire suppression vendor, electricity, internet, etc...
And if a hardware failure occurs, you are at the mercy of whatever support contract (1 hr, 4 hr, whatever.). And just like a remote vendor, you are at the mercy of your other vendors if they go out of business. I worked for a hospital with all Alpha VMS servers. Compaq bought them and phased vms out. Not much I could do about that either. Being remote doesn't make you any more or less in cont
Is Yahoo! the Facebook of webmail? (Score:5, Funny)
I can't transfer my yahoo to my twitter, this cloud computing has gone wild.
Yes (Score:2, Funny)
If you mean a big hit that everyone knows.
Re:Yes (Score:5, Informative)
If you mean a big hit that everyone knows.
I don't think that's what they meant by turning Hotel California into an adjective or analogy.
I believe the one-way street attribute would probably be the easiest way to describe it. Although there's more subtle caveats to 'Hotel California' as a lyrical work. Though interpretations have been numerous (I've heard it compared to prison), the writers describe it as an allegory about hedonism and self-destruction in Southern California [wikipedia.org]--especially the music industry (that we all know and love). From the Wikipedia entry:
"Don Henley and Glenn wrote most of the words. All of us kind of drove into LA at night. Nobody was from California, and if you drive into LA at night... you can just see this glow on the horizon of lights, and the images that start running through your head of Hollywood and all the dreams that you have, and so it was kind of about that... what we started writing the song about. Coming into LA... and from that Life In The Fast Lane came out of it, and Wasted Time and a bunch of other songs."
So if I may elaborate the analogy may be trying to describe cloud computing as something you're kind of forced into and it would seem stupid not to take it ... but then you start to realize that it's not everything it was made out to be at the beginning. You are promised success and all the resources imaginary but then at the end when you realize you don't have control over the situation and your data or privacy becomes seriously important to you, it's nowhere to be found and irreclaimable. The song's final lyrics before the guitar solo and double stop bass: "You can checkout any time you like/But you can never leave."
No, this isn't unique, Lynyrd Skynyrd [wikia.com] felt the same way as did The Kinks [wikia.com] and I bet if I sat and thought I'd come up with much much more. I guess you'd be better off explaining it outright than calling cloud computing Hotel California but the English language allows one to play and invent I guess. The author might consider the younger crowds though for this piece.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
While all of this is true I think you took the reference a little far. They most likely just meant a small bit of the song.
"You can checkout any time you like, but you can never leave."
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
No. You have to wait for a long guitar solo to finish before you can look at your address book.
Apples and Oranges (Score:2, Insightful)
Facebook and MySpace are not computing clouds they are applications
The google and amazon clouds are not applications(sort of). You can always move your data from one cloud to an other just back it up and restore it.
I would not expect to move cloud configuration from one cloud to another. That would be like moving from Windows to Linux, or Solaris to HP, they may be similar but work using different mechanisms.
Steve
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
I usually think of Cloud Computing in terms of places to run virtual machines - Like Amazon's EC2, or a private cloud. There should be no problem getting data off of a cloud infrastructure.
Least Common Denominator (Score:4, Informative)
I tend to save things in LCD format, txt or RTF for Documents, tab delimited for tables, JPG or GIF for images (or PNG), MP3 for music etc.
The point being, if you save data in a format that is limited (.doc, .xls, .raw, etc) you're going to have difficulty moving it around.
And stuff that has to be saved in a proprietary format gets a simpler version, that may be missing things (formulas, charts), so that I can move them to a new system should the need arise. I used to use Dataviz to convert stuff, but found it was just easier to re-create the things I need rather than trying to clean up the splash of translation.
It is also makes it easier to learn a "new" setup if you have to use it to set the things up you need, rather than letting something automate it.
The point is, you don't need to worry about data portability if you plan for it.
Google or EC2 a "closed data service?" (Score:3, Insightful)
Can someone give a little depth to the vague and unsubstantiated comment in TFA, referencing i.e. google: "...with closed data networks making it difficult to impossible to move data into competing services."
So which is it? Difficult or impossible? Or both?
I'm not at all surprised that facebook or myspace are not jumping up and down to allow various kinds of data export. But the fact that these obstacles are conflated with google and EC2 policies in the same paragraph without giving any details whatsoever makes it tough to take this post very seriously.
What would stop you from taking your data out of the cloud? SFTP not allowed? Can't access Mysql DB from outside? I'm asking honestly - I'd love to know.
Re:Google or EC2 a "closed data service?" (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Re:Google or EC2 a "closed data service?" (Score:4, Interesting)
Uh, yeah.. maybe your data wants to be free, but my data is staying right the hell on my computer, where it belongs.
Parent
First, define cloud computing (Score:5, Interesting)
As I understand it, cloud computing can be a cloud application, like google. Or you can actually run your own servers in the cloud, to which you would have complete control of the data and could dump it at will.
Of course using Software as a Service will lock you in... even if there aren't nefarious reasons behind it. But if your going to provision several cloud server instances, load Redhat on them, and put everything in mysql... then your free to do what you will with your data.
Software as a Service Cloud Computing. If anything SAS is just a small segment of the Cloud Computing movement.
Why not Roach Motel? (Score:2)
Why on earth would they do that (Score:5, Insightful)
Ever tried getting your Facebook data into, say, MySpace? Good luck with that.
From the "but-you-can-never-leave dept?" More like from the "no-shit-sherlock" dept... Why on earth would a company allow customers to automatically populate another company's website with your data? What I've found with social media sites is that if you invest so much time into inserting your data into their site, you are going to be much less inclined to go to the same thing again and again on other websites. Even if you don't like the interface as much as you may like some other site, you may feel a bit lazy and stick around. Whereas if the company said "here you go, click this button to transfer your profile to !" people would be jumping ship all over the place and it would be much more difficult to retain customers.
Re: (Score:2)
That I've found with social media sites is that if you invest so much time into inserting your data into their site, you are going to be much less inclined to go to the same thing again and again on other websites.
Ermm.... I disagree. I know plenty of people that have duplicate social media pages that are basically mirrors on Facebook, Livejournal, Myspace, and Twitter.
There are software tools out there that simply update all of them at once, but I'm not sure if that is either here nor there about your argu
Capitalists? (Score:5, Insightful)
"For the capitalists, it's just like Software 1.0 all over again, with fat profits waiting to be had."
At the risk of stating the obvious, isn't the whole idea of the straw-man capitalist (as opposed to an individual in a capitalist society) that he/she treats everything as a profit opportunity? I mean, for the greedy, there are fat profits in rubber band manufacture or book binding or air fresheners, to choose three items I can see from my chair. It's necessarily not some intrinsic aspect of cloud computing/web 2.0/web 1.0/whatever.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, but the rubber band makers, book binders and air freshener peddlers have a harder time accomplishing vendor lock-in.
Ever tried ... (Score:3, Funny)
No, and I never tried fucking a styrofoam sheep while doing underwater welding either.
For the freedom-inclined among us... (Score:5, Insightful)
HAHAHAHAHAahahahahahahahahahah excuse me
ahaahaahha oh man im so sorry i just cant stop laughing at this idiotic comment
Perhaps not the best analogy. (Score:5, Funny)
Some dance to remember, some dance to forget. This is not what I look for in hardware.
Hotel California (Score:2)
My interpretation of "Hotel California" has always been as a particular and unusual vision of Hell.
I guess cloud computing fits in that.
They're working on it. (Score:2)
http://www.dataliberation.org/ [dataliberation.org]
For the non Eagles fans here (Score:2, Insightful)
We are all just prisoners here, of our own device
You can check out any time you like, but you can never leave
And
They stab it with their steely knives, but they just can't kill the beast
Psshaw (Score:2)
Thanks to this open format known as HTML, it's not too hard to build a screen-scraper and get your data back out. Not to mention that the google and facebook APIs will help you pull quite a bit out.
Compare that to a client GUI program with no copy-and-paste capability. As someone who's done a lot of data extracation from closed systems, I'll take a terminal first, and a web client second, everything else is a distant third.
wtf? (Score:3, Informative)
this article is total garbage. slashdot needs some new editors who has a little common sense of the things they are publishing.
Just like file formats (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Facebook/Myspace != cloud computing (Score:4, Funny)
It's the warm smell of colitas, a plant, not of coitus. ;)
Parent
Re:Your official guide to the Jigaboo presidency (Score:5, Informative)
He forgot to hit the anonymous button on his last post. I still don't understand what the point is... these guys never even respond when I ask.
Parent