Firefox Passes IE6 In Browser Share 350
Jared sends word of Ars Technica coverage of Net Applications' monthly browser share numbers. What's significant this time is that Firefox has finally passed IE6 in worldwide share. "Internet Explorer remains ahead of the rest of the competition, but since month after month it continues to lose ground to all other browsers, Firefox has now finally surpassed IE6, which is easily the most hated version of Microsoft's browser. ... In October, all browsers except for IE and Opera showed positive growth. Between October and September, Internet Explorer dropped a significant 1.07 percentage points (from 65.71 percent to 64.64 percent) and Firefox moved up a sizeable 0.32 percentage points (from 23.75 percent to 24.07 percent). ... Although IE's decline seems to be unceasing, the real shame is that the old versions have more share than the newer ones (we can only hope that as Windows 7 gains popularity, this trend will reverse)." Ars presents a graph with their own site's browser share picture, and as you might expect it's very different from the general population's.
StatCounter etc (Score:5, Interesting)
Just remember that StatCounter and other stat counting sites tend to be very US and English language generic - completely ignoring Russia and China and such.
What's interesting is that Opera actually has 40-60% marketshare in CIS countries [opera.com], better than both FF and IE (and not just a single version).
But good that people are finally starting to move off from IE6.
Antarctica! (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Antarctica! (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
No way. Real penguins use IceWeasel, of course!
Re:Antarctica! (Score:4, Insightful)
I just wondered why the Statcounter site showed without and images or stylesheets... Then I remembered that it was completely blocked in AdBlock. Because it's a nasty dirty disgusting privacy-raping piece of shit of a tracking site!
I would see their statistics as more than useless, as everyone with half a brain already blocks them and their nasty friends.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
This article/summary/whatever seems much ado about nothing.
Saying that Firefox beat IE6 is like bragging Mac OS X surpassed Windows 98 in usage share. oooh.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Antarctica! (Score:5, Funny)
And Firefox has a 100.0% share in Antarctica (maybe just 1 user?) http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser-an-monthly-200902-200902-bar [statcounter.com]
Those damned penguins!
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re:StatCounter etc (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
They might see Internet Explorer as "The Internet", but this is behavior that can easily be changed. My company actually had to block Google Chrome (not a decision I agree with, mind you) because too many people were installing it (somehow without knowing what they were doing) and then reporting problems with our Intranet*. When we asked what browser they were using, they wouldn't know but when pressed they would say "I'm using The Google Internet." Their view of IE as "The Internet" was easily changed t
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Versions of IE before IE4 were actually called "The Internet" on the desktop and had an icon of a globe and a magnifying glass.
No other major browser has the word "Internet" in its name, and if it did Microsoft could probably sue for trademark violation. No doubt calling their browser "Internet Explorer" instead of "Web Explorer" to take advantage of the then-more-well-known term "Internet" over "Web" worked out well for them. They may have actually propagated continued confusion of the two terms by doing
Re:StatCounter etc (Score:4, Insightful)
The thing is, most Americans see Internet Explorer as 'The Internet'
Fixed that for you.
No my mum is an Australian and she is exactly the same. Fortunately she has three offspring to install software for her.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:StatCounter etc (Score:4, Insightful)
True. And it generalizes. The general rule is, you're 'allowed' to say things about majority-groups who are in power, that you can't say about others.
So, if you're adult, male, white, middle-class, christian, heterosexual, well-educated, you're fair game.
Whereas if you're a lesbian, jewish, old, female from Ghana, you can hardly be *described* without it being perceived as racism.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:StatCounter etc (Score:4, Insightful)
And I resent being called the cause of some other group's problems, simply because I look like someone who might have done something bad to their ancestors.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
As a member of one of those "groups who have the power" I (as an individual) don't feel very powerful, wealthy or in control of much of anything.
Go visit a slum some day, then tell me again how difficult your life is. Trust me, you have plenty of power and wealth. But, like so many other Slashdot nerds, your worldview is so narrow (probably thanks to a lifetime spent in a basement) that you don't even realize it. Which is probably while libertarianism is so popular around here...
Re:StatCounter etc (Score:5, Insightful)
Okay,
Here's one. How would you explain the same exact situation in one place where it is seemingly blatantly by color of skin, where there is no significant differences in color of skin?
Poverty and slums and ghettos are fairly universal thoughout the world, and very rarely does it matter what color of skin one has, compared to others.
In Africa, there are whole regions where black on black power struggles occur, and the minority is not that significantly different than the majority.
The point I'm making, is that it isn't color of skin that is the cause, it is just something to distract from the REAL cause, man's inhumanity to man.
The worst propgators of this are not the white Anglo Christian heterosexual males (Most aren't Anglo btw), but the self hating race baiters like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, and Jeremiah Wright.
They do nothing to resolve the issue of man's inhumanity to man, and turn any dialogue into self fulfilling prophecies.
Whenever you have people pitting one group against another group, it is nothing short of hatred. PERIOD.
Yes, I've been to slums around the world. They are all around the world, and the only thing in common is that you have one group of people being pitted against another, without regard to individuality, and rarely does it have anything to do with "race".
Libertarians don't care about power, or authority, except for that of the individual. Power accumulated into groups is where the problems truly lie. The problem with people like yourself, is that they see power in terms of groups of people, and yet seek solutions by grouping people for power consolidation, which really is the problem in the first place.
True libertarians realize the catch22 nature of using groups to isolate individuals from the power of self.
THAT is why libertarianism is popular around here, as it is about liberty of all people, not just the groups you belong to.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Poverty and slums and ghettos are fairly universal thoughout the world, and very rarely does it matter what color of skin one has, compared to others.
And that right there is where you lost me. This statement is utterly absurd. Poverty is very often linked to ethnicity *specifically* because ethnic groups are targeted. Are are you going to try and convince me that ghettos in the US aren't predominantly non-anglo?
In fact, that's the whole fucking point. As a white person, your parents, and their grandpare
Re:StatCounter etc (Score:4, Informative)
As a white person, your parents, and their grandparents, and so on, haven't been subject to the legacy of US slavery and ongoing racism.
I'm part Irish. I'd like you to tell my grandparents that they - and their neighbors, the Italians - are part of a white, privileged, un-discriminated-against upper class.
Of course, you'd have to go to the Irish and Italian ghettos to find them.
Re: (Score:2)
I personally find that kinda normal ?
I'd maybe add that you can make fun of your own peer group, i.e. gay jokes by gays, Jew jokes by jews... don't bother me. I remember once during a one-woman-show trying to imagine it was a guy on stage... the girl was hilarious, I'd have docked a guy for the same spiel.
Re: (Score:2)
Whereas a lesbian, jewish, old, female from Ghana probably doesn't have full access to the legal system
Re:StatCounter etc (Score:4, Funny)
You, sir, will be hearing from my lawyer about this outrage!
Sincerely,
Ms. Mwambala Gertrude "Army Boots" Goldstein
Re: (Score:2)
The fact is that MOST people in former soviet republic countries dont even *use* Internet Explorer, which makes the poster I replied to demonstrably myopic. Sure, maybe he isnt from America after all, but that doesnt change the fact that most of the world isnt stuck on Internet Explorer. IE usage is below 50% worldwide. Thats a fact. He begins with incorrect bullshit.
Re: (Score:2)
Not true, my mother thinks the same, she's swedish. My gf's british parents thought the same (until I reeducated them - they still insists on ie because they can run all their weird flashgames and what not in ie - yes their computer crawls with viruses and trojans, one feels slightly dirty after using it)
Re:StatCounter etc (Score:4, Insightful)
I go a few steps further. IE skin, Adblock with all malware sites, silent upgrades. They won't notice the difference.
Re:StatCounter etc (Score:5, Informative)
http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser-eu-monthly-200902-200902-bar [statcounter.com]
http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser-na-monthly-200902-200902-bar [statcounter.com]
Re: (Score:2)
something a bit more current (last 3 days so not stat significant):
http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser_version-eu-monthly-200911-200911-bar [statcounter.com] - FF3.5 is most popular in Europe (ie6 has half of FF3.0)
http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser_version-na-monthly-200911-200911-bar [statcounter.com] - IE7 is most popular in US (ie6 ~= safari)
overall
EU [statcounter.com] (50% v 40%)
US [statcounter.com] (60% v 30%)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
The gap between Firefox (all versions) and IE (all versions) is also rather narrower for Europe than for North America.
Yeah, but there's something worth considering. I'm from Poland, which boasts FF leadership over IE (I am an Opera user myself but still) and there's something I realized, thinking about Poland's (and other Central European countries') results and also the massive Opera market share in Russia. Thing is, these are the countries with lower Internet penetration than North America. You have considerably moms and dads online, not to mention grannies and grandpas than, say, in the States. It's only natural that a
Re: (Score:2)
No, that doesn't explain it. Poland actually has relatively high Internet penetration. Developing countries on the other hand seem to be much more dependant on Internet Explorer, although this might have something to do with the popularity of Internet Cafés rather than a home connection.
Re:StatCounter etc (Score:5, Informative)
Hi,
I work at StatCounter and I would just like to point out that we have a very diverse sample size from around the world.
As per http://gs.statcounter.com/faq#sample-size [statcounter.com] for July 2009 here was the breakdown of our sample pageviews for the month.
* 1.3 billion United States
* 570 million Brazil
* 280 million Turkey
* 260 million Germany
* 250 million Thailand
* 240 million China
* 240 million United Kingdom
* 180 million Indonesia
* 160 million Canada
* 140 million India
* 109 million Russia
Re: (Score:2)
What's interesting is that Opera actually has 40-60% marketshare in CIS countries, better than both FF and IE (and not just a single version).
I'm not sure why you'd find that more interesting than the fact that Chrome passed Safari or whatever.
The only thing I can think of that means anything in this whole "browser wars" thing, and it doesn't mean as much now as it did 4 years ago, is how vital it is to absolutely stick to web standards as a result of cross browser compliance. Otherwise, it's pretty much irrelevant. My phone has a webkit browser fully integrated into it, so when I hit the web with it, I'm probably being detected as using Safari
Opera Mini/Mobile stats (Score:2)
You know what? Web developers act so surprised when you tell them Opera Mini is the most popular mobile browser on the planet. Not some "stat counter" stuff, professional companies will give you those stats. Last time I checked, it was like 40%.
So, when you ignore that fact and don't support Opera Mini and Nokia S60 browser (which is Webkit), support only iPhone with some m.something.com , you ignore about 100-150 million people who either has J2ME or Symbian/S40 in their hands, perhaps richer than iPhone u
Hrmm (Score:5, Funny)
So when are they going to rip the skin off Firefox to show "Netscape Navigator - Double Ultimate Gold edition"?
Re: (Score:2)
I think I'll have to delay dinner...
This site best viewed with NOT ie6 (Score:5, Interesting)
I noticed many sites seem to have abandoned IE6 support completely. (Using ie 6 and 7 in virtualized XP for testing stuff)
This is how it should be. No CSS hacks, just IE6 users seeing the bugs that arise through their usage of the browser.
And for corporate users who HAVE to use ie6, for the nicest value of "they can fuck off"; they can fuck off.
IE6 no more (Score:3, Interesting)
Cure the pox. 'nuff said.
Re:IE6 no more (Score:5, Funny)
http://www.saveie6.com/ [saveie6.com]
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.saveie6.com/ [saveie6.com]
That's quite funny! More seriously, IE6 is one case where Ben Tre[*] logic is fully justified:
It must be destroyed to be saved.
[*] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Tre [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
IE6 is the only website browser that should be around.
I don't know what all this buzz is about that Firefork website viewer thing, or that Oprah browser.
I knew she did a talk show and all but web browsers? Get off my interwebs!"
Seriously considering this as my next signature.
"Trying to get your website to work correctly in IE6 is like a puzzle game! Challenging and fun!"
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
I signed.
Re: (Score:2)
``And for corporate users who HAVE to use ie6, for the nicest value of "they can fuck off"; they can fuck off.''
It is, after all, not you who imposes this requirement on them.
Net Applications? Slashdot! (Score:5, Interesting)
Looks like Firefox is dominating Ars. I'm more interested in slashdot browser share percentages, though.
Oh great and benevolent admins, please gift us with your knowledge!...
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I have posted this [glitch.tl] on /. a few times in the past so...
$ grep -v 10.1.1. access_log.* | grep access_point_names | cut -d" " -f12- | grep Linux | wc -l
180
$ grep -v 10.1.1. access_log.* | grep access_point_names | cut -d" " -f12- | grep Windows | wc -l
331
$ grep -v 10.1.1. access_log.* | grep access_point_names | cut -d" " -f12- | grep Macintosh | wc -l
83
Hoping for Windows 7's success... (Score:5, Interesting)
What this article tells me is that a quarter of the internet users are still using a web browser that was released on August 27, 2001. From a peak market share of %95, it has only come down to %23 in eight years (and change). This survival is against massive "IE6 must die" campaigns, introduction of fairly decent, and standards compliant (comparatively) browsers such as Firefox, Chrome the ever improving Safari and the somehow still surviving gem named Opera.
I was hoping that the rise of social applications like Facebook, Youtube, Digg and popular business applications such as the ones made by 37signals would put an end, a final nail in the coffin if you like, to this monster from the digital stone age.
But obviously I was, surely together with a whole bunch of other fellow /.'ers, wrong. Obviously, the failure of adaptation of Vista played some role in this outcome. But seeing that building a better (faster, compliant, etc.) browser is not the answer, I'm now genuinely hoping that Windows 7 will massively succeed so that we can put an end to this abomination.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Unfortunately many/most people do not use social networking sites, and if they do, they don't necessarily have friends who care about browser versions. Any IE6 must die campaign should be supported by the actual websites themselves, telling users they need to upgrade directly on the page.
What would be good is a small bit of script people can embed in their page, which tells IE 6 users to upgrade to something more recent by outputting a bar above the top of the page which tells them what to do. Kind of like
Re: (Score:2)
It didn't have 95% market share when it was released.
Re: (Score:2)
I still use IE6 in the very few cases I have to use an internet explorer browser. That amounts to less than 0.01% of my browsing; all sites that require IE to work are compatible to IE6 so no reason to upgrade because I don't use it for anything else.
As an additional bonus I get the pleasure of knowing that I am forcing web designers to do extra work to support legacy. That means more people needed in IT.
See my point?
Re: (Score:2)
What this article tells me is that a quarter of the internet users are still using a web browser that was released on August 27, 2001. From a peak market share of %95, it has only come down to %23 in eight years (and change). [...]
That's telling us something about the replacement cycle for Windows PCs. As discussed on Slashdot before, few private citizens will upgrade a browser on a "working" machine.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Most modern operating systems also have a web browser, shipping without one is not a wise choice. As illustrated, it also allows third parties to rely on there already being a rendering engine for such things available (or I have even seen documention ship as html).
Ie6 is the new amish (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Ditto here, and the corporate machines are under-specced for all the extra background junk they put on them. Being forced in to IE6 would be terrible if I didn't have a development machine with Linux on it, but I think Office 2003 (or OpenOffice on our dev machines) is preferable to 2007!
Interesting Results (Score:4, Interesting)
The Ars Technica stats broadly mirrors my own humble blog, I would guess that the techie crowd breaks down 5::2::2::1 Firefox::Safari::IE::Chrome across the board. If this assumption is true, I find it strange that Chrome is not as popular as Safari among the technical people whereas in the general stats they are almost neck-and-neck although less popular overall.
Personally I think that having 4 browsers with significant share (or 6 if you count IE6 and IE7 as separate, incompatible browsers) is very healthy. For a while it looked like it was going to be IE6 stamping on the face of the web forever, but now the population is fragmented web sites have to designed with proper standards in mind.
Re: (Score:2)
Chrome would be my browser of choice were it not for the lack of Adblock, Noscript & IETab; I suspect a lot of other techies feel the same way, which is why Chrome has stayed with such a modest share despite early interest in it.
I can't speak for Safari as every time I've tried to use it (On Windows) I've ended up hating it.
Re: (Score:2)
According to my Google Analytics page, only 4.5% of Safari users were using the Windows version. In some ways I think that is a shame - I like the way Safari renders pages, it does a much better job of smoothing fonts and graphics than the other browsers. Plus it is very quick (although Chrome starts up faster) and the web inspector tools incredibly useful.
But you are right, the first few versions were terrible.
Re: (Score:2)
The numbers (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:The numbers (Score:5, Insightful)
What's most interesting about IE's market share is that version 6 (this oldest one indeed) is actually the most used version of Internet Explorer. Both version 7 (released 3 years ago) and version 8 (released about half a year ago) have not caught on enough to overtake IE6's position as the number one browser out there in sheer market share.
These figures are unlike all other browsers, where the more recent versions have way more market share than the older ones. The usage of Firefox 1 and 2 for example is virtually nothing, while 3.5 is the most popular version. So "all versions of Firefox" actually mean "mostly Firefox 3.5, a bit Firefox 3 and really nothing else", while "all of Internet Explorer" means "Mostly IE6, some IE7 and some IE8".
You are absolutely right that all versions combined, IE is still very dominant, but IE-users are way less inclined to upgrade to more recent versions. Just like Windows XP is still the most popular version of Windows. I wouldn't be surprised to see the same thing with Microsoft Office. Microsoft just doesn't seem to be able to sell their latest products anymore. This is why it quite significant that Firefox with it's latest product is able to have more market share than Microsoft with it's old version, because the old versions of Microsoft products are the relevant ones.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
A much heard argument for not upgrading IE6 to something more up to date is the fact a lot of legacy intranet applications don't seem to work with anything else than IE6. I wonder if this will prevent businesses from adopting Windows 7 as well, as IE6 is not available for that platform.
Re: (Score:2)
What they mean is, all versions of Firefox put together (2, 3, 3.5) have surpassed one version of Internet Explorer (6), the oldest one.
It's also something that varies by region. Looking at browser versions in Europe, Firefox 3 is on the heels of IE 7, and well ahead of IE 6, which is then followed by Opera 9.6 and Firefox 2. Safari, Chrome, and Opera 9.2 are well behind. Firefox 3.0 and 3.5 are not differentiated, nor are sub-versions of IE 6. Opera 10 and IE 8 do not show yet - they are probably bundled in the "others" category. http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser_version-eu-monthly-200902-200902-bar [statcounter.com]
Errr....people updating a free browser is news? (Score:5, Funny)
Next we'll be seeing the revelation that Linux has overtaken Windows 98. Or something.
Re: (Score:2)
Next we'll be seeing the revelation that Linux has overtaken Windows 98.
Well, has it? I know Win98 users are few and far between, but the Linux _desktop_ marketshare is tiny, too.
Re: (Score:2)
It is quite relevant, because IE6 is actually the most used browser in the world. Despite the release of newer versions of Internet Explorer, none of them have caught on enough to change that situation.
This is radically different with all other browsers, where the lastest versions are also the most popular versions of the product.
Re: (Score:2)
Still, even going on those old figures, IE7 and 8 combined make up 36%, so I'm not sure why you think they haven't caught on.
You are right when you say that combining the usage of different versions of Internet Explorer results in quite hefty market share. But not a single version of IE is more popular than version 6. And now Firefox (yes, versions combined) is now popular than every single version of IE, including the most popular version 6.
The article isn't stating Firefox is now more popular than IE, because obviously Microsoft still holds a very dominant position in the browser market. The interesting thing is that the most p
Does that mean... ? (Score:2)
Next we'll be seeing the revelation that Linux has overtaken Windows 98. Or something.
Does that mean 2008 was the year of Windows 98 on the desktop?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
They will complain bitterly when a site doesn't work though.
I found a solution to that problem a couple of years back. When I first put OpenPisteMap [openpistemap.org] online, I got a lot of complaints from people that it didn't work in IE6. I don't have any Windows machines and I'm not about to buy and install Windows to test it in an 8 year old browser. So I added a note to the website that IE6 users see that basically says "I know it doesn't work in IE6 - if you can fix it, send me a patch". The complaints suddenly stopped. I didn't get sent any patches either, so I guess the
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Don't count out the Windows 95 users. Although, to be fair, I can't call myself that until I find an AC adapter. I can't imagine what would happen if I managed to get it onto the net.
It is becoming safer. I forgot where I saw it, but much of the bugs out there target newer versions of Windows and many don't function on Windows 98.
Problems are still corporate users and non-techies (Score:5, Insightful)
This is great, but IE6 is still going to stick around for years. The reasons - as have been widely discussed on these pages before - are:
Neither of these situations will change any time soon. Gradual adoption of Windows 7 will certainly help in the second case, but the first one is dependent entirely on enterprise-level IT departments creating lots of work (and therefore cost) for themselves when senior management can't see any tangible benefit... And how soon do you think that will happen?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Large corporate installations are highly change averse; but they also tend to be unsuppor
In other news (Score:4, Funny)
Film at 11.
Wildly different at work (Score:3, Informative)
Here are the stats for the company web site for the company I work for. It's a smallish Nordic company, and it's a safe bet that 95% of all visits are from other people at work. (I have no proof of that figure, obviously, but trust me when I say that looking at our site isn't something people do on their free time.)
MS Internet Explorer 2920837 96 %
Unknown 56869 1.8 %
Wget 32632 1 %
Firefox 18582 0.6 %
Safari 4934 0.1 %
Opera 2970 0 %
Mozilla 2532 0 %
LibWWW 148 0 %
Netscape 92 0 %
Nokia Browser (PDA/Phone browser) 12 0 %
Others 7 0 %
These figures are just incredibly different from those in TFA. Figures are page hits for the month of November, i.e. a little more than three days, but the percentages always look like this.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I'm pretty sure that our internal websites are almost 100% IE, but that's because using Sharepoint in anything but IE is a world of hurt.
Not that using Sharepoint from IE is exactly pleasant, but damn.
Re: (Score:2)
Really? I worked as a dev at a company who liked their MS technology and were one of the first (if not the first) in the UK to have a .Net powered intranet. The majority of us devs used Firefox and found it easier than IE since you could even use the quick bookmarks to get to specific numbered articles/tickets. That probably was still back in the days of IE6, though.
Now I get to use a different Sharepoint site, hosted by Microsoft, and it works flawlessly in Firefox on Fedora Linux [i]except[/i] when I need
Re: (Score:2)
Quite a lot (or even most?) of our visitors are big industrial companies, utilities, government agencies etc. It is quite accurate to describe them as working in tightly controlled environments.
I know for a fact that the website does work in FF, as that is what I use. The relatively high number of Wgets is from automated "screen scrapers" and similar applications. We have quite a lot of data that some organizations probably get this way. Also, we use awstats for the stats, but I can't guarantee that it is
Not on my site (Score:4, Informative)
Firefox (all versions) 42.1%
IE (all versions) 40.1%
Safari 7.8%
Chrome 4.5%
Go firefox!
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I have a (PC) gaming-related site. To my knowledge, the amount of IT-expert visitors isn't higher than among the general population, but obviously people who play PC games at least see the PC as something more than just a Web access device. So, over the last 6 months, I'm showing
Firefox 37%
IE 35%
Chrome 15%
Safari 6%
Opera 5%
Note that Chrome's share here is definitely higher than its overall market share. Also, IE6 is also quite unpopular. Out of IE's 35%, IE8 is 13%, IE7 is 17% with IE6 at a bit under 4%.
Some comparisons... (Score:5, Insightful)
All users of every version of FireFox taken together use more than one old version of IE.
I've been collecting stats too... (Score:2)
IE6 (Score:5, Informative)
I decided to collect some stats for the trade services section of my companies website. Our typical customer is *not* technically minded in the least:
MSIE 8.0, 38.4%
MSIE 7.0, 33.8%
Firefox/3.5, 9.5%
MSIE 6.0, 9.1%
Chrome 9, 8.4%
Firefox/3.0, 3.0%
Safari 4, 1.5%
IE 6 is dropping fast, but a very poor showing for Opera and Safari. The OS stats are dominated by Windows XP (62%) and Vista (33%), with OS X and other flavours of Windows taking the remaining few percent. No Linux at all sadly.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Don't confuse "unpopular" with "unsupported" (Score:4, Insightful)
A company I worked for had similar similar browser-share for their major web applications, and it really had little to do with Opera and Safari being niche outcast browsers. It had a lot more to do with the site being so broken as to be unusable in Opera and Safari. People would go one or two pages in, realize there was a problem, and either switch to a different browser, or as the growing fear was, switch to a different company.
It stems from the complaint above that many large corporate IT departments don't want to switch from IE6. Well, guess what the in-house web developers code for first? IE6. Then they try to tweak the design to work passably in other browsers when they should be working the other way: create a standards-based layout, then tweak for the peccadillos of other browsers.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Apparently your visitors are not mathematically minded either: Sum of those figures is 103.7% and that's without a line for "unknown"...
Old news (Score:2)
My websites and our client's websites have been showing Firefox passing up IE6, IE7, and IE8 combined. IE typically shows around 38%, Firefox shows around 39% and all others (mix of Chrome, Safari, Opera and mobile browsers) make up the difference. It's like it 1997 all over again. I'm kind of excited about the whole thing [blogspot.com] because now the new crop of standards can come to the front faster (SVG, HTML 5, etc...).
It's about time.
This tells something about Ars (Score:2)
Maybe we can compare how much technically savvy are the users of different sites by looking at the share of different browsers. We can compare the data of Ars with the data of w3schools [w3schools.com] (monthly data since 2002).
W3S's share of Firefox is larger that all the IE's together. FF overtook IE at about the beginning of this year.
MS must be happy about it (Score:2)
I don't try to be sarcastic. Each IE 6 losing its "default browser status" is good for MS especially for their image. They "won" the browser wars already, some developers working for their rivals can't dream about MS Windows without MS HTML engines/objects. Even Big Blue relies on IE in certain jobs so they need "IE 6 compatibility" mode.
IE 7 and 8 incompatibility/quirks serve in the place of IE 6 now, why should MS really bother? Outdated browser which is bad for their security/performance image is being r
Did that ages ago here (Score:2)
This is definitely not news for our company website. Don't know how well it reflects the rest of the world, but I'm quite surprised so many are still using IE6 in the first place.
Our stats show 24.25% using Firefox and 65.12% using various version of IE. (The rest going to Safari, Chrome etc. Interestingly, Safari and Chrome are almost neck and neck at 4.20 and 4.11% respectively.)
Of the 65.12% using IE, 27.11% of those are using version 6. That's 17.65% total, if my maths is any good. It's not dying (w
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
A few years ago, I would've considered "$free_browser gets bigger market share than IE6" to be a great thing. These days it just upsets me to think that so many people are still using IE6...
Re: (Score:2)
But then again, the browser market is quite different now than it was a few years ago, because large corporations like Google and Apple have hit the scene and Opera became an actual free browser. So while IE6 market share has been declining for years, they haven't all switched to the same product. There used to be only two or three major browsers out there, but in these days you can be the biggest player out there by having a little over 20% market share.
IE6 used to be the biggest browser out there until la
Re:I 3 IE6. (Score:5, Funny)
Plus, running IE6 on my machine can provide for potentially interesting conversations if it ever comes up.
And I thought I was dull.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
IE 8 has already been released. Firefox has overtaken a browser that is 2 generation old.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
People are making comparisons to IE6 because its market share is still relevant and affects the state of the web as a whole. For example, developments like Google Wave simply aren't possible on IE6 (at least without the somewhat controversial Chrome Frame plugin), so IE6 is hindering the adoption of new technology. Additionally, IE6's endless list of quirks cause untold lost hours of devlopment time for web developers worldwide.
Once IE6 drops down to a negligible percentage it means that many developers can