Review of Adobe Creative Suite 5 204
Barence writes "Adobe today updated its Creative Suite software to version 5, and PC Pro has an absolutely massive collection of reviews. Along with an overview of the entire suite, from Design to Web to Production bundles, every individual component gets the full in-depth treatment. It includes video demonstrations of Photoshop CS5's fabulous Content-Aware fill trick and new Puppet Warp function; a long-awaited step up to 64-bit for Premiere Pro CS5; and big updates to Dreamweaver CS5, After Effects CS5, and the rest."
Nuts. (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
check demonoid if not TPB. Demonoid now lists torrents even if you are not registered.
Re:FLOSS alternative? (Score:5, Insightful)
There's no FLOSS alternative to the Adobe suite.
Photoshop vs GIMP = No contest
Illustrator vs Inkscape = Maybe passable alternative
Premiere vs Cinelerra = Don't make me vomit
OnLocation vs dvgrab+kino+some other misc tools = Well, it's like saying that you can do anything emacs can do with sed, awk, grep and cat.
InDesign has no FLOSS alternative. Yea, there are toolsets that can do the things that OnLocation, Encore, AfterEffects etc can do, but they're just a bunch of tools with no integration. The Adobe suite is a whole, integrated polished set of products.
I think if you want to see an example of what the open source method of software design (many people scratching their own little itch and putting the resultant code into a gigantic unsorted global code library) can *not* do, look at the Adobe Suite.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Try http://www.getpaint.net/ [getpaint.net] as an alternative to Photoshop.
It is very nice and free (as in beer).
Re: (Score:2)
Photoshop vs GIMP = No contest
No kidding. Since Photoshop isn't even available on my desktop, Gimp is the clear winner.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Illustrator vs Inkscape = Maybe passable alternative
*sigh* Inkscape is not trying to ape Illustrator. Inkscape is a clone of Xara. And that's the way I like it. The sooner the world can forget an over-complicated monstrosity like Illustrator ever existed, the better. =)
(...Still sort of bitter that the Xara open source project went nowhere, but hey, Inkscape keeps getting more awesome with every release...)
The Adobe suite is a whole, integrated polished set of products.
We don't need a "whole integrated set of products". We don't need a walled-garden comfort zone where we have a set of "working" applications, and when you
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Translation:
"I believe in morality but I don't think I'm significant enough to have to abide by it".
Re:FLOSS alternative? (Score:5, Funny)
Can't help but notice that the only time people talk about morality is when they want money. I happen to think that my point of view is entirely moral, but then I suppose our morals must differ. Babypuncher.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Absolutely none. There are no video editing apps for Linux that are anything but toys or core dump makers.
You CAN do most photo shops stuff in Gimp if you are not whiney and afraid of learning... print media though no CMYK but that is only a tiny segment of the graphics market anymore.
But for video editing, composting and CG there is absolutely nothing that is use-able for pro or even semi-pro use.
Hell even for idiot level video podcast making adobe owns the market.... Visual Communicator has no match.
Gushing, ignoring the important issues (Score:5, Interesting)
It's not an overview, it's a gushing, excited press release. And it doesn't even drop one word on my most important concern: is Adobe continuing their trend of writing awful, inconsistent, ugly, usually-slow UIs?
The fact that that, after Macromedia's was acquired, I'd actually pay extra to get Flash 8's UI back... well, that tells you something. How the hell do you write a UI worse than Macromedia's? That takes the kind of talent only Adobe can offer I guess... IBM should hire these guys to do Lotus Notes next. ;)
Re:Gushing, ignoring the important issues (Score:4, Insightful)
I've been dabbling with these products for years now and it just never seems like the extra bloat and resource hogging provides enough additional return to make it worth the effort.
Re: (Score:2)
I watched the pre-release video, and the context- or content- or whatever it's called -aware fill knocked my socks off. I mean, literally. I can't even find them now. I may have to photoshop some into my pictures in the future to avoid looking like Don Johnson. Photoshop CS5 is a game-changer if this feature works half as well as it did in the demo.
Re: (Score:2)
Humorous, not a real demo. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, just wait until you see how it works in the wild. [blogspot.com]
Re: (Score:2)
maybe it's just difference in *how* i get my work done, or the type of work i use it for, but i've never understood all the people who yell and scream about the u.i. in adobe products. i've spent the last ten years or so in production art rooms; photoshop and illustrator are my daily tools (indesign from time to time as well) and i'm perfectly happy with the interface. nowadays i do most of my work on a 13" laptop screen, and even with this little real-estate i can always find the tools i need when i need t
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Adobe has been taking Creative Suite backwards... (Score:2)
Agreed. Adobe has been taking Creative Suite backwards in some ways. Why? Incompetence? Does Adobe want to create problems users will pay to fix later?
Re:Adobe has been taking Creative Suite backwards. (Score:3, Informative)
No, they are far too lazy and incompetent to plan that far ahead. Steve Jobs nailed Adobe's corporate personality perfectly when he called them lazy. They just throw feces^H^H^H^H^H features at the wall and see what sticks, and if they break things in the process, they don't care. Heck, the entire Carbon API was put in almost entirely to placate Adobe because they were too lazy to port to Cocoa ten years ago. Now after giving them TEN YEARS to clean up their mess and move to new APIs, they're STILL whin
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
The day you drop $350 of your own money to buy a current version of a piece of software that won't even install and don't complain about it, you'll be allowed to complain about my complaining. Until then, piss off.
Re: (Score:2)
You know, it's sad that you have to keep a license up-to-date for software you've already paid for. Unless it's just a matter of getting new plug-ins or programs on new CS versions that you use concurrently with Photoshop v.7
Re:Gushing, ignoring the important issues (Score:4, Informative)
This came up a while ago, on John Nack (PS product manager)'s blog. Basically they think their custom UI stuff for CS is the beez knees, and you unlucky shmoes who "have to use" CS will be getting MORE not less of their crap in future (including CS5) versions.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
They also blame all bugs on Apple or in the case of not being able to save file error "Could not save (file name) because the file is already in use or left open" ...
Seriously. Check out this thread. The only app on any Mac or Windows computer I use (and that's a handful) which gives this kind of error and Adobe blames the OS vendors. All those other apps which save files never report this problem, EVER!
What is Adobe's reply? It's outside of Photoshop, it's NOT ADOBE's problem.
Check out the thread at Adobe
Re: (Score:2)
The only app on any Mac or Windows computer I use (and that's a handful) which gives this kind of error and Adobe blames the OS vendors.
I've gotten that with MS Excel but only on networked drives. Had to save as another file and then log off/on because I couldn't simply unmap the drive "while a file is in use". Sigh.
Re: (Score:2)
net use (drive letter): /d /y
The Windows GUI has some limitations, the CLI still has its place, since it can do things that the GUI designers determined you wouldn't need to do or "shouldn't" do.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yea ... really like Pixelmator, and, Acorn too. Particularly Acorn's vector capabilities.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
CS5 comes with content-aware fill also known as magic. Every review of it will be entranced. Seriously, that shit is crazy.
Brought to you by the secret FM.dll file.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, but...is it actually any good?
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
It is good, but it is even better in GIMP, where it has been for years known as the Resynthesizer plugin.
http://o3.tumblr.com/post/470608946/photoshops-caf-content-aware-fill-unbelievable [tumblr.com]
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The core of Photoshop CS5's content-aware fill is not the texture synthesis algorithm, which has been around for some time now, but the Patch-Match optimization for approximate nearest neighbors, which lets them do it orders of magnitude much more efficiently than previous techniques.
Re: (Score:2)
The fact that that, after Macromedia's was acquired...
Adobe stopped caring because they didn't have any real competition and thus could simply coast along because, really, who were they going to lose customers to? I'm kind of surprised that buyout was allowed given that it completely removed any hint of competition in the graphics software market. And, as I said, since that buyout, the quality of Adobe's software has taken a dramatic downturn showing they know they don't have to try as hard, any more.
And my guess is, so long as the patent system functions a
Re: (Score:2)
There's always the European market. Especially since 'round here Adobe software is even more expensive [amanwithapencil.com].
Re:Gushing, ignoring the important issues (Score:4, Insightful)
PROTIP: Stop caring about the UI, learn some keyboard shortcuts every day, and use Photoshop in fullscreen mode with as few panels as possible (e.g. histogram, layers and layers adjustments)
Re: (Score:2)
The only part of the suite I use is Flash, which is why the UI stuff annoys me. Flash's UI was poor before, now it's godawful. And this is one app the keyboard can't save you from.
The good news is that I can edit ActionScript in another IDE. The bad news is that Flash has zero integration with external tools.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
learn some keyboard shortcuts every day
Yeah, right. Learn them everyday, because you will have to relearn them when Adobe decides to change them. Not mentioning ignoring that shortcuts may already be in use by the OS ...
Re: (Score:2)
please no. lotus is bad enough as it is. I'd use thunderbird instantly if our work approved it.
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed. We use lotus as well and it jacks up on a daily basis.
Re: (Score:2)
I've been using Adobe software for a while now and I've only found the UI somewhat inconsistent and uncomfortable when it comes to manipulating vector art, I can see how coming from using Macromedia software that might affect you.
On the whole though it seems pretty consistent and simple to me.
If you want to see a real UI clusterfuck take a look at Autodesk Maya, it's like a makeshift rusty skeleton covered with cruft sticking out every which way.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I can't comment on Maya (maybe it's worse, I dunno), but Adobe's current set of projects are pretty damned horrible.
Take a look at this blog (not mine): http://adobegripes.tumblr.com/ [tumblr.com] Even ignoring the stuff that plain does not work at all (the majority of the Fireworks entries), there are tons of extremely obvious errors in the UI.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
is Adobe continuing their trend of writing awful, inconsistent, ugly, usually-slow UIs?
I could not agree more, maybe Adobe could learn from the proven UI of similar Open [gimp.org] Source [wikipedia.org] apps.
Re: (Score:2)
One of the first things we have to do for several of our clients after unpacking a server is uninstall everything that says Adobe on it.
Re: (Score:2)
What I have found is that Adobe's UI is much like Democracy. An innefficient, nasty, worst sort of thing except for all other things tried. What should photoshop's UI look like (for instance)? And although the UI is not perfect, that is not the deciding factor for me getting a
Re: (Score:2)
True, but two points:
1) The Slashdot summary says "Review", which is clearly wrong.
2) Even for an overview, it was disappointing. They could have dropped a single sentence saying, "the CS4 interface is back in all apps" and I'd have been satisfied.
Everyone who knows the Adobe Suite doesn't use the UI that much anyway. They know the keyboard shortcuts.
As long as you ignore that Flash is part of the Adobe Suite, I'm with you-- unfortunately, it is, it requires a mouse, and it sucks shit. Even worse than Macro
Re: (Score:2)
Upgrade policy? (Score:2)
I just purchased Dreamweaver CS4 3 weeks ago. I wonder what their upgrade policy is?
Re:Upgrade policy? (Score:5, Funny)
I just purchased Dreamweaver CS4 3 weeks ago. I wonder what their upgrade policy is?
I'd imagine their upgrade policy is "Yes, we want you to buy the upgrade as well."
Re: (Score:2)
And if you don't upgrade they will send their cops to get you.
Oh wait, I read that as "upgrade police".
Carry on.
Re: (Score:2)
What's the difference between upgrade policy and upgrade police?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
According to everything I read on the web, if you purchase it after the announcement (which is today) then they'll give you a free upgrade. But before that, you get bupkis.
Re: (Score:2)
What do you mean? An African or European bupkis?
Re: (Score:2)
What do you mean? An African or European bupkis?
AMERICAN bupkis, you commie pinko! Go clack your coconuts together somewhere else...
Re: (Score:2)
And no offense, but it has been known for the last month at least that CS5 was getting ready to launch. If you went ahead and purchased CS4, and could have waited those few weeks, well, you have no one to blame but yourself.
Re: (Score:2)
Considering that our IT staff just got our CS3 folks upgraded to CS4 last week, this is very irritating. Adobe has been spinning the upgrade treadmill faster and faster since the Macromedia acquisition. And don't get me s
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Check out KB article from Adobe. Maybe it will answer your question? [adobe.com]
At my work we always get the 24 month upgrade plan with any software we purchase from the Creative Suite. We buy Design Premium for $320 and the upgrade plan only costs an extra $120, although we do get the software at educational pricing so I'm not sure how much it would be for others.
Re: (Score:2)
Bless you! I filled out the form and I'll see what Adobe says.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Software is exempt from that, otherwise everyone would buy the software, install it, and send it back for a refund.
Re: (Score:2)
Their policy is "Thanks for buying that. Now give us $799 for the new version."
What you bought still functions just as good today as it did yesterday when CS5 wasn't available, so they will not feel any compulsion to give you a break on upgrading, especially since they have no competition for you to run away to.
Aaaaargghh (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
My company decide to listen to me...
I can imagine that you would be disappoint if they did not.
Eclipse, Java, GIMP, Blender3D > CS5? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Comment removed (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't use the tools on a daily basis like I did 5 years ago, but I've been playing with Blender since 1.25 days in 1998. And to this day, I still can't produce as good of results out the box without tweaking the hell out of things in blender as I can with Lightwave. And I started using Lightwave about the same 1998 time frame. And if we want to talk horrible UI interfaces, Blender takes the cake. I remember it was like someone took the worst features of Lightwave's 5.4's UI and designed an entire prog
I predict (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
removing an ex from all your photos
..and pasting her into pictures with hardcore porn. Pictures which then are posted on 4chan.
entirely new opportunites to create PS Disasters! (Score:3, Funny)
Waste of time... (Score:5, Interesting)
Sadly after their ridiculous always broken DRM in CS3 I stopped buying Adobe products. The only unfortunate thing is that I've still yet to find a replacement for Illustrator since Freehand was killed. Ahh well...
Re:Waste of time... (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
I didn't find the DRM in CS3 all that annoying from a practical point of view, but the installer itself was really terrible. It used up a lot of resources and took forever to copy over files. Furthermore, if your installation botched in the middle (like it did with mine; got a blue screen halfway through), you have to delete everything and reinstall. If you don't, it'll happily continue installing a half-broken package. Even some of the Adobe devs complain about the installer...
I wonder if Adobe "gets it" yet... (Score:2)
Seriously, how could the design team at Adobe not realize there's a problem when they put all of their names on the splash screen, and each program loads slowly enough that the user can actually read them ALL?
I'll view it as substantial progress if Adobe ever just cleans-up the disaster that is their CS product to the degree that each app is no more than 10x the size of GIMP. It just never ceases to amaze me how a company can be so violently oblivious to the needs of its customers that it will say, "Go sc
How much... (Score:2)
As predicted... (Score:2)
Did they fix 64bit Flash on Linux? (Score:2)
Cause if they haven't, then it's still the same PoS as before. IMO, the entire CS suite has become nothing more than another glorified MS Office release. Lot's of stuff...nothing new.
Will they support non-administrative users? (Score:2)
The most important questions are:
1. Will it work correctly when the user doesn't have administrative rights.
2. Will they have a network license system.
Biggest Improvement They Could Make (Score:3, Insightful)
Unbundle the fscking apps already.
Even Microsoft lets you buy "just Word" for less than the price of Office.
All I want is Photoshop, so why am I paying for all of those other marquee apps as well? I'm using them on a Mac mini which cost less than the price of the suite.
Wait... don't tell me... that IS the price for Photoshop, and you just get all the other apps for free. I knew it! Damn you, Adobe!
Re: (Score:2)
It gets better. If you install the whole suite, and then try to run Acrobat (because that's all you wanted, anyway), the previous two versions, and no doubt CS5 too, will present you with a warning after you wait many, many seconds for Acrobat to load, which informs you that "Acrobat was purchased as part of a suite, and you can't use it now. Run another of the programs first". What manner of foolishness is that? This is very confusing for many of my easily-confused end users, and it's utterly unnecessary.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Try looking at amazon [amazon.com] next time.
CS5: Revolutionary Improvements (Score:2)
I've beet a tester since CS3 and a user since CS1. If you haven't used their applications in a while the biggest improvements you'll see are the tabbed interface, more uniform interface across application, cross-application work-flows, better responsiveness, 64bit support, tons of support for content publishing across all sorts of mediums with a particular focus on mobile and web, and GPU acceleration. Premiere, After Effects and InDesign have been improved by leaps and bounds. Streamline is now a feature o
Re:Any update on the export to iPhone? (Score:5, Interesting)
Hope they atleast release the Actionscript to Obj-C cross compiler so that people can at least attempt to use it for themselves, if not distribute it through the App Store.
Or for enterprise (proprietary, in-house) use.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Depends. Did your friendly neighbour pay for next-day delivery?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
I can't stand the interface either. Have you tried GIMPShop [gimpshop.com]?
Re:Content-Aware Fill = Old (Score:5, Insightful)
Except that actually involves using GIMP... GIMP. People like me can't stand the interface despite the nifty features it may or may not have.
From what I can gather, the main reason people despise the GIMP UI is because they're so used to the designs of other programs. I've heard it said before that people that get used to GIMP, when they try Photoshop, find its UI to be "horrible" as well. Personally I like the GIMP interface and I don't see what's so horrible about it; might I remind you that if you hate its current UI so much, GIMP 2.8 (being released later this year) will have a single window mode so people don't complain as loud.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
From what I can gather, the main reason people despise the GIMP UI is because they're so used to the designs of other programs. I've heard it said before that people that get used to GIMP, when they try Photoshop, find its UI to be "horrible" as well. Personally I like the GIMP interface and I don't see what's so horrible about it; might I remind you that if you hate its current UI so much, GIMP 2.8 (being released later this year) will have a single window mode so people don't complain as loud.
That would be because you are not a drama queen. A rare commodity here. The UI you are used to is the one that you find easier. Simple as that. Gimp, Blender, Open Office, you name it. The UI is only an issue to the twits who are desperately searching for a means to make themselves appear more important. And to be honest, some kid with a pirated copy of a professional package he would not be able to afford if he had to pay for it, is not really an objective critic. But then neither is some kid with a burni
Re: (Score:2)
In GIMP, the everything is a separate window is a window. Unlike other modern interface, like IRIX, the hovering of the mouse does not select the tools windows. This means that two mouse clicks are necessary for such simple things as moving between a pen and erase. Since I forget that I need two clicks, I often have the wrong tool selected.
On topic, there have been some talk about if CS5 is worth the money. I am sure it is, but it is a little too expensive f
Re: (Score:2)