Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Botnet Crime Security Technology

The Life of a Cybercrime Investigator 79

Posted by Soulskill from the dragnets-for-botnets dept.
An anonymous reader writes "Steve Santorelli gets computing experts and law enforcers to cooperate in a global fight against organized Internet crime. This article talks about the role of law enforcement in identifying and battling online threats as they change and evolve. Quoting: 'The common wisdom about hacking and cybercrime is, in Santorelli's view, severely out of date. He says cybercriminals aren’t lone wolves; they are financed and directed by international criminal syndicates. ... Organized crime also has vast resources derived from its traditional operations to finance the hiring of quality hackers around the world. There is even evidence that some syndicates are investing in research and development, looking to create proprietary, next-generation hacking tools, Santorelli says.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The Life of a Cybercrime Investigator More

The Life of a Cybercrime Investigator

Comments Filter:

  • Problem is people (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward

    This is why the problem isn't Windows. These people will do whatever is necessary to make profit. Linux would be just as well targeted if it had the same market share and amount of stupid people. Windows as an OS is secure, especially Windows 7, but there's nothing you can do about user stupidity unless you close down the whole OS. And is that something we really want to happen, locked "consoles" for everyone?

    • It's coming (Score:2, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward

      And is that something we really want to happen, locked "consoles" for everyone?

      It's already here and it's called iOS iPad, iTouch, and iPhone.

      • Re: (Score:2)

        by Moryath ( 553296 )

        And the people who use them always love to say "well if everybody just used Apple nobody would have viruses."

        Nevermind the fact that the moment this happened, even those devices would be targeted by a ton of remote-rooting attacks.

        • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

          by Billy the Boy ( 2016540 )
          It's already happening too. All those jailbreaks are really remote exploits. That's right, just by going to a website your OS gets rooted. Great.

          • While there are remote exploits [notably, the PDF one with the original iPhone v1.0], most of the jailbreaks are not 'remote' in that you need to have the physical phone with a hardware connection to a computer running the jailbreak software.

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by lwsimon ( 724555 )

      As a geek who gets a call every time a family member's PC so much as has a popup - YES!. Locked consoles for everyone, please.

    • This is why the problem isn't Windows. These people will do whatever is necessary to make profit. Linux would be just as well targeted if it had the same market share and amount of stupid people. Windows as an OS is secure, especially Windows 7, but there's nothing you can do about user stupidity unless you close down the whole OS. And is that something we really want to happen, locked "consoles" for everyone?

      Not entirely true Linux isn't a single OS there are many different distributions these different variations cause a problem with exploiting flaws the uniformity of windows and it's popularity make it a good target.

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by mlts ( 1038732 ) *

      We have that in devices, and attempts like ChromeOS are likely going to bring that to the desktop.

      There is a big push to take root/Administrator away from the end user, for a number of reasons:

      1: Joe Sixpack users won't be installing Trojans.
      2: The hardware can not have features enabled.
      3: OS updates are controlled, and it is easy to force users to get new equipment if they want to use apps with a new OS version.
      4: Features can be disabled at will, like OtherOS.
      5: Un-uninstallable "branding" can be add

  • Not just criminal syndicates, governments too (Score:3, Interesting)

    by elrous0 ( 869638 ) * on Monday March 14, 2011 @01:01PM (#35482098)

    Much of the hacking now is government-sponsored too. China, Israel, the U.S., and Russia have all been allegedly involved in this for some time (probably a lot of others too). Stuxnet [wikipedia.org], theft of Google source code [wired.com], you name it. Seems like everyone is in the cybercrime (or cyberwarfare if you want to stick a more polite euphemism on it) business these days.

    • Let's see now....Micro$oft's ADVAPI.DLL, and their sellout of the kernel to the Chinese Totalitarian Capitalist State? You nailed it of course, elrous0, and with the Pentagon's giving access to phony anonymizers to certain neocon PACs, it's all Wall Street motiviated, 'natch.

    • No. Government militarization dates back to 1990s (Score:4, Interesting)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 14, 2011 @01:15PM (#35482346)

      I personally observed at least six or seven countries' military domains looking at one of my sites in the late 90s which focused on then unrealised methods of remote operating system fingerprinting (many of which were ICMP-based, and not implemented publicly until years later). As well as many parts of the US military, there was (South, obviously) Korea, Japan, and Germany I believe. Of course, back then they were happy to browse from a .mil.* IP, these days none of them would do that. Australia used to have a lot of network warfare information up on the DSTO website, there's less these days, however they are still a good source for the multi-military JWID events (Joint Warfare Interoperability Demonstrations), a regular compatibility-of-command-and-control event that involves many western militaries. The trend I have seen thus far is for government/military to co-opt hackers through establishing corporate fronts, usually led by an otherwise-reputable hacker who is on the take or convinced to 'help the country' with nationalism. They also pay hackers with basic community cred as informants, and send them to security-related events all around the world in the hopes of acquiring actionable intelligence. We all need to be very careful who we give information to. Furthermore, the increasingly commercial development of some areas of our industry (open source intelligence gathering / computational linguistics / passive traffic analysis + surveillance / video surveillance systems) are strongly contributing to the further degradation of society in to a 1984-like situation. The best thing we can do as people is to avoid the allure of money and refuse to work in these areas, whilst publicly pointing the ethical finger at those that do.

      • In other words, the government seeks to turn hackers into informants aka stooges?

        What isn't know is how the government gets them to do that, without paying then any money. Threats? Help us or gitmo? Why would any hacker want "community cred" as an informant? And why would a hacker risk their lives for free? Patriotism?

        That being said, these hackers would be informing or working for the mafias and others if not the government because the mob runs a protection racket just as the government does. But what you

  • You mean the trinity of evil when you speak of organized 'net crime? Or that big time criminal outfit, the US DOJ? Confused by propagandistic articles? We all should be by this time. When the banksters are finally executed, then and only then should people speak of the lower echelon of ethnic crime.

  • Some lone wolves still (Score:3, Interesting)

    by trollertron3000 ( 1940942 ) on Monday March 14, 2011 @01:21PM (#35482422)

    Although all of the powerful crackers know others, some of them truly are lone wolves. For instance, The Jester (th3j35t3r ) with his Xerxes botnet. He doesn't claim any affiliation AFAIK and is self-proclaimed former military hacker. I always wondered if they give him a pass because he helps with other things, like taking down Islamic-jihad websites which he's know to do. No man is an island after all and he definitely has connections. But still he seems to be the "lone wolf" acting with impunity at times.

    And that's just one of many that have never claimed a group affiliation and seem to be driven more by underground fame and rage than money or crime.

    • Don't usually post to my own comments but a correction - he is self proclaimed former military and served in Afghanistan. He never claimed he hacked for them AFAIK.

  • Santorelli has devoted his career to identifying, tracking and apprehending cybercriminals in a new cyber-environment in which police chases are clocked at light speed and villains drive on a global superhighway congested with 1.8 billion law-abiding commuters.

    LMAO! XD

  • .... and hope that these organizations don't band together, start sharing innovations and start developing 'next level threats' as I'd call them. With those resources and people behind them, evil people could do bad things to the internet. Gah, lets hope not. Lets hope.

    • They're already doing that with criminal clearing houses and exchanges. We just have to stay one step ahead of them and pay the best hackers to "white hat" for us. That's the key. We need out own heavy hitters that can skirt the fine line.

    • Comment removed based on user account deletion

  • We noticed (Score:5, Informative)

    by DCFusor ( 1763438 ) on Monday March 14, 2011 @01:47PM (#35482740) Homepage
    A good while back, while we were still on dialup, actually. Being a small software shop who delivered results and of course our bills over the 'net, we did a ton of email traffic. At the time it was a windows shop as well (by customer demand). We "captured" many viruses in emails, didn't catch them -- we were all pros and knew better. Since we had all the best tools money could buy, we looked pretty closely at these "captured" (eg, not caught) viruses. At first, they were obviously not the work of very skilled or well financed people. Many still had debug symbols in the code, and things like Devstudio and reverse compilation showed they were usually done with a "free" C compiler, not GCC, but Borland.
    Most were pretty crummy code, at least by our standards, though there were a few interesting tricks, like pushing data on the stack and then doing a return to get a goto to happen, often into a system function.
    All of a sudden, things got better or worse, depending on your POV. The stuff we were capturing suddenly changed, a lot - it was well written, well obfuscated, and tricky stuff -- we even got a cool idea or two from it, and the new stuff was much smaller and made better use of the system API to do nearly all the work -- none of the obviously malicious code was in the virus itself, just system calls with destructive parameters. This would have been around the 2006 timeframe.
    It was obvious that someone had started putting money into the game, or for whatever reason the quality of the crackers had suddenly gotten a heck of a lot better, which usually implies the former. Real talent.
    To the fanboi who said "it's not windows", sorry pal. Might have been true once, for bot farms and so on, that need volume. Today's cracking is financially based, and much more targeted. And most machines that deal with tons of money aren't running windows -- after being burned a few times, you think the financial business has any loyalty to the guys in redmond? Or anyone at all, for that matter? Linux is just plain more difficult to crack, and more proactive about patching when possible vuln's are discovered. Anyone who looks at the flow of updates to Ubuntu and how many of them "fix a possible security bug" knows this. Many bugs that would have been zero-day exploits are fixed before anyone has put an exploit out for them at all, just by doing some fairly obvious code analysis, looking for ways to overflow allocations and such.
    Could be windows guys do that some too, but since they long-delay even well known holes, and you can't see what is in those closed source, uncommented updates, (sometimes there's a KB entry, but not always and always little detail) how could you prove that? I don't think you can.

  • they are financed and directed by international criminal syndicates

    This is the part I don't understand, or maybe its a troll indicator.

    So.... I've seen all the movies. You wanna buy $100K worth of coke in Columbia to sell in the USA for $500K. But you don't have $100K. So you get a very special loan, with some very special terms, etc, from some dude in Columbia. Thats financing by an international criminal syndicate.

    How exactly does an international criminal syndicate finance hacking? How much money has to be fronted to get a .torrent of visual basic or whatever, on a

    • They're not financing workstations in basements--they're paying for real coding talent, for information, and for new exploits (or new uses of old exploits). If you know what game development teams look like, you've got an idea of what more and more criminal enterprise teams look like, except that, instead of a semi-competant boss who is looking out for the company's bottom line, you have a trusted semi-competant boss whose only mission is to pass the deliverables on to the syndicate. Slacking off, or thro

    • Re: (Score:1)

      by Anonymous Coward

      Just because the information doesn't get tweeted and dissected in main tech-media, it doesn't mean that there aren't real mafia-like crime syndicates around.

      There are real criminals, with real organization, who collect 'protection money' just like you've seen in mafia documentaries and movies.

      You do not have a choice but to pay up and be quiet. If you had an online business, say a betting site, which generates considerable amount of money on hourly basis and you would find yourself DDOS'd with the option t

  • The fact that there's been a move from the idealistic and casual hackers to organized crime has been sounded by wise security folks for years and years and years. The writing seemed to be on the wall pretty clearly since about 2004, and I was warning IT auditors and bank examiners about it from the mid-2000s onward.

    It should be no surprise to anyone in the IT field, but I can see how there might be a big disparity between contemporary IT thought and the knowledge held by law enforcement units around the c

  • Probably the largest amount of criminal activity comes fro women on dating sites trying to scam men into sending money to enable travel to the man. If the government gets serious millions of American women could get severe prison sentences for that game. In law it is not so difficult to offer proof that a woman has promised to travel to live with 75 different men all over the world on the same day and taken money from many of them.
    This is an issue like stealin

    • This is an issue like stealing bicycles. Bicycle thefts total far more than bank robbery losses and more deaths result from bicycle thefts than bank robberies as well. Yet a bank robber can easily get 20 years for a first offence and a bicycle thief will rarely be put in prison. We have it backwards.

      bicycle thieves rarely use shotguns to execute their crimes...

  • Where to send my CV (Score:3)

    by Curunir_wolf ( 588405 ) on Monday March 14, 2011 @02:25PM (#35483172) Homepage Journal

    Organized crime also has vast resources derived from its traditional operations to finance the hiring of quality hackers around the world.

    How do I get in on that?

    • 1. Move to Easter Europe
      2. Learn to speak Russian and Moldavian
      3. Tell everyone you meet you are a super 1337 h@x0r
      4. ???
      5. Profit
      6. Get arrested and prosecuted locally.
      7. Accept slap on wrist
      8. Profit

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by OWJones ( 11633 )
      Don't worry. If you've got an electronic version stored somewhere, they've already grabbed a copy.

  • Look, I know who they are, the bad guys. Haven't you noticed in every hollywood movie that features a hacker, they use totally different hacking tools than what we see normally? Those Matrix like, futuristic hacking scenes allow a mediocre hacker to crack DoD mainframes in like 15 seconds with a gun pointing to his head! Un-Be-lieable! Oh, and don't forget that they all use Macs. I don't have any proof that is related, but Steve Jobs is on some big freaking Studio's board.

    • Re: (Score:1)

      by Anonymous Coward

      Haven't you noticed in every hollywood movie that features a hacker, they use totally different hacking tools than what we see normally? Those Matrix like, futuristic hacking scenes allow a mediocre hacker to crack DoD mainframes in like 15 seconds with a gun pointing to his head!

      You mean like in that movie 'The Matrix Reloaded', where trinity uses nmap [youtube.com] to find an exploitable SSH server? Insultingly infeasible.

  • I hope no one out there dun goofed!

Slashdot Top Deals

"Trust me. I know what I'm doing." -- Sledge Hammer

Close