Solar Powered Laptops 120
smitty777 writes "Greentech is running a story on a solar powered laptop concept. The device was created by industrial designer Andrea Ponti, and includes a solar panel on the outside of the case as well as one below the keyboard. The idea seems to be taking shape; Samsung has a design they've been developing as well."
But what happens to the laptop life? (Score:4, Interesting)
Seriously, solar cells get hot, and laptops themselves have enough trouble from getting hot, I'm curious as to how bad the hit is going to be in terms of device durability.
Re: (Score:2)
Durability will be interesting. Solar cells are extremely fragile. However, there are a number of strong encapsulants out there, so it shouldn't be too much of a problem.
Re: (Score:2)
The four bit microcontroller inside my bicycle computer is turing complete. The 99c calc may have the same device inside. Consider using e-paper for the laptop screen and an arm microprocessor. Solid state storage. Take a lot of care with power. Maybe don't use batteries at all because charge/discharge cycle costs power.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, technically my laptop isn't Turing Complete, because emulating a Turing Machine requires infinite storage to emulate the tape, so in that sense you're correct.
Re: (Score:2)
Why not? solar cells on the quad core might not eliminate the need to charge the battery, but they'd certainly stretch the battery life between charges.
I wonder if case makers will respond by making a clear window in laptop bags so the laptop can charge when you're carrying it around.
Re: (Score:2)
If they make a laptop bag with a clear window it won't be so it can charge while you are carrying it around.
It will be so your hippie friends can see that your trust fund is bigger then theirs as you can afford to waste more money then them. Same as hybrid cars.
Re: (Score:2)
They sell solar powered calculators at the 99 cents store. That can be considered a solar powered laptop.
A laptop is little more than an overpowered calculator with some extra bells and whistles. Heck, even solar powered calculators have limited memory functions.
They can make a solar powered laptop. Sure, it's not going to be a quad core with lots of processing power and a fancy monitor, but they can make a solar powered laptop.
That solar-powered calculator has a direct-drive (not multiplexed) LCD display, and a "CPU" that probably runs at 32KHz, if that.
Forget Turing; lets talk Miller, Watt and Ohm.
Re: (Score:2)
He is close enough. I wouldn't go so far as calling him a moron. They have to improve the energy efficiency (significantly) of the components as well as the cells though. We are after all talking about energy! If we can build a solar powered vehicle or aircraft however basic it may be certainly a laptop isn't impossible. It might start out with a mouse pad like connection piece and require you to be in the sun along with a screen similar to a ebook reader that is b/w and a very low power cpu + wifi with very little functionality capability why wise. Probably no sound for instance, optical drive, usb ports, etc.
Ok, not a moron. His IQ may be higher than 60; however, as far as something you'd want to actually use to do anything more than a Kindle does when you are reading a book, I really don't think that would work. Especially not unless you live in an area that has cloudless skies every single day, and you can do all your work outside.
Re: (Score:2)
What makes you think that it would *only* be solar powered? Is a charging port really that difficult?
Some back-of-the-book calculations suggest that it's not out of the ballpark. A large laptop keyboard like on my 17"-er may give you 1m^2 of surface area. You can get over 40% efficient solar cells (although they're expensive), and thus get 40W in ideal conditions, or more down-to-earth-priced solar cells and get 20W. Subtract for key interference, hands over the keyboard, suboptimal angles, blah blah bl
Re: (Score:2)
What makes you think that it would *only* be solar powered? Is a charging port really that difficult?
Some back-of-the-book calculations suggest that it's not out of the ballpark. A large laptop keyboard like on my 17"-er may give you 1m^2 of surface area. You can get over 40% efficient solar cells (although they're expensive), and thus get 40W in ideal conditions, or more down-to-earth-priced solar cells and get 20W. Subtract for key interference, hands over the keyboard, suboptimal angles, blah blah blah and you're looking at ~20W and ~10W, respectively.
Most of the energy used by a large laptop is to power the screen; in the sun, all the moreso. The Apple approach allows you to get your light for the screen at 100% efficiency using the very sun that makes you need a bright screen to begin with, via reflection when available (using a backlight when not). So you can take all but the CCD out of the picture on that one. The other alternative is e-Ink, although that has its own downsides. Without most of the screen's power consumption, a power-optimized laptop could easy run on under 10W average.
So yeah, I think it's quite plausiible. Easy? No. Will there be show-stopper engineering difficulties? There certainly could be. But some quick calculations suggest it's plausible.
I really wish your engineering optimism would translate to the real world on this. But it just won't. Even Samsung can't make it work, and they have not only a huge R&D budget, but also the OWNER of the company pushing for it. Note also that Fujitsu, who is no engineering slouch, either, isn't pursuing this beyond the "Wouldn't this be cool" stage. Fujitsu has the ability to throw R&D resources at nearly any problem, electrical, mechanical, or physics-al. And if they have backed away from this game-
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Is it that it is technically impossible or just monetarily infeasible?
It is not technically impossible. Under perfect conditions, it can be accomplished; especially if the hardware is very power-frugal, and the user demands are very light (no pun).
However, it is unlikely that most slashdotters (or most others) would be happy with the result. Or the fact that they would have to:
1. Compute only outside, and only on bright, sunshiny days. No computing on overcast, rainy days.
2. Live no farther North or South than about 30-40 deg. from the Equator, period.
2. Compute betwe
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That was supposed to read .1 square meters, not 1 square meter. The calculations done were assuming .1m^2. .22m^2 would not give you "6-8W in ideal conditions"; it'd give you 90 watts with a high-efficiency panel, or 45 watts with a cheaper one.
Re: (Score:2)
Really, I mean laptop manufacturers give advice like this [toshibalife.com] :
"Laptops generate a surprising amount of heat, and are engineered to extremely tight thermal tolerances. That means even the shortest period of prolonged heat can harm them. To best take care of your laptop keep it out of direct sunlight and away from heaters or radiators."
The heat is going to kill the battery. Not that it matters this is a "design concept" and has pretty much a zero chance of become a real product.
Re: (Score:2)
That sure sounds like a true manufacturer's warning, fully self-contradictory.
On a more serious note, have you never seen a solar powered fan? There's no need to have a fast, high powered solar laptop if the goal is just to have a solar laptop. A six inch by 10 inch solar array can generate about 7 watts, and that's more than enough for a carefully designed, if somewhat feeble, netbook.
Indeed... (Score:2)
There's no need to have a fast, high powered solar laptop if the goal is just to have a solar laptop.
And there's no need for a laptop that actually works when you can make one out of cardboard.
As for solar-powered laptops, there are elegant solutions out there already but they are pricey. [voltaicsystems.com]
Re: (Score:2)
That sure sounds like a true manufacturer's warning, fully self-contradictory.
On a more serious note, have you never seen a solar powered fan? There's no need to have a fast, high powered solar laptop if the goal is just to have a solar laptop. A six inch by 10 inch solar array can generate about 7 watts, and that's more than enough for a carefully designed, if somewhat feeble, netbook.
Yeah, I had one of those solar-powered fans. Totally useless, even in direct, bright sunlight.
And that's 7 W at 10 degrees North, on a cloudless day, at Noon.
Re: (Score:2)
Depends on what type of battery you use. All batteries are not created equal. If you use the sort of battery on a ThinkBook X1, it should have excellent thermal tolerance. The "fast charge" chemistries generally don't mind heat much.
Re: (Score:2)
Seriously, solar cells get hot, and laptops themselves have enough trouble from getting hot, I'm curious as to how bad the hit is going to be in terms of device durability.
It comes with a cooling unit in a backpack. The backpack AC unit is also solar powered you just have to spread the included wings and keep your back to the sun.
Hmm...now where have I heard that before... :-)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_Plus
Re: (Score:1)
Yes, laptops should standardize on some sort of power connector, and they should sell detachable solar panels, that you can move to your new laptop when you upgrade after some years.
But, a solar-powered laptop will have a big advantage: you'll be able to charge it in places where you don't have access to electricity. This of course does not negate the points in the previous paragraph.
Re: (Score:2)
Detachable with a decent length of cable, or a dock you can put your battery in to charge it...
I could leave a solar panel on the dashboard of my car all day, but i wouldn't leave a laptop there or its likely to be stolen. Anywhere you could leave a solar panel to charge is by definition out in the open, and would be an attractive target for thieves.
Re: (Score:1)
Sounds like a great idea!
The only problem is that laptop manufacturers employ an infinite diversity of batteries and infinite variations of power connectors.
Re: (Score:1)
Detachable with a decent length of cable, or a dock you can put your battery in to charge it...
I could leave a solar panel on the dashboard of my car all day, but i wouldn't leave a laptop there or its likely to be stolen. Anywhere you could leave a solar panel to charge is by definition out in the open, and would be an attractive target for thieves.
All day on the dash...
It would be stolen way too quickly.
Laptop bags and back packs are dark places.
However anything that can increase the apparent battery life
and make a demand for low power displays and sane web
site design is a good thing. Combine with some of the new ultra
capacitor technology and improved thermal and power management
and we could see a bit of a resolution.
This is especially so for the tablets and the likes of Kindle and Nooks...
Re: (Score:2)
Solar panels take 8-10 years, in direct sunlight in most ideal locations available to simply produce the energy required to manufacture them in the first place (maybe a year less in a desert).
"Energy payback estimates for rooftop PV systems are 4, 3, 2, and 1 years: 4 years for systems using current multicrystalline-silicon PV modules, 3 years for current thin-film modules, 2 years for anticipated multicrystalline modules, and 1 year for anticipated thin-film modules (see Figure 1)." -- says the US Department of Energy [nrel.gov]. They cite references, too.
Re: (Score:2)
And look at how out of date that document you linked is. It's notably less now. Some of the thin-film manufacturers are now talking 3-6 months.
Re: (Score:2)
Those are costs, and likely subsidized ones.
Re: (Score:2)
I have nothing against the government subsidizing it, however it is very unlikely that total energy spent on a modern panel (including all steps in production, from mining to transportation) are going to be recovered with few kilowatts running 6 hours a day for a few months or even years.
Re: (Score:2)
Thin film panels are a couple milligrams (if that) of solar material on top of a thin sheet of glass, plastic, or aluminum. There's not much energy at all put into making them. The challenges they face are not energy, but throughput.
Re: (Score:2)
Do you have any idea how much energy it takes to produce aluminum alone?
Or to make the whole sandwich with given parameters?
Re: (Score:2)
Bulk structural aluminum? A ton.
Aluminum foil? Basically none.
Re: (Score:1)
Do you have any idea how much energy it takes to produce aluminum alone?
As for aluminum the average Coke and Pepsi consumer generates enough
empty aluminum containers to recycle into a very sturdy frame for
a laptop. In addition aluminum can be used to good effect for thermal
management. Carbon fiber not so much.
A lot of marketing folk are missing the opportunity to design and sell a
sturdy long battery life system as they quest for a "light as
air" thin as a children's book computer.
Re: (Score:1)
Blimey, 2004 -- I didn't even see that. I must have a trawl for some more recent studies when I get the time...
Re: (Score:3)
The capital energy cost of manufacturing can always be produced by clean, abundant nuclear power.
Re: (Score:2)
Only nuclear isn't very popular right now, so countries are actually shutting down nuclear plants rather than building more...
Re: (Score:2)
Beyond any battery life, this is a MASSIVELY ANTI-GREEN laptop. It is more "Green" to run your laptop from the most polluting coal powered station you can find, than to buy this laptop!
Solar panels take 8-10 years, in direct sunlight in most ideal locations available to simply produce the energy required to manufacture them in the first place (maybe a year less in a desert). A laptop solar panel will NEVER recoup the energy required to produce it, never mind the actual laptop components.
This is the most polluting and wasteful concept ever possible.
This is aside any other downside of direct sunlight + computer screen.... :S
Wish I had mod points left. You are EXACTLY correct.
What? (Score:1)
I don't take my laptop outside and I live in a dark room, like any nerd.
can aruldy do this (Score:1)
mabye so (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:maybe so (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You gonna carry that around in your pocket?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
You want a solar tent.
Re:can aruldy do this (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
For example, look at sunelec.com
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Why do you need an inverter? The Laptop itself takes DC, the solar cell generates DC, at best you'd need a voltage regulator to output the laptop's dc input. You'd lose a lot more energy putting it through a double inversion process.
-Restil
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Wait a minute (Score:4, Funny)
So does this mean that my porn habit has to be fed during the day, and out doors? Kinky...
Re: (Score:1)
The radiation from the sun is an excellent disinfectant too. Not good news for basement dwellers. You'd need to go outside in a black suit with a broad brimmed hat and gloves also sunglasses and a ski mask. Also SPF10000 cream to guard against specular reflections - in bright sunlight even they are strong enough to make a basement dweller COMBUST. The humans will become suspicious.
Frankly I prefer to run my laptop from the small reactor I built in my basement - it's much safer.
E-Ink (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I agree a few small strips could supply the Kindle's power needs, but I'd imagine it would be hard on the battery. Solar calculators usually run off solar only and don't have a battery in them. Constantly topping off the battery may actually cause memory issues or otherwise just shorten the life of the battery such that the minuses outweigh the pluses.
Wouldn't be hard to try, but given how aggressive everyone (but Sony) has been at pushing prices down, it may be enough of a cost issue.
It's too bad. Sony w
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
I would do it all the time if my screen weren't glossy, and used to when my screen was matte....
Re: (Score:2)
Whats the deal with that, the matte finish used to be a selling point of LCD over CRT, but now theyre making LCDs glossy...
Re: (Score:2)
put it down to humans are really not much better than our monkey ancestors
Re: (Score:2)
Great (Score:2)
This will work! (Score:2)
Bad idea (Score:2)
Sun -> heat -> Dead batteries.
why charge it in the sun if you'll end up having 10 minutes autonomy after 1 month?
Re: (Score:2)
yeah because we all have to use our solar powered calculators outside...
Re: (Score:2)
Are you comparing the kind of power required by a laptop with a calculator?
And you missed the point. 99% of batteries used in laptops/phones are extremely sensitive to heat. sun = heat, so I doubt that battery will keep it's power for long.
Re: (Score:2)
1. A laptop doesn't have to be used all the time, so when you leave it on the couch while you're doing something else it can partially recharge.
2. Battery doesn't have to be next to panel.
3. Panel on a calculator doesn't get hot. I'm guessing they aren't going for the most efficient panels.
4. I don't think laptop display work that well in direct sun either, so it probably isn't designed to be in the sun.
5. Solar panel probably is a bad term. Light panel? Photon panel? IDK.
Re: (Score:2)
Ok, are you trolling me or being serious?
Anything left out in the sun (in this case, to recharge), can easily reach 60. Even if they are not next to the panel, they will get hot, eventually.
Lithium-ion batteries are extremely sensitive to heat. That's a well known fact...
The only way I can see a "solar powered laptop" is if the solar panel can be detached from the laptop and recharges it using a wire of some kind, to avoid solar exposure of the machine.
This is why working for other people is fun/sucks (Score:2)
this is a case where we need to keep certain manufacturing jobs overseas and far away from the U.S.
Re: (Score:2)
Whatever you have to say against China, their low wages mean they might be able to crack the cost/efficiency ratio if they make it cost really cheap.
And all sorts of good things happen when you do this... Anyone with any visionary blood in them knows what this means. Solar panels everywhere, energy on the cheap. Transportation doesn't cost gas money... Water and food is cheaper... etc etc...
You don't got to
15 years ago... (Score:2)
This is a concept? This has been around since 1996. Apple's PowerBook 1400 had a removable cover on the lid and a company called Keep It Simple Systems made a solar panel for it.
You can see how successful it was because they're ubiquitous now.
Backlight (Score:2)
Since this solar laptop is for use in sunlight, there's no need for a powered backlight for the LCD display. Use the sun, that's what it's there for.
Providing some shade for the viewing side of the display would help contrast.
Heck, use a reflective LCD screen. No need for silly backlighting arrangements.
Laptop != Calculator (Score:4, Interesting)
All these comments comparing calculators to laptops...
- Have you ever felt a calculator or MP3 player get hot? Ever come across one that gets so hot that it needs a fan?
- Have you ever felt a laptop get hot? Ever come across a laptop that doesn't need a fan?
- Calculators use so little energy that a small strip indoors is enough to power it. Laptops are still not solar powered because the amount of energy required has so far been too much for solar cells to produce.
My point is that, in terms of heat, laptops and calculators are very different.
Have you ever used a laptop in the sun? I have, when sitting next to a window where the sun shines in. I soon move because the laptop gets uncomfortably hot. I don't know how bad that heat is for my laptop, but it's considerable, and I think it might be too much for the little fan, so I'm not about to test it.
Summary: In terms of energy use and heat... Laptop != Calculator
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
All these comments comparing calculators to laptops...
Or on the flip side, all these comments immediately assuming it's like one of those giant desktop-replacement beasts.
I can't answer for the others, but when I saw the headline, I immediately thought of netbook-class processors, or smartphone class. No moving parts. Charge it either in the sun or with a cord. Run in non-backlit mode when in the sun, a modest sized screen won't draw so much power, and an ARM system-on-a-chip only pulls one watt at full blast.
Re: (Score:2)
Yep. First sensible post in this thread. This is what I had imagined. I would want something that I could take on holiday, and read e-mail where there is a connection, some simple word processing and data visualization, not viewing videos or gaming. You could keep a diary when hiking, and stuff like that.
If you have a solid-state hard disk, and don't have a display backlight, or a DVD drive, and the USB ports only supported very tiny current draws such as thumb drives, you can omit the battery and rely o
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed!
Though I was not referring to a desktop replacement. I was referring to a proper laptop running mostly cool , but feeling uncomfortably overheated by sun light..
But yes, I agree with you.
Re: (Score:1)
Light Powered Laptop (Score:1)
Now all the morons on slashdot will collectively go after their weird logic on sunlight, heat and other tangents. Granted sunlight is the most efficient way to charge, however indoor lighting however inefficient can still change. So it's a good thing to have. I guess all the morons who posted about solar porn watching sit around in the dark watching porn all day.
Backlight (Score:2)
Considering how well most laptops work in the sunlight, does this mean that you can either power it or see what's on the screen?
Will Not Work (Score:3)
When you start looking into this, you will soon find out that PV cells suck so incredibly hard that, unless you live someplace like Arizona, that the rated output of a typical PV cell, which is almost always rated at "1 standard sun" (I kid you not! It's a real unit-of-measure), is so far below that number, that you end up having to have something that folds-out like the solar-cell arrays on Skylab.
Yes, PV cells have gotten a little better since 1990, and there are some mobile CPUs that are better on current consumption than what was available at that time, too; but not enough to matter in either case; because so many people live in areas where their average sun exposure is closer to 0.5 Standard Sun, and they will never even get close to 1 Standard Sun's worth of solar energy.
It's a great idea; but it needs a real breakthrough to make it practical.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, PV cells have gotten a little better since 1990, and there are some mobile CPUs that are better on current consumption than what was available at that time, too
Ya think? Its a good thing you looked into this 20 years ago. You may have just saved this company from wasting their time.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, PV cells have gotten a little better since 1990, and there are some mobile CPUs that are better on current consumption than what was available at that time, too
Ya think? Its a good thing you looked into this 20 years ago. You may have just saved this company from wasting their time.
Except that the Engineers at the well-heeled R&D department at Samsung [coolerplanet.com] don't seem to be having much luck right now, either; even with the Owner of the company pushing hard for it. Also note that Fujitsu has no plans to market this world-changing technology. Wonder why?
It's one of those things that looks quite do-able, until you actually try to make it work in the real world. What one of my former bosses used to refer to as a "Lab Queen".
Re: (Score:2)
cranky laptops (Score:2)
Bad idea (Score:2)
This reminds me of the famous Chinese initiative (in Mao's times) when they made iron in every backyard [wikipedia.org], in small kilns. The process was very inefficient and produced metal of poor quality, nearly useless.
We don't run our own electric generators in our homes (except in emergencies.) We instead buy electric energy that is produced elsewhere. We don't want to order coal or gas, we don't want to subject our homes to endless inspections, and we don't want to invest into boilers and turbines and generators.
B
Re: (Score:2)
Whatever you say, laptops spend most of their life either on desks or in backpacks. Unless you are a student who works outdoors (because it's impossible to work in your room due to some scheduled orgy) you virtually never take the laptop outside. It's insecure; it's inconvenient; it may be raining; a bird may decide to land on it, with the obvious end result; there are millions of reasons why laptops typically stay indoors.
So don't buy it. Nobody said this has to be useful to the majority of the population. A small number of people actually has to work in the sun, regardless of such inconveniences, and can't plug it in when they want.
Good luck (Score:2)
Extra heavy.
Only useful in the situations where you least need a laptop.
More fragile.
Why not just create a bloody bike-laptop which you have to cycle on to use.
Would be about as practical.
Re: (Score:2)
A bike-laptop reminds me of this [hackaday.com], so awesome. And he did cycle while using it, although it was to power a different thing than the computer ;)
I'm skeptical (Score:1)
I may of course be completely wrong and maybe it is in fact possible in countries that have a lot of sun I've a feeling I'd be wasting m
Potential breakthrough capability, if it works (Score:2)
I bought a Samsung NB30 to try out Pixel Qi's daylight-readable screen, and have been very impressed with Samsung's engineering. Since the display enables me to carry the NB30 everywhere, it's taking quite a beating. Fortunately, it has a waterproof membrane undr the keyboard, a feature I've accidentally tested with many spills. The drive automatically parks, so the several times I've dropped it has not done more than break small pieces off of the case. This is one tough little PC.
Right now, my biggest
convenient, not green (Score:2)
The article says "could become the greenest laptop ever made". I'm pretty sure it's not. While such a laptop might be convenient in certain situations, its lifetime is way too short for the EROI of the solar cells to become even near positive, even if left permanently in the sun.
It's been tried repeatedly. (Score:4, Interesting)
doesn't it seem like this is way overdue ? brilliant idea.
It's been tried repeatedly. The problem has always been that, with available solar panels, computers, and displays, the laptop doesn't have enough area by a LARGE factor to collect as much power as it uses. It also doesn't present its surface to the sun very well when in use. About the best you could get is a laptop you could leave in the sun all day to charge enough for a few minutes use. (Want to leave it unattended that long?)
Further, more crunch has been the target for a long time and that requires more power than less crunch at the same silicon fabrication technology level. A lot of people have not wanted their laptops to be several-generations-back stupid. Improvements in run time have been driven more by improved batteries that store more power and hacks to turn parts of the machine off or down to slower running when not in use than by actual improvements in watts per crunch (though the latter has been worked on as well - beyond the desktop "keep it from melting as you make it faster and smaller" target.)
And then there's radio-based networking to eat more power. If you can't be bothered to plug in the charger you certainly don't want to find a network jack. And if you're out in the boonies with no outlets (or even in a city park) you're probably far enough from the wireless networking access point that the transmitter has to be running at the high end of its power range.
With new high-efficiency panels, low-power processors, e-ink displays (which only use power to change, not to sustain or to backlight) or LED backlighting, and a leveling out of the demand for crunch when just browsing non-animated web sites, editing documents, or the like, a low-capability machine that's fully solar powered may be coming into reach.
Or at least for people in perpetually-sunny areas who are willing to expose themselves to the thermonuclear cancer-generator in the sky for hours per day. And it might be useful in disaster scenarios (though I really don't want lives to depend on it not running down in a crunch).
But I think we're still far from on that is practical for most usage scenarios.