Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses Communications Idle

Workers In Brazil Can Claim Overtime For Answering Email After Hours 198

New submitter zzyvits writes "With smartphones becoming more and more common, the push for employees to work after hours is becoming greater. Would the push be as hard if the employers had to pay for it? A law recently passed in Brazil makes it possible for employees who answer emails after normal work hours to claim overtime pay."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Workers In Brazil Can Claim Overtime For Answering Email After Hours

Comments Filter:
  • by Karmashock ( 2415832 ) on Saturday January 14, 2012 @11:33AM (#38697686)

    They're not going to pay overtime. So what they'll do is instruct the email servers to not send mail outside office hours. This might cause problems if employees don't all work at the same time. But doubtless the servers can be programmed to send mail in some customized fashion.

    Maybe even make it the employee's job to update a settings page in the web terminal for the email system.

    Memo 5441: Employees are required to keep current their hours by logging into the provided address. Errors in this system will be assumed the employee's responsibility and the company takes no responsibility for... yahtah yahtah yahtah.

    They're not paying over time. Governments might be dumb enough to do it but corps just won't. So they'll find some way to not do it. They don't really need employees to respond to company emails outside of work time anyway.

  • by cayenne8 ( 626475 ) on Saturday January 14, 2012 @11:41AM (#38697756) Homepage Journal
    Actually...it puts more incentive for people to try to opt for the contractor paradigm.

    I don't mind working....but I do NOT work for free. If I do work at any time, I bill for it, and yes, it definitely makes the employer think twice about calling or bothering you after hours.

    This, and considering that there is such thing as employer loyalty nor job security....hell, just about everyone should opt (if possible) for the contractor route.

    If you're gonna get the loyalty and job security from an employer that a contractor gets, you might as well get the freedom, tax breaks and bill rate that a contractor gets....no?

  • by Hentes ( 2461350 ) on Saturday January 14, 2012 @11:43AM (#38697764)

    Not paying overtime by not requiring overtime work is exactly the purpose of this legislation I believe. What is wrong with that?

  • by dougisfunny ( 1200171 ) on Saturday January 14, 2012 @11:49AM (#38697794)

    Then that would imply the managers aren't working, since the manager's job is to make sure the peons are working.

  • by Hentes ( 2461350 ) on Saturday January 14, 2012 @12:15PM (#38697966)

    Brazil is a leftist country, which means they take workers' rights seriously. You see, as there is a competition in a labour market, without regulations like minimal wage or overtime pay the companies could just require workers to work more for less pay, because there would always be someone else to take the job. By regulating overtime, the state ends the competition between the workers, thus solving the prisoners dilemma scenario and resulting in an environment that's better for everyone.

  • by TheRaven64 ( 641858 ) on Saturday January 14, 2012 @12:21PM (#38698004) Journal

    No, the manager's job is to make sure that the company's objective's are achieved on time and in budget. If an employee's overall productivity is higher if he or she takes periodic breaks to play Angry Birds or post on Slashdot rather than working solidly all of the time in the office, then only a bad manager would insist on removing the 'distractions'. Most people work best if they take short breaks quite frequently.

    I'm pretty sure that you are replying to a troll though. The 'company's bandwidth streaming music' bit was a bit of a giveaway - streaming Internet radio uses very little bandwidth and lots of people work better with music in the background.

  • by Lumpy ( 12016 ) on Saturday January 14, 2012 @01:18PM (#38698446) Homepage

    "that's why I quit my previous employer. The HR bitch at ABM was threatening to fire me if I didn't work off the clock and pay checks were usually quite late."

    You fill out time cards anyways and turn them in with the overtime. make copies and send them and your pay stubs to the state.

    HR bitch ends up fired, Company is fined a very significant amount of money and is forced to pay all back wages to all employees with interest.

    If you keep your mouth quiet and act like a good slave they get away with this crap.

  • by jd2112 ( 1535857 ) on Saturday January 14, 2012 @01:41PM (#38698642)

    Competent IT will put in Stream reflectors for the users.

    We put that in place for the 10 top played internet radio streams in the company, the $200.00 linux servers connects, and then rebroadcasts the stream to up to 500 users.

    So I have 500 people listening with the bandwidth overhead of 10.

    But when the competent IT staff proposes this management says 'Why don't we just block the streaming sites on the firewall for free?"

  • by sjames ( 1099 ) on Saturday January 14, 2012 @02:56PM (#38699412) Homepage Journal

    Complaining about having to answer AN email after hours might be silly, but if it becomes a regular part of your duties then you are effectively never off work. Enjoy answering AN email while your family is watching a movie, while your kid is in the school play, when everyone else is playing a game on the weekend, etc etc.

    Why not take it to the logical next step. Perhaps you could take 2 or 3 hours worth of homework with you each night.

  • by Dan541 ( 1032000 ) on Sunday January 15, 2012 @02:42AM (#38703930) Homepage

    Fucking cowards. Stand up for yourselves,

    Says the person posting anonymously.

"Everyone's head is a cheap movie show." -- Jeff G. Bone

Working...