Video See the Tesla S at the Detroit International Auto Show (Video) 143
Video no longer available.
The weather in Detroit was frightful and Slashdot editor Timothy Lord was nine hours away. No problem! He loaded his camcorder and a bunch of other stuff in his car and drove to Detroit for the 2012 International Auto Show. In today's video he looks at the Tesla Model S. Next week we'll have more video highlights of the auto show for you, so stay tuned...
when did this happen (Score:5, Interesting)
Slashdot has reporters who do on-site video pieces now?
Insert quip about how they can do that but can't hire editors to make sure the summary blurb is accurate. ;-)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
"Oh the weather in Detroit was frightful,
Electric cars, so delightful."
Okay, I'll stop.
Re: (Score:2)
No new people, actually -- the content on the site is put up pretty much by the four guys whose nicks you see on the site ;) (Maybe eventually there *will* be new people to make more video, and better than I know how to, but for now it's an ongoing experiment.)
And what -- you want everything?!
timothy
Waiting for my favorite reviewer (Score:1)
I'll wait til Jeremy drives one on Top Gear.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Top Gear is a great show, very entertaining. A LOT of people (and I am not saying either one of you are one of these people) do not realize that it is pretty much completely staged. Outside of the stig's track times...and the star in a reasonably priced car....you have to take anything on that show with a g
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Top Gear is over the top on lots of stuff, and I think that's blatantly obvious (disclaimer: I love the show). But to call it a "hatchet job" is also overly exaggerated.
Sure, they staged the filming of the Tesla running out of battery, but the point that it would have run out very quickly was absolutely true. Sure, they were driving it like maniacs, and that's part of the point. Driving any car like that will result in far higher fuel consumption than the advertised average mpg (or miles per charge). But th
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
If you drive it like you stole it, it will shut down much, much sooner than normal.
The 'shut down' may be in terms of reduced performance, admittedly, and it may still go at much reduced speeds.
With pretty much any battery pack, if you discharge it very rapidly, you get potential issues from many areas, from thermal hot-spots on.
The tesla is not immune to this, and will reduce power, and advise the user to pull over (IIRC) when it risks battery damage.
Is this 'running out' - if you're on a track day - yes.
See the Telsa S (Score:2)
I thought it was going to be some large spectacular Telsa coil. That would be far more interesting than some electric car I can't afford.
Re: (Score:2)
Yikes..."Tesla"
TESLA!!!! (Score:1)
So jealous (Score:5, Funny)
Every day I drive pass my local Tesla dealership and see all those rows of beautiful cars and think of just stopping in and buying one right on the spot. And then I remember that Tesla cars aren't actually real, there are no Tesla dealerships, and the company stays pretty much on the verge of bankruptcy, with models that always seem to be on backorder or are "coming out sometime next year...we hope." Then I notice that Natalie Portman is my girlfriend sitting in the seat next to me, and realize that I'm dreaming.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Don't dream and drive; the live you save might be your own.
Re: (Score:2)
If you're keen on visiting a dealership, here's a list:
http://www.teslamotors.com/buy/stores [teslamotors.com]
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, wow. I certainly impressed that you live in or near Chicago! May I have your autograph?
Useless review / video (Score:3)
Other than the hot chick in the boot, that was a worthless video.
Re: (Score:2)
Very cool car (Score:5, Informative)
I saw it there, and it's one of the few cars on the floor that shows you all of the mechanicals (Ford did it with their trucks, which was also really cool). The mechanics of this car are incredibly simple. This should significantly reduce ongoing maintenance costs and make car ownership easier for the majority of people.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Very cool car (Score:4, Insightful)
Diagnosing electrical problems can be a real nightmare in regular cars
Regular cars have a whole bunch of solenoids and sensors all over, to run systems that electric cars don't have.
No matter what, an electric car with X features will be dramatically less complex than an IC-engine car with X features.
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps, but electro-mechanically and electronically it is quite complex. I wonder how rugged and durable it will prove to be in everyday use. And I don't mean the battery, but all the ancillary systems like the adjustable suspension, the glass roof, the touch screen and the various powered gizmos. Perhaps they will be just as good as any other car, but they are a potential point of failure.
Re:Very cool car (Score:5, Informative)
For components that matter and are in areas that need to be protected, I'm pretty sure Tesla uses milspec components, and Elon Musk publicly announced that for most of the interior components they use stuff found in more ordinary consumer electronics.
The really complex part electrically is the battery monitoring system, where Tesla has a dedicated system monitoring the voltage levels and maintaining consistent heat levels in an attempt to keep the Li-ion battery pack from overheating or "melting down"... as sometimes happens with the technology. The cells are isolated with the system in a way that if one cell burns up, it won't take the whole battery pack out with it. That is mechanical engineering, but it doesn't have moving parts.
As for the moving parts themselves are concerned, the Tesla vehicles have a simple electric motor (AC variable frequency induction motors) with a transmission to match wheel speed.... and the transmission is rather simple compared to internal combustion engine transmissions. The hard part there is simply getting a transmission built that would handle the torque put out by the electric motor. Going from 0-60 in under 4 seconds (the Model S appears to match this same performance spec that the Roadster also had) is a whole lot of torque to put onto the drive shaft. An auto mechanic would have no problem recognizing or repairing the transmission. Electric motors are quite famous for being rugged, and would likely outlast the chassis of the vehicle it is mounted in.
The other miscellaneous gizmos you are talking about are what you would find on any luxury automobile. Yes, they are potential points of failure, but it won't stop the vehicle from operation and they are also repaired quite easily. Replacing those components is no different than trying to change a bulb inside the dash of a more ordinary automobile. None of those components should take more than an hour to replaced even if your were a novice mechanic.
Seriously, I fail to see where the complexity is at, other than simply putting together the whole thing. Compared to modern ICE automobiles, it is significantly less complexity. Compared to a hammer or a crowbar, yes it is more complex. What is your standard here?
Re: (Score:2)
The battery will be significantly more expensive to replace. It's an easy job though.
Re: (Score:3)
I think the point of that might be some day you could just go to a gas station (or gas station equivalent) and swap out your dead battery for a full one, which would let you drive significant distances without needing to stop and charge overnight.
Re: (Score:2)
Supposedly if you can charge from 440v mains, charge time is on the order of 20 minutes. Time enough for a cup of coffee and a toilet break after 120 miles.
Re: (Score:2)
Yay! Government funded luxury wanker mobiles! (Score:2, Interesting)
Yes, I know that the government gave out $25 billion in loans under that program and Tesla got just $465 million, but still. I can't imagine a dumber way of promoting green transportation for the masses than building a $60,000 sedan.
So ten thousand or so greenwashing celebrities, financiers, and Ivy League professors will buy one and then...what? They claim they'll make a cheap model when they work o
Re: (Score:1)
>>I just don't see why Tesla deserves our adulation.
Do you really think the Nissan Leaf or Chevy Volt would exist if Tesla did not?
And clearly someone thinks Tesla has value as Toyota has inked a deal with them to build battery packs and power electronics for EV versions of the RAV4 mini-SUV. Daimler Benz also has agreements with Tesla to build battery packs.
Re: (Score:3)
Of course they would. No one looked at a struggling boutique electric car manufacturer with a single car priced over $100k and said "let's be like them". If you want the inspiration for other manufacturers stepping up their efforts just look at the Toyota Prius. Yes, it's a hybrid, but full electric is just the obvious evolution of what was done there and a way to avoid being just "another Prius". The success of that car
Re:Yay! Government funded luxury wanker mobiles! (Score:4, Informative)
So the reason why Toyota decided to make a major cash investment into Tesla Motors and had the CEO come to California to meet with Elon Musk was because they already were the world leader in electric vehicle transportation and didn't need to copy or learn anything from Tesla?
Seriously, please explain that one.
BTW, it was the CEO of General Motors who met with Martin Eberhardt when Tesla was in Detroit (doing a sales demo in that city) that was the clinching case to build the Chevy Volt. The Roadster really was the inspiration for getting the Volt built. The Volt was also the only new vehicle project that survived the GM bankruptcy as well. I think that says Tesla was a bit more than a "boutique electric car manufacturer".
I could get into more details, and certainly the inspiration to use standard Li-ion cells was something that neither Toyota nor Daimler ever got the gumption to try out. Keep in mind the EV-1 used ordinary Lead-acid batteries, and until Tesla came out with their battery packs it was not even considered something possible to try Lithium technology for automobiles.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Please, please, please watch "Who killed the electric car?" [imdb.com]!
Re: (Score:2)
It should, perhaps, be noted that GM didn't manage to sell even 10,000 Volts last year. Not an especially inspiring start....
Re: (Score:2)
GM didn't bother to even make more than about 10,000 of their Volt model either. I put that more something that is a problem with their marketing team than anything that is a problem with the engineering.
If you want me to nitpick about problems with the Volt, I could go on, and there are numerous issues that I see which GM didn't need to get into, but none the less the Volt is a sign that General Motors wants to stay relevant and continue to be involved with the electric automobile "just in case" it starts
This is just the way new technology is created (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I know trickle-down economics sorta works in cutting-edge technology, but Nissan already has an electric sedan for $20,000 less.
One third the price, one third the range.
The market for luxury sedans is pretty significant, and it's possible that the existence of the Model S will drive the costs of battery packs with ranges large enough for the masses to feel comfortable down enough that maybe the next generation of $20,000 electric sedan will be something everyone will want.
I just don't see why Tesla deserves our adulation.
Hey, I get your point and it's a fair one. There are other reasons to adulate the company other than them being a champion of the masses. For some of us, just ma
Re: (Score:2)
I think the government grant money was grossly mishandled overall (much of it went to companies that only had ideas that sounded good on paper).
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, oh, if you are dying for a 60,000 dollar car, wouldn't you die 50% more if you had to pay a 50% more for a government sponsored car?
You can get this Al Gore mobile (Fisker Karma) for just 95,000 USD. [politicons.net]
Well, you can get one, once they are shipped back to USA from Finland, where Fisker is outsourcing the manufacturing to. I wonder how the Finnish are taking this, after all, it's only 529,000,000 USD that the Obama administration (well, US gov't), has 'invested' into this deal.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I've seen exactly one on the road (with manufacturer plates) and I work near a major automotive testing facility where they test just about everything. I've seen more Lancias than Fiskars, and they don't even sell Lancias in the US.
I saw it at night, and at first I thought it was some weird Peugeot, as it was hideous-looking from the back (the week before I had seen a new Peugeot wagon on a flatbed - I thought it was a Golf with some awful body kit bolted-on)
Re:Yay! Government funded luxury wanker mobiles! (Score:5, Insightful)
It's one of the few things we do well, and it does our society a tremendous amount of good to invest in new technologies, even if they don't immediately produce profitable outcomes. That's why we were the world's number one economy, and it's shortsighted nonsense like demanding that everything be developed by private industry -- most of which can't see past their next quarterly report -- which is going to continue our slide to last place in the western world.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not opposed to a car maker getting government money, I just think Tesla is a boutique manufacturer for rich people masquerading as a technical visionary. They seem to me a place with more hype than substance, sucking up government loans a
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Remember that the government actually made money on the loans in TARP which brought the total cost down to $34B, a small fraction of the $700B initial outlay.
I would still call that a waste of taxpayer money to prop up failing businesses.
Re: (Score:1)
TARP looks like a success on paper, but a big chunk of another $3 trillion was involved to prop up the assets of those companies so they could repay the TARP loans with subsidized valuations. Fannie May and Freddie Mac took the heat for a lot of those losses. http://pra-blog.blogspot.com/2011/03/true-costs-of-tarp.html [blogspot.com]
Free market could handle this were it not for the lobbies and regulations that favor big business. Why *must* automobiles have airbags and be built to survive impacts of 100 km/hr? So drivers
Re: (Score:2)
+1. There were cars in the 90's that got 40-50MPG using the new EPA formulae. They would be considered death traps these days. Gotta load in 400lbs of airbags, crumple zones and double-folded steel pillars to keep people safe.
Using today's engine and transmission technology, the same cars would probably be pushing 80MPG, without all the extra safety equipment weighing them down.
Re: (Score:2)
You're missing the fact that it was a LOAN, not a grant.
No, I'm not missing anything. From my original statement:
Yes, I know that the government gave out $25 billion in loans under that program and Tesla got just $465 million
Tesla may be required to pay back the loan, but they could also completely fail to produce sufficient sales to pay it back, in which case the government will much more likely see fit to forgive the principal, make ridiculous concessions on repayments, etc. than sue Tesla into oblivion and seize their assets like any competent private lender would do. The government has a hideously bad track record of getting money back out of the things they've bai
Re: (Score:2)
As to you other point about what Tesla should do with the loan money, they've had a very public strategy since the company was formed and have hit all their marks along the way so far AND as a bonus sold their technology to other auto manufacturers.
Re: (Score:2)
It depends on "afford", I suppose. Many middle-class people could shell out $60k if it were absolutely necessary, but most financially prudent people making mid to high five figures wouldn't spend that much on a car.
Re: (Score:1)
There is a Tesla project for a $30,000 sedan. It will go into production several years after Model S production starts. There is also another project to make a crossover in the same price range as the Model S.
Since Tesla has neither the huge amount of engineering manpower nor the massive amounts of capital of a Detroit or Tokyo Big 3 automaker, starting in the high end and working their way downwards is their best option.
A Nissan Leaf will go about 100 miles on a charge. A Volt, while not a true EV, will
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Electricity is cheaper than gas where I live. Good luck affording the ongoing costs of that SUV.
That is, unless your SUV is just a status symbol you want parked in your driveway to impress your neighbors.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Bzzt! Sorry, death barges are many things, but practical isn't one of them. Unsafe, gas guzzling, underperforming, overweight and overpriced, yes, certainly. But practical? No.
Re: (Score:2)
Unsafe
Citation needed. In fact, how about I will just post one to the contrary: http://www.iihs.org/ratings/summary.aspx?class=50 [iihs.org] http://www.iihs.org/ratings/summary.aspx?class=55 [iihs.org] http://www.iihs.org/ratings/summary.aspx?class=110 [iihs.org] Now as to practicality - you fit 5 family members, 3 tents, inflatable boat, cooler and 3 days worth of food and water for a camping trip, or bring an Ikea dining room set from the store in your sedan, I dare you.
Re: (Score:2)
Turns out it's better to avoid a crash than to get in one. Try this: http://www.gladwell.com/2004/2004_01_12_a_suv.html [gladwell.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Just in time (Score:1)
Timed to calm the equity markets jittery over the news of two key Model S engineers leaving [seekingalpha.com]
Hardly a Sedan (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Judging by the pictures (can't see the video) it is a pretty standard 4-door sedan. I assume the optional rear facing seat are to allow kids to sit in the trunk area or something. In fact, on their website it says seating up to 7 - that would be 5 normal seats plus two kids in the trunk I guess.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Optional rear facing mini-seats? This isn't a family car, this is just a roadster that can transport a family in a pinch.
Right, just like most other luxury sports sedans. It's for well-off folks who like fast cars but need something practical enough to justify owning when you have a family.
Guessing by the number of these kinds of cars by BMW, Lexus, etc I see as I drive around, this is not a tiny market.
Re: (Score:1)
It is a family car, has four normal seats (the expected ones), and has optional additional 2 seats. The rear facing seats are in the trunk. (it is a hatch back).
Video features comment (Score:4)
The Tesla is great but... (Score:1)
It's a pity, this is a great example and great use of technology but deep down, it's just not able to deliver any real benefits over any other sedan.
The energy costs of the car in an entire lifespan are probably equal or worse than petrol. This technology requires more energy to make and involves expensive mid-term disposable battery packs. Energy used for it has probably had 50% of it's already non-optimal conversion efficiency wasted in down-the-wire transmission.
When that's taken into account, what's t
Re: (Score:1)
A hydrogen economy is so far off that it's even more fiction than a Tesla. There are at least two Tesla dealerships in the Denver, Colorado area, and these cars are in fact driving around (at least the Roadsters).
First, hydrogen is just an energy carrier. How are you going to produce this hydrogen?
Second, once you produce hydrogen, how are you going to distribute it around? Replace natural gas? Not for hundreds of years....
If you have the energy to produce hydrogen, why not just use the existing grid?
Re: (Score:2)
Hydrogen can be produced at the point of delivery or even in your home, so the distribution system doesn't need to be nearly so extensive as natural gas or other fuel distribution systems. It can also be shipped in bulk as ordinary water for those few places that may need to have it shipped in from a distance. A tanker truck full of water is not really a significant danger on a highway other than the sheer mass of the vehicle.
Getting fueling stations set up is a bit harder for hydrogen, and by far and awa
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If electricity was made incredibly cheap due to fusion power, losses would be trivial and irrelevant. I have no idea what that does to the overall environment, but that is a completely separate issue. Besides, who says you need to have power lines that extend for thousands of miles? On top of that, the grid with power lines is already built and designed to handle Gigawatts of energy, while something like a Hydrogen gas pipeline would require a whole new infrastructure.
Natural Gas pipelines are interestin
Re: (Score:2)
This technology requires more energy to make and involves expensive mid-term disposable battery packs.
They aren't going to just dispose of a component that comprises a third of the price of the vehicle. Already all the electric vehicle makers are finding buyers for used battery packs when they don't have enough charge left to be useful in the car. And once that's gone they'll be recycled for the lithium.
Energy used for it has probably had 50% of it's already non-optimal conversion efficiency wasted in down-the-wire transmission.
That seems highly pessimistic. Transmission losses are less than 10% on the grid, and will be much less within the car.
Lets just get over to being a renewable power produced hydrogen economy already.
Hydrogen fuel cells also require high-tech manufacturing.
Re: (Score:2)
Relevancy of the weather in Detroit? (Score:2)
Nice but....Volt! (Score:4, Interesting)
You can hate on "government motors" all ya want - They did a great job on this one, and unlike the haters, I'm getting that bailout money back in the form of something pretty darn cool. Could it just be sour grapes? Or is it all astroturfing by people with errrm, illiquid investments in the oil patch who are desperate?
More here: http://www.coultersmithing.com/forums/viewforum.php?f=48 [coultersmithing.com]
Don't get me wrong - I admire Elon and his projects quite a bit. They're just behind. A big company might take longer to get the word, but once they get in motion, look out - I couldn't get a Tesla, or afford one, but this is in my driveway now. And I promise to exit the car within the three weeks it takes to catch on fire after being total lossed sideways into a pole. I'd rather not starve to death before burning.
Re:Nice but....Volt! (Score:5, Interesting)
You can hate on "government motors" all ya want - They did a great job on this one, and unlike the haters, I'm getting that bailout money back in the form of something pretty darn cool.
Also it should be noted that GM is once again the world's largest seller of automobiles [latimes.com]. So it would appear the bailout had its intended effect -- instead of a gaping hole where GM used to be, we now have a successful domestic auto company.
Video feature? Hmm, alright, but... (Score:2)
Love the idea of video features, however this is all I took away from that piece:
* the trunk has rear-facing child seats
* the battery has 4 bolts for quick exchange
* someone with functioning ears could help improve the "robot seizure" intro and outro clips
Detroit "International" Auto show? (Score:1)
Who Killed the Electric Car? (Score:2)
Who Killed the Electric Car? [imdb.com]
Advertising (Score:2)
Content unavailiable? (Score:1)
Not interested... (Score:2)
Not interested in any family cars....more than 2 seats.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
If you haven't sat in the Model S then you're opinion is pointless. Its an AMAZING machine and a beautiful piece of engineering.
Re: (Score:3)
Anything with more than two seats...is not a sports car, it is a family car.
Re:Not interested... (Score:5, Funny)
It is also a HORRIBLE airplane!
Re: (Score:2)
No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.
oh wait, that dude doesn't post here anymore...
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
See also Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution MR (4.8s) and Subaru WRX-STI (4.4s). The WRX-STI comes in a station wagon and is a 4.x second car factory standard. For anyone needing a practical family race car.
Re: (Score:2)
M3? M5?
While BMW might make (mostly) "family cars" by your definition, my definition differs: They were the first to offer a regular production car that could achieve greater than 1 lateral G on a skidpad, and happened to do it in a vehicle that can seat five people.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Fair enough -- I'm certainly not here to tell you what you might be interested in, but I'll gladly take your comment to mean that you concede to my point.
Sports cars have 2 seats = bad definition (Score:2)
Just some examples I can think of 4 seater sports cars - which few people will argue are not sports cars:
Porsche 911 (all models except for the GT3 which has no back seats)
BMW M3 and M5
Nissan GT-R
Aston Martin Rapide and DB9
Yes there are more, but you get the point. Some will argue that a true sports car must be a 2 seater, and be a convertable, but.... so what.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The Roadster was not an Elise with a different nameplate. Yes, the chassis was made at the same factory for both vehicles, but that is pretty much where the similarity ended.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
That was until gasoline engines got better.
Actually, there was a lot of fashion as well, and steam was deeply unfashionable. There were innovations (see e.g. Doble) which kept steam technically competitive.
Re: (Score:2)
Clearly you didn't read the summary or watch the video (or read the title for that matter?)
The Tesla Model S is around $60K, and is a sedan.
The Tesla Roadster is around $120K, and is a two seater sport car.
Please read before posting.
That's Fisker, Dumb-ass (Score:2)
You're thinking of the Fisker Karma, dumb-ass, which is being built in Finland. The mass market car Fisker is developing - the target of the vast majority of the Federal investment - will be built in the US.
You probably think Newt is a respected philosopher, too.