Google's Quickoffice Purchase Takes Aim At Windows 8 63
alphadogg writes "Google announced Tuesday it has acquired Quickoffice, whose software could bolster Google Apps on tablets and smartphones. Terms of the deal weren't disclosed. Google's second buyout in two days (yesterday it announced the acquisition of social/advertising company Meebo) gives the company more ammunition in its fight for the mobile office versus Microsoft, which is steaming ahead with Windows 8 and its Office apps. Quickoffice offers apps for Android and Apple iOS tablets and smartphones, but it's unclear what will become of the iOS ones under Google's domain."
Apple's weakness is in the office suite (Score:4, Interesting)
On the Macs, Apple relies on Microsoft to provide the office suites
On the iPad / iPhone, Apples again relies on others to provide the office suites
Which means, unless Apple purchases a 3rd party which made office suite for iOS, it may have to settle with an office suite that is owned by Google
Re:Apple's weakness is in the office suite (Score:5, Informative)
iWork seems to be pretty decent for most things. I don't have much experience myself but I know others who use it regularly, except when needing something with the power of Excel.
Re:Apple's weakness is in the office suite (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Apple's weakness is in the office suite (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Apple's weakness is in the office suite (Score:4, Funny)
It's just a sig, you know.
Re: (Score:2)
Are you still seeing two sides in this game? The enemy of my enemy of my enemy of my enemy is very much alive here. Google will bolster iOS momentarily just enough to bring Win8 down.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
>Which means, unless Apple purchases a 3rd party which made office suite for iOS, it may have to settle with an office suite that is owned by Google
There are strong rumors suggesting that Microsoft will be releasing Office for iOS in the fall. In fact, this story was posted only 3 hours ago.
http://www.itproportal.com/2012/06/06/office-ipad-launching-november/ [itproportal.com]
Re: (Score:2)
No worry Apple can just buy Microsoft & Facebook and then they have it all.
Re:FRIST POST! (Score:4, Insightful)
> make googel music better looking
Or.. accessible to places outside the US...
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Well then call me stupid, but I prefer my TF300 over the iPad. Yes, I have used one, for 2 weeks after dropping my original tf101. It was an exercise in pure frustration. Editing text in text boxes alone drove me away from it. Then there is the letterboxing of widescreen content because the device, touted as one of the best ways to consume media, isn't widescreen. Getting my own music onto it was painful, playing my own video was equally painful. It refused to play nice with my DLNA setup, hell just accessi
Will Google opensource it? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
A few notable exceptions... like every single Android app?
You really didn't think this one through, did you?
Re: (Score:2)
Like Google sky? Oh wait that one is open source.
Or maybe basically all the system apps, nope those are open source too.
Basically just market, goggles and maps are closed up.
Not every single Android app. I doubt they will open this up, but surely not every single Android app Google has made is closed.
Docs (Score:2)
Completing another piece of the jigsaw (Score:5, Interesting)
I'm guessing here, but we have to consider that Office Apps are required for a platform to be seriously considered by the enterprise. Microsoft have Office, Apple have iWork, and this gives Google QuickOffice. All three also have an online viewing/editing/storage option too.
What can we expect in the future then? Google will presumably make the software free at some point, bundled with their platforms. Tablet Androids would be first, and then at some point a port to Google's ChromeOS must surely happen to make these devices more attractive. However I wonder how easy it will be to take software optimised for mobile devices with small screens and translate it to a laptop or desktop environment.
Re:Completing another piece of the jigsaw (Score:5, Insightful)
What I find interesting is how Microsoft still uses the Office suite to fend off threats to the real reason it is still entrenched in many back offices... Exchange.
I've personally seen many businesses try alternative office suites only to say that while they are more or less happy with the replacements for word processing, spreadsheets, presentations and the like, they didn't feel they could drop Outlook because they rely so heavily on the collaborative features of Exchange.
These companies don't want to migrate to Google's cloud based offering because they want things kept on premises. And there isn't a compelling all-in-one alternative to Exchange that is as easily tied in with their existing systems (e.g. auto-login via Windows authentication). So because they keep Exchange, they keep Outlook. Because they keep Outlook, they keep Office. And so the wheel turns.
Re:Completing another piece of the jigsaw (Score:5, Interesting)
My experience is that both Exchange and Outlook are both terrible, badly written and hard to maintain..... but work just that bit better than the alternatives, and users are familiar with it and it does everything they need (which seems to be different for each user...)
Re: (Score:2)
How exactly is Exchange hard to maintain? I understand it doesn't scale well but it ends up in small businesses mainly.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
--What I find interesting is how Microsoft still uses the Office suite to fend off threats to the real reason it is still entrenched in many back offices... Exchange.--
Nothing else quite like it especially for a small business. So yes, Office, is what Microsoft really has. It's been a cash cow for years, but it's kinda worth it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm confused. I thought they were very similar.
Google branded Androids (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
+1 Insightful (If I had mod points)
Re: (Score:2)
The manufacturers will still probably roll their own so they can have branding and the opportunity to inject some additional revenue streams and crapware. The carriers will add theirs as well.
Why sell you a device that doesn't also steer a little more revenues their way or reinforce their branding?
If the manufacturer isn't going to act like a greedy ass, the carrier will.
Re: (Score:2)
That would make sense if QuickOffice was the only Office suite for Android, or at least the best one - but that's not the case. As it is, Polaris Office is superior in most respects (and rather popular among Android OEMs - I don't think you can even buy it in the app store). And long-term, SoftMaker will soon release their office suite for Android (currently in public beta), which rips all competitors apart in terms of MS Office format fidelity.
Horrible (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Quickoffice has some of the worst reviews for an office app on iOS. 1-2 stars. I would think Google could afford something a but better.
I support that - as long as it's a female "but better". :-)
You probably composed that in your browser, but if you had done it in MS Word, you would have gotten a squeakily blue underline. I wouldn't know what Quickoffice would do because I don't have it. I do my word processing stuff in regular o' Office in Windows.
I'm looking for reviews for Quickoffice. On their site [quickoffice.com], everything is positive. On Amazon, Quickoffice got 3.4 out of 5 stars. Which reviews are you referring to? And which version and type ar
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Polaris Office is also pretty good, but you can't buy it separately - it either comes with your device or it does not.
Re: (Score:2)
I think mine has that and I haven't even opened it up.
Re: (Score:2)
I think the Android version might be better or at least the reviews are better on Google Play or whatever they are calling it these days.
Meebo, eh? (Score:2)
This is good (Score:2)