Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Windows Microsoft Upgrades Technology

Full Upgrades To Windows 8 Only From Windows 7? 222

CWmike writes "Microsoft will support full upgrades to Windows 8 only from the three-year old Windows 7, according to a report Thursday by ZDNet blogger Mary Jo Foley. Citing unnamed sources, Foley said that Microsoft has informed select partners of the upgrade paths to Windows 8. While Microsoft may be revealing upgrade paths to some partners, it has been much more reticent to keep customers informed than three years ago when it rolled out Windows 7. Among the details the company has not disclosed are the on-sale date and the pricing of the two retail editions. By this time in 2009, Microsoft had revealed both: On June 2 that year, it pegged a launch date for Windows 7, and by June 25 had not only posted prices for the operating system but had also kicked off a pre-sale that discounted upgrades by as much as 58%. The increased secrecy from the company was demonstrated best last week, when it unveiled its first-ever tablet, the Surface, but left many questions unanswered, including the price, sales date, and even the hardware's battery life."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Full Upgrades To Windows 8 Only From Windows 7?

Comments Filter:
  • Even better (Score:4, Informative)

    by kurt555gs ( 309278 ) <kurt555gs@OOOovi.com minus threevowels> on Saturday June 30, 2012 @10:43AM (#40504545) Homepage

    Free upgrade to Ubuntu from any version of windows.

  • Problem: You can't roll back to 7 once you start down the dark path of 8. Forever will those metro tiles dominate your destiny.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 30, 2012 @11:03AM (#40504703)

    with a format/reinstall i most certainly can

  • Re:And... (Score:5, Informative)

    by Opportunist ( 166417 ) on Saturday June 30, 2012 @11:06AM (#40504715)

    The corporate WORLD is full of old legacy programs. But that's only half of the deal. The other one is how corporations work.

    First of all, we're talking about a serious budget position. The licensing fee for a corporation wide system upgrade isn't something your average IT department can rubber stamp. This can easily run the six to eight digit range, and that often requires the ok from some C-level goon. Sadly, to my eternal regret, it is rarely the CISO or even the CIO, i.e. the two Cs that would actually know what they would buy.

    More often than not, such a "problem" finds its way to the CEOs desk. Where it sits for a while because CEOs don't make decisions. No, I'm not kidding. They do not make decisions. They wait 'til some "meaningful" (read: economic) paper writes something about the item. If you want something approved from your CEO, don't come with facts or university studies, subscribe to the same economy papers he reads and wait for them to push an article that goes in your favor, then ask him "oh, sir, have you read..." and you're in.

    This is, sadly, not a joke.

    And until that time, you will not see a CEO make any decisions about upgrading Windows.

    Then, when they finally get their butt into gear, integration tests come. That alone can take a year in larger enterprises. Another hint, never ever volunteer to be one of the test subjects. Unless you don't have anything important to do anyway, or if your boss understands that due to IT issues your reports are late. You will lose days. Not hours. Days. Because one of the proprietary tools you use every once in a blue moon won't work and you get to figure out by yourself how to make it run. Which is in turn a huge headache for your security department, but I digress.

    In other words and in a nutshell, I know quite a few companies that still run on XP as their main system, who have been running integration tests for Vista and 7 for a while now and are just about to roll it out... unless of course their CEO notices that 8 is around the corner and he halts the program because he wants to leapfrog the "obsolete" versions...

  • Re:Even better (Score:5, Informative)

    by rgbrenner ( 317308 ) on Saturday June 30, 2012 @11:17AM (#40504781)

    IIRC in the apps menu, type "terminal" into the search bar

  • Re:Even better (Score:5, Informative)

    by swanzilla ( 1458281 ) on Saturday June 30, 2012 @11:20AM (#40504813) Homepage

    Sorry for offtopic, but I've been trying for ages and cannot figure it out: How do you get a shell in the latest version of Ubuntu? Somehow I can't seem to find it...

    Ctrl+Alt+t

  • by michaelmalak ( 91262 ) <michael@michaelmalak.com> on Saturday June 30, 2012 @11:48AM (#40505017) Homepage

    The article is about how much data gets preserved during the upgrade process not about pricing. Since Windows machines should be re-imaged anyway periodically, that is pretty irrelevant. As for the pricing, the relevant issue, yes, XP evidently qualifies for upgrade pricing:

    XP-to-Windows 8 upgrades preserve the least amount in a move: User accounts and files only.

"If anything can go wrong, it will." -- Edsel Murphy

Working...