Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Transportation AI

Lit Motors, Danny Kim, and Changing How Americans Drive 144

Nerval's Lobster writes "In early March, Lit Motors founder Danny Kim hit the road to meet investors. The Portland native needed to keep the momentum growing for his small firm, which builds the two-wheeled C-1. His modest lab, located in San Francisco's SoMa neighborhood, could accommodate another 12 employees—but he needed the money to fund them, and to build a manufacturing facility that could turn his prototype ideas into a reality. Like Elon Musk and other manufacturing savants, Kim is someone who enjoys the challenge of building things—whether it's eyeglasses, chairs, or motor vehicles from scratch. He's spent the past five years re-thinking modern transportation, and using those insights to design prototypes of two-wheeled, motor-driven vehicles that can self-balance with a dancer's grace, thanks to an integrated software platform and a patented gyroscopic system. In a wide-ranging conversation with Slashdot, Kim discussed his plans for manufacturing the C-1, as well as the challenges in convincing consumers to try out a new kind of vehicle. "Seventy-two percent of commuters drive alone, so it just made sense to cut the car in half," he said, explaining the decision to go with two wheels instead of four. 'You have to think about this two-wheeled car as a robot because of its stability. It purely uses our AI/stability algorithm so it can balance and you don't have to. We had to develop our own firmware for our own dynamic system. It is code heavy.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Lit Motors, Danny Kim, and Changing How Americans Drive

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 18, 2014 @10:16AM (#46515459)

    Just because people usually ride alone doesn't mean that they always ride alone. These one person vehicles become useless if you ever have passengers. And they're not cheap enough to justify having a second one just lying around if you ever need a passenger.

  • by i kan reed ( 749298 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2014 @10:16AM (#46515463) Homepage Journal

    I wish that phrase didn't set off my "marketing bullshit" alarms(as is clearly appropriate in this case) because a culture of long-distance driving commutes is leading to serious long-term problems with respect to suburban sprawl and blight. Retreating residential neighborhoods a little further down the interstate every time an area falls into disrepair(and no, it's not just white flight) is causing huge swaths of places where no one will ever want to live.

  • by EvilSS ( 557649 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2014 @10:21AM (#46515505)
    Haven't we heard that before? About another self-balancing 2-wheel vehicle?
  • by timeOday ( 582209 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2014 @10:25AM (#46515531)
    I disagree, I think it looks nice. Certainly nicer than a Smart Car.

    As a motorcyclist (including daily commuting), an enclosed motorcycle doesn't seem at all absurd to me. It addresses the main disadvantages that prevent most people from riding motorcycles - higher safety (if it is adequately constructed, obviously) and protection from the elements.

  • by PSUSkier ( 3517721 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2014 @10:35AM (#46515595)
    ...for our own dynamic system. It is code heavy." Maybe I've been working around software too long, but the more code needed to run a single function generally equates to more software defects. In a balancing and stability control system, I'd hate to be the one to find it.
  • Why two wheels? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Wdomburg ( 141264 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2014 @10:36AM (#46515603)

    What specific value is there in using two wheels and a "code heavy" stability algorithm instead of using more vehicles. For example, Elio motors is aiming for 84mpg with a three wheel car [phys.org] that uses "no special technology" and is expected to cost $6800.

  • by EmperorOfCanada ( 1332175 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2014 @10:41AM (#46515637)
    The key problem with such an elegant vehicle is that it fails the "Gives better than it got" crash test. SUVs and pickup trucks are popular because people perceive that they are driving a tank and will fare better against the various pop-cans out there. Quite simply if you are in a BMW X5 and have a head on with a prius then you may very well limp away with the prius crew ending up in body bags. With this perception then a vehicle like this will not get much of an audience beyond a few hipsters.

    But at some point when driverless cars dominate (and ideally own) the roads then you could potentially safely drive a car made from non-tempered glass. Once this has sunk into car culture then people will wisely conclude that you want to commute (and park) in the least amount of vehicle required to keep you comfortable and get you to your destination in haste.

    But while the roads are still filled with morons behind the wheels of multi-tonne homicide factories then any vehicle of this nature will be regarded by the vast majority as DIY coffins.
  • Brazil (Score:4, Insightful)

    by wcrowe ( 94389 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2014 @10:45AM (#46515665)

    I am reminded of the scene from the movie Brazil, where the protagonist is drving this tiny little one-person vehicle on the freeway, surrounded by huge trucks on all sides.

  • by beelsebob ( 529313 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2014 @10:48AM (#46515699)

    The easiest way to change how they drive is to change the structure of the roads. The amount of fuel and tarmac America wastes by having stop junctions, and light controlled intersections everywhere is enormous.

  • by Bigbutt ( 65939 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2014 @11:10AM (#46515871) Homepage Journal

    Perhaps. But the more folks who start out on 2 wheels, the more observant they are of the surrounding area and of motorcyclists. So bring it on. The more, the better.

    [John]

"Gravitation cannot be held responsible for people falling in love." -- Albert Einstein

Working...