Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Social Networks

Back To the Social Media Future 40

theodp writes: Decades before WhatsApp, Gmail, Facebook, and multiplayer Call of Duty, there was TERM-talk, P-Notes, Notesfiles, and Battlestar. Brian Dear goes back to the future, penning A 1980 Teenager's View on Social Media, as written by his 19-year-old UDEL undergrad self, an avid user of PLATO, the 55-year-old granddaddy of today's MOOCs. (His article is a response to "A teenager's view on social media," published last week by a current teenager.) Of old-school texting, Dear notes that you-are-how-you-type: "Every character is displayed in real time as each of us types. So *how* you TERM-talk with folks becomes part of your reputation. Kind of like what your handshake is like. We all know when we shake somebody's hand and they have a firm, confident grip, full of vigor and life, a quick shake and release and you know this person is with it. And then there are those with cold, clammy fish hands that feel like they have no bones, it's all just cushion all the way down. Well in TERM-talk, if you type fast, that's cool."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Back To the Social Media Future

Comments Filter:
  • I can remember back to the days of paper tape and punch cards - that was "real" computing.
  • by Anonymous Coward

    We all know when we shake somebody's hand and they have a firm, confident grip, full of vigor and life, a quick shake and release and you know this person is with it. And then there are those with cold, clammy fish hands that feel like they have no bones, it's all just cushion all the way down. Well in TERM-talk, if you type fast, that's cool.

    Someone who gives a dominating handshake or typesreallyfastwallsoftext are more likely to be full of shit and talk before they think.

    I like talking to people who spend time before they come to a conclusion. The best conversations are mostly spent in silent thought.

    • by vux984 ( 928602 )

      Perhaps. But remember they can see the characters ... a...s ........ .y...........o............u...... t....y............p..... e....

      A pause for reflection before a response is one thing. 3 minutes watching the response slowly how up as they hunt and peck the keys is something else.

      (sigh, lameness filter encountered. Trying to add some filler here to convince it the ellipses had a point. Nope that's not enough. I guess I'll remove some dots. There were longer pauses between some of the letters.

  • News? (Score:4, Funny)

    by nospam007 ( 722110 ) * on Saturday January 10, 2015 @05:30PM (#48782877)

    Being an old fart myself, I immediately recognized my wife's hand when she sent me a Morse message.

    Am I cool now? Or is it my wife, I'm not sure.

  • But on Cyber1 I don't use Notes or Term. That got me kicked out of NovaNet a long long time ago.

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W... [wikipedia.org] http://classic-wbs.net/ [classic-wbs.net] and Geocities/Freeyellow/Angelfire/Intelcities was the social media in the mid-late 90's even irc was pretty cool and met a few people off of fit. Of course new groups were the king at that time too.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    ICQ had the real time (every key as it was pressed) text conversation in 1997.

    I remember it being popular within my group of internet friends (we all came from a chat site about rock bands). None of us had any self consciousness about it and it was one of those things that made us confident that we were living in the friggin' future.

    It's so weird that the feature has been absent from every modern chat client and system since. Is it because the vast majority of people would be embarrassed by how often they'r

  • He uses the term "social media" a lot, for an unknown term 35 years ago. He name drops both bill gates and steve jobs. I call bullshit, this article was not written 35 years ago.

    • Given your level of understanding, it is probable that you have nothing useful or interesting to add to this discussion. Have you considered just reading other people's comments for a change?

The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the `social sciences' is: some do, some don't. -- Ernest Rutherford

Working...