Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Transportation

How Flight Tracking Works: a Global Network of Volunteers 52

An anonymous reader writes If a website can show the flight path and all those little yellow planes in real time, how can they not know where Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 went down? Answering that involves understanding a little about how flight-tracking sites work, where they get their data, and the limitations of existing technologies. It also involves appreciating a relatively new approach that the two large flight-tracking companies, Texas-based FlightAware and Sweden-based Flightradar24 are rushing to expand, a global sensor system known as ADS-B, which broadcasts updates of aircraft GPS data in real time. ADS-B is slowly superseding the ground-based radar systems that have been used for decades, becoming central not only to flight tracking but also to the future of flight safety. And it's powered, in part, by thousands of dedicated aviation hobbyists around the globe.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

How Flight Tracking Works: a Global Network of Volunteers

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward

    I live in the middle of nowhere in the USA, and provide ADS-B data. Its fun.

    If you lived in a populated area like California or New York, there are already hundreds of people in your area doing this, and so its probably not necessary.

    • I didn't even know FlightAware had a program like their ADS-B FlightFeeders [flightaware.com] I checked their map, and I'm a bit farther North in my area than the nearest feed, and there's a large gap to the next.

      I have some questions for you. Hopefully you read this. What services accept hobbyist input, besides the ones in the article? Is there hardware you recommend for cheap and reliable?

      I only took a quick look through, so I have more reading to do. Is there a software that reports to multiple services? Like C

  • Misleading summary (Score:5, Informative)

    by swaq ( 989895 ) on Friday April 10, 2015 @08:22PM (#49450685) Homepage
    ADS-B is not powered (in whole or in part) by aviation hobbyists. They are just piggybacking with receivers for flight tracking.

    The ADS-B system itself was designed for plane-to-plane communications to improve situational awareness. Ground-based ATC or hobbyists are not required to make the system work.

    Source: I worked on an ADS-B product at Garmin.
    • They are however required to keep the realtime databases that the websites mentioned in the article use. The reciever is basicaly a usb DVB-T terrestial digital tv receiver working as a software defined radio and a bunch of code to pickup the ADS transmissions. The results are streamed to the tracking sites databases.

       

      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        by tshawkins ( 1239974 )

        http://flightaware.com/adsb/pi... [flightaware.com]

        Build your own for under $100, raspberry pi, dtv reciever, internet connection.

        • by KGIII ( 973947 )

          Interesting. I have six Pi's that do exactly nothing. All of them have memory cards in place. My goal was to build a cluster for the enjoyment of it but it never got any further then that. Now I may have to take one, or go ahead with clustering first, and then give this a try. It is all automated, right? I won't have to run around with some exactly tuned directional antenna ever time I want to share? I am way too lazy to do that and would give that up in just a few days.

          • by 0123456 ( 636235 )

            I set one of these up a while ago with an old Atom server I had lying around. A couple of hours' work, about $15 for the USB receiver, and the antenna is just taped to my bedroom windowsill. Works OK out to around 100 miles, though reception gets patchy beyond 50.

            I'd often wondered where all the vapour trails over our heads were going, and now I know. Of course, I could have saved time and just looked it up on the Internet :).

            • by KGIII ( 973947 )

              Looking it up is the lazy way. Is it a specific meter length required antenna? Did you have to make it? Or is it just some stereo wire taped to a T and then strung up or similar? I do have the absolute perfect tree to tape a fishing sinker to and toss it over and I am on the side of a mountain so I may do well but there's not much traffic out this way. My hand-held scanner does airplane frequencies but I seldom hear (I had actually typed here, I'm glad I preview before the preview.) anything and that has an

              • by 0123456 ( 636235 )

                It's just the free antenna that came with the USB receiver. A proper, tuned antenna should do much better, if you want to spend the time making one.

                • by KGIII ( 973947 )

                  And it would make a good excuse to rescue the tower. He could make more selling it for scrap than he'd make selling it to me. I don't know where you live but it is just 100 USD.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    It's a shame that services like FR24 are not more open. A lot of people are contributing to the service for free - though some may get a free subscription in exchange - but then what happens to that data?

    First, it gets massaged. Sensitive flights, flights operated by people who don't want to appear on FR24, etc.get removed. Alright, I can see how that makes sense - if for no other reason than that if they didn't, they'd probably be shut down pretty quickly.

    Second, you don't get access to the data. You o

    • by Shinobi ( 19308 )

      Let me guess, you're one of the cunts who made one of those advertising funded apps that only pulled data from FR24's servers, leaving them with the bill for all the server and bandwidth use, while you yourself earned a decent sum every month?

      That's a very real problem FR24 had with all these entitled freeloaders(as did MarineTraffic's AIS data site)

      • by Anonymous Coward

        Well they seem to have chosen the worst of all options: close the service to the point of no use. That kind of makes them cunts of their own right. Instead they could monetize on the obvious demand for the data by selling API access, priced by bandwith etc. Hell, they might even make enough money to pay out to those volunteers who make their site work in the first place. Takes one lot of tight assed dumbf****s not to do this. Talking of freeloading cunts, gee.

    • by dbaker ( 7409 )

      FlightAware's PiAware software and FlightAware's FlightFeeder hardware both allow access to unfiltered access over TCP ports 10001, 30002, and 30003 as well as a live web interface on port 8080.

      FlightAware, for years, has offered APIs and data feeds: https://flightaware.com/commer... [flightaware.com]

  • by steve-san ( 550197 ) on Friday April 10, 2015 @09:44PM (#49450949)
    "ADS-B is slowly superseding the ground-based radar systems that have been used for decades"
    ... until the aircraft decides to become "uncooperative" and turns the darn thing off -- at which point, this (and any beacon/transponder-based system) becomes instantly useless.
    Which is why you'll see ADS-B augment, but never completely replace old fashioned search radar anytime soon.
    • by raxx7 ( 205260 )

      Primary radar (what you call search radar) is not very used for air traffic control.
      Primary radar stations are very expensive to build and to operate; their range and accuracy is rather limited too. That is because primary radar stations need to transmit very powerful pulses and listen back for the very faint echoes generated by the aircraft, while discerning them from all the other sources of noise and clutter.
      In general, only the military operate primary radar stations and coverage is rather limited. Eg,

      • Thank you for reinforcing most of my comment, except for one little thing:

        Eg, a large country like the USA will not have much coverage of primary radar deep inside it's borders.

        Fortunately for the USA, you are wrong:
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J... [wikipedia.org]
        Consider it a lesson learned from 9/11.

  • But the problem is the user application, at least for flightradar24. Have the paid version on iOS and it shows sometimes inconsistent data, or clearly not updated areas (while WIFI is ON and fast). If there is one tangible argument to show that the app is not well written: when the app is updating the screen (takes about .5~1 second for a busy area) the user cannot move (drag) the map (user should have priority as (s)he doesn't care about the display since it's gonna change in 2 seconds after moving!).
  • Here in Europe radars remain essential because of Russian planes (both fighters and nuclear bombers) are flying around with their ADS-B switched of, just to test how quick European forces respond to possible treats. These planes fly in international air space, but often at close range of commercial flights. European countries are quite angry about this behavior, but the Russians think that they do nothing wrong. Just waiting for the first mid-air collision to happen. About a decade ago, the Russians started
    • by tlhIngan ( 30335 )

      Here in Europe radars remain essential because of Russian planes (both fighters and nuclear bombers) are flying around with their ADS-B switched of, just to test how quick European forces respond to possible treats./blockquote.

      ADS-B isn't mandatory on planes yet. There are plenty of aircraft in North America that are NOT ADS-B equipped, notably General Aviation ones where ADS-B Out devices still remain in the $5000+ category of avionics cost. Even in Canada, when Transport Canada mandated use of 405 ELTs th

  • Cruising Sailors (Score:5, Interesting)

    by anorlunda ( 311253 ) on Saturday April 11, 2015 @08:40AM (#49452531) Homepage

    I am a blue water sailor. I, and many others like me, would be happy to carry an ADS-B reciever onboard. That is, provided that it draws very little power, and that it gathers data unattended without my active intervention. Statistically, I think cruising sailors would cover a large fraction of the ocean areas of the globe. I believe the probability of a sailing vessel being within 200 miles of MH370s final flight path would be almost 100%.

    The caveat being that I can not transmit the data to the Internet until the next time I reach shore and I can find someone who will let me plug in a USB device. That could mean a delay of months up to a year.

    Would non-real time information be valuable? Thinking of the MH370 case, the answer must be yes. Not matter what the delay, the information is still valuable to someone. We could also record AIS signals that many vessels already transmit. I receive AIS from up to 40 miles away.

    The idea could be etended to (symbolic) notes-in-a-bottle. A million floating ADS-B recorders would eventually reach shore, and some of them may have their data extracted and transmitted, then thrown back into the sea. Would that be worthwhile? Hard to say.

  • The SKYWARN network that is involved with tracking storms, I was told, is also largelyl volunteer driven. It uses a network of amateur radio operators as storm spotters.
  • I would really like to get my hands on a live ADS-B feed like FlightAware and FlightRadar24 apparently have. Does anyone know what I would need to do to do that? Global data would be ideal but European or Arctic coverage would also be very interesting. But others might be interested in other areas.

"It's the best thing since professional golfers on 'ludes." -- Rick Obidiah

Working...