An Extra-Large Nanocage Molecule For Quantum Computing 22
JMarshall writes: Researchers have built a molecular nanocage 8 nm across that represents a step toward quantum computing. It is difficult to make uniform nanoparticles more than 4 nm across, but new work solves this problem. Researchers made eight-membered metal rings from chromium and nickel that can act like a qubits in quantum computing. More connected rings means greater quantum computing capacity, so the team worked to combine many rings into one molecule. They managed to pull 24 rings together into an 8-nm sphere, secured by palladium ions at the core. The molecule had a surprisingly good phase memory, an indication of the molecule's quantum computing potential. The researchers say building a molecule with 70-100 rings would allow them to do "some serious stuff" in quantum computing.
build a hollow molecule big enough (Score:3)
and you have a General Products Hull
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, but watch out for the anti matter
Re: build a hollow molecule big enough (Score:2)
Indeed, with all due respect to Niven nothwit
Re: (Score:2)
No, General Products hulls were NOT entirely transparent to radiation. Just to radiation in the visible spectrum....
Re: (Score:2)
is it breakthrough or not... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Picture this.... Imagine point A being the day we formed first theory of Quantum physics and point Z the day we built the first functional Quantum computer. Does this invention represent a huge step toward point Z for quantum computing?
More of a quantum leap I think. ;-)
Re: (Score:3)
Yesnomaybe.
I assume this is a step forward in making molecules with rings ... beyond that, who the hell knows?
Quantum computing is overhyped and underrated. At the same damned time. Because it's freakin' quantum!!
I'm still not sure most people even know WTF it is supposed to be used for, how it works, or if half the claims are (or even can be) true.
Re: (Score:2)
If it works, it will be used to break encryption. It's doubtful there will be an official announcement. Look for unexpected changes in the flows of money and influence.
Re: (Score:2)
What, you mean things somehow different from the already fucked up money system we have?
Sorry, but the only people who would notice that would be the ones skimming off the top through High Frequency Trading.
The rest of us will have no damned way of knowing.
Re: (Score:2)
the other problem is that we don't know how to properly set up presently intractable problems on a quantum computer; they *might* be a breakthrough for problem solving
brawl of the nanocentury! (Score:3)
In the Extra-LARGE Nanocage!
The Maryland University Laboratory for Physical Sciences -vs- DWave!
in an no-holds barred entangled deathmatch!
1QB -vs- zombEinstein
NIST -vs- Hal Puthoff
in a teleportation race for the cash!
and a special guest appearance by Oderus Urungus singing the National Anthem before the show
general seating only $11.11 at the door
BE THERE! or maybe not.
2015 (Score:1)
When this baby gets to 88 rings, you're gonna see some serious stuff...
Shor algorithm (Score:2)
I understand the day quantum computing will be able to do serious stuff, then RSA based crypto will collapse because of quantum computer ability to factorize big number through the Shor algorithm.
I see progress in the quantum computing field, but I do not see RSA replacement coming in the consumer crypto field (i.e.: TLS). I understand even ECDSA relies on big number factoriation being difficult.
We are heading to a difficult situation.