Microsoft Temporarily Suspends Availability of Windows 10 Builds 106
Mark Wilson writes: If you haven't already downloaded Windows 10 build 10162 or 10166, you're now too late. Microsoft has suspended the availability of these two builds — previously available on the Slow and Fast rings respectively — in the run up to the big launch day in a couple of weeks' time. As we edge closer and closer to the RTM build of Windows 10, Microsoft is now asking Windows Insiders to stick with the build they currently have installed for the time being. Anyone who hasn't upgraded to these latest preview builds is out of luck. As well as disabling upgrading through Windows Update, Microsoft is also suspending ISOs and activation.
Dammit (Score:2, Interesting)
I botched up my disk drive's EFI partition while trying to install Windows 10. By the time I resolve all my problems, I may not be able to activate the damn install!
Re:Dammit (Score:5, Insightful)
I botched up my disk drive's EFI partition while trying to install Windows 10. By the time I resolve all my problems, I may not be able to activate the damn install!
Fortunately you weren't trying out a beta on your production machine, so the two weeks without Win10 won't matter, right?
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
More like messing around with a personal machine I didn't want to lose the customizations or data from the past month. More flying by my ass than I would have liked in hindsight; less flying by my ass than the worst possible case I could have exposed myself to.
Re: (Score:2)
I think everyone reading this is has been in that boat sometime or another. The only thing that might have helped was to run a wbadmin backup of your personal machine (at least the hard drive with the Windows partition) so you can boot OS media and reload the entire drive fairly quickly if you encounter any bumps.
Re:Dammit (Score:4, Interesting)
I think everyone reading this is has been in that boat sometime or another.
Nah, in my case, it was my own damn fault. I should have been more familiar with EFI/UEFI issues before starting. I've been a long time linuxer, so I was counting on my outdated MBR/dualbooting and ntfsclone dumps to get me through. The first snag was that Windows 10 would not install on my secondary drive for some reason, because it already had an EFI partition, which somehow made it unsuitable for booting. (I know this may sound incorrect to some; I'm just relating my first hand experience.) It was the relative sluggishness of the Windows install menu that made me accidentally delete a partition important to my OS drive and then hilarity ensued...
wbadmin backup? You're talking 8.1, right? Nope, windows 7 here at home. Yeah, I've been able to mount all my intact partitions, so I haven't lost data, but I'm working on repairing EFI partitions and restoring the relevant hidden system drive dump to the correct partition. Actually, I was doing the book learning I should have done before attempting anything, and then Microsoft now "mentions" they're shutting down the preview activations.
Well, I've mentioned elsewhere that I was able to get my 10162 build installed & activated today (different machine), so one day soon I'll be back to square one.
Re: (Score:2)
> I should have been more familiar with EFI/UEFI issues before starting. I've been a long time linuxer, so I was counting on my outdated MBR/dualbooting and ntfsclone dumps to get me through.
--Could you please recommend a good link/resource to learn more about EFI/UEFI? TIA...
Boy howdy.... (Score:2)
I recently built a Windows 7 box (out of an old Linux box - my how times have changed) and it was a hair pulling, teeth gnashing, ragefest.
It makes you really appreciate how much help Linux gives you in sorting out weird problems.
Re: (Score:2)
For a single-boot install, it's always best to just delete all the partitions and let Windows install to the unpartitioned drive (it will add its own partitions, in fairly sane layout, and you can adjust them later). Obviously that's not an option for multi-boot systems where Windows isn't the first OS you're installing, but for single-boot it has never failed me (and I've run into lots of weird installer / partitioning issues when I tried doing otherwise).
Re: (Score:2)
Fresh install on brand new SSD, single-boot. (The mb and other hardware was older, but the drive was new)
It took several attempts before it took, and I was doing nothing but the defaults.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
FYI, Build 162 and Build 166, War Thunder sound works fine again.
Before those builds, if you launched War Thunder from an admin Powershell, the sound would work too.
Re: (Score:2)
Install 10074... It's sufficiently stable and will weather you over the two weeks.
Re: (Score:2)
Fortunately you weren't trying out a beta on your production machine, so the two weeks without Win10 won't matter, right?
If course it matters, it's a beta! Duh.
That's two weeks of lost beta testing and compatibility verification with your companies software and existing infrastructure. That's potentially another two week delay in being able to successfully deploy it.
It may not matter much or a lot, but it certainly does matter.
In my case it only slightly matters, but I only have 45 days remaining of my free license for the new version of our ERP client I'm testing for compatibility.
Now I admit I already ran into a couple sh
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Not on his gaming machine, I think not.
Re: (Score:1)
Not on his gaming machine, I think not.
Almost at 2000 linux games... more than many consoles.
Re: (Score:1)
More than failed consoles but it still pales compared to a Windows box.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm looking forward to seeing how well it works on a Core 2 Duo laptop. Thanks to some updates to VLC, I'm actually able to play 1080p movies on the old laptop connected to the TV. It taxes the system - mostly b/c of an old GPU, though. It's ever on the threshold of being taken to the recycling center should it fail to perform its duties.
If Win10 is slower, then the machine is done for -- unless I give it new life with Linux Mint or Cubuntu.
I already recycled a Pentium IV machine because it couldn't ha
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Dammit (Score:4, Funny)
"My head hurts!"
"Try smashing a toe with a hammer!"
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If you want any copy of any Windows OS to work beyond 30 days, it has to be "activated" by Microsoft's licensing servers. I have no idea if my preview build has/had a 30 day clock; it may have had a 0 day clock. Was it a big deal? No, but given the fuzziness of the "free" Windows 10 license with a VALID Windows OS install, I wanted to preserve the freebie Windows 10 license that would be mine by installing the Insider preview.
You can delay activation (Score:2)
Activation can be delayed on Windows at least twice. It's kind of hidden but is supported. Lets you have sort of a trial period.
Open a root prompt (cmd, powershell, whatever). /rearm /r /t 0 if you want to use the command line for that too).
slmgr[.vbs]
Reboot (shutdown
The slmgr (Software Licensing Manager) script, and its rearm flag, is documented here: https://technet.microsoft.com/... [microsoft.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Did you, or did Windows do that to you?
I did, using the Windows partition tool in the "advanced" disk management menu.
Yesterday's update of Windows 10 delete the Linux partition on my toy computer.
That will probably become news on Phoronix or The Register, if that's the case. I'm inclined to beleive you're either mistaken, or something other than a Windows 10 update did that.
Wonder what MS might be adding for the RTM build.. (Score:4, Interesting)
In the past, there were last minute "gotchas" which MS tossed in right before a build went RTM. In the antediluvian past, it was removing direct MS-DOS access in Windows ME, with XP, it was the Secure Audio Path (which was a DRM stack which required all audio drivers to be signed, in order to prevent programs like TuneBite from existing.)
I wonder what is going to be tossed in at the last minute. Hopefully nothing too headache-forming.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Any other examples from 15 years ago?
When I was 10, I was rude to my parents. I wonder if I'll call my Dad a bastard tomorrow?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
If you fire all of your QA, you don't plan to test anyway. So, what's the difference?
Re: (Score:3)
I hope this is the case, and I'm proven brain-dead wrong. MS hasn't really pulled any real "fast ones" recently. W10 looks like it will be the next Windows 7 or XP.
As for OS releases, MS's real interesting OS release will be Server 2016. I'm guessing MS is going to wait and see what bugs pop up with W10, get them fixed before WS2016 goes out the door (which is a wise move.)
WS2016 is (for me that is) the one to watch, especially the added virtualization and container capabilities. I wonder how many place
Re: Wonder what MS might be adding for the RTM bui (Score:1)
I've been using the tech preview and its a shit pile, it would be amazing if Microsoft managed to turn that garbage barge around in a few weeks time.
Re: (Score:1)
This just in: Well known Linux zealot and anti-Microsoft troll previews Windows 10, calls it shit. News at 11.
Re: Wonder what MS might be adding for the RTM bui (Score:5, Informative)
It really is in a lot of ways.
1. They still have two separate control panels: The windows vista era one, and the one that uses that butt-ugly 'modern UI' that looks and works like something thrown together on linux 15 years ago, complete with badly rendered fonts. They didn't even try to consolidate them either. Fucking idiotic.
2. The new scheme follows office2013/16's 'all white' mantra, making it hard on the eyes. Like windows vista and up, this is not easily editable. Window metrics are fixed and unchangeable without hacks, like win 8.1.
3. The start menu is usable again, but still isn't as flexible as previous ones. Startisback++ exists and works fine, but still.
4. They totally hosed ddraw fullscreen support which breaks a lot of backward compatibility. There's no reason for this either. Hacks that existed for win 8.1 no longer work (disabledwm.exe).
5. More pointless 'metro' apps that also look like shitty linux X11 from 15 years ago. What's worse is that some of these have replaced traditional windows utilities like calculator.
These are the issues I've noticed. This list is not meant to be all encompassing.
Re: (Score:3)
One major issue which for me means I'll be disabling Windows Update when they EOL 7: NO MEDIA CENTER IN 10.
Fuck that. I'm sticking with 7.
Re: (Score:2)
2. The new scheme follows office2013/16's 'all white' mantra, making it hard on the eyes. Like windows vista and up, this is not easily editable. Window metrics are fixed and unchangeable without hacks, like win 8.1.
Incorrect. The colour scheme is very easy to edit, just right click on the desktop and select "personalize..." from the menu. Like Windows 8.1, it has a feature where the colour scheme will track the colour scheme of the desktop wallpaper, or you can edit it manually.
Window metrics scale with DPI and accessibility settings, or as you say you can do some trivial registry edits.
4. They totally hosed ddraw fullscreen support which breaks a lot of backward compatibility. There's no reason for this either.
The reason is for high DPI support. If the app doesn't scale it's going to be unusable on a 4k monitor. Sadly, sometimes you have to
Re: (Score:2)
Selecting from a few predefined themes and colors is hardly flexible compared to past editions of windows. I shouldn't have to edit the registry to get rid of all that white space (and color) either. Those themes also don't affect the majority of the window, which stays white. The metrics are also not editable in the GUI either, and the defaults are terrible. Sure, the 'high contrast' themes are there, but they don't resolve the metrics issue, are much more limited in what can be colored, and all of this re
Re: (Score:2)
1. They still have two separate control panels: The windows vista era one, and the one that uses that butt-ugly 'modern UI' that looks and works like something thrown together on linux 15 years ago, complete with badly rendered fonts. They didn't even try to consolidate them either. Fucking idiotic.
Wait, what? I though they consolidated them late last year already.
Re: (Score:1)
I'd call it more a case of "work in progress". They both still exist, but more and more settings are moving into the new "modern UI" settings.
No way they'll have this completely transitioned by RTM (not even sure if they are planning to transition everything)
Re: Wonder what MS might be adding for the RTM b (Score:2, Redundant)
You probably don't know the difference as a windows user.
As someone who has to develop on linux, Mac and windows, switching over to my windows partitions or vm env's is like going back in time a decade or more.
Re: (Score:1)
SSH too will be SWEET and a must have too in any enterprise environment with security needs. To have powershell, remote desktop, and perhaps even AD SMB communication encrypted will prevent devices any hacker can plug into an electrical socket and 0wn the network or put in ransom where at the AD schema level.
Server 2012 is a hefty upgrade too with schema deletion restoration, WinRM, compression of AD/SMB traffic for slow WAn links, Powershell Desired state configuration templates SSD tier to raids for cachi
Agree to disagree. (Score:1)
On the not so good side. It is hard to make search only search my machin
Re: (Score:2)
I've been trying out the various Technical Previews over the past few months and I'm not surprised that they've pulled the plug on this. There's no way it was going to be ready by the target date of July 29.
They didn't kill their July 29 RTM date. They suspended new TP builds "briefly", specifically to switch over to using the production channels distribution channels. According to the quote, it sounds likely that they will resume TP builds prior to RTM.
Considering at one time they averaged 2 months between fast ring releases, any new TP release prior to RTM would be much faster.
And then there's all the pointless, useless "apps".
You think that is a recent phenomenon? It's been that way since Windows came into existence.
It's not that I disagree with you thou
Re: (Score:2)
is that what stopped my Sonicstage (which worked flawlessly on Windows 2000) from properly detecting my NetMD on xp?
Reading Is FUNdamental... (Score:2, Informative)
The summary is quite wrong.
Microsoft is asking people to receive the next update via the same channel that they'll eventually use (in a few weeks) to push the operating system to retail users. They didn't say that there would not be more builds (in fact, they explicitly said that there would be). The whole point is to test out the new distribution channel.
Re: (Score:3)
Then why cease validating build 10162? Immediately shutdown downloading the test ISOs, and warn that they'll stop validating any "old" windows 10 releases in three days.
Re: (Score:2)
Microsoft achieves the same result by cutting off the ISO downloads. The "panic" activations probably would be under 10K. I understand the attitude Microsoft would have toward evaluator value, but its kind of "rude/abrupt" to slam the door without any advanced warning.
Re: (Score:3)
1) Its probably not available. If its available, it won't be soon.
2) I already had a copy of build 10162. The problem is that the Insider blog mentioned that Microsoft would NOT be activating 10162 builds anymore.
3) It still activated for me today. But the experience was odd. When I ran the initial install, it hung at "Please wait for a moment". I was certain that it was hung because Microsoft was not validating build 10162 anymore (sic). Of course, I waited for 30 minutes, and then rebooted. It t
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Let's see: Windows 3.1 was ok. Win95 sucked. Win98 good. WinME sucked. WinXP great. WinVista sucked. Win7 good. Win8...yeah what about Win8? And what happened to Win9? And now Win10? WTF??!!!
Let me correct you a bit..
Windows 3 (3.1, workgroups) = Great OS for the Time
Windows 95 (a, b, c) = A huge leap forward but very buggy
Windows 98 (rel, SE) = Great but buggy
Windows ME = Useless
Windows 2000 = Excellent OS for the time.
Windows XP = Great
Windows Vista = Great if you had decent driver support.. (the OS was
Re: (Score:1)
Vista was crap. Driver issues aside, they simply screwed it up early on and it wasn't until about 18-24 months later, once they patched the code that was causing major bottlenecks, that the system started to stabilize. It was a clusterfuck before then.
Windows 7 is not without its issues either. There was an incredibly simple paradigm that let me teach "how to use a computer" to the computer illiterate: Left click selects (ie focus), right click gives you the options (ie: context), and double click starts
Re: (Score:2)
I bought a laptop (Core2-Duo CPU, 2MB RAM) that came with Vista shortly after Vista was released. I actually liked it, and that's saying something when you consider that every single Microsoft OS has let me down at one time or another. It seemed to me that most of the people that didn't like Vista were trying to run it on systems that were optimized for XP.
I now have Windows 7 on all my gaming systems (long story, i'm all about using the right tool for the job), and I'm considering Win10.
Re: (Score:2)
My roommate bought one that came with Vista in 2007, it had better specs, and she would swear at it non-stop because it would always be running something in the background/slow doing nothing but word processing. Does my anecdote trump yours?
I'm on Win8.1, I'd upgrade to Win7 if I could, Win10 isn't touching my system until I can confirm without a doubt that it doesn't suck as much as Win8.1. If that's the case, it'll get installed but no way am I subscribing to the yearly release Microsoft wants. My next
Re: (Score:1)
from what I actually used:
3.1: was just bizarre. Although at the time I wasn't particularly interested in what was actually running the machine, I was more interested in nbody physics simulations in GWBASIC! For which I'd more often than not restart in DOS mode with a custom config to maximise available conventional/upper memory. Oh, the days when you had to literally hack your way to a usable configuration!
95 Gold: was a pile of shit, but there again that's probably because I was running it in a 4MB memory
Downloading 10162 right now?? (Score:3)
My hunch is MS does not want piracy.
Since I am grandfathered in with the insider program I can download. I am doing this now so I have a free VM image for my labs as MS made it clear it is a free upgrade for registered as well as beta fresh installs as a thank you for the insider program.
I can't wait until it updates to RTM and I can finally get RSAT tools to make it useful as a virtual joined computer. In the meantime I am stuck with time bombed versions of 8.1 for the labs. 10 being light and EFI means very light resources and fast boot times :-)
yes, ISO download still works, for now (Score:4, Informative)
Works for me too, and outside the browser, so no cookies needed.
wget http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink... [microsoft.com]
Windows 10 Insider Preview (x64) - Build 10162
Download (3.86 GB)
SHA-1 hash: C1C08D22876F45444880275D26CB5ECB8347620B
http://windows.microsoft.com/e... [microsoft.com]
Re: (Score:2)
holy hell, I'm getting 72MBit off that first link!
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry, I gave the hash for the Proper English version, but link for the US English. Nice to see someone actually checks those things :-)
Anybody else diapointed with the "start menu"? (Score:3)
I saw it on a coworkers machine and we were both disappointed.
The whole endless list menu is way too long. /S
Love the Single Letters too to make it longer still.
If this was a tablet Ok fine but this is gonna cause training issues.
Re: (Score:2)
Fortunately Classic Shell still works on Win10 and it's even targeted for support by same.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yep, I was disappointed with it at work too. I'll stick with W7. Even Mac OS X and Linux are disappointing these days. Or maybe I'm old. :(
Re: (Score:2)
It was build 10162 and previous that Microsoft was going to turn off the activations. They did not say that "fast ring" evaluators were going to have any problem with activations. Thus, your 10224 build works fine. (The issue is moot for me, because I got my install activated anyway; just not on the machine I intended.)
Skype (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
yes it works on the machines that we have run it on. Be aware that there is a modern version and a desktop version. use the desktop version because i think the modern one may be going away and the modern one does not always start for me after a reboot so you can miss messages if you forget to start it.
Re: (Score:2)
my issues (Score:1)
I'm on 10166 but when I try to launch Visual Studio I get a bad install warning on some of the choices to start it.
I loaded Steam and tried defense grid 2 but the video drivers aren't working properly.
Start up and surfing is faster than Ubuntu 14 was on the laptop - so that was an eye opener.
I hate that windows is moving to type it to find it, I prefer list it and click it.
I don't want to remember what what I need to use. I want the list of stuff so I can find what I need to use.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, "moving to"... a feature that Windows has had since late 2006? Whoo...
Ever since Start search became available on Windows (Vista betas), using any version of Windows that lacks it is infuriating. I hit the Windows key, type a few letters, hit Enter (all in under a second), and... something random happens, rather than actually launching the program or control panel I identified.