Startup Builds Prototype For Floating Data Center 96
1sockchuck writes: California startup Nautilus Data Technologies has developed a floating data center that it says can dramatically slash the cost of cooling servers. The company's data barge is being tested near San Francisco, and represents the latest chapter in a long-running effort to develop a water-based data center. Google kicked things off with a 2008 patent for a sea-going data center that would be powered and cooled by waves, conjuring visions of offshore data havens. Google never built it, but IDS soon launched its own effort to convert old Navy vessels into "data ships" before going bankrupt. Nautilus is using barges moored at piers, which allows it to use bay water in its cooling system,eliminating the need for CRAC units and chillers. The company says its offering may benefit from the growing focus on data centers' water use amid California's drought.
Re: (Score:2)
Good: more efficient cooling, which is better for the environment
Bad: ... but not if power is supplied by inefficient on-board generation
Ugly: Piracy
Serious problem... Redundant high speed Data connections...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Bad: ... but not if power is supplied by inefficient on-board generation
The ships are moored to a pier, and using shore based power. Burning bunker fuel to generate electricity is not only inefficient, but at least in SF is illegal. Bunker fuel produces filthy high sulfur smoke, and the boilers are required to be shut down as soon as a ship is moored.
Re: (Score:2)
California could use the waste heat from the servers for desalination.
Re: Good/Bad/Ugly (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Far better to use waste heat from power plants to drive desalination
Even better would be to forget about desalination, and just stop paying subsidies to people growing rice in the desert.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Good/Bad/Ugly (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
With the waste heat from so many thermal power plants within 20 miles of the ocean, we are foolish to not use these.
Modern desalination plants use reverse osmosis, driven by electric pumps, which have no use for "waste heat". Low grade heat could be used for the first stage in distillation, but distillation would still be prohibitively expensive.
Re: (Score:2)
RO is used, but it is expensive. The reason why it is preferred is that it can be located anywhere and power lines ran to it. Now, if you have a power plant close to the ocean, esp if it is being used for cooling purposes, then desalination is next to NOTHING to do. Basically, it uses waste energy to create clean water. As such, it is NOT expensive, just limited in where it can operate.
Re: (Score:2)
Basically, RO is expensive, but pushed by the wrong ppl. Thermal desalination using waste heat saves money.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.carnegiewave.com/projects/perth-project.html
The force of the waves pumps water and that can drive desalination as well as run generators.
"growing focus on data centers' water use" (Score:5, Insightful)
>> growing focus on data centers' water use amid California's drought
Um...what? Don't they just chill the water, let the data center warm it and then reuse it?
Why not check to see what California agriculture's doing with it's majority share of the water first?
Re: (Score:1)
Ummm ... because it requires a lot of energy to cool water and companies are trying to do it cheaply so they want to take groundwater which is already cold?
Re: (Score:1)
Don't they just chill the water
here is a person with a pretty poor grasp of themodynamics
Re: (Score:3)
No. It gets lost through evaporation.
Re: (Score:3)
I believe that the chillers used in data centers spray water over a radiator allowing the water to evaporate, the evaporating water draws heat away causing a performance increase to the warm side of the AC unit.
Usually however, they use grey water for this purpose as the water doesn't need to be clean, any water (except black water) will work. This is why the concerns over the NSA Utah data center's water usage are laughable, it is using grey water, not clean water, so it is water that otherwise would be b
Re: (Score:1)
it is water that otherwise would be being treated and dumped into a river.
you just told us that they are evaporating the water, so it would end up in the atmosphere
Re: (Score:2)
Re: "growing focus on data centers' water use" (Score:1)
Yes, an insult often used by people too dumb to understand the confusing world around them.
Re: (Score:2)
The water used in cooling datacenters is water that if not used for that purpose would be being treated and dumped back into rivers, not already treated water like comes from your tap.
Re:"growing focus on data centers' water use" (Score:4, Interesting)
So, I'm no rocket surgeon ... but even I can imagine a closed system.
You know, it evaporates, but it's still inside some kind of vessel. Then it condenses, and you magically have water again. The water can then be evaporated again. Bonus points if you can exchange some of the heat with a separate loop of water without mixing them. Or maybe some kind of thing to increase the surface area and cool it. I'm calling it a radiator.
It's a new idea I just made up. Brand new and everything.
Go the remedial section, look at several examples of closed systems and recirculation.
A hockey arena, your kitchen, your car AC (or it's engine cooling system), a nuclear submarine .. these are all applications which exist right now which allow the equivalent to happen. All without dumping it straight into the atmosphere.
Seriously ... WTF? Do you think magic happens inside of an air conditioner or a fridge?
I can't speak to how well it works or what the limitations are ... but I can say that what you describe is, in fact, a solved problem.
Unless of course you're imagining the streampunk data center, in which case venting the steam is just part of the awesome. But somehow, I don't think you meant that.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Modulating local water temps? (Score:5, Insightful)
Is anyone considering the local effects of warming the water in the harbors these centers will be docked in? It seems to me, given the current toxic algal bloom off the west coast of the US at the moment, we might be just a bit concerned, right?
Re:Modulating local water temps? (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
4 degrees (C??) seems fairly large.
Even if their "goal is to minimize the temperature differential" presumably the energy they
are dumping into the bay will be the same.
e.g. faster flow will probably result in lower temperature differentials but applied to a larger quantity of water
Re: (Score:2)
In a recent test, Nautilus says the water being returned to the bay was was just 4 degrees warmer than the intake temperature. Their design goal is to minimize the temperature differential to avoid any environmental impact. Having said that, the proof-of-concept test was with 5 racks of gear, rather than an 8 megawatt data center. They believe the design works, but it hasn't yet been tested at scale.
Without knowing the volume of water, "4 degrees" is meaningless. That's like saying "We run our servers at 60 volts instead of 120 volts, so they use half of the electricity.
Re: (Score:2)
Is anyone considering the local effects of warming the water in the harbors these centers will be docked in?
does anyone consider the local effects of warming the air around these centers when they are on land?
Re: (Score:3)
Hot air will move up and away, how water will disperse slower. Also land/air animals are generally much less sensitive to changes in temperature than aquatic animals.
in other words, it screws up the weather, but you don't know how much
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Is anyone considering the local effects of warming the water in the harbors these centers will be docked in? It seems to me, given the current toxic algal bloom off the west coast of the US at the moment, we might be just a bit concerned, right?
Artificial way to produce an "El Niño"... Environmentalists will be coming unglued... (Grin)
Re: (Score:2)
If they are forced to use multiple outputs as power stations are forced to do then that problem goes away. Local warming is a cheapskate shortcut problem and not an inherent problem with the technology
Salt water? (Score:1)
Great for rusting
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Yep. I used to work for a cruise line in IT. Each cruise ship is basically a floating data center because of all the things the computers are involved with. The infrastructure folks would say that it was the most hellish environment imaginable for servers and often kept multiple extras for any hardware on ship for when something failed.
Re: (Score:3)
The infrastructure folks would say that it was the most hellish environment imaginable for servers
You lock your servers up in airtight steel containers, you have an infinite heat sink available for free, and you don't have to worry about finding an admin at whatever hour, because they are right there on the ship. Sounds a lot better than most installations.
Re: (Score:2)
Totally different meaning of Software Piracy (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
No. no.. That's where the servers end up...
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Wouldn't knowing what a cleat is be more important than a yardarm?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I can see it now, actual pirates stealing full boatloads of servers.
Alternately:
SysAdmin: The data centre is down.
Manager: It crashed?
SysAdmin: Yup.
Manager: How long till it's back up?
SysAdmin: Not sure, a few months maybe.
Manager: A FEW MONTHS?!?! What the hell happened?? Can't you just reboot things?!?
SysAdmin: Not really, a yacht crashed into it and it's sitting at the bottom of the harbour, it's going to take a few months to patch the hole and raise it back up to the surface.
Re: (Score:2)
Manager: How the hell did that happen?!
SysAdmin: Hey, you are the one that though those surplus Phalanx systems were a waste of money....
Re: (Score:2)
Skeptical (Score:2)
I'm skeptical that even at SF's inflated real estate prices that floating servers on a boat is cheaper than a ground-based datacenter. Marine structures are expensive to build and maintain and they have to pass regular USCG inspections. For cooling they could rent a warehouse near the bay and pump the water in.
Re: (Score:3)
having your servers on a ship can come in handy if your country suddenly decides to change its data retention laws
Re: (Score:1)
True, you just reflag the vessel to a country that has data retention laws you like and move into international waters.
Re: (Score:2)
Running the fiber optic cables could get rather expensive though...
Re: (Score:2)
"Running the fiber optic cables could get rather expensive though.."
Look at the proliferation of places where underwater cables are landed now. There would be no need to patch over to an interconnect point.
Why not just pump in sea water? (Score:5, Insightful)
Is it really cheaper to build a barge than it is to circulate sea water to a land based facility?
Re: (Score:1)
Agreed. Putting this thing on a barge is expensive navel gazing. You wind up with the maintenance of a boat, wired connections that must be protected and yet are exposed. Someone's vision of "we'll use the resources of the ocean" got away from them.
The only way a floating data centre makes any sense is if you actually need the mobility of being in a ship. If you do this for hire (e.g. temporary demand to support special events), or on an emergency services basis, or if you have unusual security requirem
Re: (Score:2)
"Put the DC onshore. Run pipes, they can be as long as you need"
Good idea, especially if you want to make use of the waste heat when it emerges as hot water. But the Greens are going to object that in the event of a tsunami, the local groundwater is going to get contaminated with ones and zeroes. Windows malware could persist in the environment for generations to come.
Re: (Score:2)
Not even just the building location, but the rent. Harbor space is EXPENSIVE! Limited docking space options, maximum need. We're talking billions to have space to dock large vessels, as an example. The cost per acre is probably an order of magnitude higher, or more, than an inland data center.
Re: (Score:2)
There are a few issues with this idea:
1: Is the data center going to be on a ship? If so, will it be in US waters? If not it is free game for any naval force whatsoever who feels like boarding the data center. There are a lot of issues about maritime property rights that make property disputes on land look tame in comparison, especially in international waters.
2: Reliable power? Ships are not static objects.
3: Stability. The closest thing to a stable platform is the prison barge attached to Riker's Island, and that thing requires a naval staff, bilge pumps, ballast tanks, and many other items. If they don't do their job, the barge can sink. A data center barge only will be worse.
4: Marine environments are by far the worst environments to even think of putting a data center in. There is a reason why anything related to boating costs 10-20 times as much as normal landlubber stuff. For example, just attaching a lug to a battery wire requires a $4000 hydraulic crimp tool as well as proper shrink wrap insulation. Same job for a car? $10 pair of pliers can do it.
5. Data connections will be difficult, high speed ones even worse.
6. Provisioning and resupply of fuel, maintenance spares, personnel and food will be very expensive.
7. Emergencies will be hard to deal with, fires, accidents, taking on water etc..
8. Storms, wind, waves, etc will all cause you issues.
But, as you point out, on board power will be the largest cost issue they face and will make this very difficult to accomplish, even if they can get it from natural sources and not have to generate it from
Re: (Score:2)
These are barges in a bay not ships as sea. So those are non-issues.
Re: (Score:2)
these would be non-is
"5. Data connections will be difficult, high speed ones even worse.
6. Provisioning and resupply of fuel, maintenance spares, personnel and food will be very expensive.
7. Emergencies will be hard to deal with, fires, accidents, taking on water etc..
8. Storms, wind, waves, etc will all cause you issues.sues"
Okay 7 is still an issue but storms in a SF Bay, data connections, and provisioning would not be a big deal.
Cheaper until they run into env regulations (Score:2)
Too bad they aren't making distilled water, too. (Score:3)
They could use the "Free" heat to boil the water to make distilled water and sell the distilled water!
Re: (Score:2)
I thought of this, too. Is there a way to recover some of the waste heat and turn it back into electricity?
100% efficiency if the Water Needs Heating (Score:1)
It's even better if you can find some water that already has to be heated. The college I went to looked at using pool water as their heat destination. Their calculations showed it could be 163% efficient. I don't think the backup data center it was designed for was ever built, but it still seams like a decent idea. http://www.calvin.edu/~mkh2/thermal-fluid_systems_desig/2010-data-center-seminar.pdf
I would laugh .... (Score:1)
Good luck with that in California (Score:2)
Corrosive. (Score:2)
Nothing says rust like a steel barge that floats in salt water and breathes salt air.
It is perhaps worth adding that here in the Northeast there is a powerful movement towards reclaiming the industrial waterfront for parks and green space.
For the curious, 95 examples of used barges for sale:
The add copy should be read like you were shopping for a second-hand boat in a "Monkey Island" game. Used Deck Barges [oceanmarine.com]
Guam is the best place for a data-centre. (Score:1)
So what does Guam have going for it?
It is already a fibre hub. http://www.submarinecablemap.c... [submarinecablemap.com]
It is less than 150 km north of the bottom of a very deep ocean trench. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
It is politically stable because it is a US territory. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Recycle (Score:1)
Can't we recycle the heat generated by data center to electricity?