Slashdot Log In
YouTube Adds Full-Length Television Shows
Posted by
timothy
on Monday October 13, @07:26AM
from the what-about-magnum-pi-and-square-pegs? dept.
from the what-about-magnum-pi-and-square-pegs? dept.
thefickler writes "YouTube has moved to put full-length television shows on its site for the first time. Historically, YouTube has hosted a bewildering and attractive variety of video clips, the vast majority of which have been under ten minutes in length. YouTube has announced that it had finalized a deal with CBS to offer shows such as Star Trek, MacGyver, Beverly Hills 90210, and The Young and the Restless. I can't wait to watch The Young and the Restless!"
Related Stories
[+]
Higher-Resolution YouTube Videos Currently In Testing 214 comments
jason writes "YouTube has never really been known for streaming videos at a high resolution, but it appears that they are taking early steps at providing higher quality videos. The project was announced last year by the site's co-founder Steve Chen, and now appears to be in the earliest stages of deployment. By adding a parameter onto the end of a video's URL you're able to watch it in a higher quality (in terms of audio and video) that is actually quite noticeable. Not all videos have been converted at this point, but they do have millions upon millions of videos that they need to do."
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
Still using Flash (Score:5, Interesting)
Reply to This
Re:Still using Flash (Score:5, Informative)
I don't disagree that I would like to see that happen, but think about it from the perspective from someone who works at GooTube and wants to keep that job: would it really make sense to switch to a brand-new standard only supported by [let's be generous] 25% of the market?
Ok, you may respond, why not maintain two parallel versions of the site: one for legacy users and one for browsers that support the new standards? And to that I say, it's a little bit hard to go to management and ask for the resources and time to implement a second parallel version of a service that already works splendidly well.
I would be just as happy as you if YouTube started offering video streams in other formats and other access methods. Until they do, though, I'll continue watching their FLV streams directly with VLC. The newly-released 0.9.2 even has a Lua scriptlet specifically designed to allow you to drop a YouTube URL directly into the playlist.
Not good, but good enough. At least you don't need Flash.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Still using Flash (Score:5, Funny)
However, seeing as though they will be showing MacGyver, Google will only have a paper clip, post-it notes, and 4 bullet casings to complete the objective.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Still using Flash (Score:4, Informative)
MPEG-4 contains patented technologies that require licensing in countries that acknowledge software patents. Patents covering MPEG-4 are claimed by over two dozen companies. The MPEG Licensing Authority[1] licenses patents required for MPEG-4 Part 2 Visual from a wide range of companies (audio is licensed separately) and lists all of its licensors and licensees on the site. New licenses for MPEG-4 System patents are under development[2] and no new licenses are being offered while holders of its old MPEG-4 Systems license are still covered under the terms of that license for the patents listed (MPEG LA â" Patent List). AT&T is trying to sue companies such as Apple Inc. over alleged MPEG-4 patent infringement.[3] The terms of Apple's Quicktime 7 license for users[4] describes in paragraph 14 the terms under Apple's existing MPEG-4 System Patent Portfolio license from MPEGLA.[1] [wikipedia.org]
No, it's not.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Still using Flash (Score:5, Informative)
No, but Theora and Dirac are. Theora [theora.org] is from the Xiph open source community (the same people that do cdparanoia, FLAC, Speex, and Vorbis). The FSF has recommended its use along with Vorbis audio for some time now. Dirac [diracvideo.org] is from the BBC.
Reply to This
Parent
As a non-american... (Score:5, Insightful)
...Hulu sucks, since it won't stream outside the USA. No mention in the article as to whether YouTube will add regional restrictions on these full-length shows, but let's hope they can convince the studios otherwise. If not, well, bittorrent works just fine.
Reply to This
Re:As a non-american... (Score:5, Informative)
Reply to This
Parent
Region-locking is an abomination. (Score:5, Insightful)
It's called the WORLD WIDE Web, assholes.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Region-locking is an abomination. (Score:5, Insightful)
So if they used a medium of delivery beyond HTTP, you'd be happy with it? Or would it just ruin your witty one-liner?
Seriously, just because licensing agreements haven't yet caught up with the global nature of the Internet doesn't mean we should disparage the positive steps being made in the direction of having content available on the Internet AT ALL.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Region-locking is an abomination. (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes this is the WWW, except that the American owners don't want non-americans looking at A-Team, McGuyver, et cetera. They want to sell those programs to Japanese stations for reruns, or on DVD directly to European citizens, and thereby maximize profit. If they gave this stuff for free via the web, they'd be killing their non-american market.
Everything makes sense if you just follow the dollar to its source and assume the owner is greedy.
Reply to This
Parent
A closed curve on a sphere has no inherent inside (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:A closed curve on a sphere has no inherent insi (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:As a non-american... (Score:5, Informative)
Hate replying to my myself, but went to find one of these full-length Trek episodes, clicked on it: "This video is not available in your country". So much for that.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:As a non-american... (Score:4, Informative)
Yes.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:As a non-american... (Score:5, Informative)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:As a non-american... (Score:4, Informative)
The videos are still encoded to 480x360 at the most. That's hardly "better than TV".
-uso.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:As a non-american... (Score:5, Insightful)
Youtube offer better-than-TV resolution. Check out their high-quality option, which you can view full screen.
If you say so... I have yet to see a YouTube video encoded anywhere close to 768x576 (SDTV resolution), and resolution aside, they don't come close to broadcast quality from the encoding point of view either.
In an era when people are interested in HDTV (1920x1080), making a big deal about a crappy sub-SDTV streaming service seems a bit nuts.
(Note: I'm not one who believes in bothering with HDTV for most stuff - maybe nature programmes, etc, but certainly not worthwhile for anything with a story - but I do draw the line at watching significant amounts of YouTube quality TV).
Reply to This
Parent
Re:As a non-american... (Score:4, Insightful)
Which is why I watch YouTube on my TV. I installed a GreaseMonkey Script [userscripts.org] that will send the URL of a YouTube video to Xbox Media Center. After a little bit of caching, the movie plays.
So you get to watch it on your TV in crappy YouTube quality instead... great...
Reply to This
Parent
Re:As a non-american... (Score:5, Insightful)
If you haven't noticed the BBC isn't ad sponsored, it's UK license fee paid. How are they meant to cover the costs of international streaming? Youtube does streaming of their video internationally paid for by advertising with a well built back-end that can handle it.
Comparing the BBC's iPlayer license fee paid service to the ad-sponsored Youtube is like comparing Apples and Oranges.
Reply to This
Parent
Hulu vs. The World (Score:5, Insightful)
It might have to done something with the fact that Hulu's "video library can only be streamed within the United States".
Some people go to great lengths to put their feet over an axe, just to see if it hurts or not.
Reply to This
What Next? (Score:5, Interesting)
Reply to This
Re:What Next? (Score:5, Funny)
Wait a sec, you're calling MacGyver "garbage" on a nerd website?
Reply to This
Parent
CBS only? (Score:5, Insightful)
The shows and their original networks:
Star Trek: NBC
MacGyver: ABC
BH 90210: Fox
Y & R: CBS
I guess I don't understand how these things work...
Reply to This
Please no (Score:4, Interesting)
With short clips the YouTube UI is bad enough. For full-length TV shows I want:
- a UI that can be controlled from arbitrary input devices, e.g. an IR remote and rotary controller (Griffin Powermate). Sitting at your computer doesn't cut it, I want control from my comfy chair.
- a full-featured UI with controls for skip forward/reverse (at short/long intervals), aspect ratio, mute, etc.
Basically, I want the VLC UI.
Reply to This
US-ONLY! :( (Score:5, Informative)
So, this means I won't have to pirate the videos to watch my favorite shows?
Think again.
"This video is not available in your country."
Oh well, at least I know a site [thepiratebay.org] that DOES let me play the videos in my country - and without ads.
Reply to This