The Internet

Will the End of Lockdowns Change Our Relationship with the Internet? (theatlantic.com) 81

Last year author Sonia Shah predicted that after pandemic-induced lockdowns finally ended, "The hype around online education will be abandoned, as a generation of young people forced into seclusion will reshape the culture around a contrarian appreciation for communal life."

This week the Atlantic's technology staff writer is now suggesting that "As the stress of the pandemic is beginning to recede, our relationship with the internet might be renegotiated..." As vaccination rates tick up, and IRL social life resumes, it's getting easier to imagine that we're on the brink of something big: a coordinated withdrawal from swiping and streaming, a new consensus that staying home to watch Netflix is no longer a chill Friday-night plan, but an affront. Could this be real? Are we about to start the summer of a Great Offlining...?

A few signs that this movement could be upon us: Netflix reported its worst first quarter in eight years, after seeing historic growth in 2020. Tinder conceded that more than half of its Gen Z users have no intention of using its videochat features ever again. Clubhouse downloads dropped significantly in April, prompting worry that the app was always just "a temporary salve to being stuck inside."

On The Cut, Safy-Hallan Farah has predicted a post-pandemic future in which our culture prioritizes, among other things, "earnestness," "communism," and "being extremely offline." The writer Luke Winkie forecasts a 10-week period of everyone abandoning the internet, adding that "offline is going to hit like a drug." Discourse's Patrick Redford put it best, writing that "the idea of further screen-only interaction with my friends and loved ones after a year overstuffed with them makes me want to toss my phone into the Pacific Ocean...."

[B]ut it's hard to imagine that a Great Offlining is really in the cards. Instead, we could be heading for a Great Rebalancing, where we reconfigure how we do our work and how we organize our time on the internet. We've grown more aware of how we rely on one another — online as well as off — and of the tools we have or could build for responding to a crisis. The biggest tech companies' accrual of power remains one of the most serious problems of my lifetime, but I no longer talk about the internet itself as if it were an external and malignant force, now that I've lived in such intimate contact with it for so long.

Comment Re:Typical Apple Bullshit (Score 5, Interesting) 93

This. Ideas are literally everywhere. No business start up without one, and almost all of them fail. Execution is the hard bit. Is Woz never supposed to do anything because someone convinced him to use his name one time? Cmon. Thats bullshit. This guy never started a tech university using Woz's name. It wasn't for lack of funding either. Did he ask Woz for a loan into the business? No. A full 6 years later, and nothing had happened. Woz went ahead with a legitimate group that actually got it off the ground. A handshake does not entitle you to perpetually squat on an idea, and we should all move off that notion so that executors have room to execute and actually make something that has real benefit to others.

Also, Apple isn't the one that steals bro.Citation
The Courts

Steve Wozniak Faces Copyright Infringement Lawsuit Over Branded Tech School (gizmodo.com) 93

A user quotes Gizmodo: Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak is facing a million-dollar lawsuit for allegedly stealing the idea to create a Woz-branded tech school, according to a weekend Insider report.

Connecticut business professor Ralph Reilly claims he and Wozniak agreed to establish a "tech university" and sealed the deal with an on-camera handshake in 2011. The educational platform, which was aimed at teaching adults computer and other technical skills, would lean heavily on Wozniak's name and reputation as a key engineering force in Apple's early days for branding purposes. However, the partnership never got off the ground, Reilly said in court filings reviewed by Gizmodo and Insider. Wozniak went on to launch virtually the same idea under the name Woz U in 2017 after partnering with the code-learning firm Coder Camps. In response, Reilly reached out to Wozniak via email asking to be a part of the venture, according to court filings. "It's exactly what I envisioned for Woz Institute of Technology when I first approached you with the idea," Reilly wrote at the time.

"You are right on the mark," Wozniak responded. "You had the right idea... I doubt it would have happened without your initial idea!"

But when Reilly pushed back asking for partial ownership in the project, he was met with radio silence. Reilly went on sue Wozniak for alleged intellectual property theft and copyright infringement. He's seeking at least $1 million in relief and damages. Other accusations Reilly's brought against Wozniak such as breach of contract have already been dismissed by a judge...

For his part, Wozniak's team claims the two never reached a real deal on the proposal and the aforementioned on-camera handshake was just one of countless photo-ops he regularly conducts with fans.

Comment Re:Blaming VRE is dumb anyway (Score 1) 265

Storage is becoming economically viable. [batteries] [compressed air]

Or pumped hydro storage (PHS), which has already been viable since the 1940s. Round trip charge/discharge cycle is apparently in the 80% ballpark (87% claimed at some sites).

That compares well with the 75-85% AC-to-AC round-trip values for larger utility Lithium Ion systems. Li-Ion also ages out and has to be replaced - although both the lifetime and efficiency are still improving with tech advancement.

(Haven't got efficiency numbers for utility-scale pumped redox.)

97% of the grid's current storage is PHS. Downside is that you have to have a reservoir (i.e. dam and flooded valley) and a reliable river, or two reservoirs, plus a pumping/generation station. So don't expect a lot of new construction.

Comment Re: Republicans lie (Score 1) 265

Shortages? The oil industry, even with a tremendous amount of production still shut down, has had stores climbing while simultaneously crying that oil is in short supply as they raise prices.

The fact is that we're still working from home, and it is looking like a lot of it will be permanent. Here in Florida, workplace and public transit mobility are still down 25% and 20% respectively since prior to the pandemic. This is despite the fact that we are one of the most fully reopened states in the nation.

The challenge for the fossil fuel providers over the next decade is going to be in retiring their infrastructure quickly enough to avoid being weighed down by costs for things no longer needed. Everybody is underestimating how quickly EVs will take over the majority of transport and solar/wind plus storage will start shutting down fossil fuel plants. The thing being most underestimated is how quickly many new more effective battery techs will come online. A lot of investment is going into grid scale battery tech that is very different and cheaper than vehicle battery tech due to the lack of concern for density.

Comment Not really a change at all then... (Score 2) 117

YT has been doing this *for years* already with "random" demonetisation of channels, regardless of size. This just formalises the process slightly more to say "WE'LL make money off your work via ads regardless: any payment to you is entirely at our discretion".

I see a lot of people calling this a "bait and switch", but it's really not. YT has ALWAYS been like this, with Google collecting the money no matter what, and a stance that "content creators" should just be grateful that YT pays them at all (if it does).

For tech/game/etc channels at least, I don't think ANY channel I've seen that's more than a year old doesn't have stories to tell of their channels randomly getting demonetised; or removed from YT's "promotion" algorithm; or etc etc, with YT's response always being non-existent because there's basically no process in place to even attempt to provide "fairness": Google's getting their cut so everyone else can suck it, regardless of how many million subs you have.

Communications

US-Backed Consortium Beats China's for Massive 5G Contract Blanketing Ethiopia (livemint.com) 87

"A U.S.-backed consortium beat out one financed by China in a closely watched telecommunications auction in Ethiopia — handing Washington a victory in its push to challenge Beijing's economic influence around the world," reports the Wall Street Journal: The East African country said Saturday it tapped a group of telecommunications companies led by the U.K.'s Vodafone Group PLC to build a nationwide, 5G-capable wireless network.

The group had won financial backing for the multibillion-dollar project from a newly created U.S. foreign-aid agency. The agency offers low-interest loans, but the financing comes with a condition: the money won't be used to buy telecom equipment from China's Huawei Technologies Co. and ZTE Corp. Washington considers both a spying threat, an accusation the companies deny...

The telecom license auction in Ethiopia took on wider geopolitical significance amid heightened competition between the U.S. and China over key technological pursuits, from the rollout of 5G to chip manufacturing. "The U.S. and China are fighting a proxy war in Ethiopia for influence," said Zemedeneh Negatu, chairman of Fairfax Africa Fund LLC, a U.S.-based investment firm that focuses on Africa. After all but shutting out Huawei in the U.S., Washington has become more assertive about challenging Beijing's economic footprint overseas. It is using new financial tools to win influence and ensure that strategic assets in foreign countries stay in friendly hands...

Backing the Vodafone bid was the International Development Finance Corp., or DFC. The U.S. government-funded agency was created in December 2019 with a goal of offering alternatives to cheap, Chinese financing for foreign infrastructure projects... U.S. law also prohibits its loan from being used to buy Huawei or ZTE equipment, though one person familiar with the matter said it is possible the Vodafone-led bid could still buy some Chinese gear because of the project's size and cost.

Comment Police incompetence (Score 5, Insightful) 109

Everyone seems to be focussed on the tech problems yet noone s focussing on the incompetence of the cops. Sure they left their wifi unprotected. So what? Its the cops' jobs to investigate and find actual evidence. If I left my home unlocked by mistake and someone broke in and used the place to have sex with a minor would the cops be investigating me? No. They would be looking for the actual perp. With cybercrimes the cops understand so little that if they get a small piece of a clue they just run with - I mean computers cant be wrong can they? Cops need to be trained on the concept of garbage in garbage out. Computers are not infallible.

Comment Re:The Plan (Score 1) 117

I'm surprised they didn't do that, at least for 'alt-tech' sites. Maybe they're worried about possible anti-trust issues given they hold a large majority of the market. Given that YouTube operates membership features, blocking linking to sites like Ko-fi, SubscribeStar, and Patreon would seem to be leveraging their dominance of video hosting to push their subscriptions business.

Play Raid: Shadow Legends over a VPN.

Comment Re: Republicans lie (Score 1) 265

And yet he did end vietnam. Johnson was 100% behind that shit show. You do remember johnson was bragging to his mistress he would be president soon just a couple weeks before Kennedy got assassinated dont you? Kennedy was holding up the war in vietnam and the industial military complex had tech they needed battle tested. Give credit where credit is due.

Comment Re:Trump didn't show them that (Score 4, Insightful) 265

History is turning out to show Reagan as one of the worst Presidents in history in terms of outcomes.

- Complete economic failure of supply side "trickle down" policy
- Dismantling of the welfare state, demonization of the people and programs
- Completely wrong on energy policy, killed any progress made coming out of the oil crisis in the 70's
- Escalated the War on Drugs into hyperdrive, drove up our huge incarceration numbers.
- Exacerbated the trend of rampant inequality we are mired in today.

You can take just about any chart that shows negative trends today and the inflection point is when Reagan was President. The man got simply lucky to be in power during the tech boom of the 80's and Republicans have essentially been using stolen valor ever since.

Power

Texas Governor Knew of Natural Gas Shortages Days Before Blackout, Blamed Wind Anyway (arstechnica.com) 265

Long-time Slashdot reader AmiMoJo quotes Ars Technica: Texas Governor Greg Abbott's office knew of looming natural gas shortages on February 10, days before a deep freeze plunged much of the state into blackouts, according to documents obtained by E&E News and reviewed by Ars.

Abbott's office first learned of the likely shortfall in a phone call from then-chair of the Public Utility Commission of Texas DeAnne Walker. In the days leading up to the power outages that began on February 15, Walker and the governor's office spoke 31 more times.

Walker also spoke with regulators, politicians, and utilities dozens of times about the gas curtailments that threatened the state's electrical grid. The PUC chair's diary for the days before the outage shows her schedule dominated by concerns over gas curtailments and the impact they would have on electricity generation. Before and during the disaster, she was on more than 100 phone calls with various agencies and utilities regarding gas shortages.

After the blackouts began, Abbott appeared on Fox News to falsely assert that wind turbines were the driving force behind the outages.

Slashdot Top Deals