Birth Of A Terascale Baby 75
Seanasy writes: "Want to follow the construction of the most powerful unclassified computer in the world? The Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center will be publishing status updates on the installation of the Terascale Computing System. Right now you can view an MPEG movie of the first clusters to be installed."
Oh, I don't know.... (Score:1)
I mean, it takes all the energy I have just to read the blurb for the articles, let alone actually reading the article itself or even 1/3 of the posts - I know they'll be on-topic mostly, or if not, really not have the bite and flame-inducing stupidity of the old guys - you know, siggy, oog, grits-boy, pertriphile, and so on. Sometimes it's just not worth going on!
I've been here too long, I think. My uid is below 1000, and I've just seen and read too much on
Clustering? (Score:1)
Hey, it's free, works with Solaris/SPARC - what's not to like, if you can use it?
Re:Fun stuff to know: power usage (Score:1)
Umm, "a lot" is two words. ;>
Hmmmm (Score:1)
Between this box and the previous 3D display, we should be able to view high-framerate, fully 3D porn like never before!
Now, where do we sign?
Number-crunching *IS* the point! (Score:1)
Do 'they' ever do anything useful with these things? It's fun drooling, but I personally think something with this much power would be well-suited to intense graphics work or something equally resource-consuming. So far all i've heard is done with supercomputers is number-crunching.
That's because that's what supercomputers do -- crunch numbers. Mostly big physics, chemistry, and engineering problems. Where I work (a supercomputer center), that IS what's considered useful. The target audience for this thing is NSF-funded scientific researchers, and they (NSF) didn't pay $36M+ for a really nice Quake server...
Whoa...misread that big time. (Score:1)
Paging Mr. Freud...
Re:whatever (Score:1)
If you touch my car I will fuck your dog.
Juan Epstein
Re:Remember Newsreels? (Score:1)
But this would have been in the ear of serials - works on film somewhere beteween TV mini series and full blown TV shows. The Lone Ranger comes to mind.
Funny... (Score:1)
Re:Just in time (Score:1)
In other words, the engineering part is more important than the popularity-contest, awe-factor part.
Compare and contrast with the "open source" software community...
as usual.. for AU/NZ folks a mirror of the movie.. (Score:1)
movie for those folks in AU/NZ who want to get
it a bit faster.
http://mirror.aarnet.edu.au/pub/movies/misc/wec
-jason
Neeeeed mmmoooorrree cccaaffffiiinnneeeeeeee (Score:1)
Jeremy
Glutious
How about the classified computers? (Score:1)
Got any stats on those? I bet it's a bit more impressive. The NSA measures its computers in acres...
Re:C'mon guys... (Score:1)
----
Dave
MicrosoftME®? No, Microsoft YOU, buddy! - my boss
Re:Tera = Electronic Ton! (Score:1)
Even valuable, conscientious posters have to kick back and be silly now and again.
You're quite right about all your criticisms -- especially 1 tera = 10^12, not 10^16, which was a mental lapse on my part. I'll be more careful about posting lighthearted stuff with a +1 bonus in the future.
heh... not a moment too soon (Score:1)
I'm sitting on a gigabit 1 hop away from PSC (in CMU) and this site is taking FOREVER to load...
Birth of a testicle baby? (Score:1)
That would be one sweet machine to work on.
-motardo
Apparently... (Score:1)
stop them from being slashdotted.
Uh Duh (Score:1)
$45 million and all they can come up with is 6 teraflops? IBM's budget for Blue Gene is $100 million and they expect to reach 1,000 teraflops (1 petaflop). I am unimpressed.
Proprietary protocols? (Score:1)
OpenGL is already widely used in the scientific visualization community, and it has the advantage of hardware adaptability -- for example, SGI's Cave, mentioned before on Slashdot, uses a library derived from, and directly compatible with, OpenGL. If you have a program already written to use OpenGL, it's trivial (as in, adding only a few lines of code) to get the software to work in the Cave.
Having to rewrite major portions of software to support their 'proprietary system' will be a pain (read: expensive). However, having to add only a few lines to your existing OpenGL code to get it to work would make it EXTREMELY desirable for many scientific and even home users.
Re:Proprietary protocols? [wrong article!] (Score:1)
boring story (Score:1)
Andrew J. Tosh, dropping his karma since 10.03.2000
Re:Number-crunching *IS* the point! (Score:1)
Case in point: Voyager I and II are still operating and NASA is still communicating with them. However, if they didn't have this site [nasa.gov] I, being John Q. Public, would be a little bored with the subject and say "What the hell is NASA doing these days?"
What I'm trying to say is that after you've run your simulations take a day a create a web page telling us common folk what you found. That way we know someone is using these powerful computers and we might just learn a little something we didn't know yesterday.
In advance, Thanks.
Quake III, anyone? (Score:1)
Re:Fun stuff to know: power usage (Score:1)
The issue of power requirements for all the hardware that the "new economy" runs on is big, big, big and is going get bigger in the next few years.
It's been estimated that 8% of total U.S. power consumption is related to IT, and that figure is going to climb. In addition to pressure on the demand side, there's a problem on the supply side as the last several summers have shown. Power companies are offering people rebates for allowing them to install thermostats which they can control remotely to manage power demand in peak periods.
The first issue of the Huber-Mills Power Report [powercosm.com] (PDF) at www.powercosm.com [powercosm.com] is very interesting reading.
The Wall Street Journal has also run a few interesting articles recently. "Got a computer? More power to you," (September 7 page A26) is available here [manhattan-institute.org]. The WSJ ran another article entitled "Cisco opposes plan for new power plant" (September 18 page A2) which I couldn't find, but Google has related things here [google.com]. It's somewhat ironic that Cisco is against more power to run its hardware; it wants to build new office space nearby and is concerned about quality of life issues. A power company executive said "if this plant isn't built I'm guaranteeing you outages...I'm guaranteeing you an economic disaster in the valley." That's hardly coming from a disinterested party, but it's still a hot topic.
Re:Fun stuff to know: power usage (Score:1)
The point? (Score:1)
Do 'they' ever do anything useful with these things? It's fun drooling, but I personally think something with this much power would be well-suited to intense graphics work or something equally resource-consuming. So far all i've heard is done withsupercomputers is number-crunching.
Re:The point? (Score:1)
I didn't mean just processing graphics, a la playing Quake...I meant as in creating them. Maybe I phrased it wrong, but I didn't mean number crunching was a bad thing, just that computers with that much power have the possibility to also be used for different things.
Imagine my suprise... (Score:1)
Re:Slashdot it (Score:1)
Slashdot it (Score:1)
Re:A look at the competition (Score:1)
Perhaps I should send them that little 'earth simulator' perl script I knocked together the other night...
Get off my internet (Score:1)
Re:Fun stuff to know: power usage (Score:1)
er, thats square meters. 10,000 meters square(d) is HUGE
so much for the power... (Score:1)
Oh.... (Score:1)
What he means is... (Score:1)
Translation: "The first 2 people to see this new topic can view an mpeg movie of the first clusters to be installed. After that, the server will stop responding due to the SlashDotDOS attack."
Six Terraflops? (Score:1)
C'mon guys... (Score:1)
I, although surrounded by high-end, high-performance computers all day, am quite impressed by the sheer numbers involved with this thing.
Unlike some of you, I can think of a few OTHER applications for such a monstrosity than prOn or that pathetic excuse of an FPS Quake III.
How about the S.E.T.I. league? I'm sure they could put it to good use. Or the Human Genome project?
Or that article posted about electron fission, a beast like this could definately be put to use on the location of electrons at a point in time which would be required for my matter teleportation device.
Then again, it sure would be a lot of PrOn.
Hmmmmm, Pooooooorn. (dribble dribble)
Re:C'mon guys... (Score:1)
Yeahhhhhhh!
Re:C'mon guys... (Score:1)
You mean radio isn't instant? Oh...My...GOD...
My point was more that people couldn't come up with an application for such a supercomputer other that prOn, not that the SETI league should be the ones to use it....
Why the hell am I explaining it to you? You didn't get it the first time.
first computing project for the new box.... (Score:1)
that's the kind of bloat I'd expect from you-know-who
Oops (Score:1)
Present list... (Score:1)
Is it too late to add one of these to my must-have Christmas present list [slashdot.org]?
Michael
...another comment from Michael Tandy.
Re:Number-crunching *IS* the point! (Score:1)
If you want to see what it does, click on the link 'program' in my parent post. Allthough it will probably not make that much sense to someone outside of the field at least it is out there to see. Basically it helps us find ways to model the evolution of early galaxies.
If you're very interested in this kind of stuff, head to our main site [utoronto.ca] to check out all the work that the other astrophysicists are doing.
Gee Whiz (Score:1)
Wow. I'm using 4 of these servers right now and I thought that was pretty impressive.
Re:Number-crunching *IS* the point! (Score:1)
From what I have been hearing on /. lately it seems that most people don't really think advances like this are that interesting. While we're at it we might as well tear down all our particle accelerators and stop doing space missions as well since they don't really have any immediate use...
Re:Quite a machine (Score:1)
Re:Slashdot it (Score:1)
all the points they connect to see to always die. *sigh* it makes working on the university a bit harder. oh well.
[mrzer0] (i've got stinky net
Re:Slashdot it (Score:1)
[mrzer0]
On what planet will 1,000 Pentiums perform (Score:1)
Re:The point? (Score:1)
Graphics work is number-crunching, with the distinction that you get a pretty picture at the end of it. Or did you expect a computer to be manipulating something other than numbers?
Re:Fun stuff to know: power usage (Score:1)
whatever (Score:1)
I LOVE YOU [mikegallay.com]
Sports games (Score:1)
NCSA will build one, too! (Score:1)
Re:On what planet will 1,000 Pentiums perform (Score:1)
Cool but Crap (Score:1)
Re:It has to be said... (Score:2)
Bill - aka taniwha
--
Re:Will it support OPENMP (Score:2)
Does anyone know if this system will support OPENMP?
Probably. The building blocks are ES-40s, which are 4-way SMP systems. The individual ES-40s are connected via Quadrics, which is a fairly fast (and *very* expensive) network fabric. One way you could write a parallel application for such a system is to break your problem up across boxes with MPI, and then use OpenMP to parallelize the loop structures within the program running on each box. I've written a couple codes this way, and it's not really any harder than doing pure MPI.
OTOH, you wouldn't be able to use more than 4 processors on it using just OpenMP (unless Quadrics does some funky shared-memory-between-boxes stuff I don't know about). To get larger processor counts for a purely OpenMP application, you'd need a large SMP or ccNUMA system like a Compaq GS320 (up to 32 CPUs), a Sun UE10k (up to 64 CPUs), or an SGI Origin (up to 512 CPUs).
Re:It has to be said... (Score:2)
When slashdot has been plagued by trolls for so long that a "classic troll remark" is funny because it's nostalgic, now THAT is pitiful.
Who's going to resurrect meept? You realize that eventually Natalie portman, grits, and stoning will all be classics too...
As much as some people hate them, slashdot ain't slashdot without the trolls.
Tera = Electronic Ton! (Score:2)
I would like to propose that we redesignate one thousand trillion bits as equal to one Electronic Ton. After all we have british tons, metric tons, even a volumetric ton. Why not an Electronic Ton? When you realize that 10 tera-tera (10*(10^16)^16) electrons actually weighs about a metric ton, it seems especially relevant!
Welcome to the age of the 1 ton computer! Next year I predict we'll all have half-ton palmpads!
Wow (Score:2)
ALG
Indeterminancy principle again! (Score:2)
Re:The point? (Score:2)
JUST number crunching? Scientific and medical research generate so much data that even this machine would never be able to process even the smallest fraction. There is always a need for number crunchers; they give us insights into the meaning of data (for example, the Human Genome project). Sure, they're sequenced it, but now they have to just "crunch numbers" in order to figure out where the genes are and find homologues in other organisms... but I guess that's not important. Neither is is analyzing protein folding and protein-ligand docking, because that's just "number crunching" and could never produce useful results...
I sincerely apologize for this rant, but I simply cannot stand the attitude of people who feel "if it can't play Quake[III/IV/XXX] at 200 fps, it's crap". (Although I will admit, if it's not Scottish, it's crap!). Computers do have uses for things other than looking at pretty pictures and splattering your buddy's insides all over a wall.
-------
Re:It has to be said... (Score:2)
"Evil beware: I'm armed to the teeth and packing a hampster!"
Re:C'mon guys... (Score:2)
SETI is a joke and a waste of computer time. Suppose that some alien culture did use radio waves for communication. Suppose they were oh, 100,000 light years away from us. That would mean they would have to have been using radio 100,000 years ago for us to get it, and then even when we did get it, would we be even recognize it as anything but noise? And if we did recognize it, what are the chances we could decode anything intelligible. Even if we did that, our info would be 100,000 years old. And all that is only if their planet is actually letting any radio waves out. Most of our noise is being abosrbed by the atmosphere, theirs might be more ionized than ours and reflect even more.
What the point? We are probably not alone, can't we just work on more relevant things and assume that there probably other beings out there and be content with that?
-
Remember Newsreels? (Score:2)
Just some random thoughts.
Quite a machine (Score:2)
hmmm... Compaq has shown interest in linux, i wonder what the OS will be? (anything but windows
Just in time (Score:3)
-Chris
It has to be said... (Score:3)
OK, Fire the moderation beam!
Funding? What funding? (Score:3)
NSF Awards $45 Million to Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center for "Terascale" Computing
Looking into the future, I can see the next one to be posted...
Project cancelled, following $48 million bill in bandwidth due to excessive setup movie download by 'Slashdot' readers
A look at the competition (Score:3)
The Japanese are carrying out an insanely ambitious [hoise.com] project,for a 640 node, 40 sustained TeraFlops computer, housed in a building the size of a large hockey arena. They call it the "Earth Simulator" and its main purpose is to carry out atmospheric/climatological research and simulations of the simmering ball of lava we live on (volcano and earthquake research).
Construction is in full swing now; hardware to come online first quarter 2001, software "will take a little longer".
More tech-oriented info here [jaeri.go.jp].
/.ed (Score:4)
Fun stuff to know: power usage (Score:5)
In Amsterdam (the Netherlands), no more computer-centers (e.g. co-locations where you can put your servers with a fast net connection) can be built because there is not enough power for them! Level 3 Communications [level3.com] has a co-location building there which is about 10.000 meters square (this is not as big as it sounds, it's just 100x100 m), filled up with ISPs servers and the like. This single building is actually using more energy than Schiphol airport (which is rather big - many trans-athlantic flights go through Schiphol. If you've ever been in the Netherlands you'll know)
They also have a diesel power generator that can power the entiry building in case of a blackout - it burns around 1000 liters (about 250 gallons or so) a day.