Solar Clothes 70
Ant sent this link to a story about solar-powered clothes, well, solar-powering, maybe. This may be the breakthrough we've been waiting for to convince computer geeks to spend some time in the sun.
Let's organize this thing and take all the fun out of it.
Re:Spend time in the sun? (Score:1)
you mean . . . (Score:2)
hawk, let down
Generic geek image. (Score:1)
Even though I myself don't get much sun when I hide away with my servers I usualy try to get some sun....
How long will it be before the surgeon general releases a warning about staying to long in the sun with your laptop
Don't compute in the sun, you might get cancer.
Outlet power is cancer-safe!
I think you get the point.
// yendor
--
It could be coffe.... or it could just be some warm brown liquid containing lots of caffeen.
Re:Just because you can . . . (Score:2)
Re:and yet.. (Score:2)
Re:Other uses (Score:2)
Re:This implies (Score:2)
Re:Other uses (Score:2)
Re:Other uses (Score:2)
Other uses (Score:2)
Re:sun? (Score:1)
---
Re:Spend time in the sun? (Score:1)
---
Got Zap? (Score:2)
Kevin Fox
--
Re:Just because you can . . . (Score:1)
Re:Other uses (Score:1)
This implies (Score:1)
<P>
<P>Americans... sheesh.
<P>
<P>Also, it sounds like these things are not going to work so well after a few cycles through the washer and dryer.
Re:This implies (Score:1)
questions... (Score:1)
(2) How light are they?
Efficiency? (Score:2)
Although I can see some advantages of having flexible solar arrays, some of the issues right now aren't so much the flexibility, as most arrays are flat parts which fold up. If you need to fit to a curved surface, you just use a series of smaller cells to approximate the surface, and then use a conformal coating as a sealant.
The issues that I see, however, is that they admit that these are less efficient, how large of an array are we going to need to get a useful amount of power? Last time I looked into it [1995 or so], agricultural solar cells were considered to be about 20-22% efficient. Hughes Electronics at the time had some that were 35% efficient, but you were looking at paying through the nose for 'em [US$100k per square meter worth, assuming you could find a supplier]
Looking at some current numbers [ise.fhg.de], it looks like these have a chance at being near 10% efficient. To take things into perspective, the typical solar car for the GM Sunrayce in 1995 had an 8 meter squared solar array, and produced at most 200W per square meter under optimal conditions. [Normally 100-150W]. If we assume that we're going to get 50W/meter from these clothes, we can compare them to a standard NiMH rechargable AA battery.
Looking at the battery stats on a very efficient [apple.com] laptop, you're looking at needing 10W to run it [50W*hr battery lasts 5hrs]. The Sony Vaio [sony.com] lists its power requirements as needing a peak of 49.5W. [A single battery is 1.8mAH@19.5V, so about 35W*hr, and lasts 2.5hr, so typical would be 14W draw].
Naturally, a larger, more feature rich portable would require more draw. Realistically, we might assume 20-30W. Which means we'd need 1/2 a meter squared of exposed surface. [about 775 sq in, or 5.4 sq ft]
So, based on these calculations, any of you skinny nerds are going to need to find a few more fat people wearing these shirts to sit next to you while you game.
[oh, and hey, it was 6 years ago when I was working on a solar car. My numbers may be off a bit, as I didn't get much sleep during those days]
and yet.. (Score:2)
Re:and yet.. (Score:2)
Re:Other uses (Score:2)
Whats the big deal? (Score:1)
Tom Green could make a solar rant out of this...solar on my hand, solar on my foot, solar on my bum, solar on my head! Yippee!
But...I think optically conductive clothes would be cool though. Especially if you could create a pattern of the fiber terminations, to go 180 degrees around the individual and come out on the other side. You should be able to get near phase coherent re-routing of the optical path. Or in laymans terms, invisibility.
Re:Sun,,,, (Score:1)
This is a more likely application, based on the efficiency issues already mentioned. Simply making the existing battery more effective and the resulting power delivery more efficient.
Re:Shocking! (Score:1)
Surprisingly, blow driers suck alot of power; 1500W in a pretty standard one. That's ALOT, more than some TV's, so powering a blow drier is no small feat. And I'm sure you know that TV's can most certainly electrocute you.
-----
"Goose... Geese... Moose... MOOSE!?!?!"
Re:Vitamin D (Score:1)
-----
"Goose... Geese... Moose... MOOSE!?!?!"
Re:I saw it on /. (Score:1)
Are you trying to be clever? I almost missed that one.
-----
"Goose... Geese... Moose... MOOSE!?!?!"
Re:pros and cons (Score:1)
Re:Hmm... (Score:1)
The article says the people who are involved with this admit they are a ways off so this is all what if hype. If they happen to hit a brick wall with this technology you probably won't see anything out of it but the concept and some of their research is interesting however.
Re: (Score:1)
Of course (Score:1)
Re:Hmm... (Score:1)
Re:Another idea.. (Score:1)
Please get your units right. A Watt is a Joule per second. A Joule is a unit of energy (J = N*m). The kilowatt-hour is (kJ/s)*h, where h is 3600 seconds (one hour). Dimensionally it is the same as kJ.
If the device is generating 100 watts, ie 100 Joules per second, then it will generate 100 watt-hours in an hour, or 0.1 kWh. In 10 hours it will generate 1 kWh, not kW/h.
kW/h is truly a bizarre unit; it's dimensionally identical to J/s^2, which looks like an acceleration of power consumption. So maybe one could say "the average power consumption in California over the past 5 years is increasing at a rate of 20 kW/h" (numbers made up). An annual rate seems more likely to be reported.
Besides, I don't think they're suggesting this for saving on your electricity, but rather for providing convenient electricity without batteries.
Re:Clothes that transform thermal energy (Score:1)
Sounds good, but it turns out from thermodynamics that the highest possible efficiency of turning heat into useful energy depends on the temperature of the hot and cold body. Specifically, the efficiency is
1 - Tl/Th
where Tl is the low temperature and Th is the high temperature, both in Kelvin (or Rankine, for you Americans). So if his body temperature is 37C or 310K, and the outside temperature is room temperature at 20C or 293K, the maximum efficiency is 0.05484 or about 5%. That's pretty bad. Even in a cold Canadian winter at -30C or 243K, the best is less than 22%. And we can't actually build anything that good, it's the theoretical maximum (Carnot efficiency).
So unless your friend likes working outside on really cold days, he won't get much energy output. Also keep in mind that at rest a human puts out about 80W, so even on this winter day he'll only get about 17.3 watts, which isn't enough to run a modern Intel chip.
Incidentally to convert Celsius to Kelvin add 273, and Farenheit to Rankine add 460.
Re:sun? (Score:1)
My mom is not a Karma whore!
sun? (Score:2)
My mom is not a Karma whore!
Doesn't make me want the sun. (Score:1)
And for $2 I can buy myself some new underware, and wear those while sitting in front of this computer in my basement.
I guess I'm just frugal(sp?)
Klowner
What about... (Score:1)
- a heating element (get burnt and electrocuted)
Actually, what I'm waiting for is to move past fbrics and onto other types of synthetics. You know the typical sci-fi concept that we'll go to this type of silicon molded armor / clothing?
Well, the obvious issue is that your skin won't be getting any fresh oxygen, unless you can fashion a material that is in some way changeably porous.
And yes I know that last paragraph was slightly o/t, but what the hell.
mick
Shocking! (Score:1)
Spend time in the sun? (Score:2)
Re:questions... (Score:1)
Re:Shocking! (Score:1)
Really, you're not going to get much power off of solar panels. Event the huge ones used for solar powered cars can barely power a blow drier. I doubt you're in any danger of being electrocuted.
rerun (Score:1)
Just because you can . . . (Score:4)
This isn't one of them.
I bet you could buy 1000 batteries for the price of one of these shirts (that ain't gonna survive 1000 washings).
PV shirts only curious, (Score:1)
Re:sun? (Score:1)
Re:sun? (Score:1)
Re:Spend time in the sun? (Score:1)
Did any moderators get this joke?
Re:Other uses (Score:1)
--
There is no K5 [kuro5hin.org] cabal.
Re:Other uses (Score:1)
--
There is no K5 [kuro5hin.org] cabal.
Re:More thoughts on this matter... (Score:1)
If you don't let any light into the washing machine, then there is no electricity.
The battery would have to be waterproof...
This fabric has no battery in it. It's a light-to-electricity converter, remember?
This might be a problem. I don't know. Does anybody have comments on this?
Sun,,,, (Score:1)
I goto sunny places, based soley on the fact that they are sunny. And have redhat offices.
Yes, redhat.
*loves Raleigh*
Anyways, I think that these fibers could have very real applications, but not nessc. as cloting. Think of this: a wristpad for a laptop that gathers power for it, to extend battery life!
Or as some have said, a beach umbrella that powers something.
Although the same could be accomplished with solar panels, solar panelss are bulky and inflexible, so fibers like this are a definite turn on to the inventive side of me.
*strides over to his drafting pc*
Mmmm.... possibilty goodness....
Re:Solar powered butt plugs (Score:1)
Re:Solar powered butt plugs (Score:1)
Re:Spend time in the sun? (Score:1)
Propeller heads (Score:1)
ThinkGeek [thinkgeek.com] does not have them - Slashdot [slashdot.org] should be ashamed!
Re:wow... (Score:1)
You know... (Score:1)
Bzzzzz!
pros and cons (Score:3)
You could do your work outdoors when sunny
You could play Quake outdoors when sunny
You could use your PC's @ the beach
You could set up a bikinicam @ the beach
You could do your banking outdoors
Power a fridge to cool your beer on the beach
Power your trailer (for all the trailer trah "folk")
California has finally found a fix for their issues
Cons:
You forget sundown time and work gets lost
You forget sundown and get fragged @ Quake
Your PC becomes filled with sand and useless
A sexy bikini chick kicks sand on your can fscking it up
You forget sundown and wire someone else all your money
A glitch turns your fridge into a heater so you suffer with warm beer
You could live in a trailer
Californian Power authority passes high taxes on solar powerd clothes
use the source luke!!! [antioffline.com]
uh? (Score:1)
/Geggibus "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
Another idea.. (Score:1)
This is either a 'not-very-effective' product, or I need to get out more.. I can't tell wich =)
Re:Shocking! (Score:1)
Re:and yet.. (Score:1)
one person in 100 has one arm
99 people have 2 arms
the average number of arms is 1.98
the average person has 2 arms
case and point
im drunk
Power supply for Wearable Electronics (Score:1)
You know, this could be just what the industry needs to go full steam ahead to research and develop wearable electronics. Right now they have wearable stuff but you have to carry a huge and heavy battery for the power, which doesn't last that long either. That really sucks. But now you can carry a smaller battery.. which will constantly recharge.
Levis and Philips have already developed a jacket which incorporates a mobile phone and MP3 player.. looking forward to strapping on a computer so i can play black and white on the train home.
I saw it on /. (Score:1)
And the brilliant minds that came up with those ideas will not be recieving royalty checks in the mail either. Nor will we be able to hack the fabric; I doubt those guys believe in open source.
What about solar powered circus tents. Now that is a bright idea. For all you corporate spies out there, I hereby patent that idea under the newly formulated Open Source Patent. And could you please make it run Apache too?
Re:Whats the big deal? (Score:1)
More thoughts on this matter... (Score:1)
Heck, if that's the case, then clothing wouldn't be viable at all. In order to get any really good sun exposure, you'd probably have to wear it as close to the coastline as possible within the tropics. There, it's really hot during midday, and you work up a sweat, which has the potential chance to come in contact with whatever form of battery the thing uses, and the next thing you know, you aren't really collecting any energy at all because the small amount that is actually being collected is discharging onto your sweat-covered body. Of course, that's a worst-case scenario, but it could very well turn into a potential legal battle if the tech actually becomes reality.
Re:More thoughts on this matter... (Score:1)
Hmm... (Score:2)
Irish Adaptation (Score:1)