Internet2 Update 112
fm6 writes "The MIT Technology Review has done a status report on Internet2, the bandwidth-intensive sequel to the Internet. What's really exciting is the way people are already using this technology: virtual nanomanipulation, online surgical procedures, even telepresence opera. Lots of interesting links."
Comming Soon! (Score:1)
I agree (Score:1)
i2 is not for The People, that's for sure.
--ybc
isn't anyone bothered by this? (Score:1)
Shouldn't we keep these two things seperate?
It's only a matter of time before someone dies due to lag and it's not going to be in an online game, I don't care how fast/stable a network is, it's gunna crash, just ask Microsoft right about now.
Re:What? (Score:2)
Yeah Right (Score:4)
What's the big deal? (Score:1)
Re:What's the big deal? (Score:1)
Re:What's the big deal? (Score:1)
Internet2 Update (Score:1)
The Internet2 Update will be happening tomorrow. Please reboot your computers tomorrow night.
---
ticks = jiffies;
while (ticks == jiffies);
ticks = jiffies;
Re:pr0n (Score:2)
so now I can suck down the entire contents
Yeah, right. If there's more bandwith, there will be more spam to sift through, and more articles to pull. And, that will only add to the missing parts. Unless there's a curve, you're unlikely to ever get a full feed.
---
ticks = jiffies;
while (ticks == jiffies);
ticks = jiffies;
Re:Preview of what's to come... (Score:2)
The technology is going to migrate to the normal internet, so the normal internet will be able to do all of this. The main difference right now is that the people on Internet2 have really good connections to it, while the people on the Internet generally don't. But they'll get good connections to the regular Internet, not good connections to Internet2.
The Internet grew so much for largely cultural reasons: people who had been on it in research and academic contexts left those contexts, but wanted to maintain their ties. So they figured out ways to get internet connections from other sources. Soon, the people they knew from other contexts wanted to interact the same way, and everyone was getting online. This won't happen with internet2, because everyone on it is likely to be on the normal internet. They'll just use that once they leave, possibly bringing their applications over if they can get the bandwidth.
After all, Internet2 is essentially the same thing as the regular internet, except with only two backbones and few non-experimental programs.
I need the I2 (Score:1)
Based upon preliminary projections, within a year, the linux kernel will be approximately 1.2GB for the newest version's source code. And since I have to get the newest version the day it comes out, my DSL won't cut it.
Plus, there's all the porn. The luscious, high quality porn. Since it's an acedemic network, does that mean the porn will be free?
Re:But does it have the Amazing X-10 Camera? (Score:1)
Re:What's the big deal? (Score:1)
Re:Preview of what's to come... (Score:2)
If ever a line needed to be preserved, say as someone's sig file...
Re:Telephone symphonies (Score:2)
Not for those of us who worked at stations where the network news and the high school football games were piped to the studio over lines leased from the telephone company.
Also, years ago (pre-WWII) there were juke boxes where you chose your selection and it was played at a remote location and sent to your location over a telephone line.
and of course... (Score:1)
QoS abuse (Score:2)
Also, QoS only currently works on private IP networks - there is no way of billing QoS traffic used to a user or content provider at present in the Internet, and this is unlikely to happen given that QoS has taken a long time to take off even in private networks.
Each customer of a service provider offering a QoS service buys a certain amount of Voice, Premium, Standard and Best Effort traffic (to use some common names for classes of service) for each site, e.g. 1 Mbps of Voice and 2 Mbps of Premium for their New York office. The provider won't let them send more than 1 Mbps of traffic from that site marked as Voice, i.e. it 'polices' the traffic against the customer contract for that site.
This means that any QoS abuse would be limited to that customer's QoS service, and would have NO extra impact on the network compared to normal customer usage of QoS.
If you have proper security, both email abuse and QoS abuse can be prevented - since QoS abuse would be much more costly to the customer (by stopping business applications from working over the network), it would be stamped on much more quickly. But, like voicemail and toll fraud, it will probably always happen - it's a question of preventing as much as possible, and detecting and stopping it as quickly as possible when it does happen, as Bruce Schneier has been saying for a while.
Re:Security? (Score:1)
Re:Preview of what's to come... (Score:2)
It already is. It's called college. :-)
Re:Security? (Score:2)
Re:Security? (Score:1)
-B
Re:Security? (Score:1)
-B
Gnomes are fun (Score:1)
You open up a single screen theater in a real estate sparse section of downtown where a dot com used to have its headquarters. You get a digital projector and a fibre line hooked up. You can download Disney or Dreamworks latest and greatest animated musical tearjerker directly from the studio to play during the day. That night you switch to that summer's blockbuster you downloaded the other night and stored on a disk array. For the late showings you put on a cult classic that draws a modest but frequest crowd of college kids and twenty somethings. You make good returns and respectable margins because you've cut the cost of the film print out of the equation. Costs now for such a setup might be high but in a world where both these technologies are commonplace the costs are affordable.
Re:Typical American Internationalism (Score:2)
When exactly did it become a requirement that the US include other counties in every research project it does? Quit whining, you'll still benefit from the results eventually.
Re:OT: Appropriate name in this article (Score:2)
--
Re:Heh... (Score:2)
--
Re:Costs (Score:1)
Re:Costs (Score:1)
AOL2 (Score:1)
I2 is a joke, and will be for 5-10+ years (Score:1)
Oh crap -- data with priority flags (Score:2)
And you think the spam is bad now? From the article:
It doesn't matter what criteria are used to decide what's high-priority, spammers will find a way to abuse it. All of their email will suddenly become "absolutely the highest priority ever," squashing yours, and if some rules like "real-time video takes priority over email" are tried, well, now you have television commercials squashing out oeverything else.
Give high-priority rights to select organizations like hospitals? Only works until the professional spammers buy their way in, or just flat out forge the keys.
Sorry, I'm in a bad mood right now. Just got more spam. There isn't a single useful thing that we in the CS community can come up with that some cocksucking marketer can't abuse.
Re:Oh crap -- data with priority flags (Score:2)
Re:segregation. (Score:1)
At least that would be my answer to this question...
Typical American Internationalism (Score:1)
In June, the consortium announced it now had member universities in all 50 states.
Oh, well then. Everything important is covered. Great!
Re:Preview of what's to come... (Score:1)
Re:I2 is a joke, and will be for 5-10+ years (Score:2)
The technology, not the network (Score:2)
Fun with Topics (Score:1)
A Time Machine
History of the Future
The Fast Lane
Across the Universe
To Infinity... and Beyond
Nano a Nano
Cyber Collaboration
The Abdominal Showman *- my favorite
You Are There... Almost
Work Trek: The Next Generation *- runner-up
Reality Programming
A Question of Quality
May the Market Force Be with You
Yeah but... (Score:3)
internet2 gold mine (Score:2)
Re:The key point... (Score:1)
Costs (Score:1)
What I use I2 for (Score:2)
What I use I2 for:
Quake 3 Arena.
Fibre's to Avoid (Score:2)
I'm told that wool fibres are very poor at getting speeds above a typical dial-up connection. Hemp fibres reportedly max out at sub-ISDN speeds. ;)
Re:Not internet 2 I think (Score:1)
Re:Security? (Score:1)
For all intensive purposes however everything is the same.
Re:OT: Appropriate name in this article (Score:2)
Re:Heh... (Score:1)
Re:segregation. (Score:1)
What I want to know is why should universites and such start a whole new internet when the money could be better spend upgrading current hardware. the Internet2 is fine and dandy, but it's really just an extension of the internet(1) and we should upgrade speeds to that of internet2 with our existing hardware.
The current Internet and the protocols used to support communication, transfers etc have serious flaws. Internet v1 wasn't designed to do what we're using it for. Upgrading the current protocols to support things like security, authentication, etc is no small task. There are millions of users around the world using countless different devices. Adding security features to IP (unless we're encapsulating protocol levels) requires a change to the standard and rewrite of everyone's communication software.
New Internet = what we're all dreamed about (new design & start from scratch)
Re:and of course... (Score:2)
Telephone symphonies (Score:1)
This may be off-topic, but what is funny is that one of the original supposed "killer applications" for telephones by mr. Bell et al, was listening to symphonies using telephone. I mean, the idea was that people could listen to real live mysic played by trained symphony orchestras, "broadcasted" by telephone lines.
It now sounds ridiculous, of course, because of the low sound quality and all, but I guess they were both imaginative (innovative? or is that (tm) by BillySoft?) and desperate for marketing stuff, even back then. Similar to how things like "videophones", "speech input", "3d UI", "video-on-demand" and such are being pushed all the time, even though apprarently few people really want or need them (see Jakob Nielsen's inteview for references on "speech input" and "3d UI", if you think I'm just trolling... he has good reasoning about their problems... they are sexy, but they will only have niches, if even that).
The First Mile needs upgrading! (Score:1)
I have a cable modem.
My ISP doesn't cap my download rates.
You know what 2MBp/s is like on a residential line? Let me tell you, its SWEET!
I can stream 640x480 VHQ QuickTime Video (Very High Quality). I don't even know how high of quality MPEG4 I could stream.
Oh wait, yes I do, DVD quality, thats what! For that matter, I could stream TWO DVD quality movies right on down my line. No reason as to why not, its about a 1gig file for a DVD quality movie (depending on the person doing the judgment of quality of course) in MPEG4. I can download 640megs in under 10 minutes. 2 hours? Heh, easy.
Oh wait.
No online sites GIVE me that type of bandwidth on a regular basis. I can easily take up an entire T1 line (T1s are obsolete now days anyways, their bandwidth goes almost nowheres), and shoot, even a T3 can only handle a very few cable modem users.
OC3 anyone? Even OC3s could not handle the types of crowds that a multimedia website would have to draw in order to sustain itself (if it ever could with the banner ad market being like it is).
Yes, the backbones are crowded, but that is really not even the largest problem. Shit, more backbones can be made easily. @Home has taken this approuch, I get a ping of 30 all up and down the west coast. Shit, there are days when I do not get pings that low on my own LAN.
Why not redefine the networks structure instead? Rather then havine one, two, or even three sites to get a file from, why not have local access hubs where all major multimedia content is stored and passed on to the users requesting it? After all, if 10,000 users on the west coast are requesting the same multimedia stream from Dnver, why not just send that media stream to a local west coast access point and then didstribute it to the consumers from there? You'd likely have to have multiple access points, not just one for the entire west coast would do it, but 2 or 3 would for the coastal states.
Hell, think about it. You'd have less data going across the main pipelines, and the local access points would be distributing the same amount of data if they where just large regional routing centers anyways. (I'm thinking of using the GigaPOPs obviously). The distribution centers would not have reason to charge any sort of money for their service (it could just be implemented as part of the routers) since technicaly they would not be using up any more resources then they would otherwise be using up under the current system. It's like multicasting, but ISPs would actualy cooperate! (yah right).
Shit, getting the data from the distribution point to the end user would then be a cinch. If ISPs do their job correctly (once again, another
'yah right') then their local networks should not be too clogged up. Any half assed broadband provider should at least be offering their consumers 2048kbit service, which is actualy a mere 256KBp/s. While DSL users are pretty much fucked on this one, those of us out there enjoying more lucritive services would be quite happy with the service presented to us.
The first mile has a bandwidth blockage folks. Bigging fatter wires running around isn't going to solve the problem forever. If you can make it so that you don't need quite so many bigger fatter wires, then you have partialy elivated the problem for the long term. After all, a permanite reduction in need, is, well, very -very-long term.
That
and I want
really really -really- fucking want
my high ass end DVD quality videos.
Fuck.
its the 21st century.
I didn't get my flying cars, or my talking intelligent robots, or even a colony on the moon (not to mention mars).
I at least want a fucking video on my computer that I don't have to illegialy pir@te from some source, or that isn't an old 60's B movie. For fucks sake, I have the bandwidth NOW GIVE ME MY DAMN ENTERTAINMENT!
Re:The First Mile needs upgrading! (Score:1)
Quite frankly I don't care if its acronyme is R.A.P.E (not that -ANY- program would -EVER- use that as an acro,
Internet2 vs. SuperJANET4 (Score:2)
Readers of a UK bent might be interested in the latest upgrade to JANET [ja.net], the Joint Academics Network. This is the primary backbone supplier to (all?) Universities and (some) Further Education Colleges in the UK.
SuperJANET4 [superjanet4.net] currently has a 2.5Gbps SDH optical backbone, rising to 20Gbps in 2002 using DWDM. At various points across the contry are JANET Connection Points (JCPs) to which Metroplitan Area Networks (MANs) are connected: these MANs then supply the universities with bandwidth. These MANs are being upgraded in concert with JANET - the London MAN, as an example, is moving to a 2.5Gbps backbone, with 100Mbps feeds to individual universities.
QoS was a key factor in designing the network and thus the routers chosen (Cisco 12016s and 12008s) support Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) (see RFC 2702 [faqs.org] for why this is good for QoS) amongst other QoS features.
JANET's link to the rest of the internet is being upgraded too, with 2.5Gbps of external bandwidth and 622Mbps transatlantic bandwidth - to Internet2.
In the past, the UK academic community has been on the ball with internetworking - from the invention of packet-switched data networks (1967) and the first ARPAnet node outside the US at University College London (1974) to one of the earliest and largest (and still very large) deployments of web caching with Squid (the JANET webcache [ja.net]). Not to mention that the web was invented by a British academic... (although he was working in Switzerland at the time... does that count? :p )
If only our commercial managers were as bright... then we wouldn't have The Great British Broadband Farce. :)
Hmmm, now can I steal 802.11 wireless from my local university? I'm sure they'd never notice now
Bill Gates manhood confirmed ! (Score:1)
Thanks to Internet2, scientists have used the nanoManipulator to conduct experiments as far away as Redmond
"I can reproduce !" he said, "and I will !"
scary...
Namephreaks (Score:2)
__
Apples and Oranges (Score:2)
__
Slashdot2 (Score:1)
segregation. (Score:1)
Re:I2 is a joke, and will be for 5-10+ years (Score:1)
Fiber in my house, what to look for? (Score:2)
Actually, it is quite realistic to get some optical fibers in the house around here now, and I'm considering it.
It will require a fair amount of digging ditches, and you wouldn't want to dig ditches too often, so I have to make sure that what I put in those ditches won't need to be upgraded for many years to come.
So, pretending this is "Ask Slashdot", what are the pitfalls?
Are there certain types of fibre I should stay away from, certain things that would prohibit me from going higher than say, 100Mbits/s, or certain things that will make the physical infrastructure incompatible with everything else?
Ah, bandwidth at the Roque de los Muchachos (Score:3)
Oh, that's really great! I've been at that site three times (the NOT [not.iac.es]), and the net connection from the mountain is really bad. It sure needs a lot of improvement. I know they've had some tests where the NOT has been remotely controlled, but it is not for mainstream use. The problem is that you sometimes need to download the picture at once after readout to decide what you should do for the next exposure, but on a slow connection, you will waste a lot of very valuable observing time waiting for an image to download. A typical image is 2048x2048 pixels, 16 bits, pluss header information. Hope we get a bit of that bandwidth the GTC [gtc.iac.es] is getting... :-) I've been on the construction site when it was just being dug out.
dept. (Score:1)
Re:Not internet 2 I think (Score:1)
can I self-moderate (0, Dumbass)?
Not internet 2 I think (Score:2)
Re:Preview of what's to come... (Score:1)
For their part, John Hopkins will blah blah blah...
The school's name is Johns Hopkins. Sorry to be so anal, but I'm programmed to respond that way whenever anyone calls it "John" Hopkins, being a native Marylander. For this same reason, any mention of Indianapolis causes me to say that the city sucks. ;)
----------
Real Usages (not porn). (Score:2)
Politicians don't understand that it isn't a matter of how much bandwith you use, it's how much you need to have avaiable to do certain things.
Typical quote: "Just look you guessed only used 5% of your bandwith last month." Yeah, but when we use it, we use it ALL!
Sigh. Anyway, I2 is great. People are just really getting turned on to the possibilities. Me, being on the technical side of things, where I use to make a phone call and talk to other universities about major technical problems/issues, now we get together and have teleconferences.
Fix the contents servers first ! (Score:2)
I work as a System Management Unit leader for one of the biggest Swiss companies.
I administer big -public oriented- servers which have to handle hundreds/thousands? Of https simultaneous connections.
I just consider how responsive some of our Top End (E10K, HP, AIX) servers are during the rush hours (whether I access these with my home cable connection or from the company's local - Gigabyte - network, I hardly see any difference...)...
If they want to make it faster, then they'll have to upgrade all the servers, replace the Broadvision shit with some real application framework, replace the Frontpage coders with professional coders who know how painful it si to connect through a 2400bauds modem and then they might get something.
When we'll be on the Internet2, we might not notice any real difference under strict conditions until the providers themselves upgrade.
Maybe they'll have to wait some more to make it carry television streams or voice/IP.
--
Re:Oh crap -- data with priority flags (Score:1)
I would think the priorities would be channel-assigned. For instance, if I head over to Slashdot, a channel is opened, with the ad being highest priority (to make sure I see it), the text being next highest, and finally the images. Other, graphics intensive sights could make the graphics a higher priority.
But, I could assign the whole Slashdot channel a lower priority than the email channel.
But you are right - I'm thinking as a programmer, trying to come up with solutions rather than deal with the underlying problem, which is that, as you said,
I think the researchers realize this, and simply want to put into the protocols some way that the tele-conference surgery gets higher priority than the pron or the spam. Good luck.Re:Preview of what's to come... (Score:2)
That's OK - I'm anal as well - I'd even say thank you, if Slashdot allowed us to make spelling corrections to previous posts...
BTW, interesting Sig. I forget the terms from logic, but is the corollary that if someone's sig is intellegent, that they are intellegent?
Preview of what's to come... (Score:4)
Just look - Internet2 is restricted to academics and researchers, just like the old Internet was restricted to universities and government researchers. It's being used for collaboration and "what-if" scenarios, and most that are currently involved have a good idea who the others are. They are even practicing high culture, trying out live colaborative opera.
And in a few years, it will be opened up to the public. It will become 3-D Porn, obnoxious teenagers who can't spell, bad music being traded all around, pop-up adds with full symphonic sound, and all the original users will complain about all the newbies...
Re:The key point... (Score:4)
But they also have the lessons learned over the last 15 years or so of the commercial internet...
The folks that turned the web over to the world probably had no idea what would happen. Who would have thought that pretty pictures and design would be more important than content? That marketers would plague the web with spam, banner ads, and pop-ups? Who would have guessed that it would eventually have to carry live video? Who would have predicted the backlash against blinking text?
They can watch the original Internet, and plan a little to make sure they encourage good uses and discourage bad ones. For instance, they are optimizing it so "important" things get transfered more reliably than "unimportant" things, and are trying to make it work before the world gets it's hands on it.
Just a few of the possible areas for improvement:
Smarter IP addressing, both for increased number space and to help out routers (geographically based top-level numbers?)
Basic Protocols that are written assuming hacking attempts rather than optimized for sharing information
Priority transmission for time-critical applications (such as surgery).
Low-level broadcast protocols.
Micro- or Macro-payment support.
Better business models by design.
Your favorite extension here
I, for one, think it's a good thing - develop the next generation, in a real prototype state, get it 95% there, then unleash the world on it. When that's done, start on the next next-generation Internet.
We need reasons to buy more expensive hardware, anyway...
Re:Preview of what's to come... (Score:5)
I can see it now...
QUAKE 6: TELE-SURGERY ANNOUNCED
John Carmack took some time off from crusing the Autobahn for a Intenet2 Virtual Conference to announce Quake 6 (subtitled Tele-Surgery), for release in Q1, 2010.
Hallmarked as the first collaboration between a game company and a medical university, the game promises to fully realize the potential of the new Internet2 to both allow long-distance research as well as teenager-oriented ultra-violence.
For their part, John Hopkins will benefit from the improved human models introduced in Quake 5, with their fully realized internal organ structure. They will also benefit from the thousands-strong mod community, which constantly updates the Quake models for better representation of the human body. These improved representations will allow medical students to practice their craft on virtual humans, rather than cadavers or live patients.
Said one student, "I know it's extracurricular, but I'm looking forward to disecting the Jar-Jar Binks model."
For their part, ID software will get live updates from actual surgeries, to help make gibs look even better in real-time. They will also get access to the unused cadavers, for "modeling, modification, and shot-reaction research", as one programmer stated. When asked about zombie-research, the programmer stated "No Comment."
Columbine parents stated they would proactively sue the game company for future school shooting incidents by current pre-adolescents. ID lawyers stated they will not settle, but instead take it to court. "By the time this suit gets through appeals, the children in question will be in medical school, inspired into a career in medicine by an early exposure to the human body. Time will prove us correct."
At the end of the press conference, Carmack added "No, it won't run on your system."
Really really fast! (Score:1)
The minimum connection speed is a blistering 155 megabits per second-a hundred times faster than a typical university lab connection and almost 3,000 times faster than a dial-up modem.
Wow, maybe some of those universities need to upgrade their LocalTalk, or whatever they wired their labs with... I hear there's a new 10 megabits per second standard called "Ethernet" that's coming out of DEC really soon now.
Online surgical procedures? (Score:2)
From the article ... (Score:3)
That's a pretty good firewall, it prevents evil h4x0rs from damaging the equipment by overheating with those dangerous infrared files.
Re:Security? (Score:1)
marketers. (Score:2)
There isn't a single useful thing that we in the CS community can come up with that some cocksucking marketer can't abuse.
i need that on a t shirt. maybe for the next meeting i have with the pr team.
--saint----
Re:Yeah Right (Score:1)
Dark fiber. (Score:3)
Of course that doesn't take into account the geographical separation of the human species and that the chromatic dispersion increases dramatically over even short distances. All 6.5B of us would have to live within a few kilometers of each other. Too crowded for my taste. More can be found at SciAm [sciam.com] and at a previous Slashdot story [slashdot.org]
It's not the ends, it's the middle (Score:1)
The problem's not at the ends, either server or receiver, it's the middle, where most people live in areas where we all go through a 300 kb/s max speed pipe. Until we get good relays and fat pipes, which is what Internet2 is all about, the real difference between the next-to-lowest speed of DSL and the highest speed is virtually nil, unless it's locally cached or served, cause it has to get there first.
And this is where the priority bits in IPv6 become useful - we can have high, mid, and low priority - and I'm hoping spam gets 0 priority, so I can buy a service where only 1 or higher priority packets arrive at my destination
What? (Score:1)
Firsts. (Score:1)
Fear it, even if it's probably way too late at this point.
Heh... (Score:1)
Re:Not internet 2 I think (Score:1)
Re:Not internet 2 I think (Score:1)
Re:Telephone symphonies (Score:1)
Rebuilt from the ground up (Score:2)
---
OT: Appropriate name in this article (Score:5)
You've got to be kidding me. There's an astronomer named "Telesco"? I'm surprised they didn't interview a chemist named Fred Hydrocarbo.
Elementary Schools? (Score:2)
Pretty soon little Bobby is going to come home and announce that he has a better internet connection at school than his dad, who is a M$ employee, has at work.
We can't even get IPV6 ! (Score:2)
Proudling notifying! (Score:2)
I'm very proud to notify you that here in Brazil we are also using internet, not only for teleconference, but also to telepresence. Including medical telepresence, experiences with surgical telepresence, and also multimedia transmition. All with colaboration with Brazilian and foreing colleges and universities(including american ones)
It's very nice to see Brazilian technologies walking side by side with the world.
The key point... (Score:5)
Though these backbones are similar to those on the commercial Internet, only about three million users can access Internet2, versus several hundred million on the public Net.
Almost all the benefit (including the workability of QOS) comes from the fact that they have limited who has access to the network and thus have a much higher signal-to-noise ratio. It's the internet culture of the late nineteen eighties, running on the hardware of the early two thousand naughts.
-- MarkusQ
Re:Preview of what's to come... (Score:2)
While I agree Internet2 technology will be open to the public, it won't be available in a few years. A few decades is more realistic. Hell, most people still can't get the full benefits of the current infrastructure. About 95% of Internet users are connected by 56K (or lower) modems. The infrastructure for DSL and cable (1 - 10 Mbps) is by no means complete, never mind one for 100+ Mbps. From the article: "Right now about 95 percent of U.S. netizens access the Internet using 56K modems; upgrading the public infrastructure to achieve 10,000 times that level of performance could take decades."
While I would love to surf Internet2: Revenge of the Nerds, I realistically won't be able to for quite a while.
Apologizing in advance if I sound like a whiny bitch,
More Xtreme? (Score:5)
But then again, sequels usually suck.
Security? (Score:3)
Already used in Finland (Score:2)
I failed to find any hard data regarding the speed of Internet 2, but I have been told that the FUNET-network in Finland is already as fast as Internet 2 is, and has been for some time now.
http://www.csc.fi/suomi/funet/verkko.html.engoatse.cx II- The Revenge (Score:2)
Ahh, but how's the virtual tittymanipulation? What else is the net good for but bomb recipes and yak pr0n?
Which will matter first? (Score:3)
Oh, fyi, since I mention it, here's where you can find more about DWDM:
http://www.ericsson.com/technology/DWDM.shtml
http://www.atmdigest.com/WDMResources.htm
http://www.iec.org/tutorials/dwdm/
Tom