Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Technology

US Army to Try Out New, Anime-based Uniforms 477

Posted by michael from the engage-cloaking-device dept.
PenguinRadio writes "This is being reported in a few places, most notably USA Today which has an article about the US Army teaming up with MIT to develop a new nanotechnology-based outfit for our soldiers that can detect bio hazards, injury, and other funky things. The 5 year, $50 million grant also wants to look at bending light around the uniform to create some sort of invisibility." CNET has another story. The Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies has its own web page, of course.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

US Army to Try Out New, Anime-based Uniforms More

US Army to Try Out New, Anime-based Uniforms

Comments Filter:
  • Didn't I see this in the Final Fantasy Movie?

  • Anime? (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 14, 2002 @03:59PM (#3164279)
    Hmm.. What does Anime have to do with any of this? Are Slashdot editors hoping that female soldiers will be outfitted with scantily-clad, breast-hugging Anime style getups?

    • Re:Anime? (Score:4, Funny)

      by susano_otter ( 123650 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:06PM (#3164343) Homepage
      Did you look at the artist's rendition? The guy is clearly ripping off Masamune Shirow. And the actual suit concepts (which are really unrelated to the artist's rendition) aren't that much different from the hard Japanese SF anyway.

      But seriously, look at the gun in that picture. It's obviously a Seburo!

      • Re:Anime? (Score:5, Funny)

        by Rimbo ( 139781 ) <[rimbosity] [at] [sbcglobal.net]> on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:34PM (#3164562) Homepage Journal
        Not only does the picture look like something out of anime, but there's also the issue of the gravity-defying D-cup breasts in the picture, long a staple of anime SF. This artist watched too much Bubblegum Crisis or Ghost in the Shell.

        But it brings up an interesting thought sort of in-line with the last line of the C|Net article. Imagine having a troop of women wearing these things dealing with issues in the Middle East, where women are second-class citizens. "Tell me to be subservient now, willya?" blam blam blam... It's no big thing for a woman to be a good fighter to Westerners, but in the Middle East, talk about adding insult to injury... You're not only getting killed, but you're getting killed by seemingly invicible warriors protected by armor and endowed with superhuman abilities, but by squads of seemingly invincible, armored, superhuman women.

        Too awesome.

        • Re:Anime? (Score:2, Funny)

          by Sri Lumpa ( 147664 )
          but in the Middle East, talk about adding insult to injury... You're not only getting killed, but you're getting killed by seemingly invicible warriors protected by armor and endowed with superhuman abilities, but by squads of seemingly invincible, armored, superhuman women.

          Yeah, but they won't care because they won't know because they will be invisible anyway (now if only the clothes could be invisible that may keep their mind away from the battle).

    • Ghost in the Shell is probably what the author was referring to. The heroine in the flick has some sort of funky overcoat that turns her invisible, but for some unknown reason she only wears it when naked.

      Well, OK, we know what the real reason is (fanboys), but just try to go with the whole suspension of disbelief thing.

      • re: Anime? (Score:2, Informative)

        by Khan Fused ( 446871 )
        ... that wasn't a chameleon-suit overcoat. That was *HER* that could blend with the background. Hence, the nudity.

        Hence, the fanboys sitting very close to the large-screen TV's with drool-sponges in front of them.
    • It sure looks that way if you check out the pictures...

    • Re:Anime? (Score:2, Funny)

      by Indras ( 515472 )
      Only if the female uniforms come complete with a cat tail attached to the back of the pants...

    • Re:Anime? (Score:5, Funny)

      by An Onerous Coward ( 222037 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:41PM (#3164610) Homepage
      As someone who has actually been in the Army, this is something we very definitely do not want. Any pleasure derived from seeing certain military type women scantily clad must be weighed against the risk of, well, seeing certain other military type women scantily clad.

      In the end, the reward just isn't worth the risk.

  • How Are These Anime-Based? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by John_Booty ( 149925 ) <johnbooty@b[ ]yp ... g ['oot' in gap]> on Thursday March 14, 2002 @03:59PM (#3164284) Homepage
    You see this sort of thing (powered and/or cloaking exosuits) in anime, but you also see it in every other walk of science fiction too. ex: Starship Troopers, every other comic book ever published, etc, etc.

    Neither of the articles mentions anime either. I'm just wondering where the "anime" reference in the article title came from. Left field, apparently, unless I missed something! (which is entirely likely)
    • ...Besides, if they were really ANIME-based, these suits would be easily pilotable by 13 year-olds.

      In fact, they'd probably be pilotable ONLY by 13-year olds, as the result of some plot twist!

    • Re:How Are These Anime-Based? (Score:5, Funny)

      by ghostlibrary ( 450718 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:04PM (#3164324) Homepage Journal
      It's anime-like because, in combat, the two sides will simply hang back and stare at each other for a while. Then both will fire off everything they have with explosive fury. When the dust settles... both sides will still be standing, but the collateral damage to the area will be _huge_ and there will be massive civilian casualties.

      Oh, wait, that's how modern military actions are now. Alas.

    • Look at the article, specifically, the artist's depiction.
    • Obviously this is a BAD IDEA, because some soldier's cloaking device will fail, he will be killed by some pathetic little humanoid and he will end up taking out a square mile with a thermo-nuclear explosion.

      Or worse, he will be killed and we will have to give a primitive weapon to his killer as a trophy and abandon the planet.

    • Re:How Are These Anime-Based? (Score:5, Informative)

      by reemul ( 1554 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:23PM (#3164495)
      Well, since most of the folks on here apparently only know Starship Troopers from the suckass movie - where they not only aren't in armor, they don't even have long sleeved shirts - I'm glad at least someone made the connection. Robert Heinlein *invented* the idea of powered armor in that book. Anime may have borrowed it, but it was RAH who started it all.

      Though the artist rendering does demonstrate what sorts of comic books that guy reads. At least he didn't do the female version, with breasts each bigger than the helmet. Too bad the artist missed the important point that with nano-scale materials, the suit could funtion while still being flexible enough that you wouldn't need those multi-part joints, which are only needed in bulky or rigid materials. But it looked cool.

      -reemul
      • At least he didn't do the female version, with breasts each bigger than the helmet.

        Look at the picture again. It may not have helmet-size breasts, but I definately see an armored boob.

  • old news (Score:3, Funny)

    by kb3edk ( 463011 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @03:59PM (#3164285)
    We Metal Gear fans have long known that stealth camo and nanomachines became standard equipment for FoxHound operatives in 1995. "Find... Big Boss! Destroy... Outer Heaven!"

  • Power? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by beninkster ( 519179 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:00PM (#3164291)
    How do they plan to power these things???

    Army trained hamster powered generators carried in backpacks perhaps? ;-)

  • Anime-Based? (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward
    That's funny, neither article makes any sort of mention about anything regarding anime.

    Oh, it must be that Slashdot editorial style. "Well, that picture looks sort of like something vaguely reminiscent of anime. OH! I KNOW! The uniforms are ANIME-BASED!"

    Sheesh. And I bet they wonder why subscriptions aren't as high as they expected.
    • What's funny is your inability to detect sarcasm or verbal irony.

      Of course the suits aren't based on anime... They are just a lot like what appears -in- anime. Evoking the image these DARPA researchers were sitting around in the lab watching Ghost in the Shell to get ideas for new weaponry is humor through ridiculousness. The straight-man presentation of the headline is just good delivery.

      Damn. If you couldn't get that, I bet you can't -stand- someplace that does that all the time, like the Register. Bet you send them email about every headline "Hey, your headline is not a true representation of what the article is about! And what's all this about 'outing'?"

  • 50 mil... a good start I guess (Score:4, Insightful)

    by the_consumer ( 547060 ) <slash@@@smitty...mailshell...com> on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:00PM (#3164295) Homepage
    Hate to say it, but most new technologies don't seem to get very far until the pentagon decides they're useful. Hopefully this will prime the pump of a nanotech industrial revolution.
  • ...also wants to look at bending light around the uniform to create some sort of invisibility

    Finally, the goodness of a second-class Arnold movie makes it's way into the military!! Now it's just a matter of time until we're cuttin' peoples heads off with extendible boomerang blade thingies ala P2.

  • Bend Light (Score:2, Funny)

    by KingKire64 ( 321470 )
    The army is gearing up for the Predator invasion if we too are invisable we shall have the upperhand... Buwahahahaha

  • Not science fiction? (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Gabrill ( 556503 )
    Can even show proof of concept beyond an artist's rendition?

  • Power Suits (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Mad Man ( 166674 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:03PM (#3164312)
    I didn't realize that Starship Troopers (1960) or Predator (1987) were anime.

  • re: 5-year MIT program (Score:5, Funny)

    by bob_clippy ( 562460 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:04PM (#3164320)
    Supercharged shoes could release energy when soldiers jump, propelling them over a 20-foot wall.

    Put me down for $100 on MIT for the 2007 NCAA torney.

  • I don't buy it. Maybe *maybe* detectors on one side can replicate detectors from the other, but it can't be omnidirectional... you'd have one side "invisible" but only from one direction. Not very effective....

    • Comment removed (Score:4, Funny)

      by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:10PM (#3164380)
      Comment removed based on user account deletion
      • Reminds me of a great fantasy series...

        in the series (Recluse series by LE Modersett JR) the "good guys" can magickly bend light around them so hey you can travel without being seen.... but you can't see a dang thing either :-)

  • Is this really a good thing (Score:5, Funny)

    by Spit_Fire1 ( 247104 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:05PM (#3164335)
    Supercharged shoes could release energy when soldiers jump, propelling them over a 20-foot wall.
    -What happens after the wall, is there also a parachute, or are you just supposed to land after your 20 foot fall.

    Micoreactors could detect bleeding and apply pressure.
    -So that the enemies crackers can cut off circulation in battle to help their side

    Light-deflecting material could make the suit blend in with surroundings.
    -So that the number of soilders hurt or killed by friendly fire increases.

    MIT's research centers had been working on nanotechnology ideas long before getting involved with the Army, but not with military applications in mind.
    -Isn't that how it always happens, soon the MIT reasercher will make a peace time achievment award.

    • I find it pretty funny that evidently the budgeteers were taken in by all of this rhetoric, but slashdot readers can spot the flaws in a matter of minutes...

      Mind you, it's not ALL bad - spinoff technologies from the otherwise flashy and unlikely projects might actually turn out to be useful (presumably the idea is that the shoes would then somehow absorb the impact to "recharge" after the jump, which doesn't seem too practical on a human being, but might have applications elsewhere in mechanical engineering, and the "fake blood" they come up with to test the pressure suits might turn out to have medical uses, and so on).

      This probably isn't the most cost-effective way to GET to those spinoffs, but what can you do?...

    • Spit_Fire1 intoned. . .

      Supercharged shoes could release energy when soldiers jump, propelling them over a 20-foot wall.
      -What happens after the wall, is there also a parachute, or are you just supposed to land after your 20 foot fall.

      A mini-parachute is a possibility, auto-deploying and auto-retracting. 20-foot falls aren't that bad, any paratrooper makes those all the time. Perhaps an auto-extending grapple-cord combo that quickly lowers you to the ground. . .

      Micoreactors could detect bleeding and apply pressure.
      -So that the enemies crackers can cut off circulation in battle to help their side

      Assuming they CAN crack each individual suit, which would likely have its' own highly encrypted control override code. . . .can you say megabit RSA keypairs ???

      Light-deflecting material could make the suit blend in with surroundings.
      -So that the number of soilders hurt or killed by friendly fire increases.

      Ever hear of IFF ??? Or perhaps beaconing on an obscure wavelength that is specially "watched" for and enhanced on the visor display ???

      MIT's research centers had been working on nanotechnology ideas long before getting involved with the Army, but not with military applications in mind.
      -Isn't that how it always happens, soon the MIT reasercher will make a peace time achievment award.

      Military research often drives initial technology development. Transistors and microchips were developed for military purposes, for military satellites and suchlike... this is no different from a common pattern in research. . . .

    • 1) If the nanotech is any good, it can absorb energy from a landing (by cascading stiffness up the armor, and allowing the armor to take the pressure without crushing the guy inside) after a fall of much more than 20 ft. Also, I have jumped off of second stories of buildings higher than that often, and 20 ft. isn't THAT much to land from (especially if you know how to land decently.)

      2) Ummm, is it just me or is connecting the suit's pressure control just the kind of feature you store in ROM, so it can't be hacked? Also, don't connect this segment of the suit to the (heavily encrypted) wireless network that you would have (but could turn off to sneak past sensors.)

      If you were in a combat situation such as the ones that the USA is likely to face in the near (50 years or so) future, the enemy will not have tech. to be able do much damage in a combat zone, and as long as you have good hackers building the systems for the US, it should be ok (randomize frequency used, use encryption, and be able to switch both in combat in case of problem)

      3) With mostly tech availible off the shelf, you could build a system that pinpointed who was using your armor and who wasn't, and display this inside of the helmet that the guys are wearing. The suit could also have night vision that would find hot bodies and check if they were wearing suits (which might be able to mask heat using insulation, by the way)

      These ideas are all within the range of technology availible by the time we have nanotech to build the suits. (the real assumption here is the nanotech good enough to make the suits)
        • If the nanotech is any good, it can absorb energy from a landing (by cascading stiffness up the armor, and allowing the armor to take the pressure without crushing the guy inside)

        Oh please. Energy isn't the issue, it's acceleration. If you stiffen the armour, you just get smushed against the hard armour instead of the hard ground. In fact, stiffening is the last thing you want to do; you want as much articulation as possible to minimise the impulse. This "leap tall buildings in a single bound" claim is pure fantasy.

    • What happens after the wall, is there also a parachute, or are you just supposed to land after your 20 foot fall.


      GO! GO! Gadget Pogo-Stick!

  • Since this is "obviously" anime inspired (and not just sci-fi in general) does it include colored hair for detecting airborne pathogens? Youknow, hair changes color when dangerous substance found. What about wildly contrasting colors that act as camoflage - not to hide from but to distort the enemies' aim.

    Oh and don't forget the huge eyes that are obviously being used to detect hidden dangers like IR tripwires.

    And don't forget that at least 50% of the soldiers wearing this gear are going to be females with more curves than a Jan and Dean song.

  • Ouch. (Score:2, Interesting)

    by mattbelcher ( 519012 )
    Supercharged shoes could release energy when soldiers jump, propelling them over a 20-foot wall

    But what happens when them come back down?

    • Re:Ouch. (Score:2, Funny)

      by bje2 ( 533276 )
      That's when the helicopter comes out of their helmet, and they drift slowly to safety....

      oh wait, that was inspector gadget..."go, go, gadget-copter!"

  • No, no, this isn't flamebait or outright dismissal, but really - a "5 year contract" to develop what their description seems to portray as super Anime' Battle Armor(tm)? Somehow, I think this will end up being a big money pit for a long time before anything that flashy comes anywhere near to reality...

    On a less cynical note, though, I imagine a lot of more "down-to-earth" inventions may come out of the program (advances in polymer science, immunoassay-like tests, and so on) if the people running it can refrain from wasting the money too badly in attempts to impress clueless legislators with flashy gadgets when the 5 year budget is over...

    • OK, look at the situation: they want to do nanotechnology research, and they want big money to do it.

      So what do you do? Tell the Army you can make soldiers invisible, especially with the war on terrorism happening, and watch the money come pouring in.

  • Bending light? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by spineboy ( 22918 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:09PM (#3164370) Journal
    In other words INVISIBILITY!!

    Or am I mistaken... Soldiers will still need light to hit their eyes to be able to see.. I guess a pair of floating eyes won't raise too much suspicion.
    What about infrared? Soldiers will still glow in that region.

    Jumping 20 ft with some sort of exoskeleton still seems unlikely to me - remember, the landing deceleration won't be too much different than jumping off a 20 ft building without any exoskeleton (that hurts!).
    It just doesn't seem plausible. The only thing useful I could see an exoskeleton useful for would be to lift/cary heavy loads. Any other ideas?

  • Anime = DBZ? (Score:5, Funny)

    by Havokmon ( 89874 ) <rick.havokmon@com> on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:09PM (#3164371) Homepage Journal
    Here I thought MIT got $50 million to develop loose t-shirts and excessive narration.

  • Why not... (Score:2, Interesting)

    by nochops ( 522181 )
    With all the technology and money being poured into this, why not just make better remote warfare technologies?

    I mean why bother making a uniform that provides instant medical care for the soldier, when you can completely remove the soldier from the battlefield?

    Some may argue, but the primary method for getting what you want in a war is to KILL, therefore people are necessary in a war.

    I acknowledge this, but while someone must get killed, doesn't it make sense to let the enemy's soldiers get killed, while yours are sitting comfy drinking coca-cola and watching pr0n?

    The whole premise seems like a massive waste of time.
    • Human soldiers don't suddenly get stupid if you cut off communcations. If you use, say, 'bots, either they're autonomous in which case you have to be VERY good and VERY careful programming them -- I'm guessing that battlefield situational analysis is *hard*, especially in, say, urban environs where innocent civvies are involved -- or they're remote-control, in which case there's potential for jamming or disabling.

  • old news (Score:3, Funny)

    by Dr. Awktagon ( 233360 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:11PM (#3164389) Homepage

    I have a shirt that can track how many days I've gone without bathing, using a "handsfree background olfactory indicator". High tech stuff, really.

    Also, I haven't tried it myself, but I think past the 30-day point it is indeed actually capable of bending light waves. It could probably also melt steel. Though due to the olfactory indicator mentioned above, it isn't exactly what I'd call "invisible"...

    Can I have a million dollar grant for this invention? Erm, yeah, I'll understand if you don't want to deliver the check in person.

  • Cool trick (Score:4, Funny)

    by fobbman ( 131816 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:14PM (#3164415) Homepage
    Bend light? The best we've been able to accomplish around the lab is break wind.

  • Good news/Bad news (Score:5, Funny)

    by BluedemonX ( 198949 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:14PM (#3164416)
    The GOOD news is, every female soldier will now be a 38 DDD.

    The bad news is, these suits are NOT proof against suddenly-appearing, demonic phallic tentacles.

  • An explanation of the "anime-based" thing (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Lendrick ( 314723 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:14PM (#3164417) Homepage Journal
    Because so many people seem to be having trouble with this...

    One would assume that they said "anime-based" because these sorts of battle suits crop up a lot in anime (although generally without invisibility) -- take Bubblegum Crisis, for example. The suit pictured in the article--along with the drawing style and the fact that the wearer is apprently female--looks suspiciously anime-like.

    Compare to this [ign.com].

    Also, a little note to the humor impaired: The phrase "anime-based" in the title of the story isn't there to imply that the Pentagon is actually trying to be anime-like. It's a joke [dictionary.com].

  • What's that army man holding in the picture?! (Score:3, Insightful)

    by garagekubrick ( 121058 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:14PM (#3164418) Homepage
    Look closely at the Army's own webpage with their little picture of what the armor suit might look like...

    He's holding a Pulse Rifle from Aliens!

    I think it's really weird that a filmmaker decides to make a film that's a metaphor for Vietnam in which superior technology is beaten by an organic enemy; an obvious moral. But now the Army wants those Pulse Rifles.

    Have any of you seen pictures of the OICW? It's the Army's latest attempt at a replacement infantry rifle for the aging M16 (A rifle which when first made, had a plastic stock stamped with Mattel's logo because they were manufacturing the plastic parts). I swear, the people in charge of defining the equipment a future soldier will be wearing must sit around all day and watch Aliens over and over and over...

    I saw some recent footage of a new integrated networking system for mobile soldiers. All these soldiers are checking their PDAs and typing into their wristpad. In some way I can understand the advantage of having access to all that information, but time and again history has proven that soldier's overreliant on technology get their asses bit.
  • Maybe our soldiers could dress like Japanese Nurses [slashdot.org].

  • better cause (Score:3, Insightful)

    by LiquidPC ( 306414 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:17PM (#3164439)
    I was watching the Discovery channel the other day and I saw a peice on asteroids and how little the government gives them ($1 million from the NASA budget) to help track the many floating around space. Alot that, if they hit earth, would cause a global catastrophy, even the end of mankind. Sure, military forces is a good cause for funding, but I, for one, would like to see more money spent in causes like that, as opposed to bending light and creating armor.
    • Sure, military forces is a good cause for funding, but I, for one, would like to see more money spent in causes like that, as opposed to bending light and creating armor.

      You're missing the big picture. If we get this technology developed, we can eventually bend light around the whole planet. You have to see us to hit us! ;)
  • This reminds me of the uniforms the marines wore in Aliens [imdb.com]. They had cameras mounted in the helmets and streaming biofeedback back to the base unit where an incompetent lieutenent gives orders. I always thought those uniforms made a lot of sense, except for the incompetent lieutenent part.

    -Miko

  • Is it just me, or does the background in the "illustration" on the article look suspisciously like a post-apocolyptic wasteland?

    Is it a good thing that the people desiging these suits are working from the premise that the world will be a shattered smoking dystopia? I'm not convinced they have the right frame of mind...

  • New dress code? (Score:3, Funny)

    by BluedemonX ( 198949 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:19PM (#3164452)
    Well, obviously now soldiers will be allowed to walk around with big, shaggy, turquoise or bright green hair.

  • Invisibility (Score:2, Insightful)

    by CommieLib ( 468883 )
    From the article:

    Light-deflecting material could make the suit blend in with surroundings

    Light deflecting? Pining for the fjords? What kind of talk is that? Perhaps:

    • Light reflecting: okay, you look like a mirror.
    • Light refracting: Predator, but way hard (this is sci-fi).

      If there is anything to this, it would seem more likely it's some kind of display camoflage, like a computer display displaying the image of the cube wall behind it...

  • $50 million? (Score:4, Funny)

    by theCURE ( 551589 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:29PM (#3164535) Homepage
    give me $50 million, i'll show you how to disappear

  • Invisibility? Huh? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by RobertFisher ( 21116 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:34PM (#3164558) Journal
    The original poster was seriously confused. Don't people pay attention in physics classes anymore?

    Simple considerations tell us that geometrical optics is an excellent approximation for any large object. The size of the object is much, much greater than a wavelength of light, so optics reduces to tracing rays from your eyeball to the source, and thence reflected or absorbed as the case may be. There is no such thing as "bending" visible light around a macroscopic object. You can make a suit which is nearly fully reflective (not a good stealth tactic -- you would appear like a nice shiny mirror), or nearly absorptive (in which case you would appear black), but there are plenty of ordinary materials that already work quite well for either purpose.

    Since I presume that the nanotech folks at MIT are well aware of this fact, I doubt they proposed to "bend light" in their suits. Rather, they are probably going to implement something which Nature has long realized in chameleons and various other creatures : "invisibility" through blending in. Various miniaturized digital cameras could sense the background that a suit was in, and change the colorations on the suit (perhaps using a variation on the "digital ink" concept) accordingly. Hence, a suit could appear sandy-yellow when in the desert, white when in the desert, and camoflouge when in the jungle.

    Since we all already doing essentially that when outfitting soldiers (no one wears the bright red of old British regulars anymore), it is unclear whether there is any real advantage to this concept, especially given the cost. Particularly since, to anyone equipped with infrared night vision goggles, every body temperature objects glow like a beacon.

    Bob

    • Indeed, when I first heard of a proposal to do this, circa 1986, it was referred to as "chameleon cloth".

      With the right software, I bet you could get by with perhaps just 4 cameras. The tricky part is having the fabric be durable, and having the signals that travel to the pixels be fault tolerant. Also, it's got to be non-stick. Otherwise, any damage to the fabric, or anything stuck to it ruins the whole thing. OTOH, if the enemy delivers bright green sticky stuff that rains down on the soldiers, it will also rain down on the terrain. Another possible tactic is to fire a flare that backlights the soldiers with a strobe. Any latency in the camo system will be detectable, although cave-dwelling terrorists aren't likely to have such tech.

  • Uhh... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by PlaysWithMatches ( 531546 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:36PM (#3164570) Homepage

    The 5 year, $50 million grant also wants to look at bending light around the uniform to create some sort of invisibility.

    IANAS (I Am Not A Scientist), so correct me if I'm wrong... But if you're bending light around a person, that means THEY can't see the light either. Right?

    If so, this approach would be limited to situations where vision is not necessary, perhaps holding a hidden position until it is time to move out. Or maybe they would use some sort of devices to allow a soldier to "see" things outside the normal human visual spectrum, thus allowing them to see something despite not being able to see the normally visible light.

    Just my 2 :)

  • Another source (Score:3, Informative)

    by decesare ( 167184 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:37PM (#3164575)

    Another reference [boston.com] with a little more material than cNet or USA Today can be found in today's Boston Globe online.

  • HAH! A Mental Picture (Score:4, Funny)

    by Petersko ( 564140 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:39PM (#3164592)
    We're gonna make soldiers so incredibly expensive that we can't afford very many.

    Then we'll send them into battle, whereupon they'll be vastly outnumbered by hoards of people carrying rocks.

    Last words? "Ah... now here's a problem we didn't consider..."
  • Light-deflecting material could make the suit blend in with surroundings.

    "You see anyone?"
    "Nope. All I see is that big, large-breasted-female shaped mirror."
    "Me neither. Want to go get a beer?"
    "Dude!"

  • OFW (Score:3, Informative)

    by Telemakhos ( 548307 ) <mistkrause@hotmail.com> on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:47PM (#3164641)
    This is part of the Objective Force Warrior Program [army.mil]. From that page: ""The Objective Force Warrior will be a Formidable Warrior in an Invincible Team, Able to See First, Understand First, Act First, and Finish Decisively." Despite the capitalization, diction, and picture, which remind one more of a video game than a project of the federal government, the page is for real and provides some interesting reading. See also The Natick Soldier Center [army.mil], which hosts the OFW program.
  • We've sent our soldiers into Afghanistan with camouflage uniforms. Great idea, right?

    They're GREEN camouflage uniforms.

    Just you wait. When we decide WE want anime-based uniforms you'll be seeing a bunch of Canucks running around at super-slow speeds with blue streaks blazing behind them to let the enemy know right where to shoot.

  • Anime based == Ghost in the shell (Score:3, Informative)

    by ACK!! ( 10229 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:48PM (#3164648) Journal
    Ghost in the Shell had the characters basically wearing a suit that made the wearer invisible. The drawing from the story looks like a straight up rip off of the art concept used by said anime.

    However, who ever submitted the story could have made that clearer.

    Still does not mean that a dozen jokes would not have come out of the comparison. I am not sure this will happen though considering how cheap a body is next to the cost of a plane or a tank but we can hope. The American military putting its soldier's first? I hope so.

    ________________________________________________ __

  • Non-military applications (Score:5, Interesting)

    by DragonPup ( 302885 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @04:53PM (#3164699)
    As I said when I submitted this 5 hours ago(no I'm not bitter:-) ), is that this technology has potential for very good non-military uses. The enchancing of strength could help people with Muscular Schirrosis move around more freely, or help people who've had a leg smashed by a car or something walk again. Lots of fuzzy warm stuff could result from the development project that can benefit humanity(as well as letting otakus live out anime dreams of a exosuit).

    -Henry

  • What's the difference between... (joke) (Score:5, Funny)

    by HEbGb ( 6544 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @05:02PM (#3164785)
    What's the difference between an MIT mechanical engineer and and MIT civil engineer?

    .
    .
    .
    .

    Mechanical engineers build weapons, and civil engineers build targets.

    Ha!

  • Oh my god!!! (Score:4, Funny)

    by Dirtside ( 91468 ) on Thursday March 14, 2002 @05:08PM (#3164826) Journal
    The military is going to hire Cobra Commander! [usatoday.com]

Slashdot Top Deals

Dinosaurs aren't extinct. They've just learned to hide in the trees.

Close