Build Your Own Carnival Ride 192
SoCalChris writes "Check out these guys who are building their own dark ride similar to the ones found at carnivals and theme parks. The ride is complete with PLC's in each of the cars, and one more PLC for the entire ride. The ride also features a blocking system like professionally built rides."
Carnies? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Carnies? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Carnies? (Score:5, Funny)
Basil: What's the other?
Austin: Excuse me?
Basil: What's the other thing that scares you?
Austin: Carnies.
Basil: What?
Austin: Circus folk. Nomads you know. Smell like cabbage. Small hands.
Re:Carnies? (Score:4, Funny)
Carnies built this country-the carnival part of it anyway -- and though
they may be rat-like in appearance, they are truly kings among men.
[5F08] [snpp.com]
M@
Already?! (Score:5, Informative)
Google's Cach [216.239.51.100]
Spooky (Score:5, Funny)
call me anal (Score:4, Informative)
Re:call me anal (Score:1)
Re:call me anal (Score:5, Funny)
You're not suffiently cynical yet.
The use of an apostrophe is indeed. . . (Score:5, Informative)
It's a contraction. The apstrophe substitutes for the "e" in the suffix "es," which is an older, but still acceptable form.
The dropping of the apostrophe in pluralizing acronyms is a modern phemonemon that comes about because of the modern practice, unjustifiable by traditional usage, of treating acronyms as if they were actually words.
They are not. They are abbreviations.
KFG
Re:The use of an apostrophe is indeed. . . (Score:1, Insightful)
In this particular case, PLCs is actually more visably appealing than PLC's. While "PLC's" is the past standard, the new convention is also acceptable.
Please, we do not need the grammar lesson from old fogies
Re:The use of an apostrophe is indeed. . . (Score:4, Funny)
The evidence suggests otherwise.
KFG
Re:The use of an apostrophe is indeed. . . (Score:1)
Re:The use of an apostrophe is indeed. . . (Score:5, Informative)
And the word is controller. Which pluralizes to controllers, not controlleres.
So, while you may be right in general, that doesn't make PLC's any more acceptable than before.
Re:The use of an apostrophe is indeed. . . (Score:2)
Nope, nope nope. Pluralization is based on the phonetic quality of the word, not its semantic meaning.
So, you're actually saying "Pee-Ell-Cees". And, as everyone knows, the pluralization of a letter requires an apostrophe, as in: Which makes much more sense than:
All you have to do is consult any style and usage work, and I'm sure that they will state that pluralization of acronyms require an apostrophe.
The poster earlier was correct. His point was the abbreviation was not a word, not that we should look at the original words that PLC stood for in order to make a determination about pluralization. However, I disagree with him that the apostrophe is intended to represent an 'es' sound. It is simply used to mark the pluralization of the acronym.
E-mail has "revolutionized", in a sense, the way that language is punctuated. For instance, notice that I placed the comma outside of rather than inside of the quote marks around revolutionized. Until recently, punctuation marks always appeared within quotes. This changed, probably due to problems like this: Copying within the quotes would yield a bad password. So, over time, punctuation moved outside of quotations, and this is the style that is now commonly used within e-mail and other electronic texts. It is still technically incorrect in normal printed work, however, so be careful around your English teacher.
In the same way, a lowercase s used to pluralize abbreviations is a new invention, necessitated, probably, by the huge proliferation of TLA's. Using a lowercase s is, in a sense, an abbreviation of 's. In a forum such as Slashdot, but PLC's and PLCs are both equally correct, although the geek "Elements of Style" might suggest the abbreviated s version. However, use just an s outside of this context, and you, my friend, are making a grammatical error.
Note: I don't think that there are grammatical errors in this posting, but even if there are, what I have said above remains correct.
Re:The use of an apostrophe is indeed. . . (Score:2)
By style and usage work, I really meant one that you would get at, say, your local library. Something like Strunk and White.
Re:The use of an apostrophe is indeed. . . (Score:2)
Bob the Angry Flower disagrees [angryflower.com] with you. Don't make the flower mad. (See "Some popular but incorrect rules", rule #2, "VCR's".)
Re:call me anal (Score:5, Informative)
I agree. Can't people follow the simplest English punctuation? :-) Check out
Bob The Angry Flower [angryflower.com]
for a tutorial for the apostrophe impared.
Re:call me anal (Score:3, Insightful)
The first thing I thought when I saw PLC was "public limited company", for whatever reason.. even though I know what a programmable logic controller is.
It didn't make sense for me at first why *either* of those things would be in a carnival ride car, but after a few hundred milliseconds of brain activity I decided it must be the programmable logic controller, or maybe some special "carnival lingo" (Hey Joe! We're all out of Pyrotechnic Lumbar Cartridges on car #3).
At no point during this time did I take any notice of the apostrophe. (Or the fact that there were no periods, throw that into your grammar mix: P.L.C.)
Now, I want those milliseconds back. Nearly a second of my time, gone forever! Think of the places I could've gone, the things I could've accomplished! Damn you slashdot!!
Re:call me anal (Score:1)
This is definitely a gray area. Here's evidence: (Score:2, Informative)
Purdue University [purdue.edu] has a nice blurb on how to properly use apostrophes. One of the uses is "Forming plurals of letters, numbers, and symbols" to avoid confusion.
This [www.ucc.ie] page says you can us an apostrophe when the acronym ends in S to avoid confusion. Their example was if you said "The DHSSs of Europe are getting together next week" it would look strange so you can use "The DHSS's of Europe are getting together next week"
This [pcroot.cern.ch] says use an Apostrophe whenever there is punctuation in the acronym. Many other publications say you can't.
Since acronyms and codes are getting more popular they have to get more complex to be unique. You wouldn't want someone getting confused between multiple Non-Maskable Interrupts and a Navy Manpower Information System. Why not make it NMI's instead of NMIs so it doesn't get confused with a NMIS.
Many people seem to agree that you shouldn't use apostrophes to pluralize acronyms but I don't. I think the "ends in S" rule is good but what about the "could be confused with another acronym which is this one with an s on the end" rule. How do you know there isn't an acronym out there that is that one with an S on the end? How do you know there won't be one tomorrow?
You cant!
The bottom line is that the purpose of language is to communicate effectively. If I can do that using 31337 sp33ch then that's ok. It's like the whole stupid he/she vs they thing. (They has always been acceptable as a singular gender neutral pronoun despite many people's assertions otherwise).
To sum it up:
Language rules are here to help us communicate and any rule that restricts our ability to do so effectively is invalid by definition no matter how much some know-it-all wants to convince you otherwise. It's the way it always has been and the way it always will be.
Re:call me anal (Score:1)
Just to completely destroy the rules... (Score:2)
You are anal's
Re:call me anal (Score:2)
It doesn't? Are you sure you're talking about the right kind of PLC?
Re:call me anal (Score:2)
There are three PLCs in the cabinet.
The PLC's cabinet is the one on the right.
Re:call me anal (Score:1, Informative)
Re:call me anal (Score:1, Informative)
Let's just take a look at the dictionary definition of "apostrophe" (www.dictionary.com):
"The superscript sign (') used to indicate the omission of a letter or letters from a word, the possessive case, or the plurals of numbers, letters, and abbreviations."
Last time I checked, capitalized acronyms (TLA's, etc.) are still just a subset of "abbreviations".
Re:call me anal (Score:1, Informative)
I have 2 cents that says the only reason that you use an apostrophe in the case of abbreviations is because you're replacing the missing period. Of course, this doesn't exist in most modern typography for acronyms, so there's nothing to replace.
Oh look, I just used another apostrophe.
Re:call me anal (Score:1, Offtopic)
But, I don't know if you use an apostrophe with acronyms, like PLC. I mean, it has P's, L's, and C's in it, but if you shove them all together, I think it just might make some PLCs.
Re:call me anal (Score:2, Informative)
I think it's actually correct to use an apostrophe for acronyms with periods, e.g. Ph.D.'s, and not use an apostrophe for acronyms without periods, e.g. TVs.
For those who don't know what a Dark Ride is (Score:5, Informative)
The Dark Ride and Funhouse historical Society
Re:For those who don't know what a Dark Ride is (Score:2, Flamebait)
Re:For those who don't know what a Dark Ride is (Score:5, Funny)
I still don't know what a dark ride is, but the signal/noise ratio on that website was scary enough. I tried to hold out as long as I could. When I looked down at the edge of my screen and saw "loading http://www.laffinthedark.com/sounds/sal001f.wav 5 of 17" I knew I could stand the terror no longer.
Re:For those who don't know what a Dark Ride is (Score:2)
but you know, Slashdot is laughing at you..
This is insane (Score:3, Informative)
Re:This is insane (Score:4, Informative)
-Peter
Re:This is insane (Score:1)
To quoteth the master... (Score:1, Offtopic)
"But you can't come! Especially Stan and Kyle!"
"So come on down to Cartman land... but don't plan on getting past the parking lot!
Does it come with.... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Does it come with.... (Score:5, Funny)
Well, if you wanted a true simulation of a real traveling carnival ride, you'd have to do much more than that.
You'd also have to forgo any and all maintenance, and keep the operator supplied with enough hash (or other intoxicants) for him to be completely oblivious to the terrified screams of customers whose children are being thrown from the ride due to inadequate restraints.
For a little added bonus, you can have the operator sell the above-mentioned hash (or other intoxicants) to passing children. This will provide an additional source of cash for you - which will, sooner or later, be necessary to pay for legal expenses and bail.
Re:Does it come with.... (Score:1)
Re:Does it come with.... (Score:1)
Not quite jive, but... (Score:5, Funny)
I happen to speak a little Slashdotese. I think this translates as :
"Kickass! Let's see how fast we can get their website over its 30gb a month transfer limit!"
Build your own carnival ride (Score:4, Funny)
Mirror (Score:4, Informative)
*ahaning throws the URL at the rabid users and gets out of the way as quickly as possible... as if feeding starved dogs*
Re:Mirror (Score:1)
Page 2, however, is not. Oh well, be happy you got page 1!
Thief! Re:Mirror (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Thief! Re:Mirror (Score:2, Funny)
Nice to see that the Digital Convergence lawyers are back at work.
Re:Mirror (Score:2)
Ahaning, can you grab my latest [slashdot.org] files and update your mirror? That way we can expose all of page one and much of page two.
Now if only someone would do this [slashdot.org] (the second paragraph).
Alternately, if the author of the site could send me a tarball, I'd gladly host it in that form and decompressed, browseable form.
Jouster
Re:Mirror (Score:1)
Nevertheless, I'll forego my schoolwork and see what I can do
Re:Mirror (Score:2)
I figured there was a better chance I'd get in before slashdotting took its toll if I clicked the link than if I connected to my Linux box, remembered the syntax (specifically, the -r part), and serially downloaded all the files.
Plus, I had a better chance of getting all the support files with Mozilla, since I knew it was downloading all of them, whereas I don't know how powerful wget's parsing capabilities are.
That said, all you really need to do is uncompress one of my zipped up files into your mirror directory. True, it won't be a precise mirror insofar as it won't map all the semantic attributes like directory names, but it will be perfectly viewable, which is all
:),
Jouster
Convenient mirror... (Score:5, Informative)
Grab the
Jouster
Re:Convenient mirror... (Score:2)
I think mine is now the only source of page 2. (You didn't know there was a page 2? Look at the bottom of the page.) If someone could grab my distribution and combine it with a google cache and google thumbnails from page three, that'd be heavenly. Just post it as a reply to this thread so there's just one "mirror" thread.
Jouster
Re:Convenient mirror... (Score:3, Informative)
Grab it in ZIP [thereifs.com], BZ [thereifs.com], or convenient browseable form [thereifs.com].
Jouster
Re:Thief! Re:Convenient mirror... (Score:2)
That said, if the gentleman wishes to contact me, he may do so at my phone number here, (540) 432-6166 x3666. I will happily take down any material that he feels I should not be providing.
Note that I blithely ignore the fact that you're a troll. Nice tactic, eh?
Jouster
While I know money is an object (Score:5, Informative)
From the second page of the article:
If you are going to do something like this, please invest in a decent tool. EMCO machine tools are the sorriest pieces of crap you can find. Look at a used machinery auction and buy a good Clausing-Colchester lathe [clausing-industrial.com] and a Bridgeport or Lagun milling machine [lagun.com].As another alternative; if you're going to drop this much money on buying machine tools, just to build one ride, contact a local job shop and work with them on making the parts.
Re:While I know money is an object (Score:4, Funny)
Hey don't forget, these are people who like living dangerously.
Re:While I know money is an object (Score:2)
It looks like this project has about three people busy for a year, plus buying a machine shop and parts. Overall cost will be higher than the $12K per car they were quoted.
You can also buy such rides used. There's a carnival ride broker. [italintl.com] Asking prices are $95K to $110K for single-level rides, and you can probably negotiate down.
Re:While I know money is an object (Score:1)
From Google's cache of the now-dead page (Score:2)
The Google cache of the second page [google.com] lists the machine as ENCO. I was pretty certain that $6k for a lathe with a DRO system seemed pretty cheap.
Re:From Google's cache of the now-dead page (Score:2)
Ahh! Now I get it. My bad.
Why not.... (Score:5, Interesting)
big box on pneumatics, big screen tv on the front, 20" CRT's on the sides, and a few days rendering up something on 3Dstudio?
would be a lot more bizarre, and cost a lot less.
See my Stuff! web.changestorm.com
Re:Why not.... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Why not.... (Score:2)
Some of the parts and props are authentic or antiques from other Dark Rides.
Neat but... (Score:2, Insightful)
Luke, (Score:5, Funny)
Just GREAT!!!! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Just GREAT!!!! (Score:2, Informative)
No!
Kinda scary when you think about it, eh?
There are some in state laws, but that does not stop the traveling carnivals from doing whatever they want.
If you live anywhere near cedar point [cedarpoint.com](near=within 4hrs drive) it is big, there is a lot to do, and they have an excellent record where saftey is concerned.
Re:Just GREAT!!!! (Score:1)
In Florida, rides are inspected by the Department of Agriculture. They also inspect gas pumps. And fruit trees.
maru
Idea for spooking people (Score:5, Funny)
Muhahahahahaha.....
Re:Idea for spooking people (Score:2)
<m$-bash>
Just setup a real Windows 98 machine. Then you'd get the benefit of seeing people's faces when it crashed for real. :-)
</m$-bash>
Probably been suggested before... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Probably been suggested before... (Score:1)
Re:Probably been suggested before... (Score:1)
Re:Probably been suggested before... (Score:1)
As long as they have no robots.txt or Pragma: No-Cache, I don't see that they would have much case.
Re:Probably been suggested before... (Score:1, Flamebait)
Re:Probably been suggested before... (Score:4, Insightful)
Yes, it's been suggested before. And yes, it's off-topic. But there are enough newer Slashdot members around right now that are posting this idea (and then modding it up) that it's time to link to the FAQ again.
Develop opt-in slashdot caching tag (Score:2)
Just invent a meta tag that specifically allows slashdot to cache the site. Put it into the FAQ under 'How do I allow Slashdot to cache my site?' and note that 'By including this Tag on your pages you specifically allow us to fetch your website and host a copy of it on our own servers in the event that a link to your site is posted to our front page.' (Maybe even make that a license agreement
That would at least allow caching for the webmasters who specifically want it.
Re:Probably been suggested before... (Score:1)
Re:Probably been suggested before... (Score:1)
In fact, the question of why
They're gonna call it... (Score:3, Funny)
Will be popular with the ladies.
Re:They're gonna call it... (Score:1, Offtopic)
I built a ride when I was about 15 (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I built a ride when I was about 15 (Score:1)
by Jack Handy
Disclaimer reads: (Score:5, Funny)
One small problem (Score:1, Offtopic)
I know that I don't enjoy fast amusement park rides like I used to when younger. I suppose battling with lane-merging 18-wheelers on LA freeways wore out the thrill.
Favorite Carnival Ride (Score:4, Funny)
There was this one carnival attraction in my hometown where you crawl through a bunch of black boxes, cushions, and tubes in total darkness.
Teenage guys LOVED that one because they could grab girls every which way without ever getting caught.
Now *that* would be the one to build in your backyard.
Trent Reznor Owns This (Score:5, Funny)
I worked at the ISP that kicked him his bandwidth in the day and his group were a pretty nice bunch of guys. I remember one day when I was BOFHing some tech calls and someone calls to add a couple of pop boxes for a domain and reset a pass. In my best "fuck you asshole, stupid loser that you are" voice I asked for the customers last name. When I replied "Like uh Trent" guy said yeah and I pulled the account up. Felt like such an ass.
Course the ultimate scare would be to be the only guy in the ride with 4 300 lb female ex cons who just got outta stir and are looking for some strange. As the lights go out and the strains of the song Closer chime in.... oof gonna have nightmares about that one.
Puto
Re:Phil Anselmo, not Trent Reznor (Score:2)
My bad.
Puto
Mirror (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.chrisnaimee.com/sd/dr1.htm [chrisnaimee.com]
http://www.chrisnaimee.com/sd/dr2.htm [chrisnaimee.com]
http://www.chrisnaimee.com/sd/dr3.htm [chrisnaimee.com]
http://www.chrisnaimee.com/sd/dr4.htm [chrisnaimee.com]
http://www.chrisnaimee.com/sd/dr5.htm [chrisnaimee.com]
http://www.chrisnaimee.com/sd/dr6.htm [chrisnaimee.com]
http://www.chrisnaimee.com/sd/dr7.htm [chrisnaimee.com]
http://www.chrisnaimee.com/sd/dr8.htm [chrisnaimee.com]
http://www.chrisnaimee.com/sd/dr9.htm [chrisnaimee.com]
http://www.chrisnaimee.com/sd/dr10.htm [chrisnaimee.com]
Am i the only one... (Score:1)
I feel mislead!
I mean, cheap is one thing, but... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:I mean, cheap is one thing, but... (Score:2)
But actually, if you look at the pictures, you can see the first shows it on the stools, and the pedestal is in the foreground, the second shows it on the pedestal (and is dated a day ahead). The next image showing one of the guys using the lathe, you can see one of the stools is being used to support a box of tools or something.
Believe me, while it may look like they could use it on the stools, any metalworker with any kind of experience would tell you that would be a bad thing...
Re:I mean, cheap is one thing, but... (Score:2)
Build your own carnival ride? (Score:2, Informative)
-Dan
Re:Build your own carnival ride? (Score:2)
I even seen it on CNN Headline news.
House of Shock. (Score:1)
Slashdotted; Can anybody tell me Which PLC? (Score:2, Interesting)
The Scariest Of Em All (Score:2)
Goin down !!
Re:Link or Mirror? (Score:4, Informative)
I don't, but my friend Google does:
http://216.239.35.100/search?q=cache:j8SrIlANLtUC