data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92ec3/92ec3a8bb51cd25da9a36d7360c786d62625a43b" alt="The Internet The Internet"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08c2c/08c2cbaa0f3f92cc8e72cef2e436f91a52b0bb9d" alt="Handhelds Handhelds"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4aed5/4aed504ce8aee2dc05aad5c795061ff521803c58" alt="Hardware Hardware"
John Patrick: ENUM is a Really Big Deal 126
penciling_in writes "John Patrick, former vice
president of Internet technology at IBM, says 'ENUM is a really big deal'. Here
is what he has to say on CircleID about this: 'Basically, ENUM
is a protocol that will make it possible to converge the Public Switched
Telephone Network (PSTN)
and the Internet. In other words, a telephone number can get you to a Web
service -- telephone number in, URL out. The idea can be extremely useful when
you consider that most telephones are limited to twelve keys on a keypad. Every
try to enter your alphanumeric login ID and password to a web site on a cell
phone or Personal Digital Assistant? It is next to impossible! The biggest
impact of ENUM will probably be for Voice Over IP (VoIP).
In fact, it could be the tipping point.'"
This message... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:This message... (Score:2)
beat the rush, and dial... (Score:2)
const is a better solution (Score:2, Funny)
And I use VoIP now and it saves me a lot of money in long distance charges. Whether the service provider is using ENUM, I don't know, but I do know that as an end user I don't care one way or the other. Const, Enum, it's all the same to me (as a user).
Re:const is a better solution (Score:1)
Except with enum you can make the last element the size - handy for compile-time joy.
Re:const is a better solution (Score:2)
Outstanding (Score:4, Funny)
"Hello this is the refrigerator, the Answering machine is broken, so speak slowly and I will put on a sticky note... with your message"
Re:Your sig (Score:1)
Re:We don't have enough IP addresses as it is... (Score:1)
Re:We don't have enough IP addresses as it is... (Score:1)
Actually (Score:3, Informative)
BTW, It also plays well with SIP (RFC 3261), because that number can map to a SIP URI sip:user@domain to route a call. Neato!
would i rather.. (Score:2)
when you spend time typing on a cellphones pad it gets much faster and quite frankly words are much easier to remember which is what ultimately matters. the difference between a number and a word or two doesn't really matter(it's just double the button punches at maximum usually, in time it's just 15 secs instead of 10, numbers pulled out of my hat).
oh yeah i've done my fair share of cellphone thumbing, including numerous sla
Re:would i rather.. (Score:2)
I always think that says "free mindlets". Funny sig, that.
Re:would i rather.. (Score:1)
Whatever happened to IP numbers? (Score:2, Insightful)
No reason to make it more complicated than it is.
Besides, old technologies such as POTS (Telephones) and TV are frequently regulated (and taxed!) by governments in a way that makes them unsuitable for open content. The very thought of connecting these very taxable technologies to the Internet scares me.
Based on trust (Score:1)
However, I don't trust people who have two first names and no
Re:Based on trust (Score:2)
Re:Based on trust (Score:2)
Re:Based on trust (Score:2)
If you think about it, the phone system is a cow (Score:4, Funny)
If we can get VoIP, we can finally tip over this flatulent bovine and bring ourselves into the 21st century. I shouldn't have to dial a number to connect to someone. No one ought to be reduced to a simple number! I should be able to call an acquaintance using their name or ideally some truly identifying tag like a URL. ENUM is essentially the only system that would allow this kind of connection.
The phone companies are sleeping on their laurels now. It's time to bring the next tech to bear and knock these soon-to-be hamburgers over.
Re:If you think about it, the phone system is a co (Score:1)
It's not been my "primary method" for about 5 years - I always dial stored numbers, looked up by name (apart from the first time I call someone, and assuming they didn't send my phone a business card).
"It's like a giant cow just standing there eating and sleeping and sucking up valuable resources and far
Re:If you think about it, the phone system is a co (Score:1)
Hmm. So rather than typing 410-455-xxxx to speak to me, you could type "Tom Swiss, Baltimore, Maryland, USA" on your terminal. Then wait for a lookup. Then have to select "Which Tom Swiss? Thomas M. Swiss in Catonsville, or Thomas C. Swiss in Towson?" Doesn't sound all that better than having a unique numeric ID.
Re:If you think about it, the phone system is a co (Score:2)
Re:If you think about it, the phone system is a co (Score:1)
Re:If you think about it, the phone system is a co (Score:1)
Actually, I also think it's not a complete integration. There have to be other things you can integrate with a live stream of data. Digital signatures would be one. Perhaps some open (and better designed) analog of Powerpoint might be another.
Re:If you think about it, the phone system is a co (Score:2)
Thank you for your input in comment 7259667. Please keep up the valuable commentary.
Kindest Regards,
514750
* Please note that when IPv6 becomes more widely released, a new value will be assigned to uniquely identify you.
Parlay (Score:1)
Cirruz
How to merge IPs and phone numbers... (Score:2)
Re:How to merge IPs and phone numbers... (Score:1)
Re:How to merge IPs and phone numbers... (Score:1)
Re:How to merge IPs and phone numbers... (Score:1)
So, with 16 available tones, you just need to press two buttons in sequence for every IP address you want to call.
Chip H.
Re:How to merge IPs and phone numbers... (Score:1)
Chip H.
Re:How to merge IPs and phone numbers... (Score:1)
That's "DTMF" for "Dual-Tone, MultiFrequency." Each button on your phone generates a sound made up of two notes. Each row has a note and each column has a note; a given button plays the notes for its row and column.
There's a 4th column, missing from nearly all phones. The entries are labelled A, B, C, and D. They have a 4th column-note.
Re:Transisition (Score:1)
Re:Transisition (Score:1)
Another problem would be the need to assure security - some form of security standard (pgp/ssl etc) would be required to ensure communications are correct (not a 'wrong ip') and un-intercepted.
Voice over IP would also mean less of a monopo
I read once that you can communicate via pigeon (Score:1)
Can the pigeon poop be recycled somehow?
Honny it's ten o'clock... (Score:1, Funny)
Junior should be home by now.
Dear - so ring his cell phone and
tell him to come home!
Never mind, I just ran traceroute on his
phone... He is... uh-oh..
Sisy - Oh, he is so grounded... hehe...
I'd RATHER use URL's on my PHONE... (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm not sure what aspect of cognitive psychology explains this, but I and many of my middle-aged friends acknowledge having problems remembering local phone numbers now that in our state we are required to dial area codes on all calls.
I'm talking about short-term memory here. Forget long-term memory, I haven't stored telephone numbers in my brain in years; I have a Palm for that.
What I'm saying is that I can look in a telephone book, see the local number 762-####, and even though all local numbers have the area code 781, remembering to dial 781 (and dialing it) put enough extra strain on my enfeebled brain that by the time I've dialed the 781 and the 762, I can't remember the last four digits any more.
Actually I dial 1-781-762 because, for some unknown reason, the power that be have decided that a) you must dial a 1 if the call is a local toll call; b) there is no simple algorithm for determining whether or not an exchange in the 781 area code is a local toll call or not; c) if I don't dial the 1 some of my calls will not go through; d) if I always dial 1 all of them go through; e) dialling the 1 does not change the cost of the call, so... well, you get the idea.
Information theory says that the "1" carries no information, and the "781"--being the same on 95% of my calls--carries less than a single bit of information. That "1781" should only amount to a fraction of a digit's worth of memory strain.
Well, tell it to my brain, because it apparently doesn't know how to do data compression on the leading digits of telephone numbers.
Even if I keep the telephone book in my hand, by the time I've finished dialing the 1-781-762, my eyes have moved off the page and it takes me a good two or three seconds to reacquire the listing visually, scan carefully horizontally to make sure I'm picking up the number that's on the same line as the name, get those last four digits, and transfer my attention back to the the dial.
The phone system seems to be getting less and less patient even as telephone numbers get longer and longer. Even though the equipment must cost orders of magnitude less than it did twenty years ago, the engineers that set the timeouts apparently can't stand having their precious equipment tied up. The result is that sometimes the phone times out and abort the call before I can key in the last four digits.
Yes, I considered posting this as an Anonymous Coward. No, I don't have any memory-related mental diseases--and I'm not all that old.
But the prospect of tying websites to telephone numbers strikes me as the dumbest idea I've heard in a long time.
Re:I'd RATHER use URL's on my PHONE... (Score:1)
Silly to have to dial it within the country though...
Re:I'd RATHER use URL's on my PHONE... (Score:2)
To direct dial an international call, you dial the international direct dial prefix (011 in the USA), the country code, and the rest of the number.
Re:I'd RATHER use URL's on my PHONE... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:I'd RATHER use URL's on my PHONE... (Score:1)
My area code has changed 3 times in the last 10-12 years, along with a change in my zip code, also without moving.
IMHO, the telcos have really mangled the way all these code splits and dialing rules have been put in place. Used to be you dialed just the seven digits for a local call, a "1" for a toll call (which originally did connect you to a toll switching center, back in the step switch days), and adding the area code for outside your a
Re:I'd RATHER use URL's on my PHONE... (Score:3, Insightful)
If we ever move to IPv6, those addresses are going to get a LOT longer. Besides, one of the purposes of lookup tools-- be they transparent like DNS or interactive like Google-- is to get AWAY from fixed, paper directories.
Re:I'd RATHER use URL's on my PHONE... (Score:2)
In the future there will be two ways to call your friends, voice prompt (e.g. "Call Jenny") or some sort of scrolling/navigational tool. Pretty soon when the number of mobiles gets too numerous, we are going to run out of area codes. When th
Re:I'd RATHER use URL's on my PHONE... (Score:2)
Re:I'd RATHER use URL's on my PHONE... (Score:1)
No, they're going to get two digits longer. The difference is they're written in hexidecimal.
Re:I'd RATHER use URL's on my PHONE... (Score:2)
Then mark me a foe and score me down so you don't see me. But oh, I see, you're an AC. You're too stupid to figure out how to set up an account and/or remember to log in. Never mind.
Re:I'd RATHER use URL's on my PHONE... (Score:1)
Re:I'd RATHER use URL's on my PHONE... (Score:1)
The fact is, most people can only remember from 3 -> 5 items in short-term memory. You can test this by having someone list off numbers, start with 1 and work your way up. They should be random, and then see if you can repeat them back after 10 seconds.
You will fi
Re:I'd RATHER use URL's on my PHONE... (Score:2)
Re:I'd RATHER use URL's on my PHONE... (Score:1)
Information theory says that the "1" carries no information, and the "781"--being the same on 95% of my calls--carries less than a single bit of information. That "1781" should only amount to a fraction of a digit's worth of memory strain.
Re:I'd RATHER use URL's on my PHONE... (Score:2)
Re:I'd RATHER use URL's on my PHONE... (Score:1)
Back when most people didn't know anyone who wasn't from the same town or the next town over, their list of phone numbers often only differed in the last 4 digits. Then as the town got too big for 4 digits being enough people started to have to remember all 7 digits for each contact. Now, as our society becomes more and more mobile (are
Not the same. (Score:1)
Re:Not the same. (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re:Not the same. (Score:2)
1-Story : Phone Numbers -> Web Pages
2-Parent Comment : 867-5309 -> 80's rock song that talks about a girl named Jenny
3-Previous Comment : This number should resolve to Jenni Cam
Ha, ha, ha, ha...
Off Topic my ass, its Funny
DUMBASS MODERATOR
Re:Not the same. (Score:1)
Re:Not the same. (Score:1)
Then why would 1-888-867-5309 be looked up as 9.0.3.5.7.6.8.8.8.8.1.e164.arpa???? That isn't right. "www.ibm.com" is organized from most specific to least specific. 1-888-867-5309 is organized from least specific to most specific. Therefore, a more DNS-like way of looking this
Re:Not the same. (Score:1)
Re:Not the same. (Score:1)
DNS for Phone Books (Score:1)
Re:DNS for Phone Books (Score:1)
Notice from systems administration... (Score:2, Funny)
Every try to enter your alphanumeric login ID and password to a web site on a cell phone or Personal Digital Assistant? It is next to impossible!
Effective next monday, all Internet users will have their usernames and passwords converted to 32-digit numbers to comply with telephone-Internet convergence. Use them to login to our website at http://2529850985513857918375981751. Your username and password are:
Username: 72946835 56198569 01854984 91856914
Password: 57105710 19158294 19469819 14691749
This i
Re:Notice from systems administration... (Score:2)
Coming soon to ENUM: wildcard service (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Coming soon to ENUM: wildcard service (Score:2)
Oh sure (Score:2)
But when they suggest that we could use this to somehow ease the pain of using a PDA/number-pad as a UI to the Internet (read: WWW), and therefore bring about the holy grail of Convergence, that's when my bozometer redlines. OK, so that phone number translates to a DNS name, which in tu
VOIP *is* the main point (Score:2)
Remember - this controls what happens when people attempt to reach *your" phone number!
Anything else, like other IP based services that could be offered on different ports from a server with the same URL is icing on the cake (or a huge revenue opportunity / regul
Re:VOIP *is* the main point (Score:2)
Re:VOIP *is* the main point (Score:2)
SRV [rfc-editor.org]. Some SIP projects use this already, carriers do not because they (wisely) do not trust DNS. I expect that even if an open standard is used to relay this kind of information it will be done over semi-private networks rather than the public internet.
OK, our TWO main points are... (Score:2)
It's not, yet, about accessing websites as such from a phone, or providing a harder to remember alternative to URLs.
Though with sophisticated phones (approaching PCs), that distinction could begin to blur...
good for the telcos... (Score:1)
This may need international delegation (Score:2)
Either that, or there would need to be st
No Kidding (Score:3, Interesting)
There are many issues to be worked out
Technically, the QoS (latency) over the low quality lines, seems something of an issue. I read somewhere that anything more than 0.1 sec latency makes conversation noticeably less spontaneous. Maybe it will encourage us all to listen to others without interrupting them:)
Politically, the regulated monopolies that provide local telephone service will be difficult to interface with. They'll demand money for access to the offices (some people have stories about this), but are also obligated to maintain lines and obey a slew of regulations, such as providing service to backwater areas, emergency service, tacking on a whole zoo of fees and taxes.
This doesn't make any sense (Score:1)
Tipping point (Score:5, Insightful)
In other words, the standards for VoIP need to crystalize to the point where interoperability with gatekeepers and other switch-like devices is a given, and not some game of vendor lock-in. I should be able to buy a Samsung/Apex/Sampo/$cheap_asian_brand VoIP phone, plug it into my ethernet network and have it just plain work with other VoIP phones, bridges, etc.
How or what the various numbering protocols work isn't the tipping point. The PSTN is too big and complex and the legacy devices too numerous to think that a new, acronym-loaded, buzzword-compliant numbering scheme will make a difference. For VoIP to matter it must initially be transparent to the POTS world, and that means telephone numbers and bridging.
Vonage is on the right track here as a bridging service. Their POTS bridge device is on the right track at least conceptually, although I can't comment on its protocol neutrality.
Re:Tipping point (Score:2)
And for this to happen, we need IPv6 because VoIP does not play well with all those NAT IPv4 networks out there.
Re:Tipping point (Score:2)
1) Static NAT port mapping to internal bridges or phones, like people do now for game/web/mail/etc servers behind NAT gateways. Requires a VoIP standard that doesn't do something lame ala active FTP and negotiate port numbers and IP addresses inside packets.
2) Protocol-standard bridging software or agents that can be integrated into NAT devices to provide NAT-friendly bridging for incom
Re:Tipping point (Score:2)
Re:Tipping point (Score:2)
The classical NAT problem the parent poster was referring to is having both ends of a VoIP session behind NAT where neither can technically communicate with each other since neither is technically reachable from the internet, which is a problem that
Re:Tipping point (Score:2)
What I REALLY want to see (Score:1)
Re:What I REALLY want to see (Score:2)
GoNumber.net offers an intro to the concept (Score:2)
ENUM is DNS ... (Score:2)
Well, we're lucky they chose the .arpa toplevel, otherwise each wrong phone number would have been answered by Verisign's sitefinder ...
Oh. *That* ENUM. (Score:2)
I read over the
D'oh. Wrong ENUM.
-Waldo Jaquith
Completely Missing the Point! (Score:1)
I have no clue why someone would think that using a 68 digit phone number to get to a web url that is only 14 easy to remember chars long would be a good thing
For anything new to be accepted and widely used... It needs to be atleast as convient as what is currently in
it's not new, but still very useful (Score:1)
Damn stupid idea (Score:1)
If you want a name, fix the bloody phone software to make it easier to enter URLs. Maybe even make it suggest completions from the phone companies' DNS cache rather than the phones' internal dictionary.
What's the betting IBM have a patent on this ENUM bollocks?