The ROBOlympic Games 139
Roland Piquepaille writes "The first International Robot Games, or ROBOlympics, organized by the Robotics Society of America, will take place on March 20th and 21st, 2004 in San Francisco, California. There will be competition for combat and non-combat robots, a World Cup Soccer game, and even a robo-triathlon. More than 400 robots are registered for this robotics competition. And the winners will receive hard cash. Nature tells us the story in 'Robolympics contestants shoot for gold.' More details and references are available in this overview which also includes a very nice photo of two robots, the larger one either fixing or rocking the smaller one. And for your information, ROBOlympics is not sold out. So if you are near San Francisco, it's still time to buy tickets. They cost $15 to $25. Entrance is free for children under 7."
Combat robots (Score:5, Insightful)
Does it disturb anyone how much effort is put into building robots designed for distruction? I mean I understand building robots that solve puzzles, and robots that overcome obstacles, but the idea of designing robots primarily for violence kind of bothers me.
Maybe this is a little off topic, but it's an interesting thing to think about.
Re:Combat robots (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Combat robots (Score:1)
You'd think Junkyard Wars would be enough for them.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Combat robots (Score:4, Interesting)
Does anyone else just find this frightening. I'm mean the TV does enough to baysit kids, but to just drop off kids with the robot. What is wrong with you man?
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Combat robots (Score:1)
I didn't RTFA yet, but it seems that in the near future it might be easier to have robots to communicate (albiet, possibly simple communications) with than to have robots that can run around, play ball, that kind of thing.
Re:Combat robots (Score:2)
Re:Combat robots (Score:1)
Re:Combat robots (Score:1)
The are all the same as well (Score:2)
I'd rather seem them liven it up by competing in an uneven surface so it would force the designs to be more flexible.
Re:The are all the same as well (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:The are all the same as well (Score:2)
-
Re:The are all the same as well (Score:2)
it would be ludicrously simple to build, could not be flipped, would have next to nothing on it that could be broken, and could wreak havoc by quickly spinning and smashing things with weapons attached to the ends of the tube.
i get so sick of those gimpy saucerbots and flippers. how about a little creativity, m?
Re:The are all the same as well (Score:2)
Re:The are all the same as well (Score:1)
Re:The are all the same as well (Score:2)
Re:The are all the same as well (Score:1)
Re:The are all the same as well (Score:2)
And to the person who replied regarding flippers -- they are currently and have always been in the UK Robot Wars. One of the most amazing is Wheely Big Cheese, which is capable of flipping any competitor robot completely out of the arena from any point in the arena. It's pretty amazing to wa
Are the IOC allowing this name? (Score:3, Informative)
A couple of years later I was asked to promote another robot event, run by the same people, but definitely not anything to do with the olympics, as the IOC is very protective about the word Olympics, not surprising given some of the other discussions on
So my suspicion is that the name will have some problems.
In conclusion, my feelings are it's not the first, and it's not the Olym
Re:Combat robots (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Combat robots (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Combat robots (Score:2)
My wife thinks they should allow fully autonomous bots in the ring with the RC bots, but give them a 4X weight allowance, or 6X if they're autonomous walkers. (In the current rules, RC walkers have a 100kg allowance over other heavyweight bots.)
Re:Combat robots (Score:2)
-
Re:Combat robots (Score:2)
Completely offtopic and UScentric, but isn't most of our existance designed for distruction? Take out destruction and there wouldn't be much "news" on the news channels or local news. Its one of the top issues regarding the election. A movie/TV show isn't really entertaining unless something blows up or at least someone gets killed. Take out violence in video games and see whats left.
To answer you question. N
Re:Combat robots (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Combat robots (Score:1)
I think the combat side is just to get the public interested, -think wrestling. Watching them do hurdles might not have the same attraction. Also, destroying another robot while defending itself is a problem-solving exercise in a sense.
Re:Combat robots (Score:3, Insightful)
Humans thrown into a boxing ring for the sole purpose of delivering injury on each other might warrant that label. Save the angst for something worthwhile.
Robotic combat gets people like teenager Lisa Winters (BattleBots seasons 1 & 2) to craft machines that try to solve a really difficult and dynamic engineering problem with pretty limited resources. Designing a rope-climber is a static and relatively simple problem, and it doesn't inspire in the way that only gourmet robotic des
Re:Combat robots (Score:2)
It's human nature. You know, same thing that makes huge explosions etc in "big" Hollywood movies a must, the same thing that gives most people immense satisfaction when they kill their best friend in an online FPS, same thing that makes a .44 Magn
USFIRST Robotics (Score:2)
There are more peaceful and puzzle-solving robotics competitions out there, such as the one put on by USFIRST [usfirst.org]. I am, in fact, one of the mentors for high school team 1031 in San Francisco, and we just took first place in the Pacific Northwest Regio
Re:Combat robots (Score:1)
The Plans are obvious.. (Score:4, Funny)
Entrance is free for children under 7.
Sure.. get the young kids used to seeing robots all over the place so they'll be taken by suprise when SkyNet launces its attack. whoops, my tinfoil hat was slipping there, sorry..
Re:The Plans are obvious.. (Score:1)
Re:The Plans are obvious.. (Score:2, Funny)
Entrance is free for children under 7."
Children that tall are usualy still in their mother's womb..
I'm rooting for "Li'l Shocker"... (Score:1)
RoboCup 2004 (Score:4, Informative)
This year in portugal we'll host RoboCup 2004 aswell
Paulo Soska
'Nuff said. (Score:1)
Tho they have sucked more as of late.
Re:'Nuff said. (Score:1)
Ummm (Score:5, Funny)
Will the governor be taking part too?
Re:Ummm (Score:1)
Detroit (Score:2)
Re:Detroit (Score:2)
Re:Ummm (Score:2)
Re:Ummm (Score:1)
No, but I heard they'll be marrying two gay robots during the opening ceremony!
Does anyone else have a problem with this? (Score:5, Funny)
MmMmmmm . . . irony.
--
Well.. (Score:5, Insightful)
It's nice to see they added this event in to draw a little more attention to the space elevator. I personally would rather build a robot to compete in that competition than the fighting ones. It may be a little easier, plus, you're helping towards a cause that would benifit us all, not building a robot purely to smash other things (which is still pretty cool).
can't we have BOTH? (Score:1)
That would be COOL!
News Flash: 100 meter dash ends before 1st Meter (Score:4, Funny)
Hopefully they have (Score:1)
Re:ROBOlympics (Score:2, Funny)
I think it's a sign that I'm on /. too much.
Re:ROBOlympics (Score:1)
No. Who's Rob Limo?
Re:ROBOlympics (Score:2)
click here [roblimo.com]
For the mouse-impared:
Hope this helps ... :-)
I'm still waiting for... (Score:5, Funny)
wow... (Score:3, Funny)
they're lookin pretty lifelike...
http://www.robolympics.net/photos/blender.jpg
*snicker*
Re:wow... (Score:1)
they're lookin pretty lifelike...
Yeah.. The susan project's come along since since Revision 1. [k12.or.us] Personally I'm waiting for Susan3 [puremusic.com]!!
The Brits already did it. (Score:5, Interesting)
Some of the bots where truly amazing, especially the rope-climbing ones. I'm not sure if it'll be on this year though, hopefully some of the bots will enter in the ROBOlympics.
Re:The Brits already did it. (Score:3, Informative)
Same Old Same Old (Score:5, Insightful)
We need some more creativity. Like a robot that makes coffee while in battle. Or a robot that talks trash.
Re:Same Old Same Old (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Same Old Same Old (Score:2)
Re:Same Old Same Old (Score:3, Funny)
Robot 2: Yo mama!
Robot 1: What'd you say about my mama? Yo' mama so dumb she brought a knife to a gunfight!
Robot 2: Yeah? Well yo' mama so poor I stood on a skateboard and she said "Get off the family car!"
Robot 1: Well yo' mama so fat she got baptized in the ocean!
Robot 2: That's nothing. Yo' mama went an ugly contest and they said "Sorry, no professionals."
Robot 1: Ha. Your puny insults have no effect on me.
Robot 2: Yo mama!
Re:Same Old Same Old (Score:2)
My combat robot is entered... (Score:5, Interesting)
Setting ourselves up for disappointment? (Score:5, Funny)
let me guess (Score:1, Insightful)
it will be a radio controlled wedge shape with a flipping device
it will be low to the ground and built from 2 sheets of 8mm hardened steel with the electronics and servos from a 1993 radio control car
yeah "robotics" but is it really ?
Re:let me guess (Score:1)
Do you hear the Trademark lawyers running? (Score:5, Informative)
I'm thinking the event will be named something else by the time it becomes the 2nd Annual, since the US Olympic Committee has told them they can't use Olympics in their name. [wired.com]
When I was in high school, we saw the name of the Olympics of the Mind [odysseyofthemind.com] program changed to "Odyssey of the Mind" for the same reason.
Re:Do you hear the Trademark lawyers running? (Score:1)
When asked about their choices, organizers explained, "Hey, this is a goddamn competition for homemade robots, alright... Do you think anyone would be interested if we didn't give it the zippy, familiar sounding name of an event that people are actually care about?"
Re:Do you hear the Trademark lawyers running? (Score:2)
Re:Do you hear the Trademark lawyers running? (Score:2)
It's potentially possible to cut a deal with the USOC, as the "Special Olympics" people did. But even that took years of negotiations.
..It is nice to let them cross-pollinate.. (Score:5, Funny)
Yeah, pollinating is about as close as any of these folks will ever get to biological procreation.
Rocking? Fixing? (Score:1)
FIRST Robotics (Score:5, Interesting)
If you're interested in the ROBOlympics but for whatever reason can't travel to it, there should be a FIRST Regional Event [usfirst.org] near you (this weekend there's one in Brentwood, NY, Hartford, CT, Sacramento, CA, Duluth, GA, Annapolis, MD, and Detroit, MI). There's more for the next several weekends as well. There's also a Championship Event [usfirst.org] in Atlanta from April 15-17.
Re:FIRST Robotics (Score:2)
Hasn't sold out? (Score:1)
I remember when Olympic sport was strictly amateur.
Can I enter my Rock'm Sock'm Robots? (Score:2)
Harbinger of Doom? (Score:2)
Even when I was young the predictable slapstick and farce made the Yogi Yahooies, the Scooby Doobies, and the Really Rottens all seem like very poorly programmed robots (and I'm not referring solely to Dyno-Mutt).
Whether this is a harbinger of doom o
NES R.O.B. (Score:1)
Autonomous Robots??? (Score:1)
In this age of BattleBots and WarriorBots and MyBotCanKillYourBots, it's good to see robots that are actually more than a remote-control car encased in plate steel.
It's also a good lesson for all those budding nerds out there that there's more to robotics than attaching a carbide blade to Bigfoot.
Re:Autonomous Robots??? (Score:2)
Re:Autonomous Robots??? (Score:1)
From my experience in robotics, the frame is the easy part. Getting it to do stuff like identify a target or not fall down the stairs, that's the hard part.
Re:Autonomous Robots??? (Score:3, Insightful)
Working steel isn't a particularly challenging job but designing the chassis certainly is. One needs to design a drive train which can support a 100kg robot and withstand other 100kg robots falling on it, sometimes from several metres in the air.
Getting good radio reception inside a steel shell with several large electric
Not a robot... (Score:1)
this overview which also includes a very nice photo of two robots
One of those "robots" is actually a Storm Trooper... namely a retarded Jango Fett clone... not a robot.
C'mon... this is slashdot. You thought you'd get away with that?
Don't forget Robocup... (Score:5, Informative)
Heartbreaking Robot Stories (Score:1)
Re:Heartbreaking Robot Stories (Score:2)
Hmmmm, I think they had that... Something called BattleBots. It was great (minus the dumbass commentary), until Comedy Central canned it..
Looks like some of the robots we saw in BB are competing in this competition too. I recognize SOW and Nightmare right off, and there were a few other ones that looked familiar too. (Although I can't believe that lady
Olympics (Score:1)
Autonomy is the key (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Autonomy is the key (Score:2)
Actually... (Score:2, Funny)
It looks like the Stormtroopers learned their lesson about cuteness after dealing with the Ewoks. That AIBO had better talk or it is gonna be one fucked up little puppy.
No one from Robonia!!! (Score:1)
Even though Bender is great and all... him having another sex operation would ruin all of his circuits completely
In a related story... (Score:1)
"You just won the ROBOlympics..." (Score:1)
"I'm going to Epcot Center!"
Olympiad (Score:4, Interesting)
I think when you can have a robot that not only can run the triathalon, but can navigate a random trail without someone on remote control, and do so in timed trials against humans, then and only then will this be significant.
*Obviously there must be some restriction on what a "robot" should be. how about, independant, and intelligent in some way? how about the robot has to be designed by machines(evolution processes, etc)?
this should make very clear which sports are trivial and which are not, (ie, Pole Vault will be difficult, whereas Javelin throw will not be.) when I see a humanoid robot run and throw himself 3000 feet into the air so they can just happen to fall over a bar, and then not destroy themselves upon landing...I'll start watching the olympics, at least until the commercialism involved drives me away again.
How about wrestling? A machine that can within the rules of wrestling pin a human being(perhaps with restriction that it must be humanoid,2 arms 2 legs and a head)? Or perhaps there will be entirely new sports gained from this! When robots begin to play soccer, then some sort of magnet-supported free-fall soccer might be more interesting, etc.
And hell, we could use that to get the companies out in the forefront as far as sponsorship goes. It's about time we had the Timex Ironman Triathalon team and the GM Wrestling team. We could have the following as a potential outcome:
GOLD: USA
SILVER: WALMART ROBOTICS
BRONZE: CANADA
etc
Ob. Futurama Ref. (Score:1)
Been there, seen it, done it (Score:1)
This is not new. As usual, the Murricans think they got there first
Who is this Rob? (Score:1)
Seriously, when I read the headline, I thought it was Rob Olympics. Geek --
R/C != Robot (Score:1)
Re:Robo stormtrooper? (Score:1)
Re:Is this a joke or stupidity? (Score:2, Funny)