Accelerated PowerPoint? 188
darkjohnson writes "If you're looking for an
excuse to offer your manager to approve that high end graphics card so you can
play Doom 3 at full tilt (on your
'breaks' ;) you might want to check out the Instant
Effects' technology as it
has the first product
(OfficeFX) that justifies upgrading your display hardware so you can do a POWER
POINT presentation of all things. Especially true if you're
the one stuck with the duty of making them look good. I saw this at Siggraph
and was not only impressed with the look but the number of people packed into
the booth to see it demoed, competing side by side with real
time 3D game renders and high-end effects software."
Green Link (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Green Link (Score:1)
Re:Green Link (Score:2)
Demo (Score:2, Informative)
SMALL DEMO [dph.com] - 13MB
Cue the PHB... (Score:2, Funny)
browser support (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:browser support (Score:2)
Re:browser support (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:browser support (Score:1)
OfficeFX: When you need to justify your salary (Score:3, Funny)
Because purty graphics make yearly losses look so much more exciting! The Red's never been so vibrant!
Didn't NASA... (Score:1, Interesting)
Imagine, now you can become dumb 3D style.
Re:Didn't NASA... (Score:5, Funny)
I recently found out that at my daughter's school, the use PowerPoint to call the role.
There's something deeply wrong about that, but I just can't quite put my finger on it...
Re:Didn't NASA... (Score:2)
Re:Didn't NASA... (Score:2)
Do people honestly think these look good (Score:5, Insightful)
And if you just have to use some transition effect, pick one. Do not use a different random one on each page.
Re:Do people honestly think these look good (Score:2)
C'mon, who doesn't like the cube effect...
Re:Do people honestly think these look good (Score:2)
I didn't learn anything, but the presentation was very very well done.
Re:Do people honestly think these look good (Score:3, Insightful)
Honestly, I could spend all day pointing out what NOT to do in a PowerPoint presentation, and I'm by no means an expert in either PowerPoint or general presentations.
Re:Do people honestly think these look good (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Do people honestly think these look good (Score:2)
Last week he wanted to show us a graph. Just one. He spent the better part of Thursday hand crafting a 45 slide presentation with 1 second automatic progression so that it would 'animate'. Since he figured that one out every single presentation (or 'preso' as he calls them) has one in, and time taken to create them has rocketed.
Of course, it could be worse. He could be doing something evil to use plebeians.
Re:Do people honestly think these look good (Score:3, Informative)
That said, saying they're never useful is almost as silly. For instance, I think the effect in the video demo they have up at 1:00 is pretty cool. Leaving that up on the screen as you wait for your pre
Re:Do people honestly think these look good (Score:2)
Re:Do people honestly think these look good (Score:2)
Powerpoint and other presentation software is a really good tool if used correctly. If the presenters have letters flying around and they aren't prepared for it, then they aren't very good presenters!! No software package can r
Just what I've been waiting for (Score:5, Funny)
Finally (Score:1, Insightful)
Except presentation systems!. On IRC at least, where I rant about this occasionally I'm often dismissed with a "feh, who really cares" but presentation software is all about making a big impression (regardless of those who attempt to use them like note sheets
Re:Finally (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Finally (Score:2)
"No one with a brain" pretty much describes most of the audiences I end up presenting to. And yes, they like pretty effects and flying text.
PP looks like crap - no vid card can change that (Score:5, Interesting)
Anyway, I doubt if getting a new video card is going to make PP look more tasteful. Someone in Redmond would have to get a sense of style for that to happen. I'm not holding my breath.
Re:PP looks like crap - no vid card can change tha (Score:2, Redundant)
Re:PP looks like crap - no vid card can change tha (Score:2)
Re:PP looks like crap - no vid card can change tha (Score:2, Interesting)
I've downloaded and installed the demo. It is a plugin to powerpoint only. It will neither install nor work in any capacity without powerpoint.
And it makes pretty animated 3d backgrounds, and makes everything do crazy spinning in 3d when you click on it. Right click and drag the screen, and the whole page can be twisted about in 3D, even flipping it around 180 degrees so you see the "back" of the text.
Very useful when presenting
Re:PP looks like crap - no vid card can change tha (Score:2)
And it looks like crap without it.
Re:PP looks like crap - no vid card can change tha (Score:2)
Re:PP looks like crap - no vid card can change tha (Score:5, Interesting)
What I've always wondered is why Word, having been in "development" for around a decade, still by default makes articles that look like crap compared to TeX/Latex, which has been around since 1985!
Yeah, you can say that Word makes a decent job at the typesetting if you haven't compared them much. But after reading a few articles in default Latex typesetting, an article in default Word typesetting is pure horror to your eyes. The text just pops out of an article collection, and not for its benefit.
What many people don't realize is that typesetting is not just about putting words one after another in a line. As Wikipedia [wikipedia.org] says: "Typesetting [wikipedia.org] involves the presentation of textual material in an aesthetic form on paper or some other media" (emphasis mine). Word simply hasn't got a clue when it comes to aesthetics.
A good example is line justification: Word (as far as I can tell) simply crams as many words on a line as possible (and most often even hyphenation isn't on, though this can arguably be blamed on the user). The extra space is put equally between the words and the last line of a paragraph is never justified. Latex, on the other hand, tries to find line breaks which look good on a whole, avoids hyphenating when not needed, adds more space after punctuation marks, and justifies the last line of the paragraph if it's almost as wide as the paragraph. Also for instance a consecutive f and i are combined into a ligature [wikipedia.org]. Simply put: it looks better.
The total is a sum of many small things, that Word just doesn't even try to handle (at least by default, I doubt at all). I'm not saying that I know much about typography, but I sure can tell what looks good and what doesn't, and it sure as hell isn't rocket science.
An interesting tidbit (Score:2)
Some of the examples I've seen are significantly better than PP, especially for engineering presentations. (Anything with formulas and graphs...)
Re:PP looks like crap - no vid card can change tha (Score:3, Informative)
While you're at it, please stop trying to open your mail with a screwdriver.
Re:PP looks like crap - no vid card can change tha (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:PP looks like crap - no vid card can change tha (Score:2)
Of course there are different tools for different needs, but Word and Latex are meant to fulfill the same need - making articles, reports, books etc. They work with different design principles - Word is WYSIWYG, while in Latex you type the content and Latex formats it - but they're designed for the same thing. And when writing something, Latex simply makes it better looking.
Sure, there are problems with Latex, it doesn't interoperate as seamlessly(?) with other ap
Fun app (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Fun app (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Fun app (Score:2)
Perhaps the funnest next to using made-up words.
What are you talking about? "Funnest" is a perfectly cromulent [urbandictionary.com] word.
Re:Fun app (Score:2)
Powerpoint seems like a lot of work to create a <ul>... Much less portable too...
Re:Fun app (Score:2)
Is it a good thing? (Score:1)
It isn't for geeks like us (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:It isn't for geeks like us (Score:2)
Re:It isn't for geeks like us (Score:2)
Or it could look like the creators have no taste or budget for anything more professional.
OfficeFX Review (Score:4, Interesting)
Points of interest:
"Besides a graphics chip like the ATI Radeon, the program requires the .NET Framework (available from Windows Update) and DirectX 9. A pre-installation panel reviews your system and tells you whether you can continue setup."
"I discussed this with Don Brittain, the CEO of Instant Effects, and he said that in his view the product is 18 months ahead of the hardware cycle. This means that you need the very latest laptop to make sure you can show an OfficeFX show. But here's how it works."
Overkill (Score:1)
Has Darl McBride purchased a copy yet?
Re:Overkill (Score:2)
And that is why PowerPoint is the most important thing in most companies.
Powerpoints new easter egg... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Powerpoints new easter egg... (Score:2)
Improving your Presentations (Score:5, Insightful)
As a technical instructor, I give presentations basically 8 hours a day, 5 days a week. And let me tell you, a rotating teapot isn't going to improve anyone's presentation. The best way to improve your presentation is to cut out as much as possible. Make yourself the focus of the presentation, not the clip art or whatever fancy crap you've got on the screen.
I'd highly recommend anyone out there who is looking to improve their presentations to check out "Presenting to Win" [amazon.com], by Jerry Weissman. Excellent book on giving presentations.
Re:Improving your Presentations (Score:4, Informative)
While we're on the essay reccomendations, Perl now has a page up on giving presentations [perl.com], geared towards the shorter presentations
Re:Improving your Presentations (Score:3, Informative)
Perl now has a page up on giving presentations, geared towards the shorter presentations
The best piece of advice in the Perl page is:
Re:Improving your Presentations (Score:2)
That's because you're a technical instructor. The best lectures I've attended are ones where the instructor uses the chalkboard/whiteboard, and *shock* actually writes legible, well organized notes on the board that *shock* perfectly compliment his/her verbal speech.
On the other hand, most business presentations, fr
Re:Improving your Presentations (Score:2)
Hint: don't try to extemporize from your slides. Write your speech, deliver it well, and use your slides as punctuation marks.
Thinking (Score:5, Insightful)
AT&T is no longer trying to sell residential phone service.
Disney no longer makes animation. Instead, they want to make computers.
and so on. "There's no money in it" they whine. What they really mean is "nobody can explain in a PowerPoint presentation or an elevator pitch (30 seconds or less with no eye-glaze) how we can make hundreds of millions of dollars this quarter with no work or capital expenditure."
Everything formerly valuable is becoming a commodity while attention span is becoming the most expensive luxury in business. Nobody listens any more. Ideas and products that make hundreds of millions of dollars CANNOT BE EXPLAINED PROPERLY IN THIRTY SECONDS.
So, everyone runs from meeting to meeting, conference room to conference room frantically looking for something, ANYTHING that they can borrow to sell and get some short-term cash to the bank so the paychecks don't bounce (well, the paychecks for the half-dozen people who didn't get fired prior to the last quarterly stock-bump layoffs).
And, so business gets what they want. Accelerated PowerPoint so the elevator pitch can be 27 seconds instead of 30. Why, we're TEN PERCENT MORE EFFICIENT! LET'S FIRE SOME PEOPLE TO CELEBRATE!
It's just another icon to click. Another "efficiency token" to impress rooms full of accountants who, in the money-grab economy, are the only people who matter.
Re:Thinking (Score:2, Insightful)
You need to stop thinking in terms of encyclopedia pages and start thinking in terms of sound bites.
Oh, one more thing: quit being such an elitist snob. You apparently don't know the first thing about business, or why businesses make or lose money.
Re:Thinking (Score:2)
You need to stop thinking in terms of encyclopedia pages and start thinking in terms of sound bites.
In other words, make it devoid of all true understanding of the material and take the flashy (and let's not forget politically-correct) pulp left behind as all there is to know... great...
I was reading an article the other day that described how the "sound bite" and modern media in general have irreversibly changed politics in the U.S. For example, rather than say anything risky or possibly requiring an
Re:Thinking (Score:3)
Remember back when I said to stop being an elitist snob? You really should have listened.
It is possible to understand without knowing all the details. I understand coronary artery bypass surgery. Does that mean I'm a heart surgeon? No. Is it necessary for me to be a heart surgeon in order to understand coronary artery bypass surgery? No.
I was reading an article the other day that described how the "sound bite" and modern media in g
Re:Thinking (Score:2)
Well, I wasn't going to respond to your post because it was ridden with unnecessary personal attacks, but I'll bite.
It is possible to understand without knowing all the details. I understand coronary artery bypass surgery. Does that mean I'm a heart surgeon? No. Is it necessary for me to be a heart surgeon in order to understand coronary artery bypass surgery? No.
But not all topics are so easy from a conceptual point of view like coronary artery bypass surgery might be (eg. "re-routing the pipes" or wh
Re:Thinking (Score:2)
I think you mean "riddled." Unless you mean "horsey," which is cute but makes little sense.
The problem is the over-simplification that inevitably results from "soundbites" and the "30 second pitch."
Nope. That's not a problem. In fact, the problem is inherent in your sentence. It's not "over-simplification." There's no such thing as "over-simplification." If an idea can be simplified, simplify it! Continue until the idea is simple.
If you can't get there, that's your problem.
Firs
OOo (Score:2)
PowerPoint: Requires version 2002 or 2003.
Reccomendation: Purchase Powerpoint version 2002 or 2003.
Why bother when you have FMV? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:PCs have DVD-ROMs (Score:2)
My eyes hurt (Score:3, Insightful)
Horrible, guys. Horrible.
Re:My eyes hurt (Score:5, Informative)
For example, this one is of the form it.slashdot.org. But if you change just the "it" part to, say "linux" (yielding something like linux.slashdot.org) the color scheme changes to that of the linux section, but keeps the same content of the article you're reading.
AFAIK, this works for all sub-sections.
Re:My eyes hurt (Score:2)
Why are you looking at /. with the stupid colors? (Score:5, Informative)
Yes, it takes some getting used to, but leave it there for a week and see if you don't like it better.
Re:My eyes hurt (Score:2)
Personally, I recommend the tritanopic version [aagh.net].
Re:My eyes hurt (Score:2)
Hmm... (Score:3, Insightful)
making PowerPoint look good is easy (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:making PowerPoint look good is easy (Score:2)
You don't want to remove them all. Plain text alone tends to bore the viewers, and if your viewers are bored, they won't listen to your message. An occasional graph or chart is helpful if it illustrates your point. If graphs or charts are inapplicable, and you have several slides in a row made up of exclusively text, it usually helps to throw in a clip art here and there.
As we all know, too many pictures and transition
Re:making PowerPoint look good is easy (Score:3, Insightful)
Inserting meaningless graphics doesn't take practice. It's the band-aid solution while you work on becoming a better speaker, because business doesn't stop while you improve yourself.
Re:making PowerPoint look good is easy (Score:2)
Tufte on PowerPoint (Score:5, Informative)
Though I'm sure I won't be last to reference this, Yale's professor emeritus Edward Tufte [edwardtufte.com] has been writing about PowerPoint for a while. This piece in Wired [wired.com] helps explain how the cognative processes encouraged by PP presentations are subtly (and not-so-subtly) corrupting the way we perceive data. And you can purchase his whole essay here [edwardtufte.com].
Whether or not you agree with all of Tufte's work, he is among the seminal thinkers about how we disseminate information. And having sat through too many years worth of PP presentations, I think he's dead right about this. I fact, I do my presentations from notes, using nothing more than dry-erase markers and a whiteboard. It never fails to impart an order of magnitude more information than a static bullet-point presentation ever could.
28 pages? (Score:3, Funny)
Where can I find the executive summary?
Re:28 pages? (Score:3, Funny)
"The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint" Presented in the Form of a PowerPoint Presentation [aaronsw.com]
Re:Tufte on PowerPoint (Score:2)
So I guess what I'm saying is, yes, bullet points can be an inferior way to try and get info
Re:Tufte on PowerPoint (Score:2)
Yes, raw data has it's place, and many time the effects and flash-bang gee-whiz of PP is used as a replacement for actual content in a presentation. But not always. Power Point is better than using overhead
Re:Tufte on PowerPoint (Score:2)
I wholeheartedly agree with this approach. For one thing, audiences understand that you actually know what you're talking about when you are so comfortable that you're willing to forgo the PowerPoint crutch.
Tufte is dead-on when he notes that PowerPoint engenders "a deeply hierarchical sin
"look good"? (Score:2)
you know what would look good? a presentation that conveys information INSTEAD OF LOOKING LIKE A FRUSTRATED PIXAR MOVIE.
pretty, unreadable (Score:2)
I just wanted a show
So many critics.... (Score:3, Insightful)
Unfortunately, we'll probably suffer the same hell that Photoshop filters have yielded (i.e. overuse of the lense flare, and drop-shadow) but I believe the talented artist will use these new features to build some truly impressive presentations.
Re:So many critics.... (Score:2)
Re:So many critics.... (Score:2)
What about content? (Score:2)
You don't have to become a marketing weeny to make a nice looking presentation. I reuse my LaTeX sources in HA-Prosper [stuwww.uvt.nl] (putting i
Flash does it better (Score:2)
Re:Flash does it better (Score:2)
As for being harder to use, I've seen people building Flash presentations after using the tool for 4 hours.
DirectX 9.0c (Score:2, Informative)
Joe
Quartz Extreme (Score:2)
Old news and misleading title (Score:3, Informative)
As for OfficeFX, ATI has been giving away free copies for bloody ages: http://ati.com/buy/promotions/officefx/index.html
So.... (Score:2)
Metacreations did something like this years ago... (Score:2, Interesting)
As I recall, it offered a much better engine for rendering powerpoint slides, complete with drop shadows and improved anti-aliasing (bascially the look that Metacreations was famous for in its interfaces). As well as that, it added a heap of new transitions, like pond rippling between slides (I know sounds dicky, but the ripple was done at 25fps, so it looked really nice).
That was the s
Make those presentations look real good (Score:2)
I always make powerpoint presentations look great on my 3GHz machine with 512MB of ram. I make sure to use the highest resolution possible for video and 24 bit bmp files and useless wav files that play at each transition. Then when my boss gives the presentation on his two year old laptop he looks like an idiot. It doesn't get any better
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Does your life lack a cause? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Does your life lack a cause? (Score:1)
CC.