1453669
story
Proph3t writes
"The up and coming operating system, SkyOS has just announced the ports of Thunderbird and Firefox, both in their 1.0 stable versions. Moreover, they will be releasing a 30-page guide on how to port these two excellent Mozilla applications to alternative operating systems soon."
SkyOS (Score:4, Funny)
We are all doomed.
Re:SkyOS (Score:2)
Offtopic grammar fascism rant: the rule I like best for dealing with the -us, -i issue goes as follows. Few people really know Latin grammar, so it's silly to try to inflect every Latin-derived word acc
Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2, Informative)
Kjella
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
So again, WTF is SkyOS anyhow? Is it just another Linux distro or what?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:3, Insightful)
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
Another one like me.
It's amazing that a little computer company from West Chester, PA could do what Apple took 2 decades to figu
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
Which ignores a lot of history: we've seen QNX, BeOS, NEXT, and a lot of others. If you want to justify SkyOS, you don't compare it Windows or Linux -- you compare it to all the OSs that have failed to penetrate the x86 user base, and explain why SkyOS can succeed
Never ceases to amaze me (Score:5, Insightful)
I love the gumption of Slashdotters. Such an arrogance to everything. A guy decides to more or less code an entire OS by himself, ports nearly all the apps, and has a running OS that does things in a pretty unique way, and some holier-than-thou nerd, with, I might add, zero credentials that we know of, immediately dismisses it. No wonder OSS gets a bad rap, this is the attitude of our citizens.
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes, it's a great job on his part, few of us here would be able to pull it off, but why should we get excited? What does it offer? Just because someone doesn't get excited about it doesn't mean he dimisses his work. Heck, it might be a very powerful OS. But it's commercial. And it has basically no software developed for it, with little reason to believe it should increase in popularity, considering the already well established competition. To me it needs to offer something unique to be something else than a hobby project. And as long as it's that, why should the general public be excited? Please correct me if I'm wrong though.
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:3, Insightful)
It's-commerical-so-it-must-be-bad-/. attitude.
You and me and the rest of the world depends on stuff that is commercial. If not, neither you nor I would have a steady income and beeing able to post this from our nice computers.
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
maybe if the world didn't depend on stuff that was commecial we wouldn't *need* a steady income!
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
what did we eat and where did we sit before commerce ?
do the birds carry purses under their wings?
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
was there ever a time when humans did not engage in barter or exchange?
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
take that back or I'll smash yer face in !!!
j/k
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:3, Insightful)
The site's down so I can't see whether it supports the whole set of GNU tools and judge potential for porting other OSS software. However, history shows that the barrier to entry is having end user applications that the users _want_. There are thousands of applications for Linux, but most of them suck and are not wanted by ge
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
I agree with the GP. I don't see any point in making a _hobby_ OS closed source. Maybe an embedded OS, but not a general purpose OS. IMO, it is a shame the developers of SkyOS do not use their abilities for an open source OS or even s
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
It's-commerical-so-it-must-be-bad-/. attitude.
Of course. Usually if it's commercial it can't be hacked (experimented with). Slashdot is for software hackers/nerds (experimenters). What else do you expect?
---
DRM - Democracy Restriction & Manipulation
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
Seriously [bbc.co.uk].
Nice (Score:2)
Did you read the post he was responding to? The post was quite dismissive. You're focusing on the one word "exicitng" and intentionally missing the point.
Slashdo
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
Hey, this is Slashdot. We'll correct you even if you're right!
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
Yes, its impressive that one person has accomplished all that, but it doesn't really sound to me like it offers anything new or amazing, sure it can work, and good for him if it does, but it isnt exactly anything that hasn't been done before, is it?
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2, Insightful)
Fair. But I guess I think it *is* exciting when a relatively new OS NOT based on existing code (read: overhead) becomes "full featured."
After all, this is Slashdot. I go to espn.com for my sports scores, I come here for news like this.
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
Just because an idea is 30 year old doesn't make it a bad idea. (Arguably it was a brilliant idea since it is still good after 30 years).
It might be written from scratch, but that doesn't mean it is based on better ideas. What exactly makes this OS better? What idea that is incorporated is better than the 30 year old idea?
Jeroen
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
try this one [ball-labs.com] then
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
But I think it is fair to say that given the current state of the OS market, you don't have any chance at all of being important to the larger world unless your product is either Free Open Source, or already an established player.
Doesn't matter if it is technically good. Doesn't matter if you give it away for free. The market for new
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:3, Interesting)
What Be did with the BeOS is STILL exciting, so much so that there are no fewer than 3 groups trying to do the same thing open source, there are efforts to finalize Reiser4 and WinFS, both of which appear to build on the work on Dominic Giampolo's BFS, and I'd argue than most OS'es are still behind in UI responsiveness.
Why is it exciting? Because if Robert and crew come up with something amazing, it might be one day the next big player. And if not, mayb
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
Ok, so it might be exciting if it inspires similar improvements to open-source software. Of course, if you are a genius with a good idea, you could cut the middleman and work directly with the open source OSs.
Because if Robert and crew come up with something amazing, it might be one day the next big player.
I doubt it. See the parent post.
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
According to the ReiserFS 4 page [namesys.com], it's released.
What do you mean when you say there are efforts to finalize it? Are you talking about bug fixes? Even if you are, I don't think you should lump it in with WinFS since ReiserFS 4 is available now, and WinFS ain't (and won't be for several YEARS).
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
However, it doesn't change that many of the features that people really dig about "modern" filesystems were pioneered in BFS 5 years ago. That's fair, right?
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:4, Insightful)
I have had similar observations.
If Slashdot was a religion people would call us fundamentalists or the "geek taliban".
If most slashdotters were women people would say we were catty and cliquish like high school girls.
I do see a handful of really cool people here and there though.
No offense to anyone, just an observation.
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
Hey, SkyOS is a feat. It's neat. So what if this other guy isn't excited. Can't really say that I am either, but I always like seeing new developments like this popping up. Keeps things interesting.
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
You make it sound as if free software and programming for nothing is bad. Well I have a surprise for you. It is actually the other way around in most cases!
Greetings,
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2, Insightful)
Simple answer:
It isn't.
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:4, Insightful)
Search engines are your friends...
Anyone else care to tell me why this OS is of any relevance?
Because someone has the gumption to put together their own OS. This is how linux got started. Maybe it's irrelevant, or maybe it's not, but you've got to respect the attempt.
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
Greetings,
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
illegal? (Score:2, Funny)
Helping the police
If you help them less they will have more job security as there is more to do.
Helping war victims
They should help themselves!
This also goes for helping any disadvantaged group.
not droppinng litter.
more job security for the low paid
Helping lil' ol' ladies accross the road
they need to get their act together and do it themselves
Any form of altruism
people should help themselves. Self reliance should be encouraged.
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
I am serious, you know I am right
Jeroen
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
Farriers, actually. Blacksmiths make things out of iron. Farriers shoe horses. Given the amount of iron used in cars, blacksmiths wouldn't necessarily be put out of business by them (they might be put out of business by the manufacturing techniques, but that's not the same thing). Farriers, however, would be put out of business as the car supplanted the horse, which was their business.
</pedant>
(Sense of humor? Who needs one?)
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
Jeroen
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
1. What is SkyOS?
The Sky Operating System, or SkyOS, is an operating system written for x86-based personal computers. SkyOS was created in 1996 by Robert Szeleney as a small bootloader. In the past 8 years, SkyOS has evolved into a full-featured, modern operating system, with a goal to be the easiest to use desktop operating system available for the average computer user. The development staff has also increased to include business, software, and graphics developers.
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
-N
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:mAtB9IdidSUJ
-N
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:3, Funny)
I don't suppose it has a spell checker?
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
Basically, I can see some definite use for this, assuming it lives up to the hype, and I wouldn't be beyond paying the $30 registration as a "beta tester" to find out if it does. The use I have in mind in particular is getting my
Pretty amazing stuff (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Pretty amazing stuff (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Pretty amazing stuff (Score:2)
Re:Pretty amazing stuff (Score:2)
Ain't no time for socializin' when you're debugging kernel spinlocks.
30 pages? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:30 pages? (Score:2)
Maybe slashdot reported a fact and didn't spin it either way?
... nah, I'm sure we're just missing something ...
Getting the userbase (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Getting the userbase (Score:2)
30 'pages' (Score:4, Funny)
http://www.skyos.org.nyud.net:8090/
Hehe, they used Slashdot in the Firefox screenshots, it's like they are asking for it
After reading a bit more... (Score:2)
Kjella
Hate to say this and all, but... (Score:4, Insightful)
Good for SkyOS, possibly, rather a non-event from a Firefox perspective, at least numbers-wise.
Forgive me oh Stallman, I know not what I speak!
Why is this significant? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Why is this significant? (Score:2)
Considering the OS appears to be BeOS/UNIX/BSD-like in nature, probably uses open-source libraries and such, and the person porting the application knows the OS intimately, I think it would be relatively trivial to port just about anything that runs on Linux.
Re:Why is this significant? (Score:2)
Mirrored files (Score:3, Informative)
A Thunderbird screenshot [nerim.net].
And the about page of SkyOS [nerim.net].
The Hidden Strength Of Open Source. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I'll be impressed (Score:2, Funny)
Re:I'll be impressed (Score:2)
Re:I'll be impressed (Score:2)
Useless mirrors (Score:2)
A click on the "about" button on any of these mirrors is a pretty good test of their usefulness, or lack thereof: you're not doing anybody any good if all the links go back to the slashdotted site. Anybody got a mirror which passes that simple test?
Xbox port? (Score:3, Interesting)
Possibly interesting for Syllable developers (Score:2)
Excellent. From what I've heard lately, the Syllable community for some reason seems to be having a lot more difficulty porting Firefox to their OS. The document mentioned above might be very useful to them indeed.
With all due respect to the (very impressive) work by the very few people working on SkyOS, the fact that it is a commercial project makes me quite sk
Re:Possibly interesting for Syllable developers (Score:2, Interesting)
Syllable (Score:2)
Being a beta tester and all... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Being a beta tester and all... (Score:2)
Re:Porting (Score:4, Insightful)
Hopefully very useful, Firefox on Symbian (OS mainly used on Nokia and Sony Ericonsson phones btw) anyone?
Re:Porting (Score:2)
Re:Porting (Score:2)
Re:Porting (Score:2)
Re:Porting (Score:2)
Re:Porting (Score:2)
The best browser according to you, yeah.
So they shouldn't bother porting because of your opinion.
Ahhh, logic falls apart!
Re:Porting (Score:2)
Re:Porting (Score:2)
Opera has to move a hell of a lot faster on the ol' implementing DOM front, because at the moment they are behind IE, Gecko and KHTML/Safari.
As for Firefox not rendering Slashdot correctly, it's an issue that's been fixed in the main Gecko trunk for months and was slightly too late getting checked in to make
Re:Porting (Score:2)
In before 12 people quote you and say "I use minimo on the desktop"
Re:Heavy... (Score:2)
Re:Heavy... (Score:2)
Re:Other ports = handheld, smartphones, etc (Score:2, Informative)
I think mozilla/firefox allows you to use xlib or gtk when you compile. So, your device must support either one of them - Minimo is gtk based and can be used on a ipaq with GPE environment. A friend has been trying to get firefox running on a handheld based on ARM - takes a bit of time and space
Re:Firefox is not there yet. (Score:2)
Re:Flamebait, what the hell? (Score:2)
If there's something wrong with it and you point it out, you are silenced.
Yeah, IE got it's marketshare from "listening to users". It encouraged people to bring up every little thing they didn't like and immediately integrated it into the product. Nobody is ever "silenced" in the world of IE. That's why they have their market share.
It appears that you haven't been "silenced" since you've posted at least twice on this subject.