Unlock seamless, secure login experiences with Auth0—where authentication meets innovation. Scale your business confidently with flexible, developer-friendly tools built to protect your users and data.
Posted
by
samzenpus
from the growing-everyday dept.
Proph3t writes "The up and coming operating system, SkyOS has just announced the ports of Thunderbird and Firefox, both in their 1.0 stable versions. Moreover, they will be releasing a 30-page guide on how to port these two excellent Mozilla applications to alternative operating systems soon."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
If I recall the "plot" of T3, Skynet used viruses to distribute itself throughout cyberspace, thus rendering itself immune to physical attack. But then, it went and started a nuclear war that would have destroyed the electronic infrastructure it was distributed through. A very irritating plot contradiction.
Offtopic grammar fascism rant: the rule I like best for dealing with the -us, -i issue goes as follows. Few people really know Latin grammar, so it's silly to try to inflect every Latin-derived word acc
I agree... what the world doesn't need now is another closed-source, proprietary (in the sense of "not designed to be compatible with anything else"), desktop operating system. Windows NT is the last one that had any chance, and even that was designed with some compatibility with an already existing operating system. OS/2 and BeOS died in the desert. Apple tried multiple times to make a successor to MacOS: Pink/Taligent, PowerOpen, and Copeland. Only a reverse takeover by NeXT giving them a Unix-based O
by and large, SkyOS's major online advocates are a bunch of loud-mouthed jerks who'll accuse anyone of being a free software "zealot" for pointing out the obvious
Wasn't there some article on/. about SkyOS using a lot of OSS and not releasing the changes? Or did I just dream that up : )
too bad Commodore went bust before the whole "If we're dying we'll try a last minute boost and make our software open source" craze kicked in) in the formative years of my programming life, but YMMV.
Another one like me.:) Could you imagine if Commodore had open sourced AmiDOS and the Workbench? Apple would have had a real preemptive multitasking operating system that ran on a 68xxx based CPU.
It's amazing that a little computer company from West Chester, PA could do what Apple took 2 decades to figu
As another of those "old school" C= fans who still hasn't forgotten reading comp.sys.amiga.misc for hours on the night of the C= bankruptcy, I feel compelled to point out that it was AmigaOS and AmigaDOS, not AmiDOS.:)
I found this interview [techimo.com] with its developers. The motivation seems to be, "Windows is too bloated and unreliable, Linux isn't sufficiently GUI-centric." The unspoken assumption is that there's no third choice because nobody's bothered to write one.
Which ignores a lot of history: we've seen QNX, BeOS, NEXT, and a lot of others. If you want to justify SkyOS, you don't compare it Windows or Linux -- you compare it to all the OSs that have failed to penetrate the x86 user base, and explain why SkyOS can succeed
I love the gumption of Slashdotters. Such an arrogance to everything. A guy decides to more or less code an entire OS by himself, ports nearly all the apps, and has a running OS that does things in a pretty unique way, and some holier-than-thou nerd, with, I might add, zero credentials that we know of, immediately dismisses it. No wonder OSS gets a bad rap, this is the attitude of our citizens.
Yes, it's a great job on his part, few of us here would be able to pull it off, but why should we get excited? What does it offer? Just because someone doesn't get excited about it doesn't mean he dimisses his work. Heck, it might be a very powerful OS. But it's commercial. And it has basically no software developed for it, with little reason to believe it should increase in popularity, considering the already well established competition. To me it needs to offer something unique to be something else than a hobby project. And as long as it's that, why should the general public be excited? Please correct me if I'm wrong though.
I just love this!
It's-commerical-so-it-must-be-bad-/. attitude.
You and me and the rest of the world depends on stuff that is commercial. If not, neither you nor I would have a steady income and beeing able to post this from our nice computers.
Slashdot needs a moderation option for missing the point. He didn't say it was bad, but he implied that few people will shell out money for some proprietary OS lacking applications.
The site's down so I can't see whether it supports the whole set of GNU tools and judge potential for porting other OSS software. However, history shows that the barrier to entry is having end user applications that the users _want_. There are thousands of applications for Linux, but most of them suck and are not wanted by ge
The GP didn't say commercial == bad. He was stating that there really is _no_ room for another commercial OS. No commercial OS is going to take out MS. And if you don't like MS, there is the commercial Mac OS. After that, we have a bunch of very good quality OSS OSes.
I agree with the GP. I don't see any point in making a _hobby_ OS closed source. Maybe an embedded OS, but not a general purpose OS. IMO, it is a shame the developers of SkyOS do not use their abilities for an open source OS or even s
Of course. Usually if it's commercial it can't be hacked (experimented with). Slashdot is for software hackers/nerds (experimenters). What else do you expect?
I would suggest trying your "bottled tap water" idea in California. They'll buy anything as long as you make it sound "hip" and charge too much for it.
Yes, it's a great job on his part, few of us here would be able to pull it off, but why should we get excited? What does it offer? Just because someone doesn't get excited about it doesn't mean he dimisses his work.
Did you read the post he was responding to? The post was quite dismissive. You're focusing on the one word "exicitng" and intentionally missing the point.
To me it needs to offer something unique to be something else than a hobby project.
Yes, its impressive that one person has accomplished all that, but it doesn't really sound to me like it offers anything new or amazing, sure it can work, and good for him if it does, but it isnt exactly anything that hasn't been done before, is it?
Personally I think things like SkyOS are MORE exciting then *nix based systems. Just because linux etc are open source doesn't make it the best. Its still basically based on a 30 year old operating system. I really like the idea of a system written from scratch, and although it would be nice if it were open source, i don't see anything wrong with another commercial competitor. Just the fact that he was able to port Firefox "easily" makes it seem that he has put some thought into making an OS that will s
There still isn't anything that sounds exciting.... Just because an idea is 30 year old doesn't make it a bad idea. (Arguably it was a brilliant idea since it is still good after 30 years). It might be written from scratch, but that doesn't mean it is based on better ideas. What exactly makes this OS better? What idea that is incorporated is better than the 30 year old idea?
I'm sure that it's very important and exciting to the guy who's spent years of his life writing it. It would have to be, otherwise he would have come to his senses years ago.
But I think it is fair to say that given the current state of the OS market, you don't have any chance at all of being important to the larger world unless your product is either Free Open Source, or already an established player.
Doesn't matter if it is technically good. Doesn't matter if you give it away for free. The market for new
Oh, I'd strongely disagree. You made your own case:
What Be did with the BeOS is STILL exciting, so much so that there are no fewer than 3 groups trying to do the same thing open source, there are efforts to finalize Reiser4 and WinFS, both of which appear to build on the work on Dominic Giampolo's BFS, and I'd argue than most OS'es are still behind in UI responsiveness.
Why is it exciting? Because if Robert and crew come up with something amazing, it might be one day the next big player. And if not, mayb
What Be did with the BeOS is STILL exciting, so much so that there are no fewer than 3 groups trying to do the same thing open source
Ok, so it might be exciting if it inspires similar improvements to open-source software. Of course, if you are a genius with a good idea, you could cut the middleman and work directly with the open source OSs.
Because if Robert and crew come up with something amazing, it might be one day the next big player.
What do you mean when you say there are efforts to finalize it? Are you talking about bug fixes? Even if you are, I don't think you should lump it in with WinFS since ReiserFS 4 is available now, and WinFS ain't (and won't be for several YEARS).
I think I "kinda" misspoke, because what I know about reiser4 suggests it is awesome (e.g. echo Yellowcard >/music/Yellowcard/Yellowcard\ -\ Breathing.mp3/artist) and I wasn't trying to imply it's some sort of clone or vaporware or anything.
However, it doesn't change that many of the features that people really dig about "modern" filesystems were pioneered in BFS 5 years ago. That's fair, right?
I love the gumption of Slashdotters. Such an arrogance to everything. A guy decides to more or less code an entire OS by himself, ports nearly all the apps, and has a running OS that does things in a pretty unique way, and some holier-than-thou nerd, with, I might add, zero credentials that we know of, immediately dismisses it. No wonder OSS gets a bad rap, this is the attitude of our citizens.
I have had similar observations.
If Slashdot was a religion people would call us fundamentalists or the "geek taliban".
If most slashdotters were women people would say we were catty and cliquish like high school girls.
I do see a handful of really cool people here and there though.
And then there's the never ending replies to those posts by people like you who can't respect the fact that we can all have our own opinion on matters, and assume that the few posts from some boring people are representing of the entire slashdot readership.
Hey, SkyOS is a feat. It's neat. So what if this other guy isn't excited. Can't really say that I am either, but I always like seeing new developments like this popping up. Keeps things interesting.
Bah, how can you say that OSS developers that help with linux take jobs away? Linux wouldn't have existed if it wasn't OSS. So the fact that linux even exists is a tribute to OSS.
You make it sound as if free software and programming for nothing is bad. Well I have a surprise for you. It is actually the other way around in most cases!
I tried going to SkyOS to find out WTF it is, down already?
Search engines are your friends...
Anyone else care to tell me why this OS is of any relevance?
Because someone has the gumption to put together their own OS. This is how linux got started. Maybe it's irrelevant, or maybe it's not, but you've got to respect the attempt.
Somehow I don't think SkyOS would be the next big thing even without linux/bsd. The problem is not Linux, its Microsoft. While windows can be a right pain in the but, is SkyOS so much better to warrent change? I don't think it could be. The problem is for a non free software OS to take of it would have to be supported by a company that can out microsoft microsoft. Even IBM with its huge resources wasn't able to do that with OS/2.
<pedant> Farriers, actually. Blacksmiths make things out of iron. Farriers shoe horses. Given the amount of iron used in cars, blacksmiths wouldn't necessarily be put out of business by them (they might be put out of business by the manufacturing techniques, but that's not the same thing). Farriers, however, would be put out of business as the car supplanted the horse, which was their business. </pedant>
1. What is SkyOS?
The Sky Operating System, or SkyOS, is an operating system written for x86-based personal computers. SkyOS was created in 1996 by Robert Szeleney as a small bootloader. In the past 8 years, SkyOS has evolved into a full-featured, modern operating system, with a goal to be the easiest to use desktop operating system available for the average computer user. The development staff has also increased to include business, software, and graphics developers.
Here's a really good cache of the "About" page that gives a great overview of SkyOS. It's enough to make me want to try it - I wonder if there's a live CD in the works. -N
How solid/usable is it at this point? Does it support dial up networking? I'm assuming that the addition of Firefox and Thunderbird means it'd be suitable for a basic user with limited needs, perhaps some word processing. On that front - does it has printer support/how good is it?
Basically, I can see some definite use for this, assuming it lives up to the hype, and I wouldn't be beyond paying the $30 registration as a "beta tester" to find out if it does. The use I have in mind in particular is getting my
What's even more amazing is that I saw it progressing from its infancy. I remember first hearing about it from the guy who wrote it on the now defunct os-dev.isa.net.au message board. It wasn't much to begin with, but even at the time I was always impressed by how much they had accomplished. It's been a long time since I've checked its progress and I can say with some certainty that I would never have expected it to progress as far as it has.
And the most amazing part is that he probably hasn't made a tonne of money off of it either... It's a gamble that might never pay off, and I applaude that he took that risk.
With all respect to the guy, if he's the type that actually would write a whole OS by himself, then I suspect he does, in fact, "hug" himself quite a bit.
Ain't no time for socializin' when you're debugging kernel spinlocks.
Well, for the ordinary granny-type user, a web browser and a mail client is all what's important. So, this very move gave them a non-negligible piece of usability.
Hehe, they used Slashdot in the Firefox screenshots, it's like they are asking for it:)
...I think they were asking for it. SunOS has been a hobby OS from 1.0 to 4.9, the first commercial version is about to be released, you can join the beta now for $$$. Slashvertising anyone?
Beacuse it is showing that it is not difficult to port Mozilla Thunderbird & Firefox to your Operating System of choice. It also adds more to the user base beacuse the OS is shipping with a good browser rather than a hopeless one (You all know what I mean!)
Yeah, especially if "your Operating System of choice" is one you wrote yourself. The guy to wrote SkyOS is the same person who ported Firefox and Thunderbird.
Considering the OS appears to be BeOS/UNIX/BSD-like in nature, probably uses open-source libraries and such, and the person porting the application knows the OS intimately, I think it would be relatively trivial to port just about anything that runs on Linux.
This is the real advantage of Open Source Software. It is there for everyone to use. It allows people to choose their OS (Open Source or Not) and Still run their favorite Open Source App. No Commercial Enterprise has the resources to port their commercial apps to all the different apps the OSS can be ported to. Lets use IE Sure it runs on Windows and It was ported to Mac, and Some Unix (I tell you the truth there was a Solaris Version of IE, it was damn slow though), Netscape was ported to more platforms
It's awful to complain about what are obviously volunteer efforts, but in the spirit of the season I'm going to be Ebeneezer Scrooge. What's the point in mirroring just the first page of a web page, particularly when the first page is just fluff?
A click on the "about" button on any of these mirrors is a pretty good test of their usefulness, or lack thereof: you're not doing anybody any good if all the links go back to the slashdotted site. Anybody got a mirror which passes that simple test?
So, when is somebody gonna port Firefox for the Xbox? Those of us who use all the other wonderful user built apps and homebrews on the Xbox only have one choice at the moment for web browsing: Linksbox. While decent, I'd love to have Firefox on there. Would be useful for those times where I'm too lazy to get up and use the computer. Any takers?
"Moreover, they will be releasing a 30-page guide on how to port these two excellent Mozilla applications to alternative operating systems soon."
Excellent. From what I've heard lately, the Syllable community for some reason seems to be having a lot more difficulty porting Firefox to their OS. The document mentioned above might be very useful to them indeed.
With all due respect to the (very impressive) work by the very few people working on SkyOS, the fact that it is a commercial project makes me quite sk
I'm looking forward to reading the HOWTO. It should be useful. I wasn't really involved in the discussion on porting Firefox to Syllable but the information from various people on the mailing lists, which in turn came from the various documentation available from the Mozilla guys, was that in order to port FF we would have to port the entire Mozilla codebase, starting at XPCOM and working up. That is obviously not the case; Robert has ported FF directly to SkyOS, so we must have taken a wrong turn at som
I'm on the betatesters team and additionally I'm on the translators team at SkyOS.org which is working terribly slowly at the moment, we've underestimated the slashdot effect I'm afraid. Still we're happy with the publicity SkyOS gets. It's becoming a great alternative OS for the home desktop users. For $30 dollars you can be a betatester, you'll receive all the betas and the final product when it comes out. You can get it here http://www.skyos.org/getskyos.php (when the slashdot storm is over).
One word: why? Not mentioning (oops, i just did) the fact that you don't actually need a browser on your phone, but wouldn't this just open another potential hole for security flaws? We all know how browsers are continuously exploited by nasty webmasters. Would you really want to expose your phone to this?
Last time I checked, Opera on Symbion was only a 30 day trial (after 30 days are up, it won't run), and although the cost is nominal ($29 isn't it?) I would prefer to have both a "free as in beer" and "free as in speech" alternative.
Opera is probably the only modern browser capable of running on a Machine with 4 megs of RAM and a 486 33mhz processor. That being said, it isn't the best browser IMO.. It's the most lightweight, but fails code complience and compatability in many reguards. Firefox requires a lot of processing power/ram in comparison, because in part it was designed around optimal flexibility. Firefox initally started as slimmed down version of mozilla, but even without the 'feedback agent' there is only so much you can
No, it might be fine with CSS, but it's DOM support blows. 7.6 has the bare bones to get _GMail_ to work, and it's still not complete (no spell checking support - thanks to Opera's crappy DOM support).
Opera has to move a hell of a lot faster on the ol' implementing DOM front, because at the moment they are behind IE, Gecko and KHTML/Safari.
As for Firefox not rendering Slashdot correctly, it's an issue that's been fixed in the main Gecko trunk for months and was slightly too late getting checked in to make
Unless you can spare a few mb ( > 5-10 mb ) on your device, its really difficult to get a browser with almost full feature functionality on a small footprint device. I am not sure how much Opera takes though.
I think mozilla/firefox allows you to use xlib or gtk when you compile. So, your device must support either one of them - Minimo is gtk based and can be used on a ipaq with GPE environment. A friend has been trying to get firefox running on a handheld based on ARM - takes a bit of time and space
See, this is why Firefox will never get more market share than IE...
If there's something wrong with it and you point it out, you are silenced.
Yeah, IE got it's marketshare from "listening to users". It encouraged people to bring up every little thing they didn't like and immediately integrated it into the product. Nobody is ever "silenced" in the world of IE. That's why they have their market share.
It appears that you haven't been "silenced" since you've posted at least twice on this subject.
SkyOS (Score:4, Funny)
We are all doomed.
Re:SkyOS (Score:2)
Offtopic grammar fascism rant: the rule I like best for dealing with the -us, -i issue goes as follows. Few people really know Latin grammar, so it's silly to try to inflect every Latin-derived word acc
Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2, Informative)
Kjella
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
So again, WTF is SkyOS anyhow? Is it just another Linux distro or what?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:3, Insightful)
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
Another one like me.
It's amazing that a little computer company from West Chester, PA could do what Apple took 2 decades to figu
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
Which ignores a lot of history: we've seen QNX, BeOS, NEXT, and a lot of others. If you want to justify SkyOS, you don't compare it Windows or Linux -- you compare it to all the OSs that have failed to penetrate the x86 user base, and explain why SkyOS can succeed
Never ceases to amaze me (Score:5, Insightful)
I love the gumption of Slashdotters. Such an arrogance to everything. A guy decides to more or less code an entire OS by himself, ports nearly all the apps, and has a running OS that does things in a pretty unique way, and some holier-than-thou nerd, with, I might add, zero credentials that we know of, immediately dismisses it. No wonder OSS gets a bad rap, this is the attitude of our citizens.
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes, it's a great job on his part, few of us here would be able to pull it off, but why should we get excited? What does it offer? Just because someone doesn't get excited about it doesn't mean he dimisses his work. Heck, it might be a very powerful OS. But it's commercial. And it has basically no software developed for it, with little reason to believe it should increase in popularity, considering the already well established competition. To me it needs to offer something unique to be something else than a hobby project. And as long as it's that, why should the general public be excited? Please correct me if I'm wrong though.
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:3, Insightful)
It's-commerical-so-it-must-be-bad-/. attitude.
You and me and the rest of the world depends on stuff that is commercial. If not, neither you nor I would have a steady income and beeing able to post this from our nice computers.
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
maybe if the world didn't depend on stuff that was commecial we wouldn't *need* a steady income!
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
what did we eat and where did we sit before commerce ?
do the birds carry purses under their wings?
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
was there ever a time when humans did not engage in barter or exchange?
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
take that back or I'll smash yer face in !!!
j/k
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:3, Insightful)
The site's down so I can't see whether it supports the whole set of GNU tools and judge potential for porting other OSS software. However, history shows that the barrier to entry is having end user applications that the users _want_. There are thousands of applications for Linux, but most of them suck and are not wanted by ge
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
I agree with the GP. I don't see any point in making a _hobby_ OS closed source. Maybe an embedded OS, but not a general purpose OS. IMO, it is a shame the developers of SkyOS do not use their abilities for an open source OS or even s
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
It's-commerical-so-it-must-be-bad-/. attitude.
Of course. Usually if it's commercial it can't be hacked (experimented with). Slashdot is for software hackers/nerds (experimenters). What else do you expect?
---
DRM - Democracy Restriction & Manipulation
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
Seriously [bbc.co.uk].
Nice (Score:2)
Did you read the post he was responding to? The post was quite dismissive. You're focusing on the one word "exicitng" and intentionally missing the point.
Slashdo
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
Hey, this is Slashdot. We'll correct you even if you're right!
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
Yes, its impressive that one person has accomplished all that, but it doesn't really sound to me like it offers anything new or amazing, sure it can work, and good for him if it does, but it isnt exactly anything that hasn't been done before, is it?
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2, Insightful)
Fair. But I guess I think it *is* exciting when a relatively new OS NOT based on existing code (read: overhead) becomes "full featured."
After all, this is Slashdot. I go to espn.com for my sports scores, I come here for news like this.
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
Just because an idea is 30 year old doesn't make it a bad idea. (Arguably it was a brilliant idea since it is still good after 30 years).
It might be written from scratch, but that doesn't mean it is based on better ideas. What exactly makes this OS better? What idea that is incorporated is better than the 30 year old idea?
Jeroen
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
try this one [ball-labs.com] then
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
But I think it is fair to say that given the current state of the OS market, you don't have any chance at all of being important to the larger world unless your product is either Free Open Source, or already an established player.
Doesn't matter if it is technically good. Doesn't matter if you give it away for free. The market for new
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:3, Interesting)
What Be did with the BeOS is STILL exciting, so much so that there are no fewer than 3 groups trying to do the same thing open source, there are efforts to finalize Reiser4 and WinFS, both of which appear to build on the work on Dominic Giampolo's BFS, and I'd argue than most OS'es are still behind in UI responsiveness.
Why is it exciting? Because if Robert and crew come up with something amazing, it might be one day the next big player. And if not, mayb
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
Ok, so it might be exciting if it inspires similar improvements to open-source software. Of course, if you are a genius with a good idea, you could cut the middleman and work directly with the open source OSs.
Because if Robert and crew come up with something amazing, it might be one day the next big player.
I doubt it. See the parent post.
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
According to the ReiserFS 4 page [namesys.com], it's released.
What do you mean when you say there are efforts to finalize it? Are you talking about bug fixes? Even if you are, I don't think you should lump it in with WinFS since ReiserFS 4 is available now, and WinFS ain't (and won't be for several YEARS).
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
However, it doesn't change that many of the features that people really dig about "modern" filesystems were pioneered in BFS 5 years ago. That's fair, right?
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:4, Insightful)
I have had similar observations.
If Slashdot was a religion people would call us fundamentalists or the "geek taliban".
If most slashdotters were women people would say we were catty and cliquish like high school girls.
I do see a handful of really cool people here and there though.
No offense to anyone, just an observation.
Re:Never ceases to amaze me (Score:2)
Hey, SkyOS is a feat. It's neat. So what if this other guy isn't excited. Can't really say that I am either, but I always like seeing new developments like this popping up. Keeps things interesting.
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
You make it sound as if free software and programming for nothing is bad. Well I have a surprise for you. It is actually the other way around in most cases!
Greetings,
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2, Insightful)
Simple answer:
It isn't.
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:4, Insightful)
Search engines are your friends...
Anyone else care to tell me why this OS is of any relevance?
Because someone has the gumption to put together their own OS. This is how linux got started. Maybe it's irrelevant, or maybe it's not, but you've got to respect the attempt.
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
Greetings,
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
illegal? (Score:2, Funny)
Helping the police
If you help them less they will have more job security as there is more to do.
Helping war victims
They should help themselves!
This also goes for helping any disadvantaged group.
not droppinng litter.
more job security for the low paid
Helping lil' ol' ladies accross the road
they need to get their act together and do it themselves
Any form of altruism
people should help themselves. Self reliance should be encouraged.
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
I am serious, you know I am right
Jeroen
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
Farriers, actually. Blacksmiths make things out of iron. Farriers shoe horses. Given the amount of iron used in cars, blacksmiths wouldn't necessarily be put out of business by them (they might be put out of business by the manufacturing techniques, but that's not the same thing). Farriers, however, would be put out of business as the car supplanted the horse, which was their business.
</pedant>
(Sense of humor? Who needs one?)
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
Jeroen
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
1. What is SkyOS?
The Sky Operating System, or SkyOS, is an operating system written for x86-based personal computers. SkyOS was created in 1996 by Robert Szeleney as a small bootloader. In the past 8 years, SkyOS has evolved into a full-featured, modern operating system, with a goal to be the easiest to use desktop operating system available for the average computer user. The development staff has also increased to include business, software, and graphics developers.
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
-N
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:mAtB9IdidSUJ
-N
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:3, Funny)
I don't suppose it has a spell checker?
Re:Slashdotted in the mysterious future? (Score:2)
Basically, I can see some definite use for this, assuming it lives up to the hype, and I wouldn't be beyond paying the $30 registration as a "beta tester" to find out if it does. The use I have in mind in particular is getting my
Pretty amazing stuff (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Pretty amazing stuff (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Pretty amazing stuff (Score:2)
Re:Pretty amazing stuff (Score:2)
Ain't no time for socializin' when you're debugging kernel spinlocks.
30 pages? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:30 pages? (Score:2)
Maybe slashdot reported a fact and didn't spin it either way?
... nah, I'm sure we're just missing something ...
Getting the userbase (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Getting the userbase (Score:2)
30 'pages' (Score:4, Funny)
http://www.skyos.org.nyud.net:8090/
Hehe, they used Slashdot in the Firefox screenshots, it's like they are asking for it
After reading a bit more... (Score:2)
Kjella
Hate to say this and all, but... (Score:4, Insightful)
Good for SkyOS, possibly, rather a non-event from a Firefox perspective, at least numbers-wise.
Forgive me oh Stallman, I know not what I speak!
Why is this significant? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Why is this significant? (Score:2)
Considering the OS appears to be BeOS/UNIX/BSD-like in nature, probably uses open-source libraries and such, and the person porting the application knows the OS intimately, I think it would be relatively trivial to port just about anything that runs on Linux.
Re:Why is this significant? (Score:2)
Mirrored files (Score:3, Informative)
A Thunderbird screenshot [nerim.net].
And the about page of SkyOS [nerim.net].
The Hidden Strength Of Open Source. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I'll be impressed (Score:2, Funny)
Re:I'll be impressed (Score:2)
Re:I'll be impressed (Score:2)
Useless mirrors (Score:2)
A click on the "about" button on any of these mirrors is a pretty good test of their usefulness, or lack thereof: you're not doing anybody any good if all the links go back to the slashdotted site. Anybody got a mirror which passes that simple test?
Xbox port? (Score:3, Interesting)
Possibly interesting for Syllable developers (Score:2)
Excellent. From what I've heard lately, the Syllable community for some reason seems to be having a lot more difficulty porting Firefox to their OS. The document mentioned above might be very useful to them indeed.
With all due respect to the (very impressive) work by the very few people working on SkyOS, the fact that it is a commercial project makes me quite sk
Re:Possibly interesting for Syllable developers (Score:2, Interesting)
Syllable (Score:2)
Being a beta tester and all... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Being a beta tester and all... (Score:2)
Re:Porting (Score:4, Insightful)
Hopefully very useful, Firefox on Symbian (OS mainly used on Nokia and Sony Ericonsson phones btw) anyone?
Re:Porting (Score:2)
Re:Porting (Score:2)
Re:Porting (Score:2)
Re:Porting (Score:2)
Re:Porting (Score:2)
The best browser according to you, yeah.
So they shouldn't bother porting because of your opinion.
Ahhh, logic falls apart!
Re:Porting (Score:2)
Re:Porting (Score:2)
Opera has to move a hell of a lot faster on the ol' implementing DOM front, because at the moment they are behind IE, Gecko and KHTML/Safari.
As for Firefox not rendering Slashdot correctly, it's an issue that's been fixed in the main Gecko trunk for months and was slightly too late getting checked in to make
Re:Porting (Score:2)
In before 12 people quote you and say "I use minimo on the desktop"
Re:Heavy... (Score:2)
Re:Heavy... (Score:2)
Re:Other ports = handheld, smartphones, etc (Score:2, Informative)
I think mozilla/firefox allows you to use xlib or gtk when you compile. So, your device must support either one of them - Minimo is gtk based and can be used on a ipaq with GPE environment. A friend has been trying to get firefox running on a handheld based on ARM - takes a bit of time and space
Re:Firefox is not there yet. (Score:2)
Re:Flamebait, what the hell? (Score:2)
If there's something wrong with it and you point it out, you are silenced.
Yeah, IE got it's marketshare from "listening to users". It encouraged people to bring up every little thing they didn't like and immediately integrated it into the product. Nobody is ever "silenced" in the world of IE. That's why they have their market share.
It appears that you haven't been "silenced" since you've posted at least twice on this subject.