Opera Invents New P2P System 60
jeffy124 writes "Opera Software has developed a new P2P communications technology, buzzword description being a platform independent real time short- to medium-range interpersonal communications technology. A press release is available on their website, as is a demonstration of the technology, which Opera has called "Soundwave"."
Holy crap (Score:5, Interesting)
It's nice to see some things don't change.
Re:Holy crap (Score:5, Insightful)
They're probably doing that because people needlessly bitch about them.
I find it amusing, really. A lot of you act like somebody spit in your face when a dupe is posted. Never mind that not everybody may have seen it the first time around, I can't believe some of you get so bent out of shape about it. If it's old news, move on. Not a big deal.
It never happens that way though, does it? No no no, you've just got to come in and bitch about it. Bitch! Bitch!! Bitch!!! Dupe! Dupe!! DUPE!!! I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if the dupes today were intentional just to have a little fun with you loudmouths with no sense of proportion.
Re:Holy crap (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Holy crap (Score:3, Insightful)
Dupes annoy me for the following reason: I am a professional. I try to put care into meeting my customer's needs. I expect the people who provide services to me (ad-sponsored and paid alike) to do the same. A Slashdot editor who cannot be bothered to read Slashdot insults me on a variety of levels: first, Slashdot is such a trivial medium that even its editors cannot be bothered to read it. So why do I read it? I guess I'm the fool. Second, my time is worth so little that they have the right to waste it, li
Re:Holy crap (Score:2)
Err.. okay. I have two problems with this argument:
1.) What does the total number of seconds lost across 10's of thousands of people have to do with anything? I'm sorry, but this is one of the weakest rationalizations I have ever heard. If Slashdot delays are so bad, you would have a super long list of things that gall you.
2.) Why isn't there an acc
Re:Holy crap (Score:2)
2.) Why isn't there an accounting of the people who didn't catch the original stories? The 1 second lost by you may be gained by me because I don't sit on Slashdot reading every single story.
According to this logic, Slashdot should run every article over and over again in case someone missed it. If there is a problem with people "missing" articles that they would have wanted to see then personalization features are a much better solution than accidentally posting the same thing multiple times even for t
Re:Holy crap (Score:2)
Sorry, no, my logic doesn't imply that. An occasional re-run is a far cry from rapidly repeating each story. Anybody who has ever watched TV before should have figured this out.
"I'd appreciate it if you would read what I wrote before responding."
I did, actually. Frankly, that answer, and the one you just posted isn't doing it for me. You're holding Slashdot's professionalism in too high rega
Re:Holy crap (Score:2)
You seem to think that 80 of 48 hours is a massive number of stories. Let's presume that there is only one editor working at a time in 8 hour shifts. Then the editor needs to post one article every half an hour. They don't need to write the interesting content: someone else does that. They don't need to find or summarize the content: the submitter does that. Presuming that the Slashdot CMS software is half-way comparable to the various free programs I've used (I haven't tried Slash), the editor basically se
Re:Holy crap (Score:2)
If you consider sifting through hundreds of submissions to get to it, yes it is.
"They don't need to write the interesting content: someone else does that. They don't need to find or summarize the content: the submitter does that."
I think you'd be surprised at how much editor intervention it is. I'm not claiming it's a lot, but it could easily soak up 10 minutes.
" Other commercial media sources don't find it so difficult."
Other commercial media sources go get the stories by people specialized in t
Re:Holy crap (Score:1)
Nothing for you to see here, please move along. (Score:3, Funny)
Honestly, I never saw it coming.
Re:Nothing for you to see here, please move along. (Score:2)
-sigh- (Score:2, Insightful)
Nothing for you to see here, please move along. (Score:1)
54 april fools and counting (Score:1)
Re:54 april fools and counting (Score:1, Funny)
DUPE! (Score:2)
April Fools (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:free Mac mini (Score:1, Offtopic)
5 Billion post on Slashdot (Score:2)
WTF (Score:2)
First, about 19 dupes ThinkGeek stories (yes, I know, they varied ever so slightly) and now this.
Re:WTF (Score:2)
Strange things happening on April 1st!? Wanna what's spooky? Every year around the end of October, I get harrassed by a bunch of kids!
Re:WTF (Score:2)
Not again... (Score:1)
first of April (Score:1)
Re:first of April (Score:2)
After all of this I am not sure if 'enjoys' is the right word...
Buggy P2P System!!! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Buggy P2P System!!! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Buggy P2P System!!! (Score:1)
Re:Buggy P2P System!!! (Score:1)
Chill! (Score:1)
Re:Chill! (Score:2, Interesting)
losing respect for slashdot (Score:1)
Time Zones (Score:1)
LOL !! (Score:1)
In AD2005, war was beginning (Score:2)
Rumble, Laserbeak, Ravage: prepare for battle. Operation: warfare. Eject... eject... eject..
I don't get it (Score:1)
They keep telling me it is 2nd of april.
I guess it is april fools day all-year-round when it comes to IT-business news.
Next dupe.. (Score:2)