Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Unix Operating Systems Software BSD

NetBSD Project Calls for Donations 43

Posted by Hemos from the gimme-yer-money dept.
A reader writes:"Thor Lancelot Simon from the NetBSD project recently made a post to the netbsd-advocacy mailing list, outlining the project's desperate need for monetary donations from its users and supporters to help improve NetBSD for everyone. Please read Thor's post here and think seriously about helping out this excellent open source project. Even the smallest donation counts, if enough people pitch in."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

NetBSD Project Calls for Donations More

NetBSD Project Calls for Donations

Comments Filter:
  • You should contribute it is excellent. Something that you need when you least expect it

    • Re:An excellent BSD (Score:4, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 13, 2005 @06:56AM (#12801328)
      I'll second that. I think it's unfortunate that when people are summing up the BSD's, they often go for the age-old "Free for performance, Open for security, Net for putting on a toaster". This gives people the impression that NetBSD is only worth checking out if you want to run it on bizarre or outdated hardware, and consequently it never seems to get considered as an OS in its own right. I urge those with the time and interest to at least check it out. Even on run of the mill x86 systems that will run any other OS, NetBSD provides a clean, minimalist, reliable Unix that's a pleasure to use. Just because it doesn't have a whole lot of hype doesn't mean there's not a lot to be excited about.

      • Re:An excellent BSD (Score:3, Insightful)

        by cmad_x ( 723313 )
        Disclaimer: I haven't tried NetBSD yet.

        NetBSD provides a clean, minimalist, reliable Unix that's a pleasure to use.

        The thing is, OpenBSD provides just as good a minimalist, clean and reliable system (note that in my opinion, the term minimalist is subjective). Heck, even FreeBSD provides a clean and reliable system (whether is minimalistic or not could be argued).

        I'm willing to give it a try though. Mainly because some of the pkgsrc features seem nice. Of course I might run into other neat stuff w

        • Re:An excellent BSD (Score:1, Informative)

          by Anonymous Coward
          OpenBSD provides just as good a minimalist, clean and reliable system

          Quite right - I love OpenBSD as much as the next guy, and use it for my router/firewall box. I'd consider NetBSD more suitable for a desktop or desktopesque box, though. It boots faster, for one thing, and pkgsrc tends to keep more up to date with its software than OpenBSD ports and packages. I see that the Firefox package in OpenBSD 3.7 is 1.0.1, which is before an awful lot of nasty security fixes where made (well, it says 1.0.1.p1

        • Re:An excellent BSD (Score:5, Informative)

          by Tet ( 2721 ) <slashdot@nOsPam.astradyne.co.uk> on Monday June 13, 2005 @07:54AM (#12801658) Homepage Journal
          OpenBSD provides just as good a minimalist, clean and reliable system

          Much as I love OpenBSD, that's not strictly true. The NetBSD init system, for example, is a thing of beauty, and it's both cleaner and more functional than the traditional equivalent found in OpenBSD. There's a lot of innovation happening in NetBSD, and it's worth keeping an eye on.

          • Re:An excellent BSD (Score:1, Informative)

            by Anonymous Coward
            Exactly the reason I think it's important people donate (I certainly will be). I think the NetBSD project is at a very exciting time in its life, where it is making the sort of solid progress that could help it become less obscure than it is now. After the excellent 2.0 release, it would be a shame if financial troubles slowed things down now.
        • Yes, yes, yes, Open BSD is nice and all, but does it run on Alpha with turbochannel bus? Does it have downloadable install ISOs? Does it have pkgsrc? No, no and no, so it is not a direct replacement for NetBSD for me.

          Of course, I should probably be running openBSD on my sparc web server, but netBSD had downloadable, bootable ISOs available, and openBSD didn't...

    • I don't even use NetBSD, but I am donating anyways. If I ever do try BSD or migrate to BSD, NetBSD is the most attractive.variant in my eyes.

  • PkgSrc (Score:5, Informative)

    by rpbailey1642 ( 766298 ) <robert.b.prattNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Monday June 13, 2005 @07:43AM (#12801567)
    PkgSrc [pkgsrc.org] alone is worth a small donation. With it, you can compile the same apps for many different operating systems, including Solaris, *BSD, Linux, and Irix. While not as extensive as some of the Port systems, the fact that it is so standardized across the board is a decent exchange.

    • Re:PkgSrc (Score:2, Interesting)

      by The Nine ( 320384 )
      PkgSrc is much more extensive than OpenBSD's ports, and not quite as extensive as FreeBSD's - but, frankly, you'll find most of what you'll ever need in there. And you're right, the portability aspect is wonderful.

      • Re:PkgSrc (Score:5, Interesting)

        by rpbailey1642 ( 766298 ) <robert.b.prattNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Monday June 13, 2005 @08:31AM (#12801956)
        Just FYI:

        Gentoo(Linux, not BSD) [gentoo-portage.com]:
        19384 ebuilds, 9440 Packages, Last Updated At 12:21:45 GMT

        PkgSrc (NetBSD+) [pkgsrc.org]:
        Over 5400 packages

        FreeBSD Freshports [freshports.org]:
        10897

        I was unable to find stats for OpenBSD, but I last recall it was in the 2000 range.

        Anywho, my point being, it contains about 1/2 of the packages that Gentoo has (and, let's be honest, a lot of the stuff in Gentoo is fluffy crap) and runs on platforms that it is dead-impossible to find decent apps for, like AIX.

        • It just so happens that AIX support is a little behind the other platforms with pkgsrc. Nevertheless, I know what horse to bet on. Pkgsrc is amazing.

          I'm actually trying to work out an issue with pkgsrc on AIX as we speak (perl58 is broken).

          When I send the NetBSD people my donation, It'll be with a thank you card.

          -Peter
        • You can't make a straight comparison, because each of those projects has a different level of package "granularity." For example, do you make kdeutils one package, or split it up into a dozen? Is X.org one package, or has it been broken out into libs, server, clients, fonts, etc? There's also the issue of multiple versions of a software counting as multiple packages.

          Comparing you numbers, it seems fairly clear that PkgSrc has half the available software as Gentoo, but it's hard to tell if which has more be

  • Hit up corporate users (Score:5, Interesting)

    by DesScorp ( 410532 ) on Monday June 13, 2005 @09:01AM (#12802201) Journal
    Our new office's copier uses NetBSD as it's OS. I'm pretty sure the company hasn't dropped a dime in the foundation's pocket. I'm a supporter of the BSD license, but if companies are using the OS, and not pitching in even a pittance voluntarily, perhaps a gentle reminder of how much expense it would cost to move to a new OS is order? Perhaps another reminder of how if they went to say, ohhhh, Linux, that they'd have GPL issues to deal with? Yeah...that sounds like it's worth a check for a couple of grand to me...

Slashdot Top Deals

"Being against torture ought to be sort of a multipartisan thing." -- Karl Lehenbauer, as amended by Jeff Daiell, a Libertarian

Close